This is pretty much correct. "Women signal receptiveness to potential escalation" is how I would prefer to write it. Women are the actual instigators and escalators but they like men to make most of the moves for them (like they like men to do most other things for them).

Basically she signals "I like you and what we are doing, make the next move if you like" all the way through. If you try to push past the absence of these signals you are basically being a pushy salesman.

Pushy salesmen can get some sales from weaker people (and we can all be weak in certain situations) but a pushy sale always results in buyer's regret (she flakes on a date/ she won't put out/ she doesn't come back for more/ she says you somehow took advantage of her ...etc). Maybe you just don't give a shit but I suggest you should for your own sake as well as hers. The best salesmen work for companies they can believe in, selling things people will value and they build quality relationships where they simply offer people stuff they will actually want and people come back for more again and again. The good salesman finds the right clients for the company gets good sales volumes on good terms for the company that are also still fair to the buyer and retains the client for the company. Nothing more is needed when the product is good. Be a good product and sell this way. Forget the pushy PUA gurus and their bullshit. (They almost all recant to an extent when they become more mature). You will do less work and have loads better sex and relationships if you get yourself the right clients, sell a good product and retain your clients.

Respecting female desire signals will avoid you almost all buyer's regret legal issues and social problems. Better still you won't invest time and energy in the wrong girls, then get upset when you don't get the results you wanted.

The mistake that the high volume cold approachers make is that they are just wasting energy on girls who never signalled receptiveness to start. If you get receptiveness signalling understood, you have a very high success rate -its really only where their availability to the market or your beta qualifications like wealth later prove inadequate that trip you up, not the actual attraction. You can sometimes still push past failure on beta quals or her availability by being a quality guy but only if there are strong signals of genuine receptiveness. The first move is female.

I have always thought high volume cold approach was a poor strategy. It looks smooth when a good Chad does it and then his followers go "wow I want to buy into this guru's teachings" but they don't realise the girl actually was interested because he was a quality Chad not because of his awesome cold approach game. She actually signalled interest from his hello, maybe from his first glance before he picked her to approach.

The one small correction to the article that I would make is that French kissing is I agree quite far down the line but kissing without tongues can be earlier. Moving in to start by filling her mouth with your tongue is a teenage move. A gentle and chaste kiss can be early on to signal "Lets make out" Her mouth will open gradually as the general caressing progresses. It also tends to happen much more in new couples than in more established couples who quite often do the whole deed without it at all. This is because the French kiss is really there as a female check on compatibility. I have even noticed this myself as a male. You get the turned off by some women's mouths. They are just not genetically compatible. Once you know you are good for each other this stage is not really needed and is optional according to preference.