New essay at The Rational Male:
https://therationalmale.com/2017/12/18/dangerous-times-part-1/
Excerpt:
Articles of Belief
Shortly after I wrote Yes Means Fear I wrote Hysteria, an essay intended to address the disgraceful (now thoroughly proven) UVA fraternity rape hoax story written by Sabrina Erdley and published by a complicit Rolling Stone Magazine. Just daring to question the validity of so outrageous a rape account was heresy to women back then. Bear in mind this took place after the Yes Means Yes consent ruling in California. At this time, just to question the story of a woman’s rape account was enough to earn you the title of ‘rape apologist’. But moreover, we were popularly expected to repeat this mantra and always accept a woman’s account as infallibly true:
“No matter what Jackie said, we should automatically believe rape claims.” http://t.co/3HFlXR7jme True insanity pic.twitter.com/AFXIyn32FS
This was the sentiment (now deleted) tweeted by Zerlina Maxwell on December 6th, 2014. Since then this meme that anything a woman had to say about sexual assault must be believed by default has snowballed into a default belief that anything a woman alleges against a man must also be believed. Whereas a male college student might stand in front of his kangaroo court at a university, now men must stand in front of the kangaroo court of public opinion where a woman’s word outweighs all pretense of due process. That college kid is now the average man who must prove his innocence because if a woman alleges it due process is reversed.
What we’ve witnessed in just 3 years is the systematic removal of a man’s right to habeas corpus with regard to women’s allegations.
And I expect that this removal will extend to much more than just women’s believability in regard to sexual misconduct. Imagine a culture where it’s expected that anything a woman accuses her ex of is to be believed in divorce proceedings.
We’re now seeing exactly what myself, Deti, Dalrock and countless other Red Pill bloggers and commenters predicted would happen, but it’s also so much more that what we could see coming. In just 3 years Yes Means Yes moved off the campus and into mainstream culture; a culture predicated on female social primacy. In a feminine-primary social order even “affirmative consent” isn’t enough – “enthusiastic consent” must now be established and maintained. That “enthusiastic consent” is a new ambiguously defined terminology, and part of the larger narrative meant to further confuse and instill fear in men.
THERichMassa 6y ago
I just did this topic on my facebook live post. I said eventually women will be too much of a liability to hire for fear of a sexual harassment suit. Then they will sue for not being hired because of being a woman. then there will be no men in charge of business and nothing will get done lol.
Surprisingly many women on my page agreed this is getting out of hand. I really think the news only glorifies the extreme and this is not the normal thinking among most women.
soulcatcher357 6y ago
I just finished a divorce that took 4 years. It's extremely slanted towards the woman already.
Hollerich 6y ago
More men will gravitate to a MGTOW lifestyle. But anyone who thinks that things will change is naive. Things are getting worse, not better. Feminism is now the state religion in Canada, Australia and the UK. And women make up the majority of voters.
[deleted]
st3roids 6y ago
Your giving too much fucks about women.
I can understand rollo and the others are making money of it so they will continue doing it.
but for everyone else don't give a fuck attotideu is the best you can do
Hollerich 6y ago
Yes. It's a business for Rollo, but many men on the Red Pill Reddit still pander to women. PUAs are still driven by women. MGTOW makes the most sense. It's just way too fuckin' risky to get involved with women, especially in the feminized Western countries.
[deleted] 6y ago
Don't Date and Don't Marry its very Simple. Doing Things Makes you Happy not a Woman i know we all have those feelings of wanting to do something with women but we should probably just ignore those feelings and move on and try to find happiness without them like they have without us
i learned a long time ago that if someone doesn't want you(women,girls) if someone doesn't want to be with you then they should be left alone and ignored.
Coming from a young guy that does get looks from the Opposite Gender but that just refuses to be used up dumped and destroyed :/ F*ck them all really what else can i say.
Prey-drive 6y ago
While I understand where your feelings come from, I believe you're adopting a defeatist attitude and it will infect other parts of your life.
IDGAF is a valid mindset which can help you, but not when it comes from denial "Well I didn't want that a lot of hot sex anyway".
Yeah...right...keep telling yourself that.
Imagine failing at an interview. Would you say "if someone doesn't want to hire you then they should be left alone and ignored"?
You shouldn't. You should learn from that for your next interview.
[deleted] 6y ago
we deserve better then them and better then that. you can't win if they have all the Rules Set up if everything is in their Favor, no of course i don't want that sex not just from anyone but sadly the person i want it with is a Unicorn she isn't real AWALT right :)
we don't need them to be happy if they want to be left alone then they should and maybe someday they will realize everything and change but even if they don't we should still go our own way devote time to ourselves and try to be happy there is that saying that everyone knows you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
We can't make them love us no matter how much we think we can we can't make them not cheat on us we can't make them do anything so spending the rest of our lives trying when we can take care of ourselves is just a waste of our time tnx though for your comment i agree i shouldn't give up but my giving up won't change anything their still going to be the same.
MattyAnon Admin 6y ago
As due process is removed and the female is default-believed, there is even less pressure on women themselves to speak the truth and the whole truth.
Ten years ago a girl might doubt herself slightly... "is this true? is this what really happened?" But no more. The female instinct to portray herself as a victim (and get attention and validation) neatly meshes with society's default response of "men are rapist bastards abusing our innocent wimminz"
As the barrier to proof lessons, false accusations multiply. Not just because more interactions are above the ever-lowering bar, but because women have yet another motivation to falsely accuse: women are now pressured by society to conform to the narrative of "Hey, I'm attractive too, I've been harassed too! I'm a victim too! #metoo".
Part of this lowering the barrier on proof, is a simultaneous lowering of the barrier of the definitions. What was rape .... changed into "rape or sexual assault"... which morphed into "rape or sexual assault or harassment".
Each time the story leads with rape and ends with the current minimum definition of some kind of oppression. This is how we get to "50% of girls are raped on campus" - a simple abbreviation of "50% of college girls are raped or assaulted or harassed or felt uncomfortable."
There is no requirement on a woman to provide any proof, nor even to make a statement about what happened. In fact a statement about not remembering is enough: "I blacked out, I can't remember anything". A clever statement that cannot be refuted, cannot be disproved, and yet proves in the court of public opinion that the man drugged and raped her.
The fundamental driver is removal of female responsibility for her actions, pushing all responsibility onto men. Whatever happens between a man and a woman, women universally agree that the man is to blame for any and all results, including her subsequent regret.
Responsibility used to be on women to say "no" if she wanted to claim rape. This responsibility has been removed. No longer does she have to verbalise lack of consent. No longer does she even have to verbalise actual consent. She can decide after the fact.... years after the fact.... whether her consent was in fact enthusiastic enough, and she can base that on her future feelings. "But did you enthusiastically scream yes?" her friends will ask, which is more than the police or the public will subsequently ask of her.
Women side with women. Whiteknights, weak betas and naive BP fools side with women. Everyone agrees women are right and men are wrong.
And this is the intended result: women are not to be held responsible for their actions. They are not to be held responsible at any cost - including the destruction of male lives.
redpillschool Admin 6y ago
Women have always used their fickle emotional states to define reality around them. Society as a whole has never before been so stupid to simply believe it. There has never been pressure on a woman to speak the truth, just an understanding that they won't.
