When i see my friends proudly posting pics like this, i can't help but think...
"y'know what, my angry white lady friends? you are the single largest voting block, by an overwhelming and statistically insurmountable margin. you outlive and outvote every other other demographic-- particularly men, and minority men by double digits. you work the fewest hours, but also control the lion's share of this country's wealth. you enjoy better, more consistent health care, have more disposable income, and have fewer work obligations. you're the unquestioned top dog here. you have the means, the status, the time, and the health to vote, and you do-- you are 54% of the electorate (in which white women are also massively over-represented, thanks to all of the above)
so when YOU shove an utterly unelectable democratic candidate down our throats, not because she's a good person, or accomplished anything of substance (unless you count proudly stumping for institutional persecution of gays with DODT & DOMA, and blacks with "super predator" sentencing), but only because she's another white person with a vagina...
and when the overwhelmingly white, overwhelming female voters that do finally show up to vote in this already doomed election, all swing heavily to Trump---
i'm not sure you really get to put on pink hats every year and wag your fingers at the rest of us, do you? when this was your show from the word go? "
but then i think "well, duh, of course you can. because you're doing it. and not only that, everybody is fawning all over you for it, telling you how amazing and courageous you are. for screaming at us for the mess you made. for protesting, essentially, yourselves."
and then, finally, i think "yeah, no fuckin way i'm not posting any of that. i would get crucified. it's just not worth the abject misery, to ever dare contradict a white girl in a pink kittykat hat."
and then i go play call of duty.
[deleted]
Unnormally2 6y ago
Excuse me? That's a vagina hat. They need to wear their vagina's on their head so everyone can worship them.
NabroleonBonaparte 6y ago
It’s funny when you think of how the feminine imperative has a stronghold on society and that women wear pussyhats to signal worship.
It’s like an ancient Mayan civilization wearing the mask of their Gods and participating in rituals of worship.
In those times they sacrificed children, animals, etc to their gods; today we sacrifice men
cashmoney_x 6y ago
Damn man. You really nailed it with this.
M23W0OH7FV2t 6y ago
While they may be the largest voting bloc, they do not have a supermajority, nor do they all vote.
[deleted]
[deleted]
VeganMcVeganface 6y ago
What does this have to do with TRP? Also, work on your grammar.
[deleted]
all4gibs 6y ago
women will always be culturally degenerate without positive strong role models
suaressi 6y ago
thats why back in the dizzay they kept them in check.. its like an uncrontrollable force, that if not contained, will just progress into a shitstorm
all4gibs 6y ago
and we will never be able to go back
[deleted]
sea_weasel 6y ago
You think men are less susceptible?
all4gibs 6y ago
oh for sure. i am living proof. do you know how odd it is to not have a role model and have to pick out small qualities among several people just to form an image of someone i respect?
if it’s possible for me, it’s possible for a substantial number of men
it’s no coincidence my younger sister is a complete degenerate
[deleted] 6y ago
Absolutely. The agreeableness of women is what sets them apart. They're far more likely to accept extremely weird and bad behavior than men are.
Furthermore, since men are less agreeable we're the ones that are capable of debating difficult topics without it becoming a shaming match. There's a good reason politics and academia have gone to shit since women entered both in droves. Also, women are inherently all about identity and community politics. This is extremely negative for society overall.
thewrecker8 6y ago
Yeah they're really showing how bad things are. The economy hasn't been this good since FDR was president (that's WWII era folks). Companies are pouring money back into their workers and the US. Jobs are coming back that were previously outsorced. Unemployment is down, WOMENS unemployment is the lowest it's been in 18 years. The stock market is up 45% in one year, etc etc etc. And they're still wearing their pink hats saying the President is bad.
Praecipuus 6y ago
They're doing nothing else but their biological job, which has never in history gone beyond "flapping your gums to get more shit, regardless".
It is us, men, who have failed our jobs of seeing that gum flapping for what it is and muffling them shut with a dick or smth.
Timthetiny 6y ago
The 80s and 90s would like a word with you. As if the last time the economy was so good waa during the depression. Fucking illiterate.
wracky272 6y ago
If you want to take this position fine, but remember to keep Trump's horse hitched to economy and the DJIA when the shit crashes, and it is going to crash.
bentob_trp 6y ago
Companies are not pouring money back into workers. Wages have been stagnant since the 70s when we factor in inflation, if we factor in cost of living they've decreased.
Unnormally2 6y ago
I know I've seen a number of companies giving out bonuses or pay raises to a large number of employees. And my own employer is hiring more than ever.
rigbed 6y ago
Women in the workforce is not a good thing.
Tallsmarthandsome 6y ago
inflation does not factor in the quality of goods and services. How much did high speed internet cost in the 70s?
bentob_trp 6y ago
That's a fair point, but i can tell you them San fran apartments have not improved too much since the 70's and they cost a damn sight more. Same with food.
And how much has the internet really improved our quality of life? It's made us more efficient, for sure, but it's also made us addicted and stressed. I'd say happiness wise it's a neutral thing.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Let's not forget all the beta fags pushing this shit.
[deleted] 6y ago
He's an asshole but he's not wrong. Women let powerful men do pretty much whatever they want. The reason most men seek money and power is because it's how you get women.
Funny thing is, they could completely change the world if they wanted to by rewarding men who are kind and generous like they do men who are rich and powerful. We already see legions of (beta) men doing ridiculous things because they think it's what women want. But biology > all and rich and powerful men give them tingles.
[deleted] 6y ago
I pointed this out and retards got mad. I said that if women chose to fuck any man who wears pink skirts then you'd see a huge culture shift where pink skirts are considered manly.
