Full post on TRP.RED
CH posted about the recent Women's Day campaign run by Budweiser which takes old, presumably sexist, ads and revamps them for 2019's standards under the guise of equality.
Of course, it should come as no surprise that women now comprise 80% of the brand's marketing team, so naturally they turn their marketing away from beer and the men that drink it, and start selling feminism wholesale.
As we've noted, when social justice warriors converge on an organization, killing the organization is a perfectly acceptable win condition for them. And Bud is all-to-happy to follow in the footsteps of the other greats committing to advertising wokeness. (Gillette, Johnnie Walker, etc)
But every time one of these woke campaigns take place, they can't help but betray their true agenda by pushing for female supremacy every damn time.
She married Two Men / She has it All
Right off the bat we begin with the low hanging fruit. The idea of women being subservient to men might be a good target for these woke campaigns- but that's not far enough for them. They want men not to be in the picture at all. Notice that she goes from bride to spinster, repeating the lie that she already has it all, so why would a woman need a man? Well if it's true that she's got it all, then she doesn't.
Women just don't need men. Right?
In what we'll see is one of two take-out oriented ad workovers, we see the woman pouring a beer for her husband who is hopelessly trying to fix a telephone with a hammer. I'd say the first one is good enough, given that they've already made her husband a bumbling fool who can't figure out how to fix things and needs a cool-down.
Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and assume he's trying in earnest to fix the phone. Is there a reason why fixing him a drink is somehow more oppressive than him fixing the phone that they both presumably use?
Well, as we expected, they wanted to push the agenda. Now they're working / moving, and both enjoying a beer. And she is not serving him in any way, shape, or form. Instead of making sure the family and the people she cares about eats a healthy meal, they elect for delivery pizza. Because it would be that much worse if she had accidentally lifted a single finger for her own husband.
Unspoken in this change-up is that while it might appear more egalitarian for them to "work together," fixing appliances is still a one-man job, which is why division of labor makes sense. Further it proves that when you don't divide the labor correctly the entire family suffers for it- as is evidenced by the junk food for dinner.
We're to believe that since she's "helping" with moving around boxes that now they've truly found co-existent equity nirvana, the truth is he's still carrying the heavy boxes and will have to do all the cooking afterwards if he doesn't want a heart attack at the age of 35. And who mows the lawn later?
Our final ad swaps a woman cooking and a man drinking a beer after a long day at work ("loosen your tie") to a woman alone with her dog eating - you guessed it - more takeout.
What they're telegraphing here is a bit perplexing. They clearly wanted to take the first two ads and mix them together. First, it's oppression for a woman to cook for a man. Secondly, it's oppression for a woman to have a man. Therefore, it must be established that if a woman must put up with a man, even the simple act of cooking is taboo, but it's clearly best if she doesn't have a man at all.
And cooking is still oppression. So for you single ladies out there, make sure you eat pizza and chinese takeout and don't you dare cook for yourself.
And drink beer! (Are you convinced yet?)
What's conspicuously missing here is the existence of both sides' gender roles. Apparently it's oppression for a woman to pour a beer or cook spaghetti, but nowhere in these ads did they show her mowing the lawn, fixing the phone, cleaning the gutters, or fixing the car.
The takeaway is that men are still required to do 100% of his work, but don't rely on the division of tasks because requesting anything from a woman is oppression.
They've removed all responsibility and purpose from the woman and branded it feminism.
And of course, skilled observers here already know: that was the point. That is feminism's end goal.
BigWeenus42 5y ago
Stop paying attention to ads. I haven't payed a single fuck to an advertisement in forever.
kagetsuki32 5y ago
If you wanted to control the population grow, which method will you use?
bobapop 5y ago
The blurb at the bottom of the advertisements is great.
​
​
I wonder if anyone who made the changes to the old ads stopped to think if the changes they decided to portray are actually positive and worthy of display.
​
​
Oh boo fucking hoo. What percentage of ads positively portray men? What percentage of ads doesn't show men as a bunch of bumbling, incompetent fools who are completely subservient and cucked?