MattyAnon Admin 6y ago
If there is one fact that underpins and causes the majority of problems for men today, it's the myth of gender equality.
By pushing the lie that "men and women are equal and if you don't agree we will ostracise you as sexist", women persuade men to believe that women and men are somehow similar.
This inflates female value by making men believe they are as honest, loyal, reliable or emotionally stable as men.
It's as you say... the understanding that women lie has been replaced with the expectation that every word they speak must be the truth. The lie of gender equality blinds men to this obvious fact.
Luckyluke23 6y ago
i'd like to know what their end game is? what do you feel WILL be there and game? how do you see the next 5-10 years playing out and do you think they even know what their end game is? or are they just " seeing what they can get away with?"
[deleted] 6y ago
if you define your terms vaguely, it will let you use the rules against things they weren't meant to be used for originally. That's the end game. Make a ton of open ended rules you can use to oppress the people you consider your enemies and take their power. The end.
redd_reality 6y ago
"Innocent until proven guilty" and "every person is equal in the court of law" are philosophical values which represent the foundation of western society freshly constructed out of the chaos of tyrannical war.
Hard men who reflect the pinnacle of masculine virtue derived these tenets. As men continue to be emasculated and feminine primacy washes over the west, those tenets will be erased. It will be a god damn witch hunt and the guillotines will continue to fall until the whole thing inevitably implodes.
imElnumerouno 6y ago
What I'm learning is simple, I'm beginning to view my desire of women the same as a desire for any harmful drug. It can be fun, but there could be bad consequences. Married for the second time, and this time I'm learning that a women will never be happy unless you can stay on your feet 100% of the time and constantly wow her. Marriage that I had in my head was not real. Now that I know the truth, I don't think the juice is worth the squeeze. Really thinking MGTOW might be good... The world of women has become to dangerous...
Nirvanablue92 6y ago
Are you scared of danger or are you brave in the face of it?
shithawk413 6y ago
Dunno man im with a great girlfriend got divorced a few years ago. Shes a southern girl comes from a close loving family treats me fucking amazing. They are out there but definitly hard to find nowdays.
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
Marry her and let us know how she treats you in about six months.
shithawk413 6y ago
Probably the same way her mom treats her dad they have been married 30 years.
OneRedSock 6y ago
Different times, dude.
Women essentially crowd-source for the proper response to any situation, especially the more unknown the situation. That is to say, when she isn't sure how she should respond to something you do that she thinks pisses her off or confuses her, she'll consult friends/family.
How many times I've seen girls go from neutral on a topic to rage-mode simply because a friend indicates that's the proper response. The opposite can happen, too. They can be very easy to manipulate if you're a trusted source. If the trusted source is against you, look out.
If she's consulting new-age feminist friends, you're fucked. Best hope she's looking to her mom for the answers to relationship advice.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Going MGTOW is the safest choice.
ETHer_ium 6y ago
Going Mgtow and fucking hookers.
CountVP 6y ago
Hookers are a blessing from heaven. Americans are fucked because they cannot acess hookers legally, we in brazil don't have this problem. Here any beta dude can just pay up and get pussy, so women are way less orbited. This regulates the marketplace to a point.
cherryCanSuckMyDick 6y ago
arent hookers legal in parts of the States, just not all?
CountVP 6y ago
I know they are legal in Nevada (LAs Vegas area), but most states ban them.
ETHer_ium 6y ago
Same here in germany. Its the bordell of europe here ????
CountVP 6y ago
Out of curiosity, how much does a decent bitch cost in germany? Here is 170 dollars an hour at their apartment. (still cheaper than going out three times to smash some girl playing hard to get)
ETHer_ium 6y ago
I paid 40€ for half an hour yesterday night. There are even some taking 30€/30 mins. For an "Edelnutte" you need to pay tousands of € tho.
[deleted]
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
Sure it does. Habeus is a special writ that permits a judge to command the jailors to bring a defendant before him usually to review whether he can be released. Habeus Would Apply in almost every single college me too case.
Bring me the body so his continued persecution can be assessed.
amekooky 6y ago
Ben shapiro said it best
all crimes are bad and immoral including this type of harassment but you wouldnt punish a shoplifter the same way you would punish a murderer. men are getting their careers ruined regardless of the severity of their action.
JackGetsIt 6y ago
Not only should there be degree of punishment but even a shoplifter deserves to defend themselves in a court of law and demand evidence be present of his or her guilt.
Ben also did a great piece on how women have been trading sex for roles since the start of Hollywood.
BlastCorporation 6y ago
They can enthusiastically consent to you expatriating to a country that treats Men better. Opt out completely if you can.
cherryCanSuckMyDick 6y ago
lmao fucking where?
Theres nowhere left on Earth thats good for men anymore. We have members from South America who report the same kangaroo courts for "sexual harrassment". China is the exact same way, only under a frigging marxist government. From talking with a Russian friend of mine I can tell Russia is only a decade behind us in the march to blue thinking.
[deleted]
[deleted]
TheBunk_TB 6y ago
Maoist, Chairman Mao. I follow you, though.
TheBunk_TB 6y ago
Maoist, Chairman Mao. I follow you, though.
TheBunk_TB 6y ago
Maoist, Chairman Mao. I follow you, though.
TheBunk_TB 6y ago
Maoist, Chairman Mao. I follow you, though.
BlastCorporation 6y ago
Philippines the Woman cannot get divorce without the Man's consent. Period. China divorce is frowned upon especially if a Woman starts the process unless there is severe abuse. Do your research brother.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
BlastCorporation 6y ago
In many other countries adultery on part of the Wife means the marriage is automatically dissolved and the Man gets custody of the children and the Woman gets ZERO alimony or anything. She is out on her butt in the street. And her family will disown her.
Happens all the time in China, India and Indonesia. In South Korea the judges are very stingy in awarding any child support or alimony most times unless the Man is rich and the Woman is broke. Even then they don't give much.
PS2Errol 6y ago
In that environment it makes it even more important not to marry or cohabit with a woman. Also, have no meetings where you are alone with women or otherwise placed in a potentially awkward situation.
You stand no chance if accused (of almost anything) and will be destroyed by the law.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
metallicdrama 6y ago
I shit where I eat. Zero fucks given. When most won’t you have zero competition. Fuck it.
[deleted] 6y ago
This is me minus the AK47. I don't need to express my own suffering. but a few paragraph of manifesto I do have.
If I am striving to be rich (in material and spiritual) so I don't have a nagging boss, a hungry belly, thirst, coldness, then I would say I don't need women. They need me. Not for food, water, or shelter, but because their superficial is the mundane and I strive to be nothing of the sort...
One day I will have complete freedom, that in itself is a powerful aphrodisiac; a contrast to material wealth and the many distractions we used to ease our live's sufferings.. there would be so much volume in my life that people would be drawn to it. What people lack they want.
So to say people want what they cannot have, and an attainment of freedom means being independent rather than dependent on others. It means being someone that don't need to have others, and so is able to give, give, and give yourself without feeling scarce (what is there to be scarce of when you don't need anything. How true can you be if you have nothing to lose).