The people didn't get it. They couldnt wrap their minds around the fact that the reason most men do certain things (like bedazzle his damn shirt or get shiny colorful cars and jewels) is because it attracts women.
what does a gold and diamond necklace that spins like a rim have to do with being a man?
what does glitter on your MMA shirt have to do with Manhood?
It's the same as nature. Peacocks large tail feathers are a hindrance, but they keep them because those or the guys who get laid.
Women can change the world and control men of they truly wanted, but they rather make poor choices and complain.
spencerc25 6y ago
I think you would enjoy the book Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior by Geoffrey Miller. he goes into detail our purchasing decisions and how it reflects who we are and our mating choices.
[deleted] 6y ago
That blue pill taste good don't it??
Stop living in fantasy land. Women will always go for the top dog. It will never be the reverse fantasy you propose.
Deal with it & accept it.
[deleted] 6y ago
...try reading that post again. Properly this time.
[deleted]
angrydelta 6y ago
I see you have poor reading comprehension, and are eager to say blue pill any chance you get. Try again.
[deleted] 6y ago
I'll remember that when your girl gives me "fuck me" eyes.
angrydelta 6y ago
If I were you, I won’t hold my breath for it MR. creepy ass neck beard.
[deleted] 6y ago
I would very much like to say "fuck this shit" let them be, let them burn.
But I can't, there's already rampant discrimination against straight white males in major corporations, in something essential as our day jobs that I just can't let this shit slide.(James Damore).
Refugees being imported to our white countries(Sweden, Germany) and racemixing propaganda, what do you think will hapen when the majority will be muslim and the minority white Christianity - tolerance? I don't think so.
We have to push back, put our women in their place. They're children with guns pointed at us at the moment.
Praecipuus 6y ago
Start your own business or live off of passive income. Move to a country where you're indeed privileged (Southeast Asia or South America).
There's no "pushing back" at this point. The only way to "push back" would be to take away women's right to vote, and we both know how likely that is.
Europe is sinking faster than the titanic and now the choices you have are either jumping off the boat or keep on playing that cello until you figure out how well it sounds underwater.
[deleted] 6y ago
There are still countries which refuse to accept refugees.
The V4 is the new Europe. Germany, Sweden, Norway can fuck off.
Praecipuus 6y ago
That's true. I foresee a lot of pressure put on the V4's, coming from the cucked rich countries in the near future.
Will be entertaining to see how things work out.
[deleted] 6y ago
Have you ever been to Sweden? I doubt it. I hope the refugees fuck all those white girls. Europe brought this on themselves & have no one to blame but themselves.
[deleted] 6y ago
Only when becoming the majority do you black guys show your true intentions.
Black supermacists are especially dangerous to us.
Fortunately my country doesen't accept refugees and the percent of black population is less then 0.2%, we are one of the few countries that protested refugee reallocation and we're proud of it.
maplemaximus 6y ago
"True intentions?"
A lot of you white guys talk about protecting your white women, yet all you do is talk about boning Asian, Middle Eastern and Latina women like no fucking tomorrow. Are you surprised men of other races might want to conquer women from other groups too?
Give me a break. Nothing he said is indicative of any "true intentions". What I see is him basically saying "Play a stupid game, win a stupid prize" which is a common saying in the black American community.
Obviously we shouldn't watch an ethnic group commit suicide, but if these white bitches wanna fuck the refugees, then let them fuck. It's not my problem, nor yours.
I doubt Bull is a black supremacist either.
[deleted] 6y ago
This is how the cowardly and sneaky leftists defend their white genocide agenda, I didn't even have to mention it you did it yourself.
The future will be post-apocalyptic if those people multiply by half-breeding:
https://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Rome_2ee189_298401.jpg
maplemaximus 6y ago
"Cowardly and sneaky leftists" spoken like a typical 2016-2017 right-winger. If you still think on terms of right and left then you're not "awakened".
I never said I wanted white people genocided, I have white people that I care about, but I'm not going to shed a tear for the Swedes if they want this stuff this badly. All humans have a duty to protect one another from danger, but honestly, this is the only way Europe is going to learn, quit whining. Truthfully, neither you nor I can actually change what's happening, best they be burned and learn their lesson.
No one wants genocide as I clearly stated that we shouldn't watch an ethnic group commit suicide. If the Swede's decide that they want to import refugees and then fuck them, then shit. Play with fire and watch yourself be burned.
Sweden would self destruct and be post-apocalyptic either way, brown people or not.
You actually did allude to it, I'm well aware of your alt-right talk that you used in your response to BlackBull. You were clearly scared about white "genocide" which is actually white suicide.
Rowingteam 6y ago
This.. This is hilarious! Amen brother.
vengefully_yours 6y ago
Fat chick in a pink hat stamping her feet, yeah I see an entitled cunt demanding more free shit.
max_peenor 6y ago
This post needs more Call Of Duty!
[deleted]
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
TRP: come for the sex advice, stay for the misogyny!
And then leave involuntarily for breaking the rules!
[deleted] 6y ago
Lmao. Respect is not a human right, nor is it required for anyone. This is a feminist notion that breeds massive degeneracy in the world. This is why things are going to shit, this is why people continue being completely fucking spineless and worthless pieces of shit like you.
No more. You. Fucking. Earn. Respect.
Let me lay some straight and clear "misogyny" on you, little bitch boy. Women entering the political and academic arena has ruined every country where it has happened.
America used to be a country of debating ideas, not shaming others for having different opinions. We used to be a country of rigorous academic achievement. Now we have ethics preventing any research that might possibly "offend" someone, unless it's pro-women. Women have taken control and shut down everything that was actually genuinely progressive.