​
Ultimately, it doesn't really effect me much since I never liked their beer anyway. However, this very overt SJW infiltration into advertising is still pretty annoying. It's somewhat hard to believe that it's actually profitable, so I wonder why companies keep doing it.
yomo86 5y ago
I quit on being agitated by it thusly I just vote with my dollars. Do shit like that get treated like that. Gilette is already on the no-buy list. These are everday products not something life saving like medical drugs.
russian_nigger 5y ago
how are any of those ads sexist? a guy working at his workshop and his wife brought him some beer is sexist somehow? or the fact that she prepared some dinner? like what fucking world do these people live in?? so they changed the ad where the woman is alone with her pet (post wall i presume) doesn't know how to cook and orders shit take out.. lmao.. fucking idiots. also the artwork is atrocious just like their "beer"
Luckyluke23 5y ago
RIP Budweiser we hardly drank ye.
mette13 5y ago
The more I read about it, the more it reminds me of how most girls in my school with a 25 ACT score got a full ride to college and both of my friends with 32 scores didn't even get a scholarship worth more than $1000, nonetheless any boy for that matter.
College is turning into a depressive, money grabbing, liberal indoctrination camp anyways, better off being an entrepreneur.
SeizeTheGreens 5y ago
The fuck were your friends doing? Flex time. I got 31 (top 4% nationally, top 1% in my state) my first try no studying and got a 58k scholarship (to a very large university). Several of my male friends got full rides to the in-state universities with 32’s.
mette13 5y ago
32 is about top ~20% over here unfortunately. It was also a public school thar didn't cover demonstrated needs thats why probably
trpblacklime 5y ago
I believe that there's a hidden agenda behind all of this. I believe that someone or some group is trying to destroy western society. Make the men useless, weak, and thus unattractive to women. Make women physically unappealing, useless, entitled, and thus unappealing to men. This in turn will drop birthrates thus requiring mass immigration. A plethora of immigrants that refuse to immigrate, coupled by weak men, and and pointless women will create a dystopia.
russian_nigger 5y ago
go on youtube and type in ideological subversion. there's your answer.
KekistanRefugee 5y ago
You got it. Kalgari Plan, we live in a fucked up world
Synthetic_Citizen 5y ago
Control. Divide and weaken the family unit. The traditional family unit is what had built nations and maintained order, to pervert, contaminate and weaken the relatiinship between husband and wife, mother and children and especially father and children creates division and weakens the values and unity that creates strong, respectful and mentally stable society. Instead people lack the core origin of strong family values and are more easily manipulated and influenced to fill the void. Voids that are usually filled with toxic and ideologies that create conflict between gender, race and economic divide. If you look closely the main focus here is in division and disunity.
Divide and weaken relations between the sexes. Men are more likely to revolt and less likely to be influenced, women are the opposite. Legally and financially empower women and demonize men, the outcome is more control and influence.
Transfer economic and legal power from the male to the female, women do over 70 percent of the worlds spending and account for half of all government tax. To force women into the workforce and force men out creates a more easily manipulated and randomised consumer oriented economic climate, at the expense of productivity, work ethic and relations.
Greatly diminish parental authority of the the male and greatly increase parental authority of the female, normalization and glorification of single motherhood and vilification of fatherhood as toxic has seen the rise of professional victimhood, entitlement and lack of accountability in youth.
Divide national unity through race wars and multiculturalism. Create division among united races by claiming that racial unity is racial favoritism and therefore racism, especially among white people. Attempt to force diversity and national aisunity through mass immigration. Disunity among people of a country means less of a possibility of organised revolt.
Lastly. Wake up and see the propaganda and buzz words for what the are, manipulation and influence. listen to a feminist talk for longer than a minute and you would have probably heard 30 buzz words repeated from her mouth already. Repeating buzz words are an old trick used to hammer lies into peoples heads so often that eventually people start to accept it as the norm.
All that was previously mentioned is the means of dividing the masses and keep tjem fighting each other, so making them less likely to unify against globalism.
