• Register
  • Sign In
  • Main Forums
  • What's Hot
  • TRP.RED
  • Tribe Forums
  • TheRedPill
  • Tribe Management
  • Create New Tribe
  • Manage My Tribes
  • Find New Tribes
  • Recent News
    • Forums in BETA!
      Visit our Development Updates tribe to discuss redesign, features, or bugs!
Sort By Hot
  • Hot Score
  • Newest Comments
  • Old Comments
  • Top Comments

Forums.Red / WhereAreAllTheGoodMen / Entitlement Princess

"My boyfriend is a good guy, but I resent him for not being able to spoil me."
2.7K Points
  
  

kevin32

Posted 12 months ago in Entitlement Princess - Permalink - Locked



Permalink
1 Point
  
  
High-Fruit-Trinity 10 months ago

OH my God I hope that's fake. It sounds exactly as described in mgtow.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
youreallmeatanyway 11 months ago

hes from thenright caste

This explains much

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
One-Move 11 months ago

her family is rich, she has nothing!

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
futurecuckoldress 12 months ago

LMAO 30$ gift.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

That response is r/pussypassdenied right there

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
DeltaPeng 12 months ago

she's used to riches and so she expects them (which, it can go the same way for guys too, we all tend to judge based off of past experiences). However, hypergamy makes it feel like a bad deal for her

If the shoes were flipped, and the guy was rich and the girl was not, society would say they shouldn't care about the money, but marry based on love. Which is true and ideal, albeit men are less likely to be accepted / get that kind of deal if the roles were reversed, as shown here.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
djkbrown2001 12 months ago

What a piece of shit of a person. I hope you die old ,alone and miserable. Fuck off .

Permalink
22 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

"He is of the right caste"

Ah these Hindus and their backward caste system.

Permalink
49 Points
  
  
fuddubandha 12 months ago

And she is Indian who will definitely get fat after sometime on her dad's money.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
ShortWarrior 12 months ago

I guess you can call her FATima.

Permalink
41 Points
  
  
Rottinghere 12 months ago

Always remember, marriage is a sacred institution built on "love."

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
Rottinghere 12 months ago

Actually, I appreciate her honesty and find it rather refreshing. It's nice to see more and more people waking up to the fact that marriage is indeed just (as you say) a financial contract, and nothing more.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
Overkillengine 12 months ago

What's detestable is her gross stupidity and entitlement, and complete lack of pragmatism and long term thinking.

She's being handed some very good terms and she is complaining they were not delivered on a gold platter by a dhoti clad servant.

Permalink
13 Points
  
  
silly_birb 12 months ago

Great men desire skills, but even the greatest of women only desire stuffs.

Permalink
26 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
hijoton 11 months ago

We have a song in my country:Pibe Cantina.
About a nigga who wins the lotto and the guetto girls want....to be shown off in his car.
Not to get a house, not to not worrying about lack of food or security. They beg to him to take them in the carn so they can show off.

Permalink
11 Points
  
  
houseoftolstoy Mod 12 months ago

One question about her current work: did she get that job on her own merits alone, or did mommy/daddy have a hand in getting her that job?

And a similar question to her summer internship: did she get that through her own merits, either with her family's influence or through a gender quota?

The point of these questions is that I am guessing that just like her parent's wealth, she did not earn the job and internship she has through her own merits. I have no issue with anyone making more money than other people, but no one should be making comparisons to others circumstances based on factors outside of their control. Her parents owning 7 properties to his parents 2 has no bearing on her or his competence in earning money and being successful.

The fact that she brings up the accomplishments of her parents and compares them to the accomplishments of his parents tells me that her mindset is not about his competency, but simple access to wealth. Since he does not have that, she resents him. Never mind that most of the comparisons are not based on fair metrics, she has no ability to be patient or grateful for what he can provide and what he likely will provide in his future. She certainly has not thought about the fact that most college students are far from wealthy, and those that do not use their student loans moronically to live a luxurious lifestyle (and likely asking Bernie Sanders to bail them out when they cannot pay those loans off) are going to be like him. Living a meager lifestyle. Our princess cannot accept that she is not getting showered with money like she did with her parents. He would be better off without her.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
NuclearTheology 12 months ago

That response is

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
PHUCK_THE_HIVE 12 months ago

Hey, at least she's honest and direct about her superficiality despite being socially unpopular.

Most women have to be superficial while pretending they're not while being socially popular. I view those more scary because the red flags are hidden.

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
DangZagnut 12 months ago

Berkely you say? The man hating school? So elitist that they completely ignore the massive homeless camp right next to them in favor of attacking white males on campus?

Oh right, they're racist and elitist as fuck. And they're not really into "black people" and quietly lock their doors driving by them.

I drove around Berkely, nice campus, the women are, seriously, hideously dog ugly I saw walking around. And they completely ignore the humongous poor camps right next door. Hilarious.

Silly white girls, so progressive. They make excellent socialists with how much they despise the poor and want them to die. A very Soviet mentality.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
FashyPkmnConspirator 12 months ago

Fuck this bitch!

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
Perlmannecklace 12 months ago

Reading this just makes me appreciate my wife more. She makes almost 3x what I do, and I am barely surviving. When I get her a $30 gift, she knows that was a significant % of what I have available to me and it's a gesture of how much I love her.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
djkbrown2001 12 months ago

Hold on to her. You have a gem.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
rvail136 12 months ago

Holy fuck, what a self entitled twat. I hope this guy wakes up to what a miserably materialistic woman this cunt is.

Permalink
24 Points
  
  
TANQspray 12 months ago

So why can’t she find a rich boyfriend?

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
djkbrown2001 12 months ago

Question. What does she has to offer ? What does she bring to the table? Why would a rich boyfriend want her?

It's obvious her approach and value she placed on relationship is totally wrong.

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
Cantide756 12 months ago

Because they have much better options

Edit: wth is nexurs?

Permalink
7 Points
  
  
BlackendLight 12 months ago

A what?

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

Women need to learn that men consider their looks and lifestyle in women as much, if not more than women consider money on men. If you demand money from a man you better have the same level of attributes in those areas. I've never found a gold digger to offer the same.

If you're going to be a whore, at least know your value.

Permalink
13 Points
  
  
masterchiefpt 12 months ago

I hope she get rid of him quick. a guy deserves better than that bitch

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

Caste...??