Something people like you don't understand is that women and men are vastly different, and it isn't misogyny to point this fact out. The agreeableness of women, the little communities where no wrong think is allowed, is vastly different from men. Men confront and debate ideas on a one on one basis, we don't shame each other. We keep things civil because there is always an underlying threat of violence, if you step out of line we will slap your stupid silly ass right back into it.
Women. Do. Not. Exist. In. This. Realm. Women shame anybody who threatens the community and women are naturally liberals.
This is why everybody here says it's a waste of time arguing with women. They set the terms and conditions because they know that they don't have to be civil anymore.
The only impotent person here is you, you're absolutely clueless.
[deleted] 6y ago
I just read something about how Americans in the mid 19th century, while agreeing that dueling was a bad practice that had to go, lamented how much more civil the discourse used to be when insulting a man could lead to a deadly duel. Imagine what they'd think now.
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
+1
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
Lol you're literally proving my point for me, you're doing the feminine shaming technique rather than actually confronting my ideas with any form of debate.
I explained why you're wrong, you're turning around and just telling me I'm a bad person for having a different (much more educated) opinion than yours.
When are you gonna realize you're actually just a female in a man's body?
WotanAwakens 6y ago
Interesting, because you don't seem to have any posts here. You do have a lot of posts in leftist subs, though.
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
Worry not, he has been given a helicopter ride.
[deleted]
IDJOM 6y ago
False dichotomy. Not being a leftist certainly does not mean you're a Republican.
Hillarysdilddo_2016 6y ago
Stop. You're gonna make his gears start smoking.
[deleted] 6y ago
[--removed--]
CrazyHorseInvincible 6y ago
I am cackling like a saturday morning cartoon villain over here.
Jagrmystr 6y ago
Don’t ban, let him stay and try and learn something.
[deleted] 6y ago
[--removed--]
[deleted] 6y ago
I think banning people for dissenting opinions might be a bad long term strategy for anything to be honest, this is exactly what feminism is doing in politics and academia or in any space they control pretty much. They shut down conflicting viewpoints.
I personally would rather have a free market of ideas, even if it means we do have to explain how retarded someone is occasionally or deal with trolls. Nobody is infallible. Trolls just get downvoted to oblivion regardless.
[deleted] 6y ago
[--removed--]
[deleted] 6y ago
If they're engaging in academic debate then they should never be banned, no matter how stupid it is. The people reading can always learn from it, even if the moron making the argument is too stupid to learn.
Definitely ban the people that just make moral or emotional arguments, though. You can't learn anything from that, those people are worthless.
This might be your policy already, I don't actually know. If it is, good shit.
Whisper 6y ago
This idea you have is similar to libertarians who want open borders because of "Freeeeeeeedom!".
Your motives are noble, but your idea is bad, and the outcome would be disasterous.
Your utopia was created when the internet was barely a thing, in the late 80s and early 90s. It was called "Usenet". It was decentralized and rulerless and had completely open borders and free speech for everyone.
And it ate itself.
How? Why?
Every September, Usenet had an influx of new users, mostly kids who got internet access through a university account, who were unfamiliar with its customs and expectations. They would run about various newsgroups, posting inane crap and generally piddling on the floor.
This was annoying, but the existing user base far outnumbered these people, and, by the end of October, the new users had learned what was expected of them, and would toe the line, either voluntarily or through the pressure of taunts and shame.
Then, in September of 1993, AOL unexpected provided all of its users with access to the Usenet system. All of a sudden, a massive wave of new users entered the mix, so massive that they outnumbered the existing community. That community was suddenly a minority and could no longer even effectively teach, let alone enforce, the culture.
September of 1993 was the Eternal September, the chaos that never ended. Usenet is now nothing but spam and cobwebs.
This is the fate of your imagined noble experiment.
Anarchy only works with the ability to exclude troublemakers, or force them to assimilate.
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
It's not so much about freedom as valuing academic debate, people aren't infallible and I do see value in discussing dissenting opinions both to propagate the good ideas and explain why bad ideas are bad. I'm fine with banning people that don't follow those types of guidelines - If it's simply moral shaming then yeah, ban the hell out of them. These people are worthless to society in the context of ideas, period.
However, you have to realize that at a certain point if we ban all dissenting opinions then eventually we won't have much to discuss lol. If we all agree we can only go over or in-depth on certain topics so far for so many times.
Whisper 6y ago
Every group has to draw the line between disagreement and sabotage.
And in the time since we made this group, back when there were about 100 of us, we've learned a lot about where to draw that line. I've not only seen a whole lot of versions of this clown you are going to bat for, I've seen a whole lot of versions of you.
The guy who thinks that we are in constant danger of "becoming too insular".
That guy doesn't understand why we made this group. He doesn't understand that we are not a university. He doesn't understand that we are not a think tank. He doesn't understand that we are not a club. He doesn't understand that we are not the academic quest for truth.
He doesn't know what we are for.
TRP is judged by one standard, and one alone. Does it give men power over their own sex lives? Does it give men the ability to get laid at will? Does it enable them to attract women?
And you know what?
Never, never, never, has any one of us, any one of the founders, seen any person come in here and make a serious, reasoned or evidence-based argument that this stuff doesn't work.
How could they? It works.
No, what they want to do is sabotage. Because it works.
I spent years of my life building this thing from 100 subscribers to a quarter of a million. So when you come in here, mother's milk wet upon your lips, and raise some academic concern about missing out on valuable ideas from a bunch of social justice warriors, many of whom would be happy to see you dead, how much weight do you think that carries with me?
