Welcome to The Red Pill
The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
Women are not allowed to post here. This is a male-only tribe. Women may post in WAATGM and trp.red side of the site.
Original Reddit Red Pill sub (quarantine bypass) that contains the full original sidebar
The Rules & Glossary
You are REQUIRED to read these before posting. Ignorance of the rules is not an excuse.
Endorsed Contributors: Respect The Tag
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms (2015)
Here to troll? Here's a Glossary of Shaming Tactics, try to be creative and avoid these. We know you won't, that's why you're easy to spot.
The Red Pill Network
Official Fail Safe Forums (Currently Locked)
New Here?
New here? Read the following threads and the Theory Reading below. Read before participating:
Confessions of a Reformed Incel
Theory Reading
Relationships, the Red Pill, and you
Women, the most responsible teenager in the house
On Value and the Value of Women
Powertalk and other Language Categories
References
Everything you need to know about Shit Tests
Comprehensive Guide to Shit Tests
Goals - A beginners guide on how to attain them
One Key Step to Not Giving a Fuck
Links to the Manosphere
Subreddit By Flair
Red Pill Subreddits
/r/TheRedPill
/r/RedPillWomen
/r/askTRP
/r/RedPillParenting
/r/thankTRP
/r/becomeaman
/r/altTRP
/r/GEOTRP
/r/TRPOffTopic
The Archives
Special Thanks
/u/CrazyHorseInvincible
/u/bsutansalt
/u/EpicLevelCheater
/u/Halitenina
/u/SlyGradient
/u/TheRedPike
/u/RedForEducation
/u/RedShifter99
/u/LegendOfTheFrontier
/u/MachiavellianRed
/u/RedSovereign
/u/OldMuckyTerrahawk
/u/Aerobus
/u/RedAsteroid
/u/CrimsonPerspective
/u/RedGoldSaint
/u/GaiusScaevolus
/u/SoftHarem
/u/-Anteros-

[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
Wolfsdorf 12y ago
They see the issue through their own lenses, they're so thirsty that they cannot conceive a man doubting about marriage, I mean, OMG ITS YOUR CHANCE!!!111 How else is he gonna find another special snowflake like her!
The Pedestal, the final boss for these people.
Cyralea Vanguard 12y ago
It stems from the BP nice-guy fantasy that being self-sacrificial will result in unwavering love and support from their partners. True love conquers all, all that nonsense.
Guy must either be young or in one of his first few relationships.
[deleted] 12y ago
I almost died at the comment: "dude, making her pay off her debts is treating her like a child".
AngraMainyuu 12y ago
Making her pay off her debt is treating her like a child? Right, because we all know children are known for being responsible. How warped do you have to be to believe something like that?
EDIT: For better context: The guy trying to make her be responsible, is what those twats thought constituted treating her like a child. In the same way you try to make children do what they're supposed to. Obviously this still ignores the elephant in the room: Being responsible is good, and expecting it is reasonable.
rigit23 12y ago
God forbid we make her responsible for her actions!
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
lloopy 12y ago
Reminds me of the movie, Better Off Dead: "I've been going to this high school for seven and a half years. I'm no dummy."
diminishmENT 12y ago
One of the greatest movies ever
bertstare10 12y ago
My favorite was
This is the same bull shit reasoning women use when they sleep around and want to justify it and how it "shaped her".
Plz go
Zanford 12y ago
But it did.
It shaped her orifices into the loose, cavernous, beef-flappy canyons they are today.
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
BluepillProfessor 12y ago
You guys did catch that the reason for this LT debt is that this girl got an education?
Women with college degree: Divorce Rate- 20%.
Women without college degree: Divorce Rate over 60%.
All the dude needs to do is sit down with her and put together a repayment plan. If they are living apart they could move in together and save a bunch of money for the debt. If she is working and makes money similar to him their is no problem. After you have the plan and have a repayment schedule well under way set the wedding for 2 years from then. Then enjoy a long, sex filled engagement- while she pays off a chunk of her debt (do it quick before you get married and she cuts back the sex to once a month if you are lucky).
zyk0s Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Oh no, not this bullshit again.
Look, you can do whatever you want with statistics, you can draw arbitrary buckets and make the world look the way you want it to. Separating women by college degree attendance is one such arbitrary separation, which makes it look like there's a causal relationship there.