So is she Indian or something. Gtfo of my country and go back to your shithole.

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
XavierMalory 12 months ago

If a woman makes more than you, you’re on the short list to be replaced.

I mean, she’s never truly yours; it’s just your turn. However, making less money means your turn is up that much sooner.

Enjoy the sex while it lasts, ‘cause it won’t last long.

Permalink
7 Points
  
  
RedditisCANCER999 12 months ago

what an absolute cunt, I hope she does dump him and finds someone more financially successful and demanding and then find out that they dont put up with her bullshit, and dump her, and the original guy finds a real gem.

i find that in my partners, the less money they have, when they buy me anything at all its far more meaningful and special, because its such a sacrifice, that it means so much more.

I only care about the thought behind a gift not the gift itself.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
HNutz 12 months ago

That "friend" gave a GREAT response!

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
yunabladez 12 months ago

"He is of the right caste"

What the flying fuck, you ain't shopping for a racing horse!

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
krusecontrol91 12 months ago

Holy cunt of an entitlement complex. Holy holy fucking cunt

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
TheSecondComing97 12 months ago

May that guy please see that and get out.

So he doesn’t have to be with someone who doesn’t see him as worthy.

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
five_eight 12 months ago

"He's from the right caste"; I bet he already knows.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
bobbiscotti 12 months ago

Sad thing is no amount of expense would buy a gift which would satisfy her. Guy is at least sort of smart for buying something on sale for a reasonable price.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
djkbrown2001 12 months ago

If he is doing computer science he could be earning a lot later in life . I have an old colleague pulling in 250k per year plus bonus

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
Astral-Projector 12 months ago

Money money money. Where did the parenting go wrong to get such a whore gold digger as daughter.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

Because the parents are probably just like her.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
bobbiscotti 12 months ago

Solving every problem by giving her something. It’s actually way cheaper and easier for a parent who has more money than time. I’ve seen it plenty of times; these girls are driving a Mercedes at 17 and still whine on social media about anything they can get pity for. It’s as sad as it is disgusting.

Permalink
28 Points
  
  
Thetrvler 12 months ago

To be woman is to be prostitute. Some just dress it up better than others.

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
BrickBurgundy 12 months ago

If it flies, floats, or fucks, it's cheaper and easier to rent.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

Very wise.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
Thetrvler 12 months ago

Exactly.

Permalink
129 Points
  
  
ThrowawayCactus6012 12 months ago

I thought Berkeley was a left-wing school. I thought they supported the whole Marxist "workers of the world" philosophy. They react violently if anyone to the right of Obama might speak or visit their campus.

My guess is that she's a limousine liberal.

Permalink
33 Points
  
  
SevehnSyth 12 months ago

Any liberal with a decent standard of living is definitely a limousine liberal because they are ALL about self. They utilize the Government force to control everyone else’s lives around them in order to safeguard themselves.

HOA’s is another prime example when limousine liberals run amuck; start demanding/ dictating how we should live so they can live in their own little “utopia” on how they think it should be.

Permalink
17 Points
  
  
iwanttheblanketback 12 months ago

As soon as she said caste I thought her entire family must be recent immigrants.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

Great point. I attended the University of Michigan, which had one of the top women's studies programs in the country. Part of my red pilling came there, where I saw these so-called "feminists" spread their legs with lightning speed for any guy with money, or who treated them like shit. They loved frat guys, who tended to be more good-ole-boyish (of course, not always).

Yeah, I learned then to never pay attention to what they said, but what they did.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
hijoton 11 months ago

YESSSSS.
Actions at the end of the day make the world move. All the palatitudes mean jack shit when they get a job in McDonals.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
arvzi 12 months ago

There was an article a while ago about how Asians are changing the nature of Cal. It's much more conservative than its previous reputation as a hippie hive.

Permalink
46 Points
  
  
urbana1 12 months ago

We say champagne socialists in Uk. Might be slightly different but same idea though.

Permalink
13 Points
  
  
BlackendLight 12 months ago

I've heard both in the us east coast.

Permalink
28 Points
  
  
CuntMonteCristo 12 months ago

Caviar Communist is a nice one too mate :-)

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
urbana1 12 months ago

I like it :)

Permalink
22 Points
  
  
EarthIsNotAGlobe 12 months ago

Material things and more “respectable” occupations are much more important to Indians than us. Minorities are mostly left wing because democratic policies disproportionately help them, not because they philosophically agree with the ideas.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

LOL, left wing policies don't help minorities. Left wing policies have destroyed blacks in America, in everything from marriage, having babies out of wedlock, education attainment and crime.

Permalink
14 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

Left wing policies don't actually help minorities. They just appear to do so.

Give a man a fish (welfare) and he eats for a day (realizes it's easier than working). Teach a man to fish (assist him in finding employment by making it easier for employers to hire him and reducing overheads that interfere with wage increases and benefits) and he'll eat for a lifetime.

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
moroots 12 months ago

said another way: subsidize poverty and guess what you get more poverty

Permalink
73 Points
  
  
Honest_Solution 12 months ago

Limousine liberal. LMAO!

Permalink
51 Points
  
  
saltlakeshady 12 months ago

She is definately a limousine liberal. She's upset that this guys family owns "TWO PROPERTIES", most family's don't even have one and live in an apartment.

Permalink
19 Points
  
  
Honest_Solution 12 months ago

I know, right? For all we know the guys family owns some huge ass farm and those 2 properties are thousands of acres.

Permalink
15 Points
  
  
maruadventurer 12 months ago

A hot shot turd pulls into a diner in his lambo. He strikes up a conversation with a young looking fella with a John Deere hat on.

[dude] Betcha never seen anything like that $1.5m car.

[farmer] Can't say as I have.

[dude] Old pickup huh.

[farmer] yep, and 2 combines and a tractor.

[dude] Soooo....

[farmer] The pickup was my pappy's so it cost me nuttin'. A combine cost $2.2m and the tractor $800k. You might call them my daily drivers, 'cept I only drive the combines during the season. You might say I am rich enough to not have to drive all my machines every day like you do. Flo' can you total my check please....

Moral: Never judge a man by the coveralls he wears.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

Love the Aesop fable style.

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
SuperGoxxer 12 months ago

No kidding, and the kicker is the John Deere equipment requires a dude with a laptop to come out to do field service requests at some high rate.