The more you give the more you get in return, and one of the return is people's attention that spawns care. And so people are drawn to those who have complete freedom, which is defined as having enough mental and physical fortitude to withstand live's innate suffering. Relatively then it would be easy to attain material wealth, since the perspective about chasing money changes to the desire to help others, a desire that manifests after realizing you do not need to take from the world.
And when you start doing the opposite of taking, which is giving, people start caring likewise and give you the value (like money) that you don't even need. You made their life better. You are a hero in their books. It all starts with attaining freedom. And then maybe realizing is not the money you keep but the confidence, that gives you the ability to give.
[deleted] 6y ago
Honestly, 2.5 months post break up with a nagging harpy who sucked at sex and the fun out of anything else in life for that matter, my life is so much more peaceful and calm. I had a living room I never used for the 10 months we lived together as the bitch took it over with hgtv, the bachelor,dr phil on my 60 inch tv as well as the rest of the house minus my computer room. A man can only take that shit so long. I maneuvered myself into a position to force her hand to end it to avoid backlash and get her to move out rather than me having to. I disinguaged and became selfish. Gave her no attention and my love life was focused on pornhub and not her. This drove her nuts and she always was forced to initiate sex and often times Id say I am too tired and passed out (used her own excuses against her). Reason for this is I shat where I eat and dated a coworker. Lesson learned but my exit strategy worked flawlessly as she believes I am the rejected one. I honestly have gone on one date since she left and that short 1 hour was enough to say nope, the cost/reward is not in my favor to waist my time on these cunts in my generation. I have finally got myself in a position of being comfortably self sufficient and I do not need to tolerate a woman's bs to have a relationship or share expenses. The extra cost of being alone is well worth it. MGTOW has called this shit for years. Women always came easy for me but I think I am due for a hiatus until sanity resumes. If it doesn't, oh well I like flying solo.
Hollerich 6y ago
Like Barbarossa used to say, "The juice isn't worth the squeeze."
UncleWarwick 6y ago
It’s already having shitstorm potential.
The reproductive rate for population growth has been in a downfall since the 70s in the US and it just hit below the number (2.1 kids per female IIRC) for sustainable population growth.
Less people are having babies, less babies are being had by people who are having babies, and let’s be honest - the people who should be having babies are probably the ones who aren’t.
cherryCanSuckMyDick 6y ago
Not just growth, thats below the maintenance level.
BewareTheOldMan 6y ago
At some point, this #Me Too bullshit is going to systematically drive many guys into a spiral away from engaging women at all.
Too late - it's already happening. Social Media posts, articles, news reports, and discussions asking men "to understand" are not going to help women.
As a group men are very pragmatic when it comes to situations where he can lose everything he worked for based on someone else's words or accusation.
Most men respond with very simple countermeasures of limiting interaction with women to necessity and nothing else. There is already chatter about women not being hired or being approached for romantic interest.
Women don’t understand. Men don’t physically fight with women, or make stupid signs and march in the streets - men disengage.
On another note: #MFIGTOW - TM that before someone else does...
red_matrix 6y ago
Men disengage. You already see it in developed nations like Japan, and the men aren't fighting back - they're completely demoralized and their IDGAF level is though the roof.
Martel_732_Tours 6y ago
You'd be surprised what most men are willing to endure for a supply of pussy.
[deleted] 6y ago
Except, porn. Dudes today have grown up satisfying themselves with porn and video games. This is way different than what hordes of rejected unattached young men might have been capable of maybe 50 years ago.
They will just stay disengaged. Dudes don’t bar fight like they used too. They just go home and jerk off to some top quality porn of their choosing.
sqerl 6y ago
Today's social marketing climate allows for the dissemination of unvetted ideas which are only meant to trigger feelings, thus thoughts and behaviours. SJW/feminists can spew their rage, but truth inevitably wins out in the end. In other words, by the very nature of feelings-first, when their feelings change, so will winds of the social climate. The path forward isn't easy; it's never easy. But being a man is never easy. Embrace the suck, lift, and work towards your purpose. Raise your SMV to attract while being mindful of the pitfalls.
A high value man will always be in demand. Women's feelings will dictate behaviour to attract a high quality man. Men being forced to give up is giving in to a never ending shit test. See it for what it is and maintain frame. There's a reason top level CEOs are mostly men. Be the top level CEO of your life. Build wealth, build power, behave accordingly.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
RHIP. the only term the MRA needs to internalize.
The rest is begging for table scraps
Hjalmbere 6y ago
Still, the stakes are higher. Never has it been easier than now for a woman to ruin a man.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
Don't apologize, have game.
This crap doesn't affect you. It shouldn't
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Hollerich 6y ago
Feminism is a subgroup of Marxist action planning designed to make relations between the sexes difficult, disempower men within society, and bring chaos to civil government. It has also created abortion (145 million White babies murdered since 1971 in the West) and opened the door to transgender issues, mass immigration, and low birth rates. It was the biggest player in the death of Western Civilization.
redditer0 6y ago
I don't know much about marxism but I don't think Marx really liked bankers...
Riproaringrampage 6y ago
Yep, those Communist Jewish Wall Street Bankers also want to institute Sharia Law in Murica. What's with rightwingers swarming all over these subreddits. Inequality caused most of the issues being discussed smh.
[deleted] 6y ago
Inequality has always existed. Even worse in bygone eras. What do you think happened to the tribal betas?
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
I've been there in divorce. All my ex-wife had to do was to lie. In Texas there's actually a separate court in place for Family Violence. There's no jury trial. You don't have to have a strong burden of evidence.
There is no presumed innocence. It's presumed guilt.
And all this happened after I left, and wouldn't go back. Let's just say I was sort of one of those who are natural red pills. I never even heard of The Red Pill til fairly recently. Basically I hated her and didn't want to fuck her anymore, or raise my kids in a house where the parents hated each other.
100% I had lost frame and knew that I couldn't get it back-- not that I actually even had the desire to get it back with the shrew that my wife had become. I didn't know the terminology or what maintaining frame really meant, but I just felt that instinctively. She tried to get me to come back for a while and when she saw it was clear that I wouldn't, she told the courts that I beat the shit out of my kids and I beat the shit out of her and that she was afraid I would come kill her.
Boom, done. That's all it took for her to get a restraining order. There's a lot more to the story but I digress. The point is we now live in a climate where that's able to happen. Due process has been crapped right down the toilet. No one cares.
The men that are part of the system are the most beta cucks you can imagine. You should have seen the judge that took her side in the whole thing. What a feminized piece of work that guy was.
JackGetsIt 6y ago
Men need to stop fighting each other and get together and fix this shit.
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
The problem is that the type of men that are the judges in this case are like the dudes you see wearing shirts that say feminist. They're the top of the white knight heap and enjoying it
redowl023 6y ago
And those will be the only men left occupying high powered positions right beside the woman who replaced the man who ogled her in an "inappropriate" manner.
How can a man not become so internally enraged and depressed by what has transpired from all of this. As a man, I feel very, very sad for our future and all of those little boys that will have to endure this pain. If I ever had a child, I would pray to god I had a daughter. This is all so wrong.......
JackGetsIt 6y ago
We have the power to form social movements and to elect redpill judges and redpill politicians.
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
No we dont. Manginas and women are a clear majority.
