The VPN advert just the icing on the cake

Nothing like having an entire relationship based on total dishonesty.

Didn't notice this previously, but...

oh, sacred asteroid of death, wherefore art thou?

"Wherefore" means "why", not "where".

When Juliet asked "wherefore art thou Romeo?" she was asking why he had to be a Montagu while she was a Capulet, not where he was. :P

I like how they blame a white supremacist patriarchy when most non- white guys aren't cool with a high body count either.

Everything hidden in the dark will eventually come to light

I cannot believe all the secrets, though few, that I tried to hide has somehow came out. It was as if the universe consciously somehow made a Rube Golberg machine for all the events to fall in place for the truth to come out. That is one reason why I now try to not lie much, and also for my own mentality, to not be a despicable person when I introspect. These women who try to hide it, they will crack, cheat, and eventually their nature will be revealed, problem is, it can months, years, or even decades for the truth to be revealed.

Why bother?

Do what commentators to this article said. Don't get married, don't have relationships.

Hire a prostitute, they are clean and less of a risk to catch STDs.

Accept the reality majority of modern western women have huge body counts, don't bother to get to find a unicorn in the west.

They cannot pair bond and will take you to the divorce cleaners once they get bored and want to get back in the CC.

Goddamn these women are giving pro tips on how to lock down a beta male after being a 304. They even promote lying, wtf. We have to find ways to find out how to fight better against this.

Strong FDS vibes there.

"Your past doesnt matter" but it does matter for jobs/employment, financial institutions whether its for a loan or credit cards, forecasting raw material requirements, hell the past matters of their BB. If he is stingy previously, she probably will skip him.

Actions have consequences, some positive some negative. Men learn this at an early age. Feminism unfortunately enables women to think there will be no repercussions.

Would men share underwear? Assuming its washed and completely clean. Would women?

If people are disgusted with community underwear they are also disgusted with community bikes.

Edit: But if the past doesn't matter, then why try to hide it? Just goes to show that it does matter.

"First of all, let’s make one thing perfectly clear: There is absolutely
nothing wrong with being a slut. This is 2022 and people are free to
experience sex no matter their color or creed."

So... the whole article is pointless and could end right there, you go kween.

One the one hand, this article looks like straight up satire, but I have the bad feeling they mean it seriously. Not that it would be news to any connoisseur of this sub, but maybe point 6 ("cry abuse") opens the eyes of guys unsuspecting of female behaviour (yeah, I doubt that too).

Remember, you will likely NEVER know the true history of any woman you’re seeing. Women have an almost superhuman ability to cover their tracks - she’ll delete texts, completely shut out guys from her past, and her friends will cover for her (unless one of them is pissed off at her, that’s when the claws come out).

Your best bet is to assume that all women are whores until proven otherwise, even more so the further she gets away from her late 20s. That sweet girl that you have a crush on probably rode a 10” dick last night while you were trying to figure out what to text her. Abandon the idea that you’ll find some virgin trad wife, or even one with a low body count.

It sucks, but it’s the world we live in. You can thank feminism.

This post should be pinned or added to the archives. Just wow.

Menwhile poor indian men go to jail if they lie about their income to get laid...

This is why you have so many infidelity stories because men marry these kind of women who have been with more men than they can count. Then they are surprised when they wife and mother of their kids cheat. When these women havr been with multiple partners they have so many sexual experiences that have been permanently burned in their minds and the one or one that was exceptionally great based on what they remember and experience they all ways crave it. It is like drugs that why you will have women even going back as far as their high school or college boyfriends some of who they said treated them like crap and was terrible. But what she never told you they had mind blowing sex and she is forever obsessed with that experience. Many men are constantly being compared to other men and you will never measure up because she have had so much she can hardly be contented with what she is getting now. It's having an all you can eat buffet with all different foods most of your life and now all you get is rice and beans.

Some women have had some freaky pass and have done everything you can imagine sexually. But they meet a decent man and they have had to pretend to be someone else in order for him think she is wife material. So she is all she and reserved with him but them he finds a video of her with another guy sometimes more than one guy at the same time doing things he would never even imagine. But that's why I say do your research and stay far from these women if you don't want diseases, divorce, a child or children that is not yours.

You are always being measured by her pass sexual encounters.

I think this is the best comment/reply in the comments section

My drunk ass girlfriend just told me that she’s had sex with over a two hundred guys. She said, “I was a real slut in college. You forgive me, don’t you baby?” Whoa. And then she passed out with her head in my lap.

We’ve been in a relationship for over two years and live together. We don’t use condoms.

What do?

And the amazing internet-winning reply:

4 years * 364 / 200 guys = new guy every 7.3 days. Since it was over two hundred guys, let’s just make it a nice even 1 guy every week. Given that she probably had sex with each guy an average of 3 times, and the average dick was probably the national average of 5.5 inches, and it probably took an average of 100 thrusts per session to cum, we’re looking at

100 thrusts per session 3 sessions 11 inches (5.5 inches in, 5.5 inches out) = 3300 inches of dick per week. 200 weeks * 3300 inches of dick per week = 660000 inches of dick, which is 10.42 miles.

Your girlfriend has had 10.42 miles of dick inside her. Get in your car, and drive 10.42 miles, and think of dicks laid end-to-end the whole way. She’s had that much dick.

She’s a high-mileage slut, and her snatch has no user- serviceable parts.

It's most likely some pasta, cause i remember reading similar post somewhere else... But good god. This is still disarming level of lol-content :D

Also I love it how the very first pic shows a white girl with pictures of only black guys. Totally NOT obvious fetish

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Whats an diúlaithe toilfhéithe?