Apparently there's a rush for older farming equipment for this reason, easier to fix and less reliance on "technicians" being scheduled for maintenance.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
ManDoIHateLiving 11 months ago

Yeah and if it works what’s the point in getting rid of it? Factories do this all the time as well.

Permalink
-3 Points
  
  
GoyimAreSlaves 12 months ago

She's Asian so she's not a liberal

Permalink
7 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

She’s Asian so she’s not a liberal

Wat?

Permalink
-1 Points
  
  
GoyimAreSlaves 12 months ago

Foreign Asians do not have a concept as liberal in their societys

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

Yeah...no.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
GoyimAreSlaves 12 months ago

Would you mind giving me some examples of Asian liberalism?

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

Sure. Google "examples of socialism in Asian cultures" and you'll have 133,000 hits in 0.045 of a second. The fact that they don't call it by the same name doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

And FYI, your username alone puts you on thin ice with me. I'm not a fan of Israel shaming any more than man shaming.

Permalink
15 Points
  
  
AveenoFresh 12 months ago

Women: We want equal or greater pay!

Also Women:

Permalink
173 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

Women are human beings and men are human doings. Therefore, she doesn't love you directly. She can't love you directly. She loves what you can do for her.

If you fall short of her expectations, she'll struggle with loving you. Intellectually she may want to, but emotionally she just can't.

Permalink
35 Points
  
  
nunhgrader 12 months ago

This 100%\^

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
Blogginginvicecity 12 months ago

Intellectually she may want to, but emotionally she just can't.

Man, you blew my mind here. Thank you. I am sitting on this and things are really coming together.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago
Permalink
14 Points
  
  
LotBuilder 12 months ago

Well said. As clear as I have heard. It’s not their fault, it’s how they are wired. Know that and proceed accordingly.

Permalink
24 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

How they're wired is not their fault. The actions they choose as a result of their wiring is absolutely, 100% their responsibility.

Permalink
-9 Points
  
  
LotBuilder 12 months ago

No, it’s your fault for not understanding how they are wired. It’s like the scorpion and the frog... scorpions are gonna do what scorpions do. Same with women. If a woman has reason to believe she’s above you, her attraction will evaporate.

Permalink
14 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

Are you saying that women aren't free to choose right from wrong?

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
BluepillProfessor 12 months ago

Let's just say the great weight of evidence suggests that they do have trouble. A lot of trouble. There are numerous bible passages affirming that women are easily decieved, flighty, unreliable, and unfaithful.

Awalt means awalt.

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago
  1. Having trouble doing something, doesn't make anyone incapable of doing said thing.

  2. Having trouble doing something doesn't excuse not doing it.

  3. There are many verses in the bible that state: a man or a woman who will do....[insert specific instruction here]. If someone is incapable of choosing right from wrong, there's no point giving them any instruction at all.
Permalink
-7 Points
  
  
LotBuilder 12 months ago

Are you saying it’s wrong for a woman to want to marry or date up from her financial or social status? It’s not. They are wired to take care of themselves and their babies... the “right” move for them to be able to do that is to seek mates with resources.

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

Are you saying it’s wrong for a woman to want to marry or date up from her financial or social status? It’s not. They are wired to take care of themselves and their babies... the “right” move for them to be able to do that is to seek mates with resources.

Seems like English isn't your first language. Here's what I said a few comments ago.

How they're wired is not their fault. The actions they choose as a result of their wiring is absolutely, 100% their responsibility.

Permalink
-11 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[removed]

Permalink
7 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

What nonsense are you talking about?

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

Might wanna get back to r/WhitePeopleTwitter.

Permalink
-4 Points
  
  
Kurt751990 12 months ago

Women can love emotionally. Jesus F** Christ. She loves Chad. Women emotionally love chads. You can become a chad. Go mimic their behavior until your brain rewires itself. Use your mgtow wisdom to keep a woman loyal.

Permalink
14 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

Women can love emotionally. Jesus F** Christ. She loves Chad. Women emotionally love chads.

I'm gonna give you a chance to actually read what I wrote a d respond accordingly.

You can become a chad. Go mimic their behavior until your brain rewires itself. Use your mgtow wisdom to keep a woman loyal.

What's your point with this comment?

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
Sonicmansuperb 12 months ago

Women love chads because chads aren't dependent on them for validation. You can be a chad, and it starts by literally being yourself. Not feigning interest in her life, not trying to hide that you're broke. Literally only giving time to the women who find you worthwhile and not giving a shit about the ones who only want to use you. Once you do that, you'll find that there are plenty of women who will put up with being richer, taller, skinnier, and/or more attractive than you.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
Destithen 12 months ago

You can become a chad.

But what if I want to be a Vlad?

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
maruadventurer 12 months ago

A good Vlad or a bad Vlad. There is a difference.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
Destithen 12 months ago

A good Vlad masquerading as a bad Vlad working for the Russian Triad, who secretly has ties to the illuminati, but is in actuality a lonely 38 year old man hoping to find love in the cutthroat world of international espionage.

A romantic comedy coming this summer to theaters near you.

Permalink
253 Points
  
  
turtle_stank 12 months ago

of the right caste

Asian cultures are weird, dude

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
v650 12 months ago

I was thinking India.

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
Stateist555 12 months ago

Indians man

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
harrypoppy1 9 months ago

As an Indian, cast system are retarded.

Permalink
53 Points
  
  
FatChopSticks 12 months ago

Isn’t the caste system specifically an Indian thing?

Permalink
7 Points
  
  
turtle_stank 12 months ago

I don't know enough to answer that question tbh so I went more general

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
handdownmandown13 12 months ago

Yup, I feel like this reads as satire depending on who wrote it. I can’t imagine someone unironically writing this if they weren’t still embroiled in the caste system somehow ended in the 50s.

Also UC Berkley is very liberal, and I have some doubts of someone co-opting the word caste to refer to someone in this scenario. Unless this was an extremely entitled billionaire kid I doubt it would be posted on a forum like that.

Permalink
20 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

It's a Hindu thing and various countries have lots of Hindus.