The truth is that chance of divorce is also correlated with age of marriage (remarriage potential, the younger the higher), IQ (higher IQ means higher impulse control) and most importantly, number of sexual partners. It also is strongly motivated by who gets the kids.
Women with college degrees tend to a) marry later b) have a higher IQ and c) have fewer kids, and have kids later. They are also more likely to have a career, which means they are less likely to get sole custody of the kids. Those are the factors that make them less likely to divorce, but I can guarantee you that the very religious virgin who has no college degree will be way less likely to divorce you than the Barista of Arts who has sampled the goods in college.
Dreamtrain 12y ago
Yes because you "levels of intimacy, of trust, and of love" are only achieved if you keep your finances tied down. Even an actual non-radical femenist would agree that such things should not be a factor. If they do, they have an agenda or self-interests in mind.
Florist_Gump 12y ago
That doesn't sound like a reason to pay her debts,
That sounds like a reason not to get married.
Swiss_Cheese9797 12y ago
Who the fuck would go to ask betas?
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 12y ago
Resentful men spreading their resent
Denswend 12y ago
They are pretty much correct when they say that this kind of marriage will never achieve the levels of intimacy and trust they could potentially achieve. You don't trust someone who spends money, gets into credit card debt, all while going abroad ("it helps her grow as a person" - BULLSHIT) with ALL YOUR PROPERTY. No sane person would.
However, if he does want to achieve that level of trust and intimacy with someone like her - then godspeed and good luck to him. Trust isn't something that when magically bestowed upon other person, makes the other person magically good. Intimacy follows the same pattern. What trust does, is not make the one who is trusted "good" for the sake of one who trusts. It gives one who is trusted additional power over the one who trusts.
[deleted] 12y ago
Holy shit, there's an actual AskBeta subreddit?
What the fuck? Who wants to acknowledge that they're beta?
niczar 12y ago
It's actually spelled /r/askmen, but it's pronounced askbeta.
[deleted] 12y ago
There's an actual AskBeta, just looked it up
/r/AskBeta
Although it has one post only
[deleted]
Gami_Lon 12y ago
FUUUUUUCK I hate reading statements like this:
That year abroad shouldn't really factor into things at all. Experiencing other cultures like that helps you to grow as a person, which makes it invaluable imo.
I know SO MANY people getting worthless degrees, and some of them take it a step further by getting a worthless degree abroad. I have a FB friend that lives five thousand miles from home and is getting an art degree.
It infuriates me, because these are the exact same people whining about their student loans, five years down the road, when they have a degree in basket weaving and $100,000 in debt because they wanted to spend a year on what amounts to an expensive vacation.
P.S. You know what makes you grow as a person?
WORK
I've traveled abroad, and I definitely enjoyed it, but let's not kid ourselves. It's a vacation. If you want to grow as a person, GET A CAREER GOING, meet some experts in your field, become their peers, learn from them, and excel at what you do. That's how you "grow as a person." If you want to go overseas and meet people all over the world, do it on your vacation time, like productive people do.
a_chill_bro 12y ago
The solution is really easy. Simply don't marry her and keep her around as a plate. This way you get to keep fucking her without taking on her debt.
Plus, you're not tied to only one woman and can fuck as many other women as you want.
What's there to think about?
RaymondCarversDog 12y ago
My ex-fiance had hundreds of thousands of dollars of medical debt, along with student loans (no degree). Every time she had extra money and I suggested paying her debt, she spent it frivolously (spending her last $1000 on a Macbook or some bullshit).
I have no debt.
One of several reasons we ended up being "engaged" for over three years before I finally ended things. Even when I was BP I wasn't that stupid.
zyk0s Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
They are completely right, worrying about keeping finances separate won't allow you to experience the deep emotional bond with that special person that you are going to stay with for the rest of your life...
Oh wait, that's right! Marriage is not for life anymore, so you do have to worry and never will achieve that bond anyway.
NiftyDolphin 12y ago
I gave my wife an ultimatum to pay off her CC debt or the wedding was off. She paid off the debt, with my help (maybe 1/4th) over a period of eight months or so.
She held it together for another year or so, until our daughter was born. She's held CC debt ever since.
She would fight me when I asked her to keep to a budget, so I went the other way: I cut her off and let her hit the CC limit. Now reality curbs her spending.