What the fuck have you put into this place, that you think you're going to tell me how it should be run? Not a god damn thing, as far as I can tell.
You think your opinion is important just because it's your opinion?
No. Respect is earned. You want your opinion to carry weight, do something other than sit in the peanut gallery and bitch about how we're too mean to trolls.
Jesus fuck, I am sick of idealists.
Fyrjefe 6y ago
That was a really cool piece of info, that Eternal September. I respect this explanation a lot. Moderation is good. If an idealist wants to hash it out, there's "Purple Pill Debate". Man, I really loved the time recently when the sub was on lockdown. There was no question that the topics would be worth our time or not. It was sidebar material that we could take a fresh look at and discuss how it applied to our lives. To the idealist: maybe you're the one in need of conversion. Start with putting your own house in order. Good post, Whisper.
[deleted] 6y ago
You're getting way angry over a slightly different opinion than yours and it's a little fucking ridiculous. I really don't give a shit what you think I have or haven't done, or if I do or don't understand what TRP is for.
Also, I'm not advocating for anybody specific, the guy that got banned deserved it. I was the one shitting on him the most, specifically for the way he thought and talked about ideas. I was just bringing up a point that I noticed other subs doing and dying because they do so.
You're being fucking obnoxious here, all I'm advocating for is allowing debates to happen so people understand the reasoning behind the way we think rather than just telling people what they should think. That's not idealistic, it's fucking down right reasonable.
omega_fat 6y ago
Go to purplepilldebate. That sub exists for the reasons you stated.
[deleted] 6y ago
I didn't even know that sub existed, but even so I still don't agree with perm banning people here who don't understand or even disagree. So long as they aren't here morally capitulating I don't see a problem with it at all. I'm not even remotely saying everything should be debated or that all ideas are valuable.
But, the entirety of Reddit is a fucking forum. People come here to read, learn, and discuss things. Preventing that might not be good for the long term health of a community, just a thought.
Blackhawk2479 6y ago
Call of Duty? I think you meant to say “and then I go lift”.
Perceval7 6y ago
Or Dark Souls, for that matter.
[deleted] 6y ago
There's nothing better than some Assassin's Creed after crushing some weights.
sadomasochrist 6y ago
Can we meet in the middle with Quake after the gym?
Blackhawk2479 6y ago
Hell yeah, I spent a ton of time on Quakes 1, 2 and 3 in my youth.
faensatan 6y ago
I think he meant Battlefield 1. It puts CoD to shame. But yeah, the OP has a point.
Trooper_1868 6y ago
Cod isnt bad, its pretty fun to just drop in and play a few games. If you suck at cod, you can get kills. If you suck at battlefield, there is nothing you can do :P I have both, but enjoy the new cod a lot because of no shitty jetpacks
[deleted] 6y ago
You can do both. Just don't play anything competitive after farmer carries (forearm day). If you're doing your workout right then you will suck at CoD for the rest of the day.
[deleted] 6y ago
This all or nothing shit needs to die for reals.
You can do both. Not everything is mutually exclusive. In the army I worked out more than I ever would in my life. That was also the first time I bought a game console and played regularly.
RedPill115 6y ago
The recurrent pattern to feminism seems to be:
1. Look at areas where women are privileged.
2. Use women's desire to complain to get them to complain about the drawbacks of those privileges.
3. Use that to take women's privileges away from them.
In medieval times, peasant women worked as hard as the men, while aristocratic women didn't work. 1920's middle class women didn't have to work either. It was feminism that told women "relationships are oppression, and work is freedom!". Gee, who does that benefit I wonder? Not women.
Women have gotten less happy every year since 1972. The more feminism women get, the less happy they are. Feminism isn't about women's rights, feminism is about maximizing the profit you can make off of women.
Patriarchysaurus 6y ago
Right on the fucking money my dude. For anyone who hasn't yet realized Feminism was devised as an instrument to redirect women's labor from private domestic affairs (raising children, maintaining the family home, etc.) to corporate and state interest; go check out "The Century of the Self" on YouTube. Edward Bernays (Freud's nephew) convinced American women of his day to smoke cigarettes by having paid models march while smoking as an "act of rebellion" (sound familiar?), and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
JcHgvr 6y ago
Heard that one before. I think it was Germans who said it.
Luckyluke23 6y ago
i boil it down to Rockefeller who wanted women to work so they could pay tax too.
yomo86 6y ago
They see the world through the constant eyes of a child. Daddy has got many moneyz. Moneyz buy nice things. Now, what he does is work. I am not allowed to work. Thus I need to work.
Same goes for courtship. They want to have the free availability for sex as men do. Yet, they overuse their SMV coin and complain later in life that there are no gentlemen anymore.
Power is never connected to responsibility for a woman.
Hjalmbere 6y ago
Said it before, saying it again: Feminism is a trade union for mean spirited unattractive women. They want all women to be as miserable as they are*. And they are succeeding.
*Notice the similarity with classical marxism which produces societies where everyone is equally miserable.
Enjoy the decline.
BurnDownTheMission68 6y ago
Rush came up with one of his Immutable Laws of Life in the 1980s: Feminism was created by ugly women to gain access to normal society
TheReformist94 6y ago
All points are valid but women are not statistically unhappier since 1972. Women have never had it better than any other time in history
saibot83 6y ago
So why the constant bitching 24/7? I don't think they're happy at all.
mcavvacm 6y ago
To be fair, who wants to wake up and realize they need to work for 50 years before getting a break, IF you survive until then that is.
Woman wanting to work for most of their lives in order to be "free" is mind bogglingly stupid but hey, whatever floats your boat.