Permalink
26 Points
  
  
FatChopSticks 12 months ago

Just googled it

There’s approximately, 1.1 billion Hindus, and 970 million Hindus live in India. And almost all Hindu’s are Indians. So most who live with or experienced the caste system is predominantly going to be Indians

I get the distinction, one is a religious affiliation and the other is based on ethnic-geography. But for all intents and purposes, if almost the entire religion is made up of a single ethnicity and mostly congested in a single area, differentiating between what’s considered Indian and what’s considered Hindu seems redundant

Thanks for the clear up, and sorry if I’m being offensive

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

This is a part of reality. Click the history section.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balinese_Hinduism

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
FatChopSticks 12 months ago

Looked it up,

So I see that Hinduism is considered an Indian Religion, it started about 2300 BC, and found its way to the Bali area in about 100 AD.

Most of the Indonesian Area is Muslim, with the exception of the Island of Bali. These are considered Non-indic Hindus.

They are literally categorized as non-indic Hindus, as in Hindus that are not Indian.

So I guess technically conflating Hinduism and Indian culture isn’t that wrong? I’m not sure what point you were trying to make

Permalink
0 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

No one can guess where they are from.
1st century AD was a long long time ago.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
Brohemond 12 months ago

2300 BC was even longer than that, both relatively and totally.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
whirlislands 12 months ago

That's what stood out to me, too.

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

Yeah but then she goes on to mention Zales, a chain of American retail jewelers. So maybe we have an Indian/American princess here?

Permalink
33 Points
  
  
GoyimAreSlaves 12 months ago

Japanese are honorable at least

Permalink
-4 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[removed]

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
RCRZ 12 months ago

Quoting Danny Devito, "suicide is bad ass"

Permalink
30 Points
  
  
accountforfilter 12 months ago

Kamikaze was honorable. Comparing Japanese Kamikaze fighters who attacked military warships to suicide bombers (who target civilians) is insulting. One could make a very strong case that the US nuking Japanese civilians was a war crime (IMO it was). However since the US won the war they get to write the history and decide what the war crimes were.

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
FatChopSticks 12 months ago

I’m not a history buff, but didn’t president Truman nuke Japan to prevent ground war, which would’ve caused even more casualties than the two cities that were destroyed?

Of course America can rewrite history any way they want, but I don’t think US bombed Japan just because it was the easy choice. It was a difficult weighted choice between one type of war over another.

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
maruadventurer 12 months ago

Nuking was not the only choice available. By early 1944 the US Navy had control of the waters around Japan. The Navy had proposed a naval blockade to starve the Japanese out. That was part of War Plan Orange that have been developed right after WWI -- https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/war-plan-orange.htm

The problem was time. By this point, politically, the US populace wanted to see and end to the whole business as fast as possible. It might have taken another decade to starve the Japanese out. Nor did the US want the Russians mucking in Far East affairs.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
accountforfilter 12 months ago

I’m not a history buff, but didn’t president Truman nuke Japan to prevent ground war, which would’ve caused even more casualties than the two cities that were destroyed?

Sure that's the words that he said. From what I've read the Japanese actually surrendered because they thought that the Russians were going to invade after the fall of Germany, and US nukes weren't the primary motivator in their surrender.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

He nuked TWO CITIES in Japan because it was all but confirmed that the Japanese military mobilized every single Japanese to fight in the war.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
backtolurkingagain 12 months ago

So if I convinced you to kill yourself, and other people. That would be honored? The fuck out of here.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
accountforfilter 12 months ago

In a war. The context matters, it's not suicide bombing.

Honored by them, not you. You don't have to value what they did, but those Kamikaze soldiers died for their people and to defend their homeland. I respect their sacrifice for their ideals. They weren't terrorists or cowardly suicide bombers blowing up civilians in a crowded place, they were attacking warships. Anyways it's off topic for the sub so I'm going to drop it.

Permalink
-1 Points
  
  
backtolurkingagain 12 months ago

Any leader who asks for self sacrifice, while safe at home. Is not a leader. Your head is so fucked up by war propaganda that you can't even see the real problem. Sad

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
0nlyQuotesMovies 12 months ago

I find your version of the order of historical events here humorous.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
disco_S2 12 months ago

What movie was that line in?

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
0nlyQuotesMovies 12 months ago

Dont tell me my business, Devil Woman

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
disco_S2 12 months ago

That's more like it!

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
GoyimAreSlaves 12 months ago

Nah dropping two nukes on Japanese civilian cities and killing 200,000 civilians (women & children & elderly) is totally NOT a war crime okay guys /s

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

Yeah, and the war would've lasted until 1948, with MUCH more bloodshed, because the Japanese were prepared to fight to the very last man, woman and child. This was confirmed in every Pacific battle, as each would last for months, because the Japanese would never surrender. Very few battles had above 10-15 Japanese soldiers that surrendered. Surrendering was dishonorable in the Bushido code, and Allied forces had to kill every last Japanese soldier in order to take the island.

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
suicidemeteor 12 months ago

Dude, seriously? You think we just dropped the bomb because "fuck it why not"?. It was due to the entire Japanese mainland being fortified to hell, children being given backpacks full of explosives and being trained to run under American tanks, the emperor himself ordering his people not to surrender (even after the first nuclear bomb) and preparations for the largest kamikaze wave ever, not because "lol why not amiright guys?". Even after dropping two nuclear bombs when the emperor surrendered there was a fucking military coup in order to stop the surrender, we would've killed and lost millions if the bombs hadn't been dropped.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
JonMaMe 12 months ago

https://twitter.com/wellerstein/status/1159799358650499072?s=19

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
suicidemeteor 12 months ago

So this basically says that we dropped the bomb on Nagasaki, but it was accidentally dropped in the wrong area and at a secondary target. This isn't saying that the bombs were just for shits and giggles, but it does show that America was a bit too liberal with them.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
GoyimAreSlaves 12 months ago

We are talking about honor and war crimes, you are justifying but it makes no difference. British did same atrocity by fire bombing civilian targets before the war even started. Can't also forget about Dresden. Is easy make excuses, but what if you and your family had nothing to do with the war and were bombed to death, wouldint that be a war crime to kill innocent lives? Yes there's always innocents going to die, but it's different when is a causality of war vs the war target

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
suicidemeteor 12 months ago
  1. The Japanese were planning to use these civilians to fight the Americans
  2. Germany did the exact same thing. Seriously.
  3. The war crime you're probably talking about is article 8 section b, which refers to targets attacked with no military target, none of which were attacked. All attacks from the US military was made to help the war effort.
Permalink
2 Points
  
  
jrpark05 12 months ago

Yeah, peace, love, and rock and roll man. The world is full of sunshine and lollipops, and the losers definitely didn't do the same.