She has a teacher's pay, so she can't get new cards with a large limit, and turns her nose up at the 2k initial limit that most CC companies offer her. So I got that going for me.
Yes, I know that if/when we get divorced I'm going to take on a large portion of that debt, but in my mind, I'm trading potential debt for time with my children. I'm making the most of that time.
Edit: So my point: if she has a high load of CC debt-> dump her. She'll be "good" until you can't escape, and then go back to her spendthrift ways.
busior 12y ago
Yup, but this rule of no escape goes both ways. So pump as long as you can and then dump once she gets old
TheReason13 12y ago
Consider the kind of advice this guy is getting. "Don't plan for the future." "Get lost." "Take a leap of faith." Its preposterous. What amuses me immensely is that this guy probably takes this excuse for rational advice seriously.
Overkillengine 12y ago
Rofl. If she can't be financially responsible before marriage, she isn't going to magically be self sufficient once the ring is on her finger and the ink is dry.
Never marry someone that has a ton of debts racked up as a result their own decisions.
That's like going to a casino, betting all your life savings, and also telling the dealer that you'll cover the losses of the person next to you too.
A fool and their money are soon to part.
sykonaut92 12y ago
I have a huge headache from reading some of those comments.
Cryocasm 12y ago
She's got her eyes on the prize: http://imgur.com/pAoK3Tq
He's being smart with his method, but isn't confident enough in himself to not turn to fucking reddit where armchair warriors will tell him that he should pay. I wish this man good luck.
NiftyDolphin 12y ago
He's most likely getting the full-court press from her team and white knights IRL. He came to reddit to get a sanity check.
Cryocasm 12y ago
That sanity check and peeking into the cesspool amount to the same thing imo.
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
RedBigMan Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
What you mean she's not responsible for your car loans? What sort of bizzaro world are we living in?
Also if it was up to me I'd tell the car company to repossess the car and be done with it. That's one way to reduce your debt.
UnderwearStain 12y ago
What happens in this situation is, they auction off the car at about 2/3 of it's value and take you to small claims court and garnish your wages for the other 1/3. Granted it's "less" debt. But only a few people really get away with this as a means of escaping debt. Mainly being an independent contractor that does work under the table. If you're an on the books earner, this hurts you in a lot of ways. Including defaulting on debt and wrecking your credit score for years. Just in case anyone was thinking about this as an easy out for debt.
Along the same lines. this also sorta compliments another reason not to marry someone with lots of debt. When things go wrong for them after the inevitable divorce, they can just file bankruptcy leaving all the debt on you unless you do the same, or continue along with an even bigger wage slave sort of debt.
[deleted]
metaliturtle 12y ago
no, I'm responsible for her car loan...
TwoScoopsofDestroyer 12y ago
Go to the bank and explain the situation, it is very possible they would retrieve the car for you (you are making the payments the bank owns the collateral) and possibly arrange selling the car to pay off the remainder of the loan.
metaliturtle 12y ago
I could but the car is her property now, she would take me to court for theft if that happened. Divorce rape is a real thing.
etcomro 12y ago
This guy just sounds practical. Anyone who would marry someone with heavy debt is downright fool.
redpillshadow 12y ago
I expected at least some men there stating that it would be stupid to be her ATM.
Instead posts upon posts and upvotes galore telling him that he is her way to pay off debts and he should just deal with it. Her second marriage will be about love.
anonlymouse 12y ago
The most upvoted comment is that she should pay off her credit card debt, but student loans are a bit unreasonable. Which is true, changing behaviour can get CC debt paid off pretty quickly, in the order of 1-2 years. Student loan debt, like a mortgage, can take decades. If it's that, what's he going to do, stay in a LTR until she's 50 and then get married?
[deleted] 12y ago
I bet there is more to the story. Like excessive shopping. There's not enough details in the original post.
anonlymouse 12y ago
Most likely, yes. And for that, definitely don't marry her with that debt. But that's what the most upvoted post said.
redpillshadow 12y ago
Oh it can take decades. I didn't know that. Then of course it is totally reasonable to share decades of debt with her cause she has a vagina.
anonlymouse 12y ago
Your reading skills are terrible. To start with, you fail to comprehend the most upvoted post in that thread, and then you fail to comprehend my clarification of it.