The first post in the comment section is absolute gold, had me in stitches.

7 is where all the Reddit stories come from. Any man paying attention should just assume she is regardless of evidence.

I don’t know if this is a parody or reality. Female solipsism is stranger than fiction.

I sort of expect this article to be a Babylon Bee special, or from The Onion... I actually find it hard to take seriously when the opening refers to the "supreme pizza" types and patriaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!chy.

But hey, let's take it at face value and see how it breaks down.

1. Find his n. It's almost certainly lower than yours, unless he's the top 10% alpha Chad type... in which case it doesn't matter because you're likely the latest PnD special and overdue for replacement any time now...

2. Lie. Sure, you could, but then the compounding effects of maintaining that lie will make it increasingly harder to maintain, and if this is a guy you want to "lock down" it'll all end in tears. Of course, if it's the "BB" guy, then that might actually be the plan and I feel sorry for him. And of course, using lies as part of the foundation is a horrible despicable thing for men to do, but seemingly par for the course for women (who suffer the most when it all collapses, of course).

3. Lie. Wait, didn't we cover this in point number 2?

4. Tell the truth. I'd expect it to go one of three ways - the Chads will not care, you're going to be replaced with a younger hotter model next week anyway. The truly Beta types will accept it unhappily, because modern dating has starved them of options. Those in-between will likely reject you - immediately if they can, otherwise I'd think subtle relationship ending actions will start happening.

5. Lie... I thought they already said this one? Oh, must be going senile in my old age...

6. The "toxic" option. I wonder how long it would take for someone to realize that you either choose those abusive partners, or have to be lying. Either one is a good reason to disengage carefully and move on.

7. Have your friends help maintain your lies. That increases the surface area and makes it even harder to keep the lie going. All it takes is one person to break ranks or say the wrong thing at the wrong time, and the lie starts to unravel.

Again, I'll point out that it seems like satire (even if it actually isn't). The lack of a name on the article raised an eyebrow - I'm not sure any relationship writer would like to be associated with a piece that boiled down to "lie, lie some more, and gets your friends to lie also". The fact that over 50% of the "advice" said to lie is either the most telling hint it's satire, or a terrible reflection of modern women dating that I've seen for a while.

Poe's Law, for sure.

P.S. Some of the article's comments are gold.

That website seems more like a theOnion style site, no?

Since when do women need prompting to conceal anything? That is their first nature.

What's funny is they never have an answer to, "Women don't care about a man's number and will usually shame a guy if he's a virgin."

Never ask an investigative question that you can't verify.

As for body counts, don't ask; you'll likely be told a lie that you can't verify. If she is sexual, it will be high. It would only be low if she's not sexual, which you should be able to determine through time.

We therefore assume, based on our understanding of female behavior, that a sexual woman will have an increasing body count over time. Therefore, time is the measurement - not asking for body count. Time is primary for considering a woman for commitment and provisions, because it reflects so many other considerations. I personally would make the cut off 24. Other men may have other opinions.

It is not the number of previous sexual partners that make a women unsuitable. It only takes one - a special one. It does not matter to describe the attributes to the special one, because - and this is important - IT DOESN'T MATTER. It doesn't matter what type of special one ruins a woman; what matters is that she's ruined (ruined for a martial relationship with a man less special than the special one). It is simply that as n increases, the probability that she's experienced the one increases.

Prior children is also a huge factor as for sexuality and fitness. In my opinion, single mothers are automatically disqualified for commitment.

A few verifiable indicators would be: health, infections, illnesses, and prior pregnancies (regardless of results/outcomes).

Say they abused you.

Wow. This is given as a genuine, non ironic advice to women. Is this why they want the believe all women shit.

What I take the most from that article is point 6. Disguise your promiscuity by LYING ABOUT ASSAULT, ABUSE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. There it is in black and white, lie to get a man's life destroyed all to justify why she can't keep her legs shut.

Save the link to this article and show it to anybody who says that women would never lie about such things. Not only do they lie about it, they actively encourage lying about it.

FFS. Satire is dead.
Also, they always knew it was a crock of shit. They are just realizing that shit don't fly as well as they hoped.

Poe's Law is in full effect here...

Gaelige—Béarla Translations:

• na diúlaithe toilfhéith = "the cock suckers/ lust muscles sucklers"

Pay premium price and maintenance, only to end up in horse manure

Number 6 wow! As if continually sleeping with men who hit you paints such a great picture of you. Fucking disgusting.

Maybe I’m out of the loop but why do some titles have a foreign looking word or a phrase, and then the OP writes in the comment section the translation for that foreign word or phrase?

Read that article and I laughed so hard I spilled my coffee. Not one mention of the Internet (instagram, bumble, tinder, tictok, etc). A quick search will foil any attempts to hide as the 'Net never forgets. Oh and tell all your 'friends'? If he's HAWT at least 2 will be willing to stab you in the back to ride that particular horse on the CC. She can lie of course but that is like adding more gunpowder to the bomb when it eventually goes off. And the 'they abused me' when in the last sentence you admitted to 8 encounters will not wash. Statistically unlikely or its you dear lady seek out such abuse (sad but true).

It reads like a how to article in how not to survive the relationship jungle.

The comment section on this is pure gold.

I'm guessing this has to be satire, or what passes for satire in the current clown world in which we find ourselves. However, the fact that we even have to wonder if it is or if it isn't says more than any clever quip I could utter.

Toy with his emotions by hinting, or even saying outright, that a lot of these old “boyfriends” abused you.

Every ex bf fits into the group, if she was going out getting sex from random and the bf said no, well now he is 'controlling and judgemental' leave out the part about why.