Get real. War has its own rules!

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
backtolurkingagain 12 months ago

I'm native American. We've done enough. Prick

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
backtolurkingagain 12 months ago

Side note. Anyone who blows people up, they're the fucking cowards.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
backtolurkingagain 12 months ago

Said like a good white man. It took 400 fucking years to kill enough of us. Fuck you.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
BluepillProfessor 12 months ago

I didn't see any japs screaming banzai and kill women or children. They targeted military ships and fought with honor.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
backtolurkingagain 12 months ago

Lol. Honor. Honor is fighting you opponent one on one. Not killing yourself to kill more than your own personal honor can handle. Fucking simpleton

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
BluepillProfessor 12 months ago

In war there is no greater honor than victory.

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
Schlag96 12 months ago

You should probably take a pitstop over at the wiki page for Japanese war crimes. They killed almost 4 million civilians in China alone.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
BluepillProfessor 12 months ago

I am well aware of the war crimes of the Japanese Empire and that is why I said they "fought" with honor. They did not conduct the war with much honor at all given Nanking, the Philippines, the Bataan death march, and a lot of other war crimes. Perhaps it is semantics but the fact is these all occurred after the fighting was done.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
Schlag96 12 months ago

"I didn't see any japs screaming banzai and kill women or children."

Perhaps you meant "kamikazis" didn't kill women or children, but you said "Japs"

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
BluepillProfessor 12 months ago

Yes, you are correct. The atrocities of the Rising Sun are very well documented. My argument is that a kamikaze attacking a military target can be "honorable." What happened in Nanking and the irrational arrogance of the colonizing Jap military occupiers once the battles were won (for now) made white colonialism look like a day at the farm.

Permalink
-72 Points
  
  
Traksimuss 12 months ago

Compared to blue and white collar castes with their own subdivisions, and untouchable caste of homeless?

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
Raze321 12 months ago

You're not wrong - nearly every culture has something like "castes". It's a nearly unavoidable product of society.

However, I do think there is a distinct difference. The caste system exists here, but it does not define us like it does in other cultures.

Regardless, your point is valid. You don't deserve the downotes.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

I don't know why this is being downvoted. Every society has different levels of classes. American politicians love to talk about the middle class, which implies both an upper and lower class to bracket it.

It's fairly standard that the poorer kids hang together and the more affluent kids hang together in public schools. Hell, the trope is so common that it was a staple of films in the 1980s, from Never Back Down to Can't Buy Me Love to The Karate Kid.

Naturally you're going to seek a mate from reasonably close to your own class.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
TheQuatum 12 months ago

I've literally NEVER thought about someone's wealth compared to mine in a romantic relationship. That is about THE scummiest thing you can do besides cheating imo. I'd date blue collar, white collar and even homeless if that's who I chose to date and their status would NEVER have something to do with it.

Permalink
15 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

This right here is why Biden won the DNC.

Permalink
49 Points
  
  
NohoTwoPointOh 12 months ago

...and why Trump will win the general.

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

Agreed

Permalink
10 Points
  
  
Original_Dankster 12 months ago

There's no reason why you should be downvoted. Western society has classes roughly analogous to the castes in India, we're just dishonest about admitting it.

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
Traksimuss 12 months ago

It is fine. I have to accept that people decide to disagree with me, even if it is truth. And yes, in the west we hide it better. While on average men test different professions better, women in general are awful to people they deem inferior. It mostly has to do with social perception of the profession. And fun social experiment - try to argue tbat garbage collectors and janitors are as necessary as doctors or teachers. Which is also truth, but women will hate you lol.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

Even black America is secretly divided by last names or other things quite often. There are many black societies in the U.S. that are exclusive to certain sub groupings.
School Daze is a film by Spike Lee that has some hints about this paradigm.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_upper_class

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
PolukranosWordEater 12 months ago

Guess im with you. Humans will always form hierarchies. In theory, in the west, we celebrate opportunity as a way to transcend up the ladder. But, how often does that actually happen in the real world? It comes off as a dreamy ideal and oddly egalitarian, espically given conservative opposition towards political ideologies that place idealism above realism. If we have different natures we have different opportunities, and opportunities are lesser and greater depending on one's nature as they will be of greater or lesser value in the eyes of the society.

At least in the Hindu system there is a concept of responsibility towards the greater whole, in stark contrast to liberal democracies insistence of individualism.

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
maruadventurer 12 months ago

But, how often does that actually happen in the real world?

About 90% of the time, at least for most men. We aren't all born with a Harvaaaad degree stamped on our butts. You start with nothing in this world, and leave the same way. In between though, we earn it. One builds up the capital over a lifetime.

Now many may have it easier to climb the ladder than others. That is a fact. But here is another one -- More 'rich families' have lost all of it by the third generation. Either by one generation screwing up, or by sheer dilution of heirs as is the case with the Kennedys for example.

Permalink
107 Points
  
  
turtle_stank 12 months ago

We have the decency to not call them "castes" and believe that it's possible to change your station in life

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

Of course, but that doesn't remove the fact that there are levels in even western society. And one thing I noted when I was married to my "new money" ex wife from Massachusetts is that "old money" still bears a grudge.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
cherryreddit 12 months ago

So do we and caste is the same as race + class

Permalink
30 Points
  
  
WeAreMoreThanUs 12 months ago

Chiming in to add some clarity. I come from a Brahmin Hindu family. It's believed (incorrectly) by many unscholarly Indians and Westerners that the only way you can elevate your caste is in the next life. Fortunately, the Buddha (many of us consider him the 9th incarnation of Vishnu as the "common man - he began his life as a Prince, however - made holy through enlightenment") teaches that a person's "caste" is just as mutable, transient, and illusory as everything else and irrelevant to enlightenment and attaining liberation (Moksha) from Samsara (the chaos of attachment to the cycle of birth and death).

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
Traksimuss 12 months ago

Now that is actually a good belief. I guess changing other people beliefs is the hard part.