Answer; is he supposed to wait until she's 50 to get married? The only reason to get married is to have kids, and it's pretty retarded to wait until she's hit menopause to get married.
redpillshadow 12y ago
That amount of debt is enough to never marry her and next her.
He is not supposed to marry her. Her life choices were a college education which bought her endless amount of debts. That makes her a bad candidate for the mother position. She invested in a career and now she has to stick to that career to pay of her investment.
Taking on 100.000$ (or more) of college debt to get pregnant and not work is fucking stupid. You don't need a college education for kids. And if that education is for self fulfillment she has to pay for that herself. Or find someone stupid enough to pay it for her (beta bux).
[deleted]
anonlymouse 12y ago
That wasn't the question he asked. He asked if expecting her to pay off her debt first to demonstrate financial responsibility was reasonable. With CC debt, the answer is yes, with SL debt, the answer is no. The former is reasonable because it's realistic, the latter is unreasonable because it's unrealistic.
You're getting upset because they didn't answer a different question than the one that was asked.
redpillshadow 12y ago
I don't get that twisted logic.
He is clearly asking if it is reasonable to marry a person with this much debt.
What they are telling him is "It is unreasonable to expect her to pay off the SL debt. Marry her anyway."
What they should be telling him is "It is unrealistic to expect her to pay off the SL debt. Look elsewhere for the mother of your children."
anonlymouse 12y ago
It's not twisted logic at all. He asked a specific question, and got a specific answer to that question.
What's twisted logic is thinking men would answer the question differently.
You're inserting something that wasn't said.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Yes, LTR until 50. Once you get married, her debt becomes your debt.
Alternatively, he can find another woman who is more responsible with her money and doesn't have debts that need to be paid off over 30 years.
anonlymouse 12y ago
You would seriously recommend that? What's the point of marrying her when she's 50?
Going to University and taking out a loan to fund it isn't being irresponsible with your money, it's being horribly misinformed about the value of tertiary education. It's not the same thing as racking up credit card debt, which is being irresponsible with money.
TogiBear 12y ago
What's the point of marrying at all?
anonlymouse 12y ago
If you want to have kids it brings some advantages.
1independentmale 12y ago
As has been pointed out to you by others in this thread: The point isn't to marry her when she's 50. The point is to not marry her at all. She's too much of a liability.
My best friend married a woman with substantial student loan debt. She moved into his house and some time after the wedding, she convinced him that his wife should be on the title to his (now "their") house. So they refinanced it, got a lower interest rate, put both their names on it and, since her student loans were at 6% and the mortgage was only 4%, they went ahead and used the equity in the house to pay off her student loans. The equity he had built up as a single man long before he met her.
He caught her cheating on him a year or two later. She moved out and they divorced. Guess who is still paying for those student loans 6 years later? Only 24 years left to go on that bank note.
anonlymouse 12y ago
Reading skills, you lack them too. I've already addressed that. It's not the question that was being asked.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Well, if we're going to go down that road, I'd argue that there's no real point to marrying - for a man, anyway, especially one that earns more than his spouse. So I'd say that in order to convince a man to sign that marriage certificate, it's reasonable to demand that his future wife not drag him down with a crazy amount of debt unless it is pretty clear that her earning potential will cover it.
Speaking of earning potential - you make a good point about responsibility with money. I'd say that if she got some worthless "follow your true calling" liberal arts degree, or even worse, a women's studies degree, then yes, she's being irresponsible with money. It doesn't take much to do the simple calculations. However, if she got a STEM degree or something else reasonably lucrative like law or business, then that's much more responsible.
anonlymouse 12y ago
If you don't want kids, certainly not, but if you do want kids, marrying does put you in a better position.
The point about liberal arts degrees is a canard. The bad advice to begin with is that any degree is worth taking a loan for.
It takes more than calculations to realise it's a mistake when from a young age your parents, your family, their friends, your teachers, your counsellors have all been saying that you need to get a degree to do well - either with an example of having a job in the field they studied for or not doing so well because they didn't get a degree. And then when you're in university, everyone tells you how great it is, in exactly the same way, and not a single dissenting voice. Of course everyone you're talking to hasn't graduated yet and faced reality or came from a time when you could pay for your education with a minimum wage summer job.