[deleted]
Menchstick 5y ago
Damn, I really liked Johnny Walker. Anyone got any suggestions for a substitute?
[deleted]
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
Switch to bourbon because scotch is awful. :P
If_I_Only_Had_A_Name 5y ago
I live in KY now, although I was born overseas, and I can 100% back you up on this. Higher quality, generally smoother, and a better buzz imo.
[deleted]
Reddoored 5y ago
The first thing I notice is that the new artwork sucks, the old ads have some charm to them.
PS2Errol 5y ago
Women made their bed. Now they can lie in it.
Female unhappiness will go through the roof.
fuze_me_69 5y ago
seriously, look at the ads. 'all you need is friends who embrace you'. 'come home with takeout chinese and have a beer by yourself'
wtf? like women are going to see these and go "NOW I WANT A BUDWEISER!!!" lmao. also who thinks those are good goals to strive for
clown world
Drummerboy860 5y ago
It already is. College breaks women. Many can’t handle the stress of it, and mentally unravel.
JrBlack95 5y ago
That's why they always pick stupid ass majors as well, or at least easier ones. Many women who graduate with a STEM degree leave the field because it makes them "unhappy". Who'd of fucking thought huh?
Drummerboy860 5y ago
Or they choose criminal justice because it looked super exciting on episodes of Law and Order.
Then they’re surprised to realize the real world usually isn’t nearly as exciting as a fictional television show.
BobbyPeru 5y ago
Or communications major since they can hack the math
MentORPHEUS Endorsed Contributor 5y ago
The second two "reimagined" ads have a strange airbrushed quality to them, almost as if they stopped their time machine in the '80s for the retouching work.
It makes me wonder how much they're really understanding the target audience. Sure, back in the day men purchasers might have been responsive to imagery (fancy glass servings) to elevate what in reality they swill straight from the can by the 12 pack to get drunk on the weekend. But, are modern consumers, women in particular, responsive to this? Do they even do focus groups and A-B testing anymore?
I'd like to see the "creative" team stay on the same trajectory of not creating shit but just rehashing old material from the past, till they come around to ads like this.
DigitalDragonSlayer 5y ago
Brands to avoid purchasing: Gillette, Johnny Walker, and now Budweiser.
And for the people who say “my purchase doesn’t hurt big businesses” then I have news for you, my retarded friend. Business units operate within these large companies (one for each product typically.) The people who run these businesses units get fucking fired for missing their growth targets all the time.
I’ve noticed these large companies tend to generate a lot of PR when they release (unnecessary) ads like this. This is GREAT in the short term, as it leads to a boost in sales (see Gillette) but long term effects? Well that is in every member of TRP’s control. Vote with your dollar. Don’t buy their shit. After a bump, a quarter later things will settle...then they start to see losses. Yes Proctor & Gamble (Gillette’s parent company) won’t fall, but the business unit leaders will hopefully feel the pinch and get fired.
We live in the Amazon Age, order your shit elsewhere. Don’t give these corps your dollars. Fuck them for alienating their bases and perpetuating false narratives and ideas that are detrimental to society.
BobbyPeru 5y ago
Yeah, even my most RP friends don’t seem to understand this. I told my wife don’t buy any more Gillette, Cascade... and P&G products one day when we were in target. She literally said “I stand with you.” My wife understands it better than my RP friends. It’s a simple effort to check for the P&G brand, and they don’t feel it’s important. SMH
DigitalDragonSlayer 5y ago
Maybe we need a post or reminder to bring some light to this topic.
DirtyBastard13 5y ago
Budweiser lost the last bit of respect I had for them with their constant pushing of Light Beer (Water lying about being beer) and their Castle themed commercials.
RealMcGonzo 5y ago
I wonder if they already primarily sell to feminists and the feminizied. I stopped drinking Budweiser so long ago, I can't even remember when - maybe 2000 or so. I switched from Gillette gel (bad for your skin) and expensive cartridges over 10 years ago. And I never liked scotch - big bourbon fan. Finally, all my friends are in the same boat, none of them use these products. But none of them are raging feminists.