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
WeAreMoreThanUs 12 months ago

As a corollary, a Taoist might say that trying to actively change their mind would have the opposite effect.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
RedditisCANCER999 12 months ago

so your argument against caste is that "Its not real/important"

well no shit sherlock, the mere fact she is referencing it means it doesnt apply in this case.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
WeAreMoreThanUs 12 months ago

I was clarifying the Vaishnavite Brahmin position on the caste system, you ray of sunshine. Great username, by the way.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
SuperGoxxer 12 months ago

My understanding is that the complexion of your skin is a factor too. So you could try to jump castes, but your skin color may be a hindrance.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
WeAreMoreThanUs 12 months ago

Absolutely, it's a factor. For the narrow-minded and superficial. As is usually the case in many countries, too many dumb people focus on dumb things to the point where it becomes "part of the culture". What I find funny is that many Asians try to become lighter-skinned by various cosmetic methods, but many people of European descent are going to tanning salons to become darker. I suppose that means we all secretly want to be Mediterranean in complexion?

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
SuperGoxxer 12 months ago

Right, just something I had read somewhere. I do think its stupid.

Who knows, maybe there is a "middle" color value that we're all converging to.

Permalink
87 Points
  
  
moroots 12 months ago

how much do you want to bet that both her well paying job and her lucrative internship were both hooked up by her parents?

this girl-child was born on third base and she thinks she hit a triple

Permalink
20 Points
  
  
houseoftolstoy Mod 12 months ago

I was thinking the same thing. Being born into wealth does not mean much, but making wealth on your own is another thing altogether. So many children of wealthy parents end up losing their wealth because they often do not grow up learning what it means to struggle like their parents did. But all the same, they are the ones that go to high school driving a BMW and acting like they were the ones who earned it.

Permalink
14 Points
  
  
AngryTheCarp 12 months ago

Exactly. Regardless of which “caste” a person is born into, you need to consider what they actually did with their starting circumstances, and what they’ve ended up with.

Lots of people hate on Donald Trump, for example, because he started with a $10 million loan from his father. But he turned that around into a net worth of about $3 billion, rather than squandering it or merely retaining its value.

Trump started with all-star players on the bases sure, but then he hit a grand slam. This woman started on third but is about to get tagged out trying to steal home plate.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
moroots 12 months ago

Lots of people hate on Donald Trump, for example, because he started with a $10 million loan from his father

and yet warren buffet, who has benefited massively from cronyism and is a notorious estate tax vulture, is celebrated as having done capitalism the "right way"

that dude makes me fucking sick. charlie Munger too. awful awful people

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
bboywhitey 12 months ago
Permalink
2 Points
  
  
ShortWarrior 12 months ago

My MOM makes more than his DAD! It's 2020 and men are supposed to make more money than women!

Permalink
451 Points
  
  
Honest_Solution 12 months ago

Whenever I suspect a woman is all about money like this cunt, I get the hell out of Dodge. I hope this man does the same. And soon.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
IWillMakeThisWorse 11 months ago

Love all the people here who talk like they’re being inundated with countless offers from women lol

Like, of course you chuds aren’t getting hit on. Stop being bitter

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
Honest_Solution 11 months ago

Stop being a cuck and allowing yourself to be used to women without getting anything in return.

Permalink
180 Points
  
  
evergreen35 12 months ago

Sorry to break it to you my dude, but ALL WOMEN ARE ABOUT MONEY.

Permalink
0 Points
  
  
gabeangelo 11 months ago

You clearly have not dated enough women to figure out that not all women are about money.

Permalink
44 Points
  
  
Faulkey 12 months ago

Thank you for sharing the video!

Permalink
29 Points
  
  
3DWomanHelps2DWomen 12 months ago

Some don't actually want to cause an emotional disturbance over expensive shit. The best thing to do now to survive in this world is to not worry about materialism and being a selfish bitch who does not love their partner for who they are and what they can afford.

Permalink
11 Points
  
  
3DWomanHelps2DWomen 12 months ago

Sure would be cool to get high end stuff for better quality (technology wise) but its very likely to find pretty cool alternatives at lower prices and only worry about the core of the product. Good sound quality for headphones but doesn't have lots of features? Who cares! Pick the best you can find and stick with it until it goddamn breaks. That's what I do because it is guilt tripping at this point whining about materialism instead of appreciating on what you have because there are homeless people out there and that may happen to anyone.

Permalink
7 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

Not true, otherwise Alfa Fucks/Beta Bucks wouldn't be a thing.

Like this woman for example, she is all about money for him.

Permalink
58 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

I've got good money and a good life but I live far below my means. Since I'm good looking, tall and much better off than most men I get a lot of attention from women but the way I live repels a lot of gold diggers, which is just what I want.

Years ago I made the mistake of telling a female friend how much I had and shit changed immediately. I never would have anything to do with her (which is why I told her) but after that our entire interactions were about how bad off she was and how she needed money.

Permalink
28 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

HAHA. Funny story...I am short, ugly, and started making a lot of money and good investments the passed few years.

I did okay with women pre money....all of a sudden, the chicks I used to orbit started fucking me when I became wealthy. My success skyrockets.

Weird how tall, short, hot, ugly...had nothing to do with anything after this epiphany, eh?

Permalink
18 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

That's their true face

and being around women so much and getting them so easily taught me that I don't like them very much. I won't stick around a woman I wouldn't want for a friend and very few women are friendship material. Most treat men as someone to save them, someone to show off or a temporary distraction.

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
SuperGoxxer 12 months ago

Yeah man, I hear you. I don't ever talk about money with chicks, but since I like nice watches and don't dress like a bum, some of them figure it out. It isn't cool when they do, because like you mentioned every interaction is a "poor wittle me" kind of bait that is designed to make you swoop in with your wallet. That is, if you weren't a member here and didn't understand her tactics. Luckily that isn't the case. We're all too aware of the golddigger meme.

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

When they bring money into it the relationship changes to quid pro quo. If that's whats important to her than she's going to have to offer something. Since it's clear she cares about money from then on it's going to be a transactional relationship.

I don't blame them. The only problem is most women have so little to offer it's not a deal for me. When I treat them badly or ignore them it's because that's what they're worth. If they wanted better they shouldn't have reduced it to a financial investment.

They just don't like being treated the same way they treat men.

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
3DWomanHelps2DWomen 12 months ago

I hope you escaped that situation.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

It's far in the past. Now I'm much more careful

Permalink
36 Points
  
  
BurdenedChad 12 months ago

after that our entire interactions were about how bad off she was and how she needed money.

In college I loaned a girl grocery money and she ran out and bought fancy stuff from Whole Foods. Never again. They’re never as broke as they make it sound.

Women always ham up being broke to friends, coworkers, random strangers etc. Some guys will ask their parents or best friend for money but most will eat their ramen noodles in silence out of embarrassment.

