Overpopulation will kill the earth. The less people being born the better. The issue in Western nations is that white women arent breeding while immigrants multiply like rabbits. White westerners will slowly be overrun by savage immigrants with backwards cultures. With the people getting stupider politicians will pass more and more draconian laws in the name of "equality."

This is how I see the big picture:

People are better at reproducing, than people in charge solving the problems of increased world population. And indeed, I think that feminism, and putting bigger emphasis of women's demands reduces population. Women want the best support they can get, and want the best support for their children. Why should they stop? Why? Two recent posts from MensRights

1. Wales gives 77 times as much money to women's groups as to men's. Okay, it is still a semi-voluntary thing, not a duty, like say taxes...

2. A 2010 government publication reveals that an average New Zealander male pays back the money to the state at age 40. From that age on, average Joe still has a positive net fiscal impact on NZ. Till the age of 80, where social pension adds up to a bigger amount, than that man contributed to his country in taxes. What about women? Well, average Jane is 45 when she is milked the same amount of money than she puts in the budget. But that's a snapshot of her life. She peaks around age 52, where she puts in roughly NZ$5,000 more money, than she takes out. To put in perspective, Joe puts in roughly NZ$15,000 more at age 47 than he takes out. But what about her lifetime? What about the cumulative impact of Jane on the state? Well, Jane Average always has a negative cumulative net fiscal impact. Meaning, that there is no time in her life, where her generated taxes up till that point are bigger than the financial support he got in her life. At age 57 Jane is at -NZ$25,000. At age 80, she is at -NZ$150,000. So the more women New Zealand has, the more deficit they have. Uh, you ask about national dept? NZ$232 billion.

So ask yourself this question: "Why would women stop, when they are winning?"

They would be stupid. They already have a scapegoat, so if the economy collapses no need to search one. But turning back to the first paragraph of population problem, this is the current solution. You have a world population where there is not enough resource for everybody, because humans are "imperfect". People in developed countries have more resources, but have bigger demands. People in developing countries have less resources, and get well with less. So instead of making up a conflict, or waiting for one, then killing those who want to take it by power, they came up with this solution. This solution is: slowly replacing the population of higher needs, with the population of bigger needs. And feminism is a handy tool to do so. And is the worlds biggest, and best scam.

People in general have higher empathy towards women. So if you come up with an idea which is widely supported, you can spend more on it. The more you spend on it, the higher the amount you can redirect to your account. All you have to do to alienate the sexes, raise your citizens in that atmosphere, make sure they create as few children with the same demands as them, as possible. And make sure your country is attractive enough to people with lover needs. Who cares when those immigrant's children get poisoned by the gender shit? There are in essence an infinite resources of those immigrants.

Evidence? There are some? UN data of total fertility rate by country, the poorer the country the more children are born. Russian GDP after a Red Piller alpha took over the country

My conclusion: If you have to work from your own resources, you need someone with deficit in the empathy department. If you can use masses of immigrants (which was not the case in post-Soviet Russia), you need feminism to make room for the immigrants. That's so simple.

When girls graduate college, they should get married and have babies, instead of getting jobs or going onto grad school.

Why even go to college? That's just CC and debt. Know way too many men who put their daughter through college who graduated and got married soon after and didn't use their degree a day in their lives.

We live in a society where simply saying that maybe we should not let in tens of millions of illegal aliens is met with cries of "racism" and "pandering to the worst elements." You can't even say "illegal alien" because that is "dehumanizing."

The entire culture and language is coopted by women to make them feel good. Gays want to buttfuck in public in front of your kids? They are just being themselves...You homophobe.

Women want to marry each other... Better not say a word except something like "that is so sweet! It is all about LOOOOOOVVVVVVE! I am so happy that you are munching the carpet of an overweight, smelly, fungus filled cavern. Yahhhh! You go girl!"

Chicks with dicks want to swing their cocks into the little girls room and watch 14 year olds pee? Better not protest or even make a statement in opposition.....you transgenderphobe.

What are you? A hater? Don't you have better things to do than worry about how people love?

Nah, actually I don't.

The following photo comes from an article on "The EU's Suicide By Reality Denial"

http://thesaker.is/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Ministers-of-Defense-small.jpg

I don't think falling birth rates are a bad thing. In 1916, the world's population was about 2.1 billion. In only 100 years, that has more than tripled.

Fuck making babies. If our population keeps expanding at the same exponential rate it has been for the past two centuries, the world will run out of food in 50 years or less.

If this was 1940, I would agree with all of your points. But it's not. It's 2016, and we're overpopulated. More babies is not what humanity needs.

More like empower the Jew, kill nations.

[deleted]

Thank god since we already overpopulated af

What this boils down to is that her life satisfaction means dick. For us to qualify a woman's laughable fore' into self discovery and career development is societal suicide. She ain't gonna be happy no matter which way you swing it and everyone is better served when she's beholden and servile to a dominant head of household and utilized for breeding. We really don't need any more of them playing big girl career cunt. It serves no purpose, it flaunts basic biology and it doesn't give her any joy not being under heel.

