Recently, u/Dorinus2 wrote a post about his thoughts on the stigma of prostitution (which was removed due to poor formatting and errors). This post is, in part, an answer and an extended thought exercise. You can view his post on mgtow [here]( https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/jv5u0a/the_prostitution_plantation_how_women_use_stigma/).

u/Dorinus’s claim is that women stigmatize prostitution to limit men’s access to sex. This is very true, but it is only part of the equation. The big picture with the issue he touched upon is not that prostitution should be legal, but that men's power is in strength and women's power is in sex. Men have, by establishing civilizations, automating away the traditional domestic duties of women and the necessity for male strength, marginalized themselves (or to be more precise, did away with the poor and less able men) and have paved their own way to obsolescence. While men have been busy automating their existence away, women have been consolidating, controlling and utilizing their power better.

When you notice what is happenings in the US after the election, this becomes very clear. I recently read a news article in the AP where various women have boasted how this election was decided by suburban women. I have seen videos of similar nature in youtube as well.^1 When I look at the vocal part of the other side, all I see are desperate people on the street worshiping a narcissist hoping that he will save them instead of asking the real questions and taking necessary measures collectively to hold the establishments that have let them down accountable. Clearly, this unwillingness to accept defeat is a big problem on more than one venue. Esthar Villar, in her book Manipulated Man, made a very troubling and accurate observation:

“As absurd as it may sound, today's men need feminism much more than their wives do. Feminists are the last ones who still describe men the way they like to see themselves: as egocentric, power-obsessed, ruthless and without inhibitions when it comes to satisfying their instincts. Therefore the most aggressive Women's Libbers find themselves in the strange predicament of doing more to maintain the status quo than anyone else. Without arrogant accusations, the macho man would no longer exist, except perhaps in the movies. If the press stylise men as rapacious wolves, the actual sacrificial lambs of this "men's society", men themselves, would no longer flock to the factories so obediently.”

Men need feminists more than women, for only they regard men the way they want to regard themselves: as powerful, patriarchal oppressors. But the truth is something else entirely. The reason behind the perpetuation of this myth is, as she notes, because of the unwillingness of men to accept the bitter reality. Thanks to the progress men have made, women no longer need men. Or to be more precise, they no longer need average and below average men. We all know that "Where are all the good men" is a [not a cry for a lack of good men, but for the dearth of superior men]( https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre/comments/96iini/what_good_men_are/). By providing women with special privileges and by treating them as perpetual children, men will only further do away with their own power. Remember Warren Farrell's words: “Men’s greatest weakness is their facade of strength, and women’s greatest strength is their facade of weakness.” Every special privilege that is granted to women stems from the assumption that men hold an unfair advantage over women and have unjustly exploited this advantage to keep them down. This is far from the truth. But men would rather believe that because it makes them feel stronger. The topic of prostitution is no exception to this phenomenon.

Contrary to popular opinion, women do not have a problem with prostitution, provided that they are not obligated to provide a service in return. All you have to do to understand that is to look at the rise of online prostitution over the last few months. Women have no problem sexualizing themselves and selling themselves, provided they don’t have to fuck someone for the money they get from them. Women do not want to stigmatize prostitution; they want to stigmatize and do away with fucking undesirable men out of obligation. This is why women are fine with whores doing “real work” but consider men who pay these prostitutes (to satiate their needs) as less than. In their eyes, a man who has to pay for pussy is not an exceptional man and in a world that does not really need average men, all he is good for is his ability to spoil her with his money.

Women do not desire men whom they perceive to be below them. The entire world tells women, even if she is nothing but a whore, that she is better than most men just because she is a woman. As hard times come by, expect more women to embrace online prostitution, call themselves brave, better, breath-taking and to be utterly miserable in the pit they will dig themselves into.

PS:

^1 According to this WSJ opinion article, this is not true.

By now everyone has heard that President Trump did worse in the suburbs and better with minorities than in 2016. While technically true, the suburban swing occurred before the 2018 midterms, and the minority shift was relatively small, except for Hispanic voters in Florida and the border towns of Texas. Some surprising findings have been overlooked. Mr. Trump’s margin of victory among white women increased from 11 to 13 points, according to CNN’s final adjusted exit polls. But his advantage among white men narrowed from 30 points to 23.

Mr. Biden won almost all the liberals and Mr. Trump the conservatives. But Mr. Biden expanded the Democratic lead among moderates to 30 points from 12 in 2016—the single most significant change. Moderate men swung the race to Mr. Biden.