Permalink
16 Points
  
  
Chairman_Ellen_Pao 12 months ago

In college I loaned a girl grocery money and she ran out and bought fancy stuff from Whole Foods. Never again. They’re never as broke as they make it sound.

This is so common there are actual sitcom episodes on this theme.

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
ThePrivilegedOne 12 months ago

I've noticed the same thing.

Permalink
21 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

I made the mistake of making out with her at work. I was the night shift boss and we had the whole office to ourselves so I thought it would be fun to do a Fatal Attraction, throw everything off the desk type of thing. It was more for the experience since I wasn't into her.

This was years before the world went harassment crazy, though she did threaten to report me for it a few times. I made some stupid decisions but they didn't come back to bite me in the ass later.

I googled her a while back and the wall hit her really fucking hard

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
Stateist555 12 months ago

link ?

Permalink
37 Points
  
  
Honest_Solution 12 months ago

She tried to shoehorn you in to the friend zone. Lend money, do favors, etc but she wasn’t trying to date you. I stopped being friends with women after being burned twice.

Permalink
24 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

I messed with her more than she messed with me. Still shouldn't have told her though.

Turns out her father got busted for embezzling a ton of money and she stood by him and saw nothing wrong with what he did. Glad I never went farther with her.

Permalink
17 Points
  
  
maruadventurer 12 months ago

Its not a good idea to talk about money except to a wife. Even parents should be off the finance disclosure list unless they are level headed about it. Relationships can be destroyed just because of money. The envy gene is embedded into way too much of the population these days and you never know who has the gene.

Permalink
9 Points
  
  
BoxofMistakes 12 months ago

I know. I was young and stupid. Since then I've had entire relationships where the woman had no idea of my financial worth.

Permalink
72 Points
  
  
drewc99 12 months ago

I think he should hang and milk her for all the expensive gifts she's worth.

Permalink
25 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

Try to get her to spring for a vacation, with the promise of a reciprocal one down the road, and then break up with her by "confessing" you are interested in seeing other women, right when you sit down on the plane to leave. She'll surely be escorted off the plane for screaming and assaulting you, then you get to go on a fun vacation by yourself. 8D.

There. I edited out all traces of deceit.
Cheers mods.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 11 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 11 months ago

Worth every penny to buy a new one in first class.

Permalink
22 Points
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

Try to get her to spring for a vacation, with the promise of a reciprocal one down the road, and then break up with her by "confessing" you have a new girlfriend, right when you sit down on the plane to leave. She'll surely be escorted off the plane for screaming and assaulting you, then you get to go on a fun vacation by yourself. 8D

This is a terrible idea for several reasons.

Additionally, WAATGM is strongly opposed to deceitful behavior. This is part of our platform. Seems like you haven't been paying attention....

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

I never said "and break the promise and never pay her back".

I'll edit the part where it says "have a new girlfriend" to "am interested in seeing other women".

Cheers.

Permalink
18 Points
  
  
chewis 12 months ago

I'm not condoning or condemning, but the mods flex a lot on this sub

Permalink
15 Points
  
  
notacrackheadofficer 12 months ago

I never bothered to read the posting rules so I'll gladly take the heat. Thanks for the heads up.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
chewis 12 months ago

Shit ladies, look no further. We got a good man right here!

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
SoulLess-1 12 months ago

To be fair, I imagine it probably has a lot to do with people claiming this is a 'hate sub' and trying to get it banned.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
chewis 12 months ago

That is a fair point!

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
diaperedwoman 12 months ago

Sounds like another gold digger. I agree with that comment, she should break up with him.

Permalink
15 Points
  
  
Ithomasfreedom 12 months ago

Never never ever let a woman tell you that it's all about love. That one word is so completely misused that it's lost all meaning. This women demonstrates it to a T! Being a "good man"(I consider that phrase an insult to men) isn't enough, it's never enough! If you are diminished in her view in any small way it flips a womans hypergamy switch to full on monkey branching mode.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
djkbrown2001 12 months ago

Good man is an insult. I used to think it was a compliment.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
Ithomasfreedom 12 months ago

It's right up there with the phrase "a real man" because of how they are both are used to shame men for not meeting a womans ridiculous impossible standards. An frankly men aren't much better toward other men when it comes to the shaming language. Men don't support each other but instead do the simping deeds of women. Think about how the words good, and real are used as weapons to diminish men.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
djkbrown2001 12 months ago

Real man that's another. What it's usually means: some one to come and take care of me and my kids.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
five_eight 12 months ago

I'm just glad she's busy at Berkeley and not running a motel into the ground.

Permalink
84 Points
  
  
Nidsan 12 months ago

CS on UC Berkeley? Unless she takes law and becomes a partner or she is going to be a specialist doctor, his financial future will walk circles around hers

Permalink
13 Points
  
  
SilkySullivan 12 months ago

Nepotism has already secured her an internship making as much as his DAD! I’m sure her mom will have a high paying position waiting for her right after graduation.

Permalink
62 Points
  
  
exiledinrussia 12 months ago

It’s nearly impossible for women like this to think long-term. It seems like she’s never had to.

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
6 Points
  
  
ace_kantrillo 12 months ago

If she's past the age of 14, her brain is done developing.

Permalink
37 Points
  
  
BlackendLight 12 months ago

It's a prestige thing too, for some reason a blue collar job or engineering degree isnt as cool as like a law or medical degree even if they make the same or more than the latter.

Like the plumber who makes 70 to 100k a year vs the lawyer who makes the same but has like 150k debt.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
hijoton 11 months ago

The soul crushing debt makes those long degrees a risk. Trade school.

Permalink
13 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[deleted]

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
fmanly 12 months ago

And girls like to tell their girl friends “I’m dating a doctor, etc

...who apparently doesn't buy rings at Zales.

Permalink
25 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

I know a guy who was certified as an underwater welder. That asshole works three months a year and pulls in $150k. He spends the other ten months on his sailboat in the Caribbean.

Oh, and he can't work more than four hours a day, including decompression time.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
hijoton 11 months ago

I'm from Uruguay and got to know an underwater welder. They got visibility issues due to our river dragging lots of debris vs clear oceanic water. He earns a nice buck.

Permalink
11 Points
  
  
BlackendLight 12 months ago

I joined the wrong profession

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
FaceAndKMS 12 months ago

Underwater welding is extremely dangerous, so the chance of fatality is a tradeoff.

