2y ago The Hub
@beer2 Both of them have proven proficiency in red pill understanding and provide an array of ideas and perspectives that are not necessarily the same as mine, which sometimes changes my views, and sometimes helps me strengthen my views by trial.
Surrounding yourself with only those who agree is a recipe for stagnation which stifles self improvement and growth.
They have both shown dedication to our cause and have demonstrated allegiance to our purpose through years of efforts and brotherhood.
I do not agree with all of my brothers all of the time, but I do defend my brothers and have their backs as they have mine.
It is within the purview of women to use and discard people when it is no longer immediately strategic- long term consequences be damned.
They have a proven track record within our hierarchy, whereas people challenging our group, such as yourself, have no reputation and no history or bond with the brotherhood that created, maintained, and defends this discussion group for men.
I'll take a thousand @adam-l and @mentorpheus over a troll who wishes to sow division among long-standing members, as the troll understands not the benefits of masculinity and brotherhood, and fails to find his own purpose, seeking validation leaching off of others'.
Read More@beer2 Nobody's perfect, we all have our weaknesses. Mine is kebab.
@Zavss Cool. I agree.
So why does RPS defend these two people? Everytime these two have an argument it goes exactly how I described. Then RPS comes in with a super cool diplomatic statement to defend these two.
Is it because these 2 are the few who still participate on this forum and losing them is not advisable? Is it because of traffic? Is it because of the EC tag?
Hey its probably because RPS is busy with his own shit and doesn't want this forum on his mind right? Idk. Whatever.
Why do you allow open leftist like adam-l and mentorpheus, with an obvious agenda on your platform? Don't pretend that they don't spout their nonsense incessantly. Don't pretend they have had one discussion in good faith. It is usually: make statement, reel at response, deflect, feign moral and intellectual superiority, attempt at insult, wait for a while, repeat same statement. Don't pretend this doesn't happen.
Is it because they are one of the old school ECs and you feel they shouldn't be kicked out, or at least defended when rightly attacked? Is it because you think they bring traffic to your website? What is it?
@adam-l Aaah yes. Another deflection. Another veiled attempt at an insult. Never admit you were wrong. Let a week or so pass. Then repeat your anti-natalist nonsense again. Don't worry adam-l. You're an old, presumably sickly, lefty. No chick wants to be near you so you don't have to worry about reproduction.