RedPill115 6y ago
Yeah, it's amazing how the amount of social manipulation works. Phrase it a different way, get the herd to repeat it over and over again, and women are all over it.
Patriarchysaurus 6y ago
"Bu-bu-but being able to stay at home and cook barefoot in the kitchen is oppression!! Being a mother is the hardest job on planet Earth!!!1!"
mcavvacm 6y ago
Indoctrination is a powerful tool indeed.
acetylcysteine 6y ago
this is exactly the train of thought i have. allowing women to enter the workforce doubled the available labour, resulting in lower wages, and the ending of the single income household. so now both partners have to work full time jobs, manage a relationship, send their kids to daycare, and spend more money overall.
same goes with corporations pushing "pink" awareness for breast cancer. the nfl used this to increase merchandise sales to women by offering pink merchandise to support awareness for female cancers. they don't care about breast cancer awareness, they care about making money.
all this #metoo and related news pieces are just imo to get more women watching the news because it actually caters to them. if it was news regarding other issues they wouldn't watch, but now they have a huge demographic of women watching the news and advertisers probably love it.
RedPill115 6y ago
See it's so well done you even end up using their language to describe it.
"allow women to work" -> "take away women's other options and force them to work"
Amazing how mean the same thing, but sound so different isn't it?
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
redditer0 6y ago
I agree. I live in south america and there's also division made by politicians (surprisingly feminism IS a thing here so there's more division).
What red pillers fail to notice is that feminism is stronger in first world societies and more connected and/or more educated societies It's just another form of power with the same aim: population domestication and monopoly over the money/resources.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
redditer0 6y ago
Yeah, I totally agree. Also money and income inequality is something real (try to eat in a restaurant without it) while race, gender, etc. "structural discrimination" is very subjetive and can't be proven, and if it can't be proven you can always claim that it exists as long as there are difference between groups of people, which will always exist.
bentob_trp 6y ago
That is an interesting thought. By doubling the labor supply while keeping labor demand roughly the same you effectively halve the price of labor. I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that wages have been stagnant since the 70's
Unnormally2 6y ago
That... I never even considered that. I wonder how much of an effect that actually had.
Tallsmarthandsome 6y ago
Gloria steinem was NOT a cia agent, Do NOT google it!
eccentricrealist 6y ago
It's between that and a high rate of low skill immigrants
RobertTene 6y ago
Sounds like there's a clear connection here. You guys might be onto something big here.
Very interesting discussion indeed...
digitaler_demenz 6y ago
This was actually a common criticism of the suffragette movement over a hundred years ago, as for example discussed by Chesterton here, chapter 16 and onwards:
https://archive.org/details/whats_wrong_chesterton_librivox/whatswrong_16_chesterton.mp3
[deleted]
dr_warlock 6y ago
Look up the "red pill video compilation nuke"
Troll_Name 6y ago
100% of feminist/SJW demonstrations are staged.
By 'staged,' I mean:
In general these demonstrators can agree on one thing and one thing alone: any semblance of tradition or national identity is their enemy. This is exactly what's been preached to them through 4 years of university day care, now they're just angry and assembling-for-pay. Political Activism Incorporated hands them signs, talking heads on the news explain what they think and what they want. Welcome to communism, this is how it thrusts its way into a society. What comes next is a revolution followed by an indefinite reign of terror.
buttyanger 6y ago
I've been saying this for years, GDP didn't double when the workforce did and you used to be able to support a 4 person family on one income. Workers got screwed.
BurnDownTheMission68 6y ago
Vox Day has been saying this for years
You probably got it from him
Troll_Name 6y ago
It's common sense to anyone who looks at the facts instead of the slogans.
More people entered the workforce. Each human hour of work started outputting several times the wealth. Organizing large numbers of workers shrunk to a small fraction of the overhead. What did it all pay for? A parasitic underclass (aka refugees welcome even though the war is effectively over, and was never on in the first place where most of them came from) and a parasitic overclass (global deep state, swarms of degenerate celebrities preaching their fake morals.)
BurnDownTheMission68 6y ago
Far from common sense
It takes keen insight of economics and sociology to put the pieces together and Vox was the first one to do so
Give credit where it’s due boi
rp-oldgame 6y ago
No, it's plain common sense. Double the workforce and halve the wages. Never even heard of Vox Day and I realized this 20 years ago.
BurnDownTheMission68 6y ago
Of course once it is pointed out it is a logical sequence but you had to be on the vanguard of conservative thought to recognize and bring to light this scenario 20 years ago
Which, apparently you were
MattyAnon Admin 6y ago
Doubling supply does not halve the price. Supply and demand is not linear like this.
2x as many people working means 2x as much money being made which is 2x the spending. Yes you have twice as many workers, but you also have twice as much stuff being bought.
[deleted]
redditer0 6y ago
You are assuming that those people are being payed the same, but that's not the case. Probably is not HALF of the price but it will diminish it.
The same that would happen if, for example, you allow all people to enter your country.
Troll_Name 6y ago
Open borders aren't about work. They're about welfare, birthright citizenship, and the state's desire to control elections indefinitely. Coincidentally, these governments all tend to put on a monthly emotional episode about the need to disarm taxpayers - if total disarmament is not already implemented.
You mean, the overwhelmingly anti-communist US military?
eccentricrealist 6y ago
Doubling supply does not halve the price but it doesn't mean you'll make twice the money either as you will lower prices anyways. There is an efficient point and we're way past it when you can pay people to just sit around and take your phone calls and not do much else. Country wealth is generally correlated to aggregate value, that you're right in that it's not about size. That's why México has a huge labor force but little to show for it, as it's all just manufacturing. Meanwhile Israel is tiny but pure tech and the people are better off for it.
