TRP.RED: Home | Blogs - Forums.RED: ALL | TheRedPill | RedPillWomen | AskTRP | thankTRP | OffTopic
Login or Register

adam-l

Reddit Username Verified

URL: The Empress Is Naked
Location: Europe

"The Empress Is Naked"
Location: Europe
redpillschool 3 weeks ago

@adam-l Thanks, asshole.

adam-l 3 weeks ago

@redpillschool "Though I am an asshole..."

Bullshit. You're just a fake asshole. Real assholes don't have a sense of honor.

PurpleFidgetMidget 3 months ago

@adam-l I'd agree if I didn't just get banned for expressing my opinion on there.

wikisnack 3 months ago

@adam-l I like how he calls it red pill rage as if the admin of the site needed help building their case against trp. Just got to get a small mgtow jab in there.

adam-l 3 months ago

Paul Elam and Tom Golden: "Places like The Red Pill subreddit are saving lives. It's a disgusting, cowardly, misleading thing to quarantine them. This is about free speech, and the silencing of men. We are pulling for The Red Pill subreddit community". https://trp.red/t/1s8

redpillschool 4 months ago

@adam-l with more than double the active users!

adam-l 4 months ago

TRP just overtook seddit in subscribers. Yay!

adam-l 5 months ago

@redpillschool What can I say... This goes a long way. I'm truly grateful.

redpillschool 5 months ago

@adam-l You get a big mention in today's sticky on reddit.

revengerence 5 months ago

@adam-l It's obvious that this is the case. If the ratios were 17-1 then betas would get no offspring. If betas got no offspring, then beta traits should have been eradicated long ago. The ideal(evolutionary) mental disposition of a young man is to pursue an alpha or beta strategy flexibly based on the feedback from the environment.

Load More

Latest Comments [Show All | Show Posts]

Cavemen were not cavemen, after all. No, 17 women vs 1 man was not the reproductive rate in prehistory. It was 2 to 1.

Your post is exactly the kind I was trying to dispell with my op. It's an anachronism, using future ideas and situations to reason about the past.

Context | Full Comments | submitted 3 months ago by adam-l
Cavemen were not cavemen, after all. No, 17 women vs 1 man was not the reproductive rate in prehistory. It was 2 to 1.

Man, you are just hypothising! Get the data, read up. The first farmers lived less than their preceding hunter gatherers.

Context | Full Comments | submitted 3 months ago by adam-l
Cavemen were not cavemen, after all. No, 17 women vs 1 man was not the reproductive rate in prehistory. It was 2 to 1.
...[More]
Context | Full Comments | submitted 3 months ago by adam-l
Cavemen were not cavemen, after all. No, 17 women vs 1 man was not the reproductive rate in prehistory. It was 2 to 1.

This is an heated ongoing discussion in the Academia. Counter arguments say that

...[More]
Context | Full Comments | submitted 3 months ago by adam-l
Cavemen were not cavemen, after all. No, 17 women vs 1 man was not the reproductive rate in prehistory. It was 2 to 1.

I totally agree on the monogamy issue.

...[More]
Context | Full Comments | submitted 3 months ago by adam-l
Cavemen were not cavemen, after all. No, 17 women vs 1 man was not the reproductive rate in prehistory. It was 2 to 1.

I believe that sex deprivation is the main beta-ization device.

...[More]
Context | Full Comments | submitted 3 months ago by adam-l

[View More]