Some of you might get distracted by her beauty. Some of you might get distracted by her Red Pill ish kinda maybe sounding message. I implore you to please put your dick back in your pants and your cape back into the closet.
Just listen to this bitch.... ?♂️
She knows that men want submissive women, but she expects you to do all the work to inspire her submissiveness.
No you silly cunt, that's not how this works.
Men and women feed off one another and balance each other. This is a two way street.
What you desire is a one way street. That's why you will be alone.
Because even if you manage to find the dream man who you describe here. Even if you manage to marry him. Sooner or later, he too will become mundane in your mind. With your attitude, he will then lose the privilege of your submission and you will turn into a cunt like all cunts.
Look around your community. Look at the alpha guys she describes and their wives who look pretty like this bitch. Look at how submissive they are at the start. Look at how this devolves over time.
It has to devolve. Because no man can live up to such an impossible standard. Not in the long run.
You know what your great grandmother did?
She was yielding and respectful to ALL men and highly submissive to her husband. That's why she had a much better marriage that lasted a lifetime.
He did his part and acted masculine. She did her part and acted feminine. They fed off each other and it lasted forever.
But this? Nah. This can't last.
And if you try to fill the role she describes, you WILL get exhausted.
Lady, just buy a cat and a dildo. You're going to need it.
Cheers!
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago Stickied
This video will expire after a day. If someone wants to archive it for longer, be my guest.
moorekom Mod 1y ago
I'm coming to the thread late, as usual, and see that the video has expired. While I don't know how this woman looks or what she demands, I know the type. They're not feminine. They try to negotiate their faux-femininity hoping to find an actual masculine man. They often fail.
orbilius 1y ago
Women want masculine men, and I don’t begrudge them that preference. But imagine a man who wasn’t masculine at all claiming that he totally would be … for the right woman
Queue the laugh track.
Everyone knows it doesn’t work that way.
Lone_Ranger 1y ago
And another thing....she says that she would be willing and ready to be submissive for 'the right man' (rich man). But here's the problem: she would have no idea how to be submissive. Its not something you just turn on, once you hit the wall and have run out of options. You either are, or you're not. And she's clearly not. I've met women like her a million times. She's an entitled, stuck up, gold digger.
I guarantee you that she is completely delusional about how attractive she is. Look carefully, she's covered in make up, hair is dyed and treated etc. Wash off all that make up and she's a 7. That's fine, nothing wrong with being a 7. But her problem is that for the last 10 years men have been chasing her, buying her drinks, DM'ing her, chatting her up, buying her dinner, and generally giving her a pussy pass in everything that she does. All that attention has given her the impression that she is some sort of prize. She doesn't realise that all the attention she ever got was from men who just wanted to pump and dump her.
whytehorse2021 1y ago
Either Rollo or Kevin Samuels called this "conditional femininity". The rebuke to these women is "what are you right now?" because that's all that really matters. Oh, you're fat but you'll lose weight for the right man? Next!
lurkerhasarisen Mod 1y ago
A woman is duty-bound submit to two men
The family patriarch before she's married and her husband after she's married.
Father and child are ranks ... husband and wife are ranks. When I was a military officer and I gave an order to a subordinate, I didn't have to negotiate compliance. My sergeants didn't get to decide if I was "colonel enough" that day before they decided to do what I told them to do.
I have no problem with people having standards, and if a woman knows that she's going to have a hard time submitting to a particular man, she shouldn't marry him, because once the rings go on, she no longer gets to choose: submission is her duty.
Obligatory "wives aren't doormats." I would never even think about making a decision of any magnitude without consulting my wife to get her take on it, but at the end of the day we both know that all final decisions are mine to make and my responsibility.
That's not some unstated thing that we "just understand," either: that is an explicitly-stated attribute of our marriage. The fact is that every relationship has a leader no matter how much people screech about their "marriage of equals." As a practical matter, unless the husband has explicit authority, the wife is in charge when they can't agree.
That agreement is the grease on the wheels of a peaceful marriage: there are very few things upon which we disagree, and we're both very easy-going people, so we can almost always come to a mutually-favorable consensus, anyway, but on the rare occasions when it has to be one way or the other, the call is mine to make and she falls into line. I honestly can't remember the last time that happened, though. In fact, I'm not sure it ever has except over trivial matters.
My duty is to put her needs ahead of mine (whether she sees it that way or not in any particular case). There is a perfect balance between authority and responsibility.
None of this is new: Christian matrimony has been governed by those rules for thousands of years, although people tend to screw it up by thinking they can improve on it. They can't.
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago
Yeahbutttt.... in a marriage, that's abuuuuuuuuuse....
This used to be the standard expectation. Today's wymynz were "liberated" from this.... that's why we have a constant stream of content around here.
Einsamer 1y ago
She's wrong. Women will always like the top 10% men. Even if all men improve tenfold, there will still not be more "good men" since women will continue to only like the top 10%.
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago
"Always" is a word that connotes consistency.
Consistency is a tool of the patriarchy!!!
And here lies the catch. Let's say you're in the top 1% of all men. You're rich and fit and have all the qualities that all women want in a man.
You get your woman and you get married. You know what happens next?
She will get used to you. You are no longer this mystical creature. Eventually, she too will get booooooooooooord and unhaaaaaaaaaaaaapy.
Just look around and you'll see it everywhere.
lurkerhasarisen Mod 1y ago
You're correct. Right now we see a lot of women saying that a man needs to be six feet tall and make six figures ($100,000) to be considered a "High Value Man." However, if everyone's fairy godmother waved a magic wand and every man grew six inches overnight and got a $50,000 raise while leaving women unchanged, women would not rejoice that suddenly 90%+ of men had become "High Value Men"... they would just change their requirements to 6'6" and $150,000.
Lone_Ranger 1y ago
You have to listen carefully and translate what she is saying, because women use a lot of euphemisms: She is saying
"I would be submissive to a man who on a mission, who has purpose, has integrity, strong, powerful"
This is all woman-talk for "rich". She is telling everyone that she would lay down for a rich man. Which is the same as saying "I am a whore".
She clearly says "I'm not going to be submissive for a nice guy" - she has no interest in men who would treat her well but are committing the unforgivable sin of having average wealth / earnings.
Side note: she says that the first problem is that there are 'not enough of the good men around'. Let me translate that for you - the 'good men' (rich) have got great 'bitch detectors' and filter out gold digging cunts quite well - there are plenty of good (rich) men around, but none of them are interested in her.
mattyanon 1y ago
True, but that is actually pretty much how it works. You have to be super hot, and then she gets all submissive and nice.
Here's what really happened:
DEAD FUCKING BEDROOM.
Women demanded marriage before sex, then turned down sex after it's too late. Happens now, happened then.
Loneliness-inc Mod 1y ago
No. This isn't how it works. That's the whole point! In a sane world, it doesn't work this way.
Women never carried responsibility like men, but that doesn't mean that they weren't responsible for anything at all. It's only in the retarted modern world that we live in, that people expect women to get away with zero responsibility.
If you act this way, you'll get this type of woman. You will invest ALL the work, only for her to ignore you, because meh, she wasn't in the moooooooooood.
Once again, you're mistaken. You're making assumptions based upon the ideals of the world we live in today - where the terms "obligation, duty, responsibility" are dirty words for women.
Stop perpetuating the toxicity.
mattyanon 1y ago
But we now live in clown world. We don't live in a sane world. The inmates are running the asylum.
You invest in yourself, not in her.
No, I'm going by the culture that prevailed 30 years ago... women were expected to have no interest in sex. They married betas for support, and were never interested in fucking them, so they pretended to not be interested in sex with anyone.