It's no more financial irresponsibility than a Japanese person having inherited their parents' mortgage debt. Yes, they come with a millstone around their neck and you'll share in it if they marry, but it's not something they had any real opportunity to avoid. Either you got good enough grades to get into university, or you got lucky by being stupid or lazy and were limited to trades.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
You don't need to be married to have kids, but you're right, and I'll concede that point to you.
Not at all. It's basic ROI.
If you borrow $200k and obtain a degree that is likely to get you a $100k salary then that is a good investment.
Borrow $200k for a degree that is likely to get you a $25k salary? You'd be better off learning a trade.
I agree that there's a serious problem with parents encouraging their kids to get a degree when the educational landscape has changed so much in the intervening time. It seems that within a generation or two, tuition costs have gone from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands for a bachelor's degree. Add to this the bullshit advice to "follow your true calling" and yeah, a lot of kids are going to be misled.
The problem is: none of this is the problem of the man - until he gets married to her. There are plenty of fish in the sea and many of them don't have hundreds of thousands in loans to pay off.
It's her burden to carry, and perfectly reasonable for him to tell her to take care of it before finances are mingled. She can always say, "No deal."
anonlymouse 12y ago
You won't learn about ROI in the main math stream. You only learn about it if you're so bad at math that you don't have the grades to get into university, and are taking "applications of mathematics" or some course like that. The only thing about money I learned was how to calculate interest, but it was never put into context. Someone needs to tell you to make that calculation at some point in your life. The sociopath/clueless/loser split applies in school too. The sociopaths are the aristocrats who are guaranteed jobs via nepotism, the clueless are the academic keeners, and the losers are those who weren't smart enough or through some degree of luck realised that putting the work into school wasn't worth it.
No, it's reasonable for him to say, "No, I'm not marrying someone with debt, I'm breaking up and finding someone else," but if he were going to say that, he wouldn't even be asking this, and he would have broken up a long time ago.
Telling her to pay it off first isn't realistic, and anything that isn't realistic isn't reasonable.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Ha, true enough. However, my response was to your statement, "The bad advice to begin with is that any degree is worth taking a loan for" which is not true at all based on ROI.
Yes, I agree, that is a reasonable thing to say. But it doesn't mean that saying "clear your debt first" is unreasonable.
I'm still not convinced of the "realistic" part. It's like saying, "We're not going to retire until our net worth is $1 million." Is that unrealistic? It might take 30 years.
anonlymouse 12y ago
In that case, I've met petroleum engineers who couldn't find a job. In Canada. Despite the oil sands. No degree is a guarantee of employment. $100K in debt with a degree with a 99% employment rate is still $100K in debt with no realistic way of paying it back if you're that 1% that isn't employed. You can't be certain you will have a job, because the job market changes between the time you start your degree and the time you finish it, and in the US, you can't declare bankruptcy on a student loan. If you're going to gamble money you don't have (and a loan on university is a gamble), you want to at least have the safety net of bankruptcy.
That's realistic, because retirement isn't something that's only viable in a 5-10 year window starting now. You get married so you can have kids. That means you want to get married when your wife is young enough for the kids to be healthy. Which means waiting until she has paid it off to marry her defeats the purpose of marriage to begin with. That's the unrealistic part. Besides, if you're getting married, her student loan debt is the least of your worries. 50% of your paycheque for the rest of your life is going to amount to a lot more than her debt. You're already making a big gamble just by getting married. Refusal to pay off her credit card debt is a huge red flag. Inability to pay off student loan debt isn't any more of a red flag than divorce laws are to begin with.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Top comment:
Last I checked, long-term debt is usually bigger than short-term debt - by orders of magnitude. Bigger debt usually means bigger problems.
"$2k in credit card loans? You'd better have that paid off before we get married, or I'm calling it off!"
"$200k in student loans? No problem babe, let's get married so it can become my problem too! Why let a little long-term debt ruin our happiness together?"
topspeedj 12y ago
Similar reasoning to how some rich people will have no problem spending $500k for a corporate law firm retainer but will foam at the mouth at an unexpected $20 admin fee.
AgentSmith27 12y ago
Its the top comment because that 200k will take decades to pay off. It just doesn't make sense to say "I'll only get married after you raise 200k". No one is going to raise that money in any reasonable amount of time.