JackGetsIt 6y ago
I have a feeling there are a lot of angry bluepillmen ready to switch teams. Also not every women votes blue pill. I'm not a Trump supporter myself but even with his locker room talk and negative press related to women 61 percent of non-college educated women voted Trump and 43 percent of college educated women voted Trump. So just because a candidate is a women or a bluepill advocate doesn't mean women will automatically vote for them. In fact I think there's a small but growing consortium of women that are sick of the #metoo and modern feminism. They might not necessarily be redpill women but there's some political capital to fix the issues we are having if they are framed properly.
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
I hope you are right but I will keep whistling past the graveyard until the tombstones are in my rear view mirror.
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
You have a good point. But something interesting has happened in this case. I haven't had any personal sway as far as the judge goes for the possible case of a relative who may have connections. This relative is exactly what you would think of the most left-wing feminist radical. But also being a blood relative she has a different view of the situation and sees exactly how the system aligned to screw not only me but also my family out of the ability to see my children for an extended period of time. Anyways she has an overlapping Social Circle with the judge who is it typical beta you may expect. Super liberal and married to a high-power liberal wife blah blah blah
JackGetsIt 6y ago
I'm sorry that you were up against such a high level of weaponized false victimhood. I had something similar in my divorce. My ex whipped up lie after lie to turn both families against me. Thank god I didn't have to deal with the court system. I hope you make it/made it through in one piece.
I wrote about this social pressure flip in this post titled "Why girls always complain they were used for sex when they get dumped" a few months ago. I can't link it here but you can search for it if you're interested.
[deleted]
banjew 6y ago
Exactly the same here in a god-forsaken latin-american country.
Bitch I was dating (not even fucking) started to hate on me, she goes to family court and says I harass her at work. I went no-contact with her a year ago, but it doesn't matter. She told the judge that I was insulting somebody "And I'm sure its me", and now I have a restraining order. Mind you, this order prevents me for going to work, and she knows this very well.
She didn't even had to lie that much. In her declaration, she says very clearly that I didn't contacted her in a year. It doesn't matter, she got her restraining order anyway.
gELSK 6y ago
// , Which country? I can remember to stay faaar away.
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
That sucks man. Women will do anything to get what they want with no conscience. My ex was definitely BPD.
What country are you in?
Dmva100 6y ago
The goal of over broadening the definition of sexual assault, is to ruin the reputations of men to keep them from obtaining high status positions in the workplace, politics etc., or removing them from such positions.
This is especially true on college campuses. If a girl tells a college counselor a guy looked at her the wrong way, they can suspend him, tarnish his record before he can graduate , and he won't get that STEM job he was going for, and that position just MIGHT be available for the women now!
If women can't use the pleasure of sex to sway the men of power, they will instead use it as a badge of victimhood to tear them down, true or not. The women who shame anyone who dare question something 'awful' as unwanted sexual advances, contact, etc. are those who fear the loss of power from such accusations. Odds are those women are ham planets that cannot secure the men they want. The men who stand behind the women on such issues are just beta cucks looking for a whiff of poon by conforming to feminist propaganda and being PC.
We are seeing a change in how sex is used for power. The less incentive for men to commit to women (marriage) the more incentive women will have to use sex as a reputation destruction tool as an effort to weaponize sex by using the law in a different way. Choose committment and or marriage for legal provisioning for your woman, or go to jail and lose everything you work for in your life that you refuse to give to women.
leviathan51 6y ago
So.. is it so bad in America? No way to defend against this?
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
The defense is mgtow. Men don't fight women. We walk away. First psychologically, then emotionally and finally physically. Men began walking away with third wave feminism when we began to mentally check out. With me too men are emotionally disengaging from all women.
Next up and coming fast is a complete sexedus.
[deleted] 6y ago
She will simply accuse you to get you out of the way or to extract resources you control.
dr_warlock 6y ago
Sex for women is about power. If they cannot use it to get you to do what they want, they will use it as a weapon to tear you down. Sex is all a woman has. She will defend it till the grave, she will weaponize it when desperate. The state will aid her 110% not because they care about protecting women, but because they love a virtue signaling excuse to oppress the populace. How is someone going to publicly argue against that to the masses (50%+ women + betas).
[deleted]
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
My brother is going through this right now. He was broken before he met her, he's on the edge now. He refuses to listen to anyone his entire life. I try to be there for him but he doesn't want it. He'll die trying to piece together his blue pill ideology.
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
Damn dude. I'll say this for myself at least. Despite all the hell she put me through-- getting me thrown in jail, basically having to drop out of grad school, losing my kids, losing my house, carrying this stigma-- staying with her even one more day would have been worse than all of that. I didn't know it was coming but I knew what I was leaving behind. And even though she blindsided me, as soon as she did it it all became really clear exactly what was happening.
Basically I'm saying I don't have the confusion that your brother has. That makes his situation a lot worse than mine.
That plus I've banged 25 women the past two years so there's always that.
BewareTheOldMan 6y ago
Despite all the hell she put me through-- getting me thrown in jail...having to drop out of grad school, losing my kids, losing my house, carrying this stigma [false accusation of family violence]...
That's a lot you endured all because of a false allegation. It’s a crazy and unjust system when burden of proof is so low a man can easily be thrown in jail with zero evidence.
My ex-wife put me through a lot of nonsense, but to her credit she never tried to get me thrown in jail or deny access to my kids.
I suspect her main reason was not to ruin the money stream of child support and other financial benefits I provided despite being divorced. It's astounding how some women can be so petty and illogical they willingly destroy a man at the behest of the system. It’s one of the base reasons TRP parrots the advice of completely avoiding marriage.
All my kids are adults, but I would be very reluctant to marry in the current times knowing how the system is stacked against men. I don’t have to make the decision, but wonder how I would have decided being aware of female nature and behavior as a younger man.
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
She's idiotic. I built her an amazing house from the ground up-- a rental property making $60 k a year passive income on Airbnb. I looked at it the other day and she's mismanaged it into the ground.
We could have cooperated and coparented as a divorced couple, but she is just that unintelligent and has that fragile an ego. But still wants child support.
BewareTheOldMan 6y ago
The house I purchased when married is a mess and barely livable. She's letting it crumble and decay year by year. I don't even want to see it anymore and haven't seen it in years. She only does "emergency repairs."
I've since purchased another home in another country (Central America Region) that's MUCH nicer than the house I literally bought for her and our kids (when they were younger).
Two-Story, 3 BRs, 2.5 Bathrooms in very nice neighborhood with impressive neighbors. She would be angry at me all over again if she sees my current residence. She's already upset I "negotiated" my retirement in the divorce so he has zero access. It sticks in her craw to this day.
PhaedrusHunt 6y ago
Yeah they think that they are owed something forever. This woman literally told me she thought she was a princess until she was about 6 or so. Solipsistic thinking.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
all4gibs 6y ago
“what’s in it for me?” only applies to men in hiring roles
it is also something that only small businesses would need be concerned about. corporations will gladly hire women 2:1
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
all4gibs 6y ago
what? since when is TRP carrying feminist talking points? maybe you’re joking?
there is no legitimate argument that any wage gap is a result of bigotry, nor is there any reliable measure for wage comparisons, nor are there any of these “arguments” when it comes to labor/construction jobs, conveniently
hoomAn12345 6y ago
TLDR: smart men have been making the decision to choose men for the job over women for centuries, or at least when they can. It's the new age of beta fugly fucks that think with their penis more than their brain that are fucking the rest of us.