Troll_Name 6y ago
Several variables...
An important one: how much more money is going in? If the amount of money doubles, supply doubles and price per-unit stays the same. If The money stays the same and supply doubles, per-unit halves. There are ways of measuring the money-in for the working class.
bentob_trp 6y ago
In the short term, but in the long term individual wages will go down. With 2x the people you are replaceable. So you'd better settle for your shit wage or they can boot you.
MattyAnon Admin 6y ago
If this were true, large countries would all be poor.
I'm not arguing here for or against women in the workplace. I am saying double the workforce doesn't decrease wages, because it also doubles the spending.
Troll_Name 6y ago
Labor requires demand. Demand involves both desire and means.
"Are you hiring?"
"Sorry, we already have all the people we can handle." (no desire)
"Are you hiring?"
"I could use the help, but I'm barely affording this office as it is." (no means)
Supply of labor was deliberately inflated to throw the balance in favor of demand, AKA the big employers. Civil rights was a crony-elite boondoggle disguised as compassion. The practice continues to this very day, in the form of rainbow flag avatars for Monsanto Halliburton Goldman Sachs etc.
"The struggle is not over!"
Hung_Chad 6y ago
You’re making the same mistake feminists are. You are assuming identity politics. Not all women vote the same, as you noted. So you can’t say that “white women” were able to elect one or the other.
MGTOW-moniker 6y ago
Why do you keep saying WHITE women? Black women are worse and the others are no better
Forcetobereckonedwit 6y ago
Such is the state of affairs in this decade's chapter of American life. It's titled "Vagina gets to speak, and all she does is complain".
Just keep your head down and mumble something vaguely supportive if cornered. Otherwise, it'll all blow over in a few years. Oh and bang a few dozen of'em while they're demanding their share of sport sex. The pendulum always swings back eventually.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
pootboy 6y ago
huh? are you talking to me?
"and when the overwhelmingly white, overwhelming female voters that do finally show up to vote in this already doomed election, all swing heavily to Trump---"
[deleted] 6y ago
Both candidates were shit. Hilary was a horrible candidate, but to say she’s accomplished nothing when Trump will go down as both the least qualified man to ever be president and most likely the worst president in history is comical.
The only thing more comical than that is a person who I assume is a self proclaimed patriot criticizing women (a class of people who don’t even have rights in some places) for democratically standing up for their beliefs, one of the most American things anyone can ever do, while you sit in your basement and play COD.
newName543456 6y ago
Nixon and LBJ would like a word with you.
He'd have to try to "top" those.
chaseemall 6y ago
A man with swaths of experience in international business, who founded around 500 companies, and is actually the genius billionaire playboy philanthropist we all wish we were is somehow unqualified? The president should be the best we have to offer, whether they be from business, medicine, law or otherwise. Politics is not a career, but something entered after a successful career by the most eminent among us. I don't know what world you live in, but where I'm at Trump certainly fits that criterion.
[deleted]
lItsAutomaticl 6y ago
The best president we can find should be ready from day one and shouldn't have to be trained on the fucking job like Trump.
chaseemall 6y ago
Find me ANYONE who is ready to be president. Washington himself had to put down a rebellion or two.
[deleted] 6y ago
I didn’t realize being an eccentric playboy billionaire qualifies you to be president. We should’ve elected Bruce Wayne instead.
Here’s a good article you should read.
I actually do agree that in theory, a man shouldn’t have to be a career politician to be elected into public office. However when Ben Carson and Trump are the best the private sector has to offer, maybe we should rethink our options.
Also, calling Trump a genius is one of the funniest things I’ve read in awhile. His entire presidency has been a bumbling compilation of scandal after scandal, with a new one coming out seemingly every day. Because let’s be real, a 5D chess master wouldn’t do his absolute best to seem as guilty as possible at seemingly every turn.
Trump is a narcissist who will face what’s coming to him, eventually. Mueller is going to nail his ass to the wall once his cronies start falling like dominos. I say this not as anything other than an American who is deeply disturbed by the ineptitude of our government.
NabroleonBonaparte 6y ago
I’m not going to claim whether or not Trump’s hands in politics are clean or not. I won’t even argue with results to determine if his presidency has been successful so far or not.
But going off of how you adamantly critique him with strawmen on his personality based off of how you “assume” a president “should” behave shows your lack of understanding of Powertalk and utilizing media to maintain attention and win over people’s favor.
This is the social obliviousness that News has been exploiting. The grey-areas in social dynamics that most can’t observe easily. The fact that elites have personal financial interests in a capitalist society that relies on certain trends of a population.
Read about Powertalk, social dynamics, and social engineering.
These 3 things are the key to mastering dating, mastering business, and most relevantly, mastering politics
[deleted] 6y ago
I fully understand those concepts and utilize them. That wasn’t the issue I have with Trump. It’s everything else essentially. I admired his ability to shit on other GOP idiots.
NabroleonBonaparte 6y ago
This doesn’t state what your issue is.
Going on the assumption that you understand those concepts and that it isn’t his tactics that he’s currently employing that’s the issue,
What ARE your issues with Trump?
I’m not talking about the past and the election, I’m speaking currently.
You acknowledge that he used these tactics towards the opposition (GOP) and that he’s demonstrated skill, but this sentence is implying that he isn’t continuing to utilize those same tactics nor does he have any opposition still.
Why is it assumed the media doesn’t have a vested interest to oppose him? If there isn’t a bias, wouldn’t it be reasonable to see the news praise Trump in certain instances rather than solely negative?