If you don't want to get married, don't get married. If you want to get married, get married. A condition like requiring them to pay off 200k is really just an immature gesture of someone who has reservations about marriage. I'm not saying that a huge loan burden is not a serious issue... but that is just a silly way to handle it.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Actually, it makes perfect sense, since the new husband would be taking on responsibility for that $200k debt.
Are you saying that the larger the debt is, the less it should be considered as a blocker for marriage?
If a debt takes a few months to pay off, then marriage is a no-go, but if it takes centuries to pay off, then don't worry about it?
If I ever sign that marriage certificate, I want it to be a win/win situation. Taking on someone's $200k debt doesn't sound like a win to me. I'm not going to be the white knight that rescues the damsel-in-distress from her crushing debt.
AgentSmith27 12y ago
I never said it was a "win", or even sensible, to take on a huge amount of debt... What I'm saying is that this is an immature way of handling a serious problem.
Saying "I'll marry you after you raise 200k" is a really strange request to make. It cannot be paid off in a reasonable amount of time. You are easily talking 15 years, probably more.
In such a case, the guy would clearly have reservations about getting married with that level of debt. Its sort of like saying "yes, I want to get married, but not really". Its a nonsensical reply.
If you are (eventually) looking for marriage, but definitely don't want to take on that level of debt, then you both move on. Its better for everyone. If you want to marry the girl, even with the debt, then you marry her. If you don't want marriage, then you tell her you don't want to get married. If you need to think more about it, that is fine too. All of these are perfectly fine options to express and talk about.
In no way is a 15 year "maybe" response reasonable. From a practical perspective, its bad for both parties.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
I bring up the "win" because it's reasonable for the man to want the situation to be a win for him, and taking on $200k in debt would definitely be a "loss" in the financial category. The amount of time he'd have to wait is irrelevant, really.
I'm still baffled as to why this is strange. The fact that it is going to take 15 years to pay off is exactly why he doesn't want to marry her yet. Look at some of the divorce stories in this thread as to why this is the case.
Exactly.
Not at all. It's saying, "I'll marry you after you get rid of your giant debt," which is a very sensible reply.
Again, it's not a "maybe", it's a condition. It's like your boss telling you, "When you hit $2 million in sales, I'll make you VP of sales." Would you say, "My goodness, that might take years! I'm not going to work that hard for a 'maybe'."
Asking her to clear her debt first is perfectly reasonable, no matter what the timeframe involved. If she doesn't want to wait that long, she can always say no. It might even encourage her to work harder to clear her debt more quickly - incentives are good.
AgentSmith27 12y ago
You keep saying the amount of time involved is irrelevant, but its clearly not. I don't think you are completely thinking this through.
Lets completely ignore the women's perspective for a moment. Let's just look at the guys perspective. Let's pretend she says "OK". Now you wait around 10+ years, as she tries to pay it off, but it becomes clear she's not going to do it. So, now, you cut your losses.... but now 10 years have gone by, and you are older and less attractive. You've just wasted all that time, and some of the best years of your life, on someone who was a "dead end". At best, you've put off marrying and starting a family for 10 years. At worst, your looks have degraded, and you will have to do some serious settling - you've blown any chance at really being happy.
The position you are championing is just impractical. No sane, smart person, would do that. Its better to analyze the current situation and determine if you think the likely outcome will make you happy. You weigh whether you think if she is going to contribute financially to paying the student loans, whether your life will be severely impacted by taking on this debt, whether you'd still want a life with her if you have to shoulder this debt, etc. etc. Then you make a decision.
You don't wait 15 years to find out if she's going to be the one you settle down with. Its the same reason you wouldn't wait 15 years to assign a new VP of sales when the position is currently vacant. You make a decision on the facts you have at the moment, and you act accordingly.
From her perspective, all of the same things are true. You'd have to be an idiot to suggest something this impractical, and she'd have to be an idiot to accept it.
Time is valuable to you, and everyone else. Any decision that depends on a 15 year cycle of future events is just completely and utterly impractical.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Okay, what you say makes sense. But consider this scenario, which I also think makes sense:
She says "OK" and you continue to see her. You even have a small wedding ceremony and have a couple of kids, but you don't get married.
She continues to pay down her debt in the meantime. 5 years go by and she has paid all but $50k of the loan with some help from her parents. By this time you've both done will in your respective careers and $50k is now a small percentage of your combined net worth. You mutually decide to pay off the loan together so you can finally get married on paper.