BobbyPeru 5y ago
NO women I l ow drink beer. It’s always wine or a fruity mixed drink. Budweiser is fucking up... big time. Get woke.
OneRedSock 5y ago
Missed the train on the Johnny Walker situation; what's the deal there?
Already switched off of Proctor & Gamble, which is too bad because I've been using Old Spice since elementary school. But there's always somewhere else, and I'll keep choosing that somewhere else when companies try to push "woke" bullshit through their ad campaigns.
Thing is, men are the ones who came up with the phrase "it's the principle of it"; which is to say, these companies keep pushing anti-male bullshit and they will hurt since we as men have no problem doing something simply for the principle of it, even if it costs more.
russian_nigger 5y ago
you should switch off these brands because their products are harmful chemical garbage in the first place and not because of some idiot marketing team
uglynihilist 5y ago
There is an obvious agenda here. Brainwashing women to believe that stay at home moms are somehow inferior to carrier driven ones.
Blackphish88 5y ago
Killing the family. The social circle. Soon everyone will be isolated at all times, even in public. Gonna be a boring world if they 'win'.
yomo86 5y ago
When they win, everybody will consume. It is like in They Live sans the extraterristrials.
largepaycheckaddict 5y ago
Yup. Life will resemble a sort of isolated individualist gauntlet In a corporate controlled world. You will wake up in your 8x8’ single occupancy cell-apartment like “player one.. go!”
They manipulate women into wanting to work and hating men via feminism. It’s all a scheme to demoralize and weaken us.
There’s been no other instances in history I’m aware of where women desired to join elite fighting forces or men think it’s ok to start wearing dresses and competing in female sporting events.
The world has gone mad.
fuze_me_69 5y ago
its the yewish agenda to further destabilize the family unit and create more wage slaves
Whisper 5y ago
Are they going to sap and impurify your precious bodily fluids?
RightHandWolf 5y ago
They already did that with fluoridation of the public water supply. ????
Shaman6624 5y ago
Well what's better. A productive member of society or a lazy bum sitting at home all day. It's not nessecary for women to stay at home anymore because the household appliances have become so efficient. That and you practically need two people to work fulltime nowadays to keep your household afloat. So yeah I would say that a woman that can also make money is better than a woman that only sits at home doing nothing after spending an hour or two cleaning the house and cooking for the day.
uglynihilist 5y ago
Depends. I don't believe that woman can have a solid career and be a mom of 2-3 kids at the same time. And being a mom is not just carrying it inside for 9 months. Personally I want not less than 3 kids and I don't need some chick who will get a lawyer license at the age of 27 and then tell me to wait another 4-5 years before she is ready. I want a young and fertile girl to take care of house and my children. When there is no kids yet or after they grew up of course she should work but again how much can she achieve entering in some field after 30 and still doing chores and spending time with kids idk.
Shaman6624 5y ago
But you want to raise your own kids as well right or do you believe its good for kids to be almost solely raised by their mother. If the mother works more then the father can have more time with the kids.
The example that you're giving about the lawyer is ofcourse an extreme and will always stay an extreme. Women will never work as much on average as driven men will and this movement will correct itsself over time.
I think the strong opposition to everything remotely resembling feminism actually gives it a lot more power. Just chill, let women have their movement of getting into the outside world and taking responsibility there and lets just go with the flow instead of creating extremism by taking such a extremist stance against it. It will all sort itsself out. Adding 50% of the worlds minds to the economy must have some positive effects right.
KeffirLime 5y ago
Went to an ad agency recently to get some work done for my business and the state of affairs is fucking horrific.
Filled with miserable female grad students, coming out of university with massive student debt, ravaged vaginas and a xanax dependency.
All of them wandering why the hell they feel so empty when they've just started their careers. This was supposed to be it? This was supposed to make them feel strong, their ticket to independence.