Never shit where you eat, and if you choose to create a toilet at your work environment you will only have yourself to blame.
This might sound odd but the hiring managers and executives who are the actual predators are fugly beta male who, by their expertise or "alpha" nature in one aspect of their life (business or work) have ended up in a position where they have power. They confused this power with super high SMV.
Let's be very clear at this point. Why are all these women coming out with Weinstein stories now? Although I wouldn't endorse what Selma Hayek went through, she did what she thought she should do to get the movie of her dreams made. She got what she wanted and had to give a lot more (allegedly) to Weinstien. All of this is to say that power in the business world can cover and give you a high SMV but only to a point. Weinstein still has a lower SMV than Chris Hemsworth.
So what's the point im making? Simply put: the beta mindset that she will or must fuck me because I deserve it. I earned it. Or I am powerful and can get her what she wants persists and has now ruined the pussy game for the rest of us. Men who are "redpilled" (not in the super right wing way that it is portrayed these days, but in the classic self improvement and sexual game theory way) know that you never fuck coworkers. Not because you can't but because that headache is not yours to handle. They are smart. Look at the big picture. One night of pussy v. Your career? If you're smart you pick career.
redd_reality 6y ago
That is precisely when the state will step in and force a diversity quota on every employable position.
[deleted] 6y ago
I’m an Economist with the DOJ. I frequently work with the EEOC.
What you are describing would be very expensive behavior. 7 or 8 figure settlements for women who were denied career opportunities by men who feared that time alone with a woman would result in a bogus accusation. And multimillion dollar fines for any employer who either knew of the practice and failed to intervene or should have known about the practice.
A man may have perfectly valid reasons for wanting to protect himself from false allegations. But if doing so costs his company a few million dollars here and there and results in increased regulatory scrutiny, he may not have much of a career ahead of him.
Most men have figured out how to navigate a successful career while avoiding both discriminatory behavior and false accusations. Follow their example. I spent 20 years on Wall Street. Arguably one of the more hostile working environment for women. In that 20 years, I hired and mentored at least 100 women and was never accused of impropriety.
Men need to learn to take some responsibility for their own actions. It isn’t difficult to protect yourself from false allegations without violating federal or state anti-discrimination laws. If you can’t manage, you should be replaced.
[deleted] 6y ago
This is the gold right here. Much of the rest of this thread is revenge porn. If you are a man and manage people in a professional environment, the truth is that you're accountable. End of story.
[deleted] 6y ago
You can’t deny the beautiful irony of a group of men who constantly state that that women are never held accountable for their actions arguing that illegal and discriminatory employment practices are easier and safer than embracing accountability for their own actions.
NYCSPARKLE 6y ago
This is crazy selection bias.
I would argue that most people here aren't the type to be corporate middle managers who need to worry about the DOJ and hiring practices.
These commentors (myself included) are sole proprietors, self-employed people, small business owners, etc. who will think twice about hiring that social media manager or assistant now. And they are not big enough to be harassed by the DOJ for doing so, so they won't be facing fines.
I agree to your point about Wall Street and not having issues there with professional women, but you'd have a hard time keeping a straight face and saying you don't think it's more likely in this day and age for false allegations to occur.
[deleted] 6y ago
I do not really focus on large companies. I spend much more of my time focused on small businesses. As does the EEOC.
I have participated in lawsuits and/or negotiated settlements with sole proprietors, owner-operated businesses, small businesses, etc.. The smaller the business, the fewer legal resources they can afford and the easier my job becomes. Frequently, a single settlement or fine will force a small operation out of business. Large businesses are much more challenging targets because they have an abundance of legal resources and can drag out a case for years.
Further, far more Americans work for small businesses than for large companies. So I can fulfill my mandate of protecting the American worker from discrimination far more efficiently by targeting small businesses.
A dentist who doesn’t want to hire a female receptionist is actually at greater risk than a Fortune 500 mid-level mananger who does the same. The dentist will lose his practice. The executive won’t have to pay a penny.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
I am very thankful that there is an enforcement mechanism for compliance with anti-discrimination laws. Remember, I enforce Title 3 of the ADA. My job is to protect some of the most vulnerable members of society and to help them gain access to public accommodations. I’m damn proud of what I do. I don’t have to work. I do this because I want to.
There are consequences to engaging in illegal, discriminatory behavior. At this point, companies and municipalities have had almost 30 years to comply with Title 3 and make public accomdations accessible. And it would be exceedingly rare for a first violation to result in a fine large enough to close a business or bankrupt a municipality.
Look at it from a different perspective. If you became disabled, would you be satisfied to be cut off from all public accommodations? What if it was your child who was essentially home bound because others didn’t comply with the ADA? What if your mother were gravely ill, but physically unable to enter the hospital? Or the pharmacy or dialysis suite?
If you don’t see the value in what I do, it’s because you have ability privilege. You never had to tell a little girl that story time at the library sounds like fun, but she can’t go because the elevator in the library has been out of order for 3 years. You’ve never needed a ride to work only to have the bus pass you because the driver didn’t want to pick up a wheelchair passenger. You’ve never been an old man who can’t get Meals on Wheels because registration requires climbing 3 flights of stairs more than you can manage.
TheBunk_TB 6y ago
You also showed your hand by using the term "ability privilege"
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
I clearly identified myself, multiple times, as an Economist at the DOJ who works on the enforcement of Title 3 of the ADA.
I also clearly stated, multiple times, that I often advise the EEOC. The EEOC has jurisdiction over discriminatory hiring practices. I have consulted on about a thousand employment discrimination cases, recommending settlements and penalties.
I never changed the subject. You have poor reading comprehension skills, didn’t look at my post history, and/or lack basic knowledge about how the government enforces anti-discrimination laws.
Reformed65 6y ago
It's similar to what Alan Sugar said in regards to a UK law where employers can't ask women if they plan on having children because "discrimination".
Senor_Martillo 6y ago
Well, for starters you only have to pay 77 cents on the dollar!
[deleted]
recon_johnny 6y ago
Certainly it's how I'm looking at the equation. No longer will I look to be social with women with no benefit for me. If I'm going to hookup, that will be a different time and place, and my intent will be obvious.
As well as my protection from invalid claims.
The gals can forget me trying to help them along. Just ain't gonna happen.
general-heartless 6y ago
This assumes that everyone is a logical thinker.
maxrp 6y ago
you forget this is about replacing men.
the law states you must have 50% women in a company, women hire women, women mentor women, women lunch women.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
BluepillProfessor 6y ago
They will use statistics as their proof. If You have 12 male managers and 4 Female Managers And you Spend Lesd Than 20% Of Your Time with The Womminz = sex Discrimination.
Youn cant Won This Game They Have Set Up.
Ganaria_Gente 6y ago
Your comment about fishing boats and sewage plants.... Note: the feminists are replacing men on the so called good jobs. The leadership positions on business and politics and stem. But not the so called lower end jobs.
Welcome to the world of supremacists.