After the loan is paid off, you have a larger wedding (vow renewal?) celebration and everyone is happy.
Now that doesn't sound so bad, does it? They both want to get married so they work together towards a common and long-term goal, similar to how the salesman would work towards his long-term goal set by his boss. She's motivated to pay off the debt so she's likely to save money and pay down extra principal each month.
AgentSmith27 12y ago
I see what you are getting at, but when we take into account living expenses and realistic career advancement, its going to be hard to make much on the principal of that loan in any short amount of time. If she starts out like most other entry level professionals, she is going to be making $35k-$40k for an entry level position, much of that is going to car expenses, rent/mortgage, food, health insurance, etc. When she starts making $55k+ is when you start having the ability to really pay that down. Depending on how quickly her career moves, it might be hard to make real progress in 5 years. In 10-15 years, the loan might have turned out to be a great investment, and she could be making six figures (who knows). Its hard to gauge that ahead of time.
I'd also like to mention that whether or not you enter a marriage, along with the legal implications, isn't really the core of the issue. As I mentioned in another post, most states treat individual debt as something that can't be transferred to a spouse (divorce or not). The legal implications of marriage aren't the problemy, its the question of "do I want to be with this person and have a family that is impacted by this debt".
If you stay with her and have children, that debt still matters quite a lot. If you have children with a girl who has no debt, and the same career path, then that translates into a very different life with her and your children. Even if you don't directly pay for the loans, children are very expensive. The extra money a debt free wife would provide would be very very nice to have. Its a completely different life that you are facing.
To me, I think the last thing you'd want to do is kick the can down the road while you become more invested in her. Even if she tries very hard, and works her ass off, the loan may be difficult to pay off through no fault of her own (recession, excess unemployment in her line of work, etc). Its a sticky (and now common) situation, that you a person needs to really think about before they consider setting down roots with someone.
Everyone is free to do whatever they want... I just don't think there are many circumstances where waiting it out is a prudent decision in a situation like this.
redpillbanana Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
I concede the point about realistically making a dent in the debt within 5 years, even assuming that she does get help from her parents and has help with living expenses from parents and her SO. Maybe 10 years is more realistic for someone who is firing on all cylinders.
In terms of pre-marital debt, this is what I found:
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/debt-marriage-owe-spouse-debts-29572.html
TL;DR: live in the listed states? You're taking on your wife's student loans.
You also make a good point as to whether to settle down with someone who has significant debt or not - it can have a huge impact on lifestyle for sure.
Another way to look at it might be: this is the woman you want to marry but you're worried that she won't be incentivized to pay off her debt once you co-mingle finances. By holding off on the marriage until she pays off the debt, you're providing a clear goal and a well-defined payoff - besides the satisfaction of paying off her debt.
One thing I've seen over and over in marriages is that the wife is just not motivated or incentivized to do anything to improve because frankly she holds all the aces. She'll half-heartedly try to cut her spending, or lose the weight, or have more sex, but after a while, everything goes back to the way it was before. And why should she try? She already has everything she wants. Better to have a clean slate before it gets to that point.
Cyralea Vanguard 12y ago
Which is why women initiate 70%+ of divorces, right? Guess he meant that unwavering loyalty was something only men have to do.
Marriage is already a suckers game, but it's a hundred times more stupid to go into it with so many potential dealbreakers.
Areimanes 12y ago
Men invented honour, pride, integrity, valor, the code of the samurai. You can't expect a woman to hold to values invented by men. What are you, some kind of misogynist?
Never get married is basically what he needs to hear.
[deleted] 12y ago
that's why they call it an STD, sexually transmitted debt. Whats funny about this whole situation is that there are a bunch of laws to keep the debt from transmitting to the woman from the man, but not the other way around.
RedBigMan Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
Nothing makes you feel intimate or trusting than going through a divorce where she takes half of all your shit and manages to dump her student loan debts onto you.
lloopy 12y ago
Where I got divorced, the student loan debt she secured before we were married wasn't counted. The debt after we were married was.
RedBigMan Endorsed Contributor 12y ago
You got lucky, there are a ton of stories of a woman's student debt being lumped onto her husband on divorce.