Lastly, it would be false to assume Trump is the only one with access to these skills, why not the media as well?
Can you spot instances where the media utilized his tactics against him?
chaseemall 6y ago
Lol, you're gonna be so salty when unemployment hits record lows (already happening for blacks and Hispanics), GDP hits record highs (already has for the 2010's), Trump gets proved innocent again and goes down in history as one of our greatest presidents.
And come on, being highly accomplished in multiple complex domains is a pretty sure sign of genius.
Edit: really? A New York Times article? Through a Google redirect? Good fucking god.
hatethisplace2 6y ago
What the hell is wrong with you? Do you think people want him to be bad at this? Do you think all this uproar is just people being dicks for no reason? People don't hate him for being a meanie or white or whatever. They hate him for being incompetent. We've had cunts as leaders before, but at least they were cunning and smart and they could get through speeches. People are worried because the guy could destroy everything.
chaseemall 6y ago
Lol. You, like most of his detractors, are hallucinating.
Name one legitimately bad thing he's done. One.
[deleted] 6y ago
Funny how you were ready to crucify Hilary for her emails (never could charge her with anything could you, not endorsing her bullshit either by the way) and yet Trump is obstructing justice and you hamster it away. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.
History won’t be kind to the Donald. If you’re not starting to see the writing on the wall at this point, I don’t know what to tell you. I’m loving every second of it, though. Because when the shit finally hits the fan the implications will be far reaching. The GOP is doing nothing but establishing itself as the party of spineless enablers, religious zealots and even more recently, child rapists. Watching the GOP go the way of the dinosaur while Trump and his henchman are shackled off in chains will be entertaining to say the least. Almost as entertaining as seeing which party will convince all the disenfranchised single party voters and poor uneducated southerners to continue to vote against their own self interests.
chaseemall 6y ago
Don't get me wrong, I hate the GOP. Bunch of fucking weaklings.
As for GEOTUS, I see him as the agent of their destruction, just as he is the agent of the Democrats destruction. Trump obstructing justice? You're gonna have to give me more than that bud. In what way? With what proof? What subpeona'd documents did he burn? What emails did he delete? (And archive the fucking link first!)
As for Clinton? Comey protected her. Lynch colluded with her. And Trump was willing to go easy on her once in office to preserve the appearance of mending fences, and to potentially soothe hot tempers.
EDIT: I know the discussion has moved further in the thread, but:
I'm sorry are you referring to Moore? As in the Roy Moore who dated women above the age of consent and was entirely gentlemanly with them, even getting their mother's permission beforehand? That Roy Moore?
As opposed to the liberals like Roman Polanski who drugged and sodomized a 13 year old, and was later applauded by the Hollywood elite like nothing happened, or Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey or Louis CK or Al Franken the DEMOCRAT senator? Most of the people impacted by #MeToo are LIBERALS. And meanwhile Moore, not accused of sexual harassment (except by one woman of profoundly dubious character) but of dating girls who were of legal age, with parental approval, but "too young and nubile" for him, is the one you focus on.
If you're a redpiller, you know Roy Moore did nothing wrong. Meanwhile tons of beloved liberals have been the target of a massive moral panic which holds the nation in a grippe beyond grippes and promises a backlash against them the likes of which the country has not seen since the days of McCarthy—who also did nothing wrong.
I'm sorry, but you liberals fucking disgust me.
[deleted] 6y ago
Getting rid of mueller and trying to shut down the Russia investigation is almost textbook obstruction. You won’t need to take my word for it, you’ll see for yourself in what I imagine to be a relatively short timeframe.
If you really think a narcissist like trump wouldn’t have NAILED Clinton to the fucking wall at the first chance he got you’re delusional. The reaction from his droogs alone would’ve made him grow a big fat rubbery one.
I do find it funny how some people can both think of Hilary as a master manipulator whose done everything from murder to collude with Russia while also believing that she’s dumb enough to leave incriminating emails out there for the whole fucking world to see. You’d think a murdering evil genius would be able to hide some emails wouldn’t you?
[deleted]
chaseemall 6y ago
1) Trump has the authority to fire a special counsel, no questions asked, especially since Mueller is counsel not even an investigator, let alone the prosecutor you believe him to be, and since NO CHARGES have been filed. You can't obstruct a criminal investigation that DOESN'T EXIST. Just to be clear.
2) Trump is going for a GOAL. He's not going to compromise his presidency to drag his vanquished foe's corpse behind his chariot.
3) Did I say Hilary was a master manipulator? Look back at my posts and look and see if I've even said any of the things you have impugned to me. Quit projecting some Shariablue caricature of a Trump supporter onto me you hallucinating, hypochondriac imbecile.
EDIT: Before you tender your inevitable response, please see my edit to the comment above.
[deleted] 6y ago
Except he essentially did the exact same thing to Bannon, who could bring down the whole circus if he wanted to given his intimate knowledge of the administration.
Keep on deluding yourself into thinking Trump knows what he’s doing. Maybe when he’s being dragged away in handcuffs you’ll finally admit you were wrong, but probably not.
This situation is a win win for me, btw. He stays in office? Less taxes on my family. He gets publicly humiliated? Even better
chaseemall 6y ago
I'm going to regret replying to you...but I'm going to anyway.
Slamming Bannon in response to a public statement given and then not refuted by Bannon is not in any way a parallel situation to Achilles dragging the corpse of Hector around the city of Troy.
You failed to answer points 1 and 3.
Please see the edit I made to the comment earlier in the chain which begins "Don't get me wrong, I hate the GOP."
pootboy 6y ago
er, not really. i'm criticizing women for protesting the outcome of the election they quite literally decided. but not to their faces, because a rational argument like that would enrage them.