Permalink
12 Points
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

Right? Sheesh. The most I ever made with my master's degree was $85k and a growing sense of dissatisfaction from pushing a fucking desk around all day. I make slightly less now but love what I do. I scraped three knuckles yesterday changing an antenna 155ft in the air. It was a very good day.

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
where_muh_good_mens 12 months ago

Good on you bro! Too often men are compared to their financial equivalency and no one seems to understand that quality of life and accomplishments cannot be quantified so easily and if they could they would far outweigh any salary a man could make.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
One-Move 12 months ago

Seen that a couple of times, spoiled girl from rich family, guy well of but not stinking rich, it never works, she “only” got a new lexus, not a new Mercedes

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
redetor13 12 months ago

This only happens if the guy is chad af

Permalink
8 Points
  
  
LORDLRRD 12 months ago

This reminds me of my ex, who told me she harbored resentment because we'd occasionally split our date costs. I'm still in school, and work part time and she was a full time accountant a few years out of school.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
tosernameschescksout 12 months ago

I got 99 problems, but a caste ain't one!

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
UpperClassStout 12 months ago

The fucking name is "Confessions from UC Berkeley" and you expect any sort of human decency whatsoever?

Thats a literal shithole of liberalism, soy males, feminism, white guilt, etc, etc etc.

Permalink
5 Points
  
  
Stateist555 12 months ago

he should marry her divorce her . talk her half of what she got . then get a younger version of her

Permalink
46 Points
  
  
Kozmocom 12 months ago

I understand the whole financial aspect as in relationships people typically fight about sex and money. I also understand knowing what you want and not settling. Thus if this girl wants a man with money then by all means go for it. That said she is forgetting a few things: (1) people are supposed to be poor when in college (2) college relationships are usually about having a great time and not designed to be so fucking serious (3) though her family has money so fucking what (4) she better be beyond attractive with that kind of bs personality

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
frikabg 12 months ago

Here is what though she is fucking poor morally and psychologically bankrupt! Her family is rich... she is not however she sees her family as extension of herself and his family as extension of himself. She doesn't care about him at all to the point where he is being judged for his family accomplishments and not for his own capabilities and merits. She also thinks that her families success is hers for some reason which couldn't be further from the truth. All and all she is disgusting despicable horrible being which.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
Im_a_Mime 12 months ago

This woman is walking piece of garbage. I pray she finds a guy just like her but richer, that would be the ultimate karma, when he breaks up with her for her parents being beneath his parents.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
SirKolbath 12 months ago

That comment is platinum!

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

I want to have something to show off.

Looks like she has quite a lot already and it's not pretty.

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
dingusfunk 12 months ago

She admitted in the post that all her privege came from her family

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
nunhgrader 12 months ago

Trash - pure and simple.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
prbonfanti 12 months ago

Hes is of the right caste, he should open own eyes and GYOW before it is too late.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
brcn3 12 months ago

"He's of the right caste"? What kind of medieval gangster speak is that?

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
five_eight 12 months ago

Dot Head. Its like in China: the Beijing word for non-human is "countrysider". People are incredibly tribal, so if every one is the same you have to find ridiculous differences to create a tribe.

Permalink
2 Points
  
  
MGTOW_BEASTMODE 12 months ago

Her future:

https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/women-are-struggling-to-find-men-who-make-as-much-money-as-they-do/

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

The shallowness wow

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
BrickBurgundy 12 months ago

At least there is one person speaking some truth to this deranged cunt.

Permalink
3 Points
  
  
bubbahubba69 12 months ago

I ain't saying she a gold digger but if the shoe fits.

Permalink
4 Points
  
  
MyNameIsChrisHansen8 12 months ago

Essentially... mommy and daddy do everything for me and gave me a free pass in life and all my future opportunities with jobs are because they put me there through their connections. Yet the bf is a problem. Yea okay, I would love to see how little she would accomplish without her parents doing everything for her.

Permalink
0 Points
  
  
[deleted] 12 months ago

[removed]

Permalink
1 Point
  
  
loneliness-inc Mod 12 months ago

Wat

Permalink
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Created By kevin32

Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", along with showing the unreasonable standards women have while offering little to no value themselves.


204 Members

Public Tribe

Unsubscribed
Post to WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
Chatroom
TRP.RED Tribe

WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar

We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes, so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the respect and courtesy that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.

In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, and used-up vaginas.

Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a man's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of thinking he was entitled to sex just for being nice.

But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys he was a "NiceGuy™" unworthy of dating, but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout he's a "real man" who treats her with respect.

Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is deliberately planned by women[1][2][3], and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, financially stable men they now seek are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.

The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.


Rules of conduct:

Relax guys! This is an amusement forum, so grab some popcorn and enjoy the whining. If the NiceGuys™ can be mocked for complaining about being rejected for jerks, then it's only fair that the women who rejected them be mocked for the outcome of their shitty choices.

  • 1. No shaming men for any reason.

  • 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.

  • 3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent, she's not asking for much". This isn't a Choosing Beggars forum.

  • 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.

Rules for submission:

  • 5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples)

  • 6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work.

  • 7. No links to any subreddits or websites. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot.

  • 8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.

  • 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.

Recommended reading:

  • Understanding The Purpose of WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

  • Dating profiles showing women's Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks strategy

  • OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone

  • Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society

  • Dalrock - They’re back in your 20s where you left them.

  • Michael's Story

  • u/where_muh_good_mens' Story

  • Paul Elam - Where the Good Men Went

  • "What Happened to All the Nice Guys?"

  • Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.

  • Feminism has succeeded

  • Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore

  • Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?

  • "I’m 43 and Alone – Can I Find a Good Man?"

  • To The Guy I Left In The Friend Zone For Too Long

  • To The Man Who Will Love Me Next

  • The Truth Behind the Increasing Social and Economic Disparity of Modern Society and Why Good Men Are The First To Leave

  • The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market

  • Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel

  • The Life Story of Carol

  • Complete list of resources here.

Link Flair:

  • The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"

  • Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.

  • Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.

  • Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

  • Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.

  • Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.

  • New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.

Content Archive:

  • https://theredarchive.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Related forums:

  • WhereAllTheGoodMenAre

  • MGTOW
Back to Top © 2021 Forums.RED All Right Reserved | Page generated in 0.0401 seconds.