But it doesn't, so they team up with the other diversity hires to whip an ad together in an attempt to double down on the lie they've been sold. They need to signal to the rest of the world that what they're doing is right, that the problem isn't with their life choice, it's with the world, and they're gonna change it like stwong wahmen do!
But alas, no matter how much they scream and shout and tell the world how toxic they are, the hole inside of them will never disappear. Their take away meals, pump and dumps and lit instagram pages will never fill the gap.
This is because they do not get satisfaction from competing, they do not get satisfaction from conquering, they do not get satisfaction from hollow beta validation, and they certainly don't get satisfaction from responsibility.
Welcome to the 21st century con, where motherhood, partnership, family and human connection were traded to be a capitalist pawn, and until that is remedied prozacs share price is gonna continue to rise and female happiness will continue to fall.
monsieurhire2 5y ago
Well, like L. Ron Hubbard said, if you REALLY want to enslave people, tell them that you're going to set them free.
I mean, what is to be expected from people who have been institutionalized since they were six years old, or even earlier by adult children to selfish and ignorant to raise their own spawn.
They know nothing but the steady diet of brainwashing. From the bed to the breakfast table with the TV, radio and newspaper, to the school, to back home again with the TV, radio, and newspaper.
The internet is really revolutionary in that people do have a chance to escape one set of reality tunnels into another to at least perceive all the complexity that comes with different sets of beliefs.
KeffirLime 5y ago
Especially for women, idealism like this hits them right on the feels, makes em feel all giddy.
They look at men's lives with their penis envy eyes and think how wonderful that must be.
Until they get it and realize it comes with responsibility, so they spend the next few decades trying to get rod of that too.
The unfortunate part is that with modern media as their weapon, they seem to be getting that right.
Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive means that the world panders to the word of the precious female victim while silencing the replaceable male.
Imperator_Red 5y ago
These are literally advertisements for dystopia - replacing home cooked meals with takeout is somehow an improvement? I guess we should look on the bright side. This will create plenty of uber eats delivery jobs as part of the new gig economy which is necessary to employ the hordes of low skill immigrants that we don't have enough real jobs for.
Gaboyski_ 5y ago
It's not just the economic aspect, but also health as well. Depriving yourself of skills for cooking healthy meals and becoming dependent on processed foods handed out by fastfoods. We're gonna have more obese, diabetic, and sick people, and overweight people in turn will become supporters of the fat acceptance movement.
[deleted] 5y ago
Bitches LOVE my home cooked meals. Something, something, enjoy the decline, I guess.
Imperator_Red 5y ago
The sky is blue and trees are green. Look, I can say irrelevant things too.
[deleted] 5y ago
Male sexual strategy. The whole point is frustrated career bitches love to come visit and enjoy a dish I learned from Playboy decades ago: Chicken Take Her Panties Off.
[deleted]
AutoModerator 5y ago
Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.
Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Shaman6624 5y ago
I think you're reading too much into it. It's just a picture of life now that women have joined the job market. Why should it entail that it's bad to cook for yourself if they show takeout? They probably just didn't want to show anyone cooking because of the negative connotations associated. They also couldve shown a man cooking and a woman sitting back in a chair sipping a beer that would've been a bit more balsy and better.
DrMrJrSr 5y ago
Show me a woman that's honestly excited to drink a Budweiser, or beer for that matter..
C'mon, how can you not see this for what it is? That's like CoverGirl advertising long-lasting eyeliner for men, as if that's their core demographic..
russian_nigger 5y ago
show me anyone that's honestly excited to drink a budweiser
Shaman6624 5y ago
Well yeah that part is a bit stupid but comon this post sounds like a conspiracy theory. It's just a funny women's day thing.
[deleted]
Compeliminator 5y ago
you are a dipshit if you believe theres not a conspiracy to destroy the west. sure,dont believe your lying eyes
[deleted]
Shaman6624 5y ago
Who is masterminding that conspiracy?
Synthetic_Citizen 5y ago
The Romans had a saying. If they are stupid enough to be fooled, then they deserve the misfortune.
You go on living in bliss, its your choice.
[deleted]