FinancierGuru 6y ago
Good point. Feminists are only interested in high-paying, white collar jobs. They don't want to be your firefighter or plumber.
mugatucrazypills 6y ago
You'll actually see feminist online celebrating how more dangerous jobs kill off men.
juliusstreicher 6y ago
Yeah, it's like the military. A female may be put into a position of leadership over Navy SEALs, while never doing a BUDS course, or, even anything related. She will have all of the glory and none of the risk or work, and then, Congress will use this to show how 'women are capable of doing Navy SEAL work, and should be paid accordingly." Ad nauseum...
jessne1 6y ago
I'm not so optimistic that the pendulum is close to swinging back. This won't be the end of their push to legislate hypergamy. Those men that decide to subconsciously make that choice between which colleague to mentor, whether male or female, will eventually be charged with sexual harassment on the basis of not including women. If they see men deciding not marry or even engage with women on the basis of risk, then they'll come after your money just by saying sexual harassment is based on whatever women decide it is at that day. Not mentoring a woman? Sexual harassment. Disagree with her at a board meeting? Sexual harassment. Things will have to get much worse before a needed mass-influx of betas decide to sack up and swing it the other direction.
[deleted] 6y ago
The pendulum will only swing back when more men start losing interest in women's bullshit and focus on themselves.
BewareTheOldMan 6y ago
Mentoring females is no different than mentoring anyone else.
Simply exercise precaution with application of the "Mike Pence Rule" of no personal interactions with females and his open door policy for office meetings. Everything is conducted in the presence of other witnesses. The Vice Pres. is a smart man indeed.
As a former manager and supervisor I regularly documented employee shortcomings and offered advice for improvement. They also received 90-day counseling highlighting their accomplishments, short and long-term goals, and areas that needed improvement. It doesn’t need to be a specific format other than a memorandum that highlights the aforementioned areas and points of performance. When end of year evaluations are due, the final evaluation is essentially complete. No one was EVER surprised by their annual report by virtue of having received regular mentoring throughout the year.
The no office romance, flirting, or dating coworkers rule is a basic Man-Law. Also - no compliments to unknown or random women lest a man risk being labeled for harassment. Any interaction with a female in a work environment is strictly work-related. This avoids misunderstanding.
Smart men offer compliments to their wife, girlfriend, or close/well-known female family members. Everyone other woman you're NOT having sex with is off limits for compliments. Again - this avoids misunderstanding. Women can't complain of being "uncomfortable" if there are no compliments that might be used to allege harassment.
The bottom line approach is to ensure interactions with unknown and random women are non-sexual and your actions as a man are above reproach.
It's very hard to make accusations, false or otherwise, if the other person has no "material" to begin with.
[deleted] 6y ago
Easier not to mentor women. Besides, mentoring the equivalent man will pay bigger dividends.
Dragon_Garoo 6y ago
TL;DR: "Don't shit where you eat."
Always apropos.
Omnibrad 6y ago
I don't think the pendulum is swinging back.
Affirmative Action is still law. How do you deal? If the minimum is not enough it will be raised. At bigger companies HR is filled with women. The universities are inventing new worlds.
I still think we have a long way to go before men get momentum.
dontgiveupcarib 6y ago
You need to learn about cryptocurrencies. It's 96% male, things will swing back.
[deleted]
dontgiveupcarib 6y ago
It's a brand new world, RP is missing out
TheEagleAndTheSnake 6y ago
I agree. I've held XRP for about three weeks with a few fuckups at the beginning and now I'm sitting at a fine 600% profit.
dontgiveupcarib 6y ago
XRP is great for gains but it actually serves the powers that brainwash the masses into blue pillers. Many coins are working to change society itself. TRPers should get into it.
TheEagleAndTheSnake 6y ago
No monetary revolution is nearby because the same people who are responsible for the brainwashing are the only ones to have a monopoly on violence. No crypto can break the world bankers as of now.
dontgiveupcarib 6y ago
They may not break the bankers but they will chip away at some of their power, so many people in crypto were nobodies with no money who are now worth a lot more.
TheEagleAndTheSnake 6y ago
Look at how much shit they throw at Trump who has a net worth of $3+ billion. Now imagine who those people who got rich off cryptos are, are they ruthless businessmen like Trump is? I'd place my bet on them being mostly smart soy boy nerds with a large ego. The ruling class would have to punish a few and the rest would fall back in line. Would be interested in an opposing argument tho.
redd_reality 6y ago
Men will be forced back into the power position when the beta males and feminists completely fuck society and the chaos of nature reclaims our land.
Then weak men and women will look to the nearest alpha male and beg them to lead them to safety, security and prosperity.
haroldpeters 6y ago
easy solution. Get all the men you hire to sign a formal statement saying they identify as female... beat them at their own game.
nebder 6y ago
HR suggests, hiring managers approve the hire.
goadsaid 6y ago
H.R. is heavily outsourced these days. There's many many firms that will do payroll, hiring, recruitment, mandatory continuing education credits and even job training for numerous companies.
Corporations aren't stupid. They realize those positions are worthless and it's much more efficient to share an H.R. department than hire their own. And these outsourced H.R. departments have a greater incentive to be good because they want to retain their corporate clients. I think the affirmative action days will begin to see their sunset.
gELSK 6y ago
// , The balance between compliance and competence varies with the industry. It may be the case in yours, but in most other white collar jobs, HR has more than just the power of filtration.
turbospeedsc 6y ago
Unless it happens the same thing as in México.....
Here all public office posts must have a 50%+1 Ratio of women, That means that if a political party has 8 districts in a state 5 of their candidates must be woman, also if theres a tie, the post goes to the woman. Now they have these new ideas that the amount of managers at goverment offices should also be these way.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
turbospeedsc 6y ago
Heres a note about the law (spanish)
http://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/politica/pena-anuncia-reforma-para-que-50-de-los-candidatos-a-legisladores-sean-mujeres.html
http://www.animalpolitico.com/2017/11/ine-candidaturas-paridad-genero-indigenas/
[deleted]
NYCSPARKLE 6y ago
I think there are two factors that give me a little optimism.
haroldpeters 6y ago
Does requiring a potential sexual partner to sign a disclaimer stating their consent give you more SMV or less, seeing as you are raising the bar higher.. hmm I wonder
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Metalgear222 6y ago
So assuming 20% of guys can generate that real love, I'd say 80% of women are still going to go the max resources route.
[deleted]
dontbethatguynow 6y ago
HR is there to protect the company, not the employees.
[deleted] 6y ago
HR is made up almost entirely of women. do you REALLY think they would defend a man? any man? if it does not suit their needs/purpose/higher goal? HR is the worst and most misandric department of any company. they do NOT have the companies interest at heart, they have their own. sure, they mask it by hiding behind the "we just want what's good for the company" excuse but c'mon, we know better than that.
dontbethatguynow 6y ago
I guess it depends what business you're in. But ultimately they are there for the people that sign their paychecks. Not the peons.
[deleted] 6y ago
I agree that that's what they should be there for but I've never seen an HR department behave in any other way than kissing ass and taking care 9f themselves first and foremost. I work in IT for the past 15 odd years in lovely misandric and racist Germany where pussy rullz and dicks are persecuted.
dontbethatguynow 6y ago
Thats understandable, i work in a male dominated field (oik). Being nice and having a decent SMV ive had them pull a few favors.