(loved your "women don't even have rights in some places!" bit though-- in a conversation about white chicks in america, no less. talk about comical! do you do open-mic coffeehouses as well?)
[deleted] 6y ago
Trump only got 42% of women’s votes? Funny you’re talking about a rational argument freaking people out when your argument falls apart when faced with even the most basic fact checking.
By the way, even if a majority of women did vote Trump, which they didn’t, your point would still be nonsense, because there would still be millions and millions of women who didn’t vote Trump with the right to protest (even if they did vote for him they could still protest).
pootboy 6y ago
53% of the white chick vote. in case you missed the entire point of my post. about white chicks marching to protest white chicks. jiminy crackers, do i need to spell it out for you in color-coded alphabet blocks?
[deleted] 6y ago
So the 47% who didn’t vote for trump somehow loses the right to protest because the other 53% (majority of whom weren’t college educated... shocking) voted for him?
If I can dismantle your arguments through a 20 second google fact check and basic logic then imagine what would happen if you made this point to an academic or even a first year political science student lmfao.
pootboy 6y ago
you mean my carefully academic argument about how i'd make fun of white women for protesting their own voting outcomes if only it was worth the resultant silly hysterics? boy you've sure proven me wrong there, ainchas.
[deleted] 6y ago
Why do you keep referring to white women as some autonomous hive mind? They’re individuals, sometimes with conflicting political views. Almost like people of the same demographic can think differently. Wow! What a novel concept.
pootboy 6y ago
it's just a shame more of them don't have better political views. and spend a lot less time marching around with pink hats and bedazzled signs, and a little more time marching into the voting booth.
[deleted] 6y ago
Stick to COD buddy, clearly politics and critical thinking isn’t your thing.
pootboy 6y ago
says the gal having a hissy that i dare poke fun at the very demographic that gave us millions more votes for bush, romney, and trump than any other.
suck it up, kiddo. as it stands, "critical thinking" is a term dramatically over your paygrade.
[deleted]
Slim___ 6y ago
Mods, please ban politics from the Red Pill.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Slim___ 6y ago
Yes. The OP was Blue Bill. Red pill is reality.
The OP was crying, wishing women and politics to be different than they are.
Accept reality.
Unless you are banging one of those chicks in a pink hat. Go post your political whinning somewhere else.
The OP was the most panty-waisted thing I've read in a while. Man up and stop complaining about reality.
The sad thing is: there is direct correlation between the growing number of pink hats and the shrinking number or red pill men. But I digress.
Most of those pink hats would be gone in a flash in the presence of a man who made the lady parts tingle.
Hell, if I were a chick and had to deal with the OP self-doubt and victim puking, I'd put on a pink hat too, just to annoy him. I sure as heck wouldn't want to #^&*^ him.
chaseemall 6y ago
Just because the rules of reality don't change doesn't mean we can't change things while within those rules of reality. Patriarchies have existed before. Societies of strong men have existed before. We can identify a problem, and solve it.
chaseemall 6y ago
Most men who have been here for a while end up right wing, because right wing thought, in its uncucked form, embraces masculine hierarchy.
It'll happen to you too. The red pill on sex leads to all other red pills
Slim___ 6y ago
I used to be right-wing. Then I came to my senses. You seem to be saying that Liberal men are cucks. I disagree. Although if you consume nothing but corporate media, you certainly would be forgiven for thinking that. I disagree that sideing with the corporate ruling class and voting against my own best interest is The Red Pill.
chaseemall 6y ago
Well this is a rather old thread, but I'll bite.
The corporate ruling class is the establishment—they are in charge of both mainline Republicans and mainline Democrats. On the "left," these are Hillary, etc. On the "right" these are the cuckservatives, such as Lindsey Graham, John McCain, etc., the ones who are scared of Trump. The actual right wing is not Graham, McCain, "Muh Oil", "Muh Israel" asshattery. It is fundamentally rule of law, following the natural order, and following the truth wherever it may lead. If consequentialist economists say that cutting welfare is better, and we witness that giving out welfare makes people poorer, you cut welfare. If you notice that asians do well in school and blacks do poorly, you don't give affirmative action out, but accept that natural differences exist and stick to meritocracy. And so on with everything else.
benzguy1972 6y ago
Exactly. The beta men lean left. They're the ones who who seriously think of frivolous women's issues that have no basis in reality. They're white-knights.
Red-Pill men do their own thing. Real women tend to jump on OUR bandwagon and follow OUR lead.
Slim___ 6y ago
It is true that the Left is awash in beta. That's why they are losing elections in America. But I'm still not going to vote against my own best economic interest just because there's some pansies who also vote that way.
APSTNDPhy 6y ago
I go more right the more I earn.
Slim___ 6y ago
I have had the opposite experience. The more money I earn the more I realize that my lifestyle is made possible by battles Liberals fought before I was even born.
[deleted]
[deleted]
lItsAutomaticl 6y ago
I'm trying really hard to understand your point, the best I can understand is that some white women nominated Hillary, and then other white women voted for Trump, thus the white women in the photo are literally protesting themselves. Alright, that's pretty fucking stupid. More importantly, is this TheRedPill or The_Donald? I don't care about this political shit.
F_Dingo 6y ago
You better start caring about this political shit or it'll make you start caring. You either find politics on your own or it finds you.
Start caring man, don't be some dreg who says "FUCK POLITICS! FUCK VOTING!" and then wonders why shit went down the drain.
[deleted] 6y ago
You may not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in you.
RobotsCantBePeople 6y ago
Why do you have such strong opinions about this?