AgentSmith27 12y ago
It depends on what state you are in. In most states that aren't community property states, your debts are not your husband/wife's debts.
thebears1986 12y ago
That is true. The person who signed the dotted line is who owes the debt and who will take the credit hit when it isn't paid. The problem is that divorce courts sometimes order the man to pay cash to the woman so that she can pay the debt.
The other gotcha is personal advisors will tell you to pay of high interest debt first for obvious reasons. So the couple is told to pay off the 18% credit card debt, then the 9% student loan debt, and then start investing. You may be surprised how many divorces are filed once the woman-only debt is paid off.
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
thebears1986 12y ago
Debt isn't passed on to survivors. An estate would need to settle debts prior to distributing the remainder, but next in kin or any other named party would not assume the debt. Only people who signed on the dotted line assume the debt (because they are a co-signer).
Example:
Man dies with $200k home loan, $30k car loan, $20k credit card debt. House is worth $180k, car is worth $20k and there are 0 assets in the estate. Bank will take the house and be out $20k. Bank will take car and be out $10k. Credit card company gets nothing and is out $20k.
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
Zanford 12y ago
Nevermind that 300 sandwiches takes less money and time to make than the average guy will spend cubicle slaving to buy his princess a shiny rock. 300 sandwiches has much more practical value.
legauge 12y ago
No pussy is worth 6 digits.
[deleted] 12y ago
It's really quite simple - if you take on enough debt in college such that you cannot pay it off my 25-26, you're hamstering hard. I have no problem with someone who takes out loans to attend a great school, works hard in a good major, and then graduates to a good salary. That shows foresight, planning, and if you worked during college to keep the loan amounts down, I'd say that shows some responsibility.
But these idiots who take out loans just to be in the lush environment of a fancy school, and then study a bunch of easy bullshit that allows for ample carousel time... Please do not support them. They will never grow into real responsible people if captain save a hos take them under their payroll.
There is absolutely no reason to take on a girl with college debt. Taking out a loan to get your MBA or MD from a top school... That probably is worth it, assuming you have the brains to follow through, network well, and so on. The problem is, even these super motivated wannabe doctor chicks get straight robbed of ambition as soon as they meet a male student who's about to finish their residency and make the real $.
In the economy, there is no justification for that. Since these women sure as hell aren't going to be putting in their maximum effort into raising kids and optimizing your home life like it's their job... They ought to be a cash-positive, appreciating asset. The girl who never went to college, worked in some low pay shop, and worked her way to manage a boutique or something by 26, that is an infinitely better prospect for marriage than some chick who's 26, deep in debt and just finishing her graduate school in some bullshit, and 200k in debt from her bachelors that she's barely been making a dent in. The first girl is smart, less hamstery, more responsible, and will have far less if a chip on her shoulder.
TheRabid 12y ago
It is quite disgusting to see people think nothing of taking on someone's debt.
slai47 12y ago
I only let my wife access to bank account because she is hating that I am paying for everything right now since she is in school. She wants to contribute and like I would say, "its fine I can pay rent, you can pay for it some other time. Save your money. " She only gets small living expense checks from her loans right now. She would put money into my bank account to pay like 30% of the rent and make it so she can always give me that amount every month.
I love her a lot and she actually likes me more since I have been more confident and more buff. I only became that way because of this subreddit.
In the case of the guy on askmen, my wife was more in the males position here. I have above 100k in debt and she has like 40k. She wants to pay off her own loans and doesn't want too much help but I have a feeling we will just merge our accounts even more and combine our income due to our debt. But I have a lot more trust in my wife then a lot of other people in relationships, so still be careful.
Rougepellet 12y ago
Sugarcoated words. Take away the sugarcoat and what've you got? Steaming pile of bullshit.
[deleted] 12y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 12y ago
You're ignoring the fact that when they become married, her debt becomes HIS problem. If she got a shitty, unmarketable degree her debt isn't likely to be taken care of by her income, and there's a chance she'll end up going to grad school (and incurring MORE debt) to get a job in her field.
And even if she is in a field that lets her make bank, what happens if 5 years down the road she gets injured and can't work, or more likely gets laid off, made redundant or pops out a kid and decides she doesn't want to go back to work? What happens then?
Also, student loans are not exactly irresponsible, but they can be extremely toxic depending on the field you go into. Most degrees aren't worth going into debt over, even at "good" schools.