[deleted] 6y ago
Sometimes I wish my SMV was higher. I don't think I'm more than a 6, maybe a 7 ...ow well...
[deleted]
Omnibrad 6y ago
Protect the company from...womens' allegations.
maxrp 6y ago
by escape goating and firing the men. problem solved.
Sad_Larry 6y ago
the proper term is "scape goating" ;)
imElnumerouno 6y ago
I can see if this keeps happening, men are going to awaken. Shit, why wouldn't they? All the men I know that are married are unhappy with their situation. You can only kick a good man so many times... Then his pain will drive him to seek the knowledge of truth. He will, he must seek his true freedom.
maxrp 6y ago
a lot of men dont.
unfortunately such a low rate, not enough to catch on. and most go along with it using it as a tool to take others down a peg or kick them out.
be-ay-be-why 6y ago
This. Even though the pendulum is swinging in the woman's favor, i believe it is still swinging that way and we have yet to experience it in its fullest. We are still at the beginning of it and it will most likely take an iconic male to speak up before it swings the other way.
FinallyRed 6y ago
I think we’ve reached an inflection point. The pendulum still continues in its current direction but it is decelerating.
imElnumerouno 6y ago
To many men are still blind... I was.. Now here i am... Disgusted by what I can see of my past, now that im learning the truth. So there, mark another man that has awoken
[deleted]
scissor_me_timbers00 6y ago
Shits not gonna improve in the foreseeable future. Just look at trump. He shit on PC culture and it just galvanized them. The culture is fubar.
Hillarysdilddo_2016 6y ago
Only desperate beta cucks buy into the "ally" proposition. These "men" are so castrated by their wives and sexually unsuccessful that they think buying into feminist propaganda and being an ally to women will get them a whiff of pussy. Well let them suffer in the consequences.
It's simple and clear as day: mentor no one. Participate zero in diversity events. It's very simple to fight the beast by not helping the beast.
gELSK 6y ago
// , You want to risk social ostracism by being the ONLY exec not to attend the diversity rally?
Do you want to be the only vendor that doesn't participate in the beast?
Good luck with that.
Troll_Name 6y ago
That's how it was in 1984.
Participation in the two minutes hate was voluntary; on the other hand not-fitting-in was a capital offense.
1984 wasn't a work of creativity; it was a documentary about the same style of governance that's been overrunning the west these past few decades.
gELSK 6y ago
// , I wonder what device is analogous to the "telescreen"
Hillarysdilddo_2016 6y ago
You have a point here. Depending on where you work, how large the org is, you might not have an option.
In that case switch to subterfuge and sabotage. There's no need to comply in good faith.
But most places are not this extreme in my experience.
[deleted]
truedemocracy3 6y ago
I'll tell you right now this becomes difficult in corporate hell hole America. We have diversity events and diversity hiring (where the bar if you are a minority to interview and get an offer being ridiculously low). Comments by women in the office about "it's so easy being a man" to seminars on 'inclusion' are the norm.
You dont even have to push back to draw bad attention to yourself, you just have to not participate (which I mostly dont). To this day you can walk around and talk about how great Hillary is but best not even date muttering you like Trump. It's authoritarian.
austrologi 6y ago
I got a call from HR stating I hadn't attended my Quota of CIs gendered white male hating events for the year, it was creepy as fuck.
[deleted] 6y ago
Dude...I work for the DOJ. I specifically focus on the enforcement of the ADA. And I use a wheelchair.
I STILL have to remind my managers, colleagues, and partners about inclusion. They will plan a meeting in a room that I can’t enter. They will plan events in different buildings and not leave me nearly enough time to get between events. They hosted an event in MY HONOR at a restaurant that wasn’t wheelchair accessible.
Inclusion matters.
Troll_Name 6y ago
When they say inclusion, they don't mean including people. They mean give me all your stuff. The people being excluded also have to pay up.
That's the same meaning behind diversity, or equality, or even "rights." It all just means shut up and pay up.
noct3rn4l 6y ago
Just wow. People will never understand how frustrating this is unless they experience it first hand. Next time just throw a brick through the restaurant window and wheel yourself through while swinging your hair. Guess who's here bishes, the guest of honor.
[deleted] 6y ago
But when I point out that there is no ramp to the dais or that a meeting was schedued in a room accessible only by stairs, someone will complain about PC culture call me a snowflake.
You would think the DOJ, which regularly fines companies for the exact same type of exclusionary behavior, would just pretend to care a bit more about inclusion.
frrunkis 6y ago
Bull fucking shit
Complete and utter bullshit
[deleted]
lakalahehe 6y ago
Maybe you should consider the world beyond the USA prison.
haroldpeters 6y ago
Australia is worse. Our women a militant feminists, and they have the most supportive welfare state behind them. They basically can do anything and the ya ya sisters all give them high 5's. I can barely watch TV now, because even on both private and government channels which have a legal requirement to be unbiased there is so much bias once you are TRP it makes you want to vomit. What is worse is all the "cool" kids are jumping on these bandwagons which on the surface appear virtuous and the right thing, but beneath have serious undertones. We have already been banned from drinking whiskey in a glass after 11pm a night, and are stoped from HEARING music after certain times of night.. its very close to a police state here, but a lot of Aussie males either have low iq, only care about "ripping doughies" (doing burnouts) and skulling beers while watching the footy that they have not noticed how oppressive it is. Every now and then you will hear them complain about being pulled over by police but overall they are lethargic and completely brainwashed when it comes to politics - believing so much bs in the media.
Troll_Name 6y ago
They don't believe society is oppressive because they're reminded every day that they're making the world a better place™ by crusading against the undesirables.
That's how oppressive societies work. It's the only way they work.
[deleted] 6y ago
Fucking oath. By the way, am I way off to make the observation that a lot of guys who look like they life are shacked up with fat bush pigs?
truedemocracy3 6y ago
Nah, I love the U.S. and wouldnt want to be anywhere else. Canada and Western Europe? Cucked. Asia? growing but still a hell hole. everywhere else? 3rd world.
lakalahehe 6y ago
Not all places are the same in each country. Perhaps you can have your own structure. Live from country to country, lower or no taxes. Expat communities with the benefits of your kind but without the government.
truedemocracy3 6y ago
If you keep you American citizenship abroad unfortunately you still have to pay taxes. And an American citizenship is most definitely worth paying for.
I do agree with the overall theme though - planning on entreprenuership long term
theycallmenubs 6y ago
Look up the foreign earned income exclusion. If you live outside the US for 330 days you get to exclude a little over 100k
truedemocracy3 6y ago
Had no idea it was that much. I worked abroad but only briefly. Very interesting.
lakalahehe 6y ago
why is it worth paying for?
truedemocracy3 6y ago
If you get into trouble abroad it is worth it.
lakalahehe 6y ago
how about alternative countries? I'm sure there are plenty more preferable ones or that it's cheaper to buy private insurance/security services.
WolfofAnarchy 6y ago
This comment is 10x better than the OP. Wonder if the mods will sticky this, hah.
slutnip 6y ago
This is actually much bigger than just man's rights in general. If you take the micro context of women vs mens right and transpose it to a macro big picture world perspective, they are wiping due process from all people in general
This Video of the Bureau of Land Management talks about the Bundy Case and government agencies doing the same thing red pill men have been seeing in general in men vs women rights
redditer0 6y ago
All moral panics (terrorist, sexual violence, etc.) are used to destroy due process.
Hjalmbere 6y ago
You got me wrong. Don’t live in the US and where I live #metoo sex accusation hysteria hasn't leaked into the mainstream yet, despite a veritable ongoing hurricane among the elites. Probably because you have nothing financially to gain due to the judicial system not encouraging lawsuits.
However had I been a young man living in the US it would definitely affect me. Some people are more risk averse than others. Let’s face it, external circumstances affect our decisions. To use an analogy: Some guys might decide to go off piste in spite of a skier being crushed by an avalanche the day before. Because the snow looks great. Others will play it safe. Especially if they are inexperienced skiers.
icutrauma11 6y ago
Not any more. A great many of you do not understand Trump because of the media's false reporting. He is a man's man and sees the injustice that white knights, snowflakes, SJWs and the left have socially crippled this nation. Just look at this difference.
First, he rolled back the Title IX directive as written by Obama for universities: https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-09-22/trump-administration-rescinds-obama-era-campus-sexual-assault-guidance
Now look how it saved this individual since colleges now have to report rape accusations to the police: https://sports.yahoo.com/report-ou-rbs-accuser-told-friend-accusation-great-political-career-181526885.html http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/21778621/woman-drops-protective-order-oklahoma-sooners-rb-rodney-anderson https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/big12/2017/12/14/no-charges-filed-against-oklahoma-running-back-rodney-anderson/952410001/
For those women that launch false rape accusations you have everything coming to you as we men will not let you lie. One for trying to ruin a person's life for attention and worse for taking away resources and focus on true rape victims.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
rigbed 6y ago
Sanctuary campus bs. The universities love obama policies as do the students so trump can only do so much.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[--removed--]
redzorp 6y ago
I dunno about that because corporations have already paid out billions for sexual harassment lawsuits over the past 30 years and the situation has only gotten WORSE, despite lobbying from business groups.
What's it gonna take - $Trillions?
This just might be one area where capitalism is subordinate to a higher power. And that power is Pussy. It gets whatever it wants because the Social Collective is one giant, thumb-sucking beta.
gELSK 6y ago
Don't underestimate the idiocy and short-term thinking of shareholders.
JamesSkepp 6y ago
"Important people losing money" is probably the only thing that can realistically revert the absurdities of modern feminism going rampant.
redditer0 6y ago
Unless "important people" start to be replaced by "important feminists.."
Rian_Stone 6y ago
expert sociopaths who like money will always win in the end.
Just so happens female sociopaths learned how whining gets you very far.
slutnip 6y ago
We actually live in a very Fascist and Oppressed Society disguised as Capitalism.
What most people dont understand about capitalism is capitalism means surplus of cash. The government definitely doesnt have a surplus nor does its people.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
We are in no substantial way fascist. Go talk to an elderly german or italian, so they can set you straight.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Unemployment numbers in the US are extremely low right now.
nebder 6y ago
Get outta here with your facts and data
Sign on bonuses for production work are the highest I’ve ever seen.
Rian_Stone 6y ago
Unemployment isn't fascism.
If youre going to make a point, try not to rble off into the land where they make the frogs gay
mental_models 6y ago
The lines between F&C become blurred as power concentrates and occupies all of the key market positions.
When this happens you can make a solid argument for F being a 'type'(or 'form') of C.
So, in that (purely hypothetical) case it would be both.
Dmva100 6y ago
All women lie about sexual assault unless due process reveals otherwise.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
st3roids 6y ago
lol orbiters now are more than ever . Its called facebook chatting get a clue. an average girl everyday has 50 guys messaging her about going out or do something together... not to mention all these desperate likes seeking attention
Hollerich 6y ago
Just take a look at some THOT's Facebook or Instagram comments when she posts a fish face selfie. All the thirsty, beta orbiters come out of the woodwork with replies like, "Gorgeous!", "You're Beautiful! ", and" Sexy!" The thirst is real. It will never end.
Original_Username7 6y ago
I like how you think and write.
Ganaria_Gente 6y ago
There will never be any shortage of male orbiters and males feminists. Sadly.
I wish karma was real but alas....
gELSK 6y ago
Totally not true. I repeatedly witness the orbital stations orbiting here in California.
nebder 6y ago
Part of the grassroots pushback must come from humor.
Mini-FR time: I’ve been establishing myself at a new venue as the fun guy who gets it. I was shooting pool and running lowkey married game on the bartender shooting with me. Shooting the shit, having fun, working on setting up a married plate (who the fuck would allow their wife to bartend? I’m not a guydrama lay down the law type of dude, but that’s beyond ludicrous for a profession for your wife. Might as well let her be a pornstar) I have an elbow to wrist tat on my outer forearm. I’m wearing long sleeves pulled back a bit, so the tip was showing. She comes over and yanks back my sleeve to check it out. Playfully said omfg #metoo, you just assaulted me blah blah blah. She ate that shit up and thought it was hilarious. Cracked a couple more jokes about it and moved on to something else. It’s possible this is the hot guy is funny deal. Who knows.
Obviously this is one gal. If you get the opportunity to plant the seed of how ridiculous this shit is, then take it.
askmrcia 6y ago
Go on the relationship sub and you will see guys agreeing to this BS because it allows their wives to earn extra cash on the side if they don't have a regular job.
Stupid I know, but welcome to the real world.
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
You're hot.
You 'get it' as Rollo puts it.
You haven't denied her commitment (yet).
That's enough.
wayneinthegame 6y ago
Yea, we can't be a bunch of pussies and hide in fear about it. It's still the court of popular opinion that this bs is coming from. Except Cali...check here if you agree to intercourse.
JamesSkepp 6y ago
Even if the accused man is proven innocent, his guilt is mostly determined (in majority of cases it's simply assumed) by initial accusations fueled by media (and social media) hype. Court rulings are irrelevant in the court of public opinion.
A light in the end of the tunnel: surprisingly, on Imgur (Reddit offshoot) the posts about false rape accusations being bad are HIGHLY upvoated and have a lot of views. There were even instances of highly viewed and upvoated posts talking about how the false accuser got a proper sentence.
Call it not-so-divine-retribution for not cultivating our male sexual strategy. That's what you get for not having RP-alphas as leaders of the society. So far overwhelming majority of men that were in the position of power (and in the context of the article - in the position of creating laws) were BP and/or beta. It's no surprise that these men who have ZERO experience of how casual, plate-like, non-commital sex looks like translate this lack of experience into the laws they are creating. BP creates more BP.
On top of point 3, add pressure from the people who get you elected. HALF of electorate is women, hard to blame them for pushing their agenda, they've been doing this since the first sexual reproduction organism appeared, having experience in the matter pays. The reason why we're losing the gender power struggle is the other half of the electorate - men, which my previous point explains.
On individual level - be proactive: become as attractive as you can (max looks, game, status, vibe etc.) and RECORD EVERYTHING. First one gives you higher probability of being a man that "doesn't count", second one is your "get out of jail free card", literally. And don't talk about TRP/PUA ever b/c if shit hits the fan it will be used to crucify you (regardless of intentions and if it's right) and this time it will be your fault for not keeping your mouth shut.