When girls graduate college, they should get married and have babies, instead of getting jobs or going onto grad school.

Since it's not OUR job (through lack of capability) this should be left to women to decide. It's a bit of a life changing decision to just tell them what they gonna do.

EDIT: Does Singapore have a meritocratic system of government?

Feminism is a suicide meme. It is literally extinguishing Western civilization.

just fuck my civilization up fam

Weaken men to make way for a one world nation.

This bullshit is not "on a macro-socioeconomic scale". Population control is a necessity so the retarded masses, yourself included don't over produce the hands of competing labour and bottom out the wages of all. A hard lesson the Chinese are only benefitting from as of recently.

No, being denied sexual socialism from a Gynocentric system so that you can reproduce, or to "keep women happy" is not a justification for annihaliating our quality of life as men. This post is trailer trash blue, and another pedestal post about the "happiness of women".

Lastly the west is still here and conservative movememts are on the rise which are being used to displace the old establishment, for purposes the ignorant masses such as yourself are better of not knowing.

See, lets look at it in true RP perspective.

Now, women marry late and ride CC until she hits wall. Cool, then we have more and more women to have sex with. Can you tell how many women our dad's generation slept with? We're clearly doing good in-terms of number of women we slept with.

Ok, in terms of stable and fulfilling relationship, we have none. We're losing out. Previous generation had more fulfilling relationships than us.

That's life guys, you can't have everything

so does this mean that with just a little alpha i can get women to pay for my shit? i don't wanna work for a living

that last bullet point nails it. moral integrity and greater good over a woman's selfish desires.

There are 9 fucking billions of us cockroaches on this earth. If anything, I advise you to wear a condom and not knock the bitch up.

Do you have any proof that more children = better economy? The job market is over saturated and with automation it will only get worse. How is a large next generation a good thing?

Humanity needs higher natality and at the same time touching female rights to ride the cock carousel is out of the question? No problem! Start working on artificial womb!

If I had the option of giving a sperm sample, and returning 9 months later to collect my child from the clinic I would have 2-3 kids now. I would raise them better myself than any of the modern woman ever could.

Good points. Gives me an opportunity to plug this article again:

It’s obvious that women want to work rather than procreate, but this is not because (most*) women particularly like working or because they prefer work to marriage and family. It’s not because housework is drudgery, most women who work do something similar to housework in their jobs.

The reason women want to work is because working is high status.** The reason women don’t have children is because having children is low status, and the more children the lower the status.

...

Having children is lower status than eduction, working, travel, or having status-giving interests. Being a stay-at-home mother is low status compared to being a working mother. Having many children is lower status than having one or two children. Having children young is lower status than having them once infertility hits.

This, more than anything, is why he have such low birth rates.

So, the answer to the fertility crisis is not tax changes, natalism benefits, or motherhood welfare. The way to get women to want to reproduce is to make children the ultimate status symbol.

50% of all children being born in 100 years will be from Muslim nations. Think more along the lines of Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Niger. Nigeria's Christian birth rate has fallen to 4 while its Muslim birth rate has risen to 7. Not only has feminism destroyed nations, it will have destroyed entire cultures, religions and ethnic groups. White Europeans will be a tiny minority in 100 years.

As an atheist it is upsetting to see the values like rationalism and liberalism slowly die. But then I realized that perhaps they are evolutionarily inferior to fundamentalism and patriarchy. I believe the world wars removed a lot of alphas from the gene pool. Japan, Germany, Koreas etc.

Countries like America had fewer losses and thus aren't as beta as Europe and Far East. Russia probably had an insanely high number of alphas, which would explain their still aggressive behavior even today. China has a massive population. The Muslim world hardly suffered any losses in those wars.

With the loss of massive alpha populations, other regions will eye beta feminist nations and wish to conquer. Europe has been a vassal state of Russia and USA since WW2. Japan and the Koreas have been under American control as well. As Americas power wanes, Russia and Islam will want Euurope. China will want Japan/Koreas.

The elite want immigrants aka non-white people because they're willing to settle for lesser wages and their votes are easier to acquire with leftist pandering.

[deleted]

Other high-income developed nations like Japan, USA, Germany, Italy, Taiwan, and New Zealand will all struggle immensely -- for fucks sake, we're all struggling ALREADY-- due to the lack of babies.

kind of offended you said nz and not Australia also. what we aren't developed enough for you! /s

but seriously we are going to be paying for this feminism shit down the road. the population is aging and living longer, but they have told men to be beta sexless virgins. how are we going to repopulate the world?

You are fucking mental, man.

And what the fuck do you want? To keep women ignorant and uneducated so they see popping babies as a more viable way of life?

Stop bitching about women riding cock caroussels and being free. Free women means more sex for everyone what can meet a minimum standard: reach that standard and that's it. If you want to start a family, start it on your own, get someone who wants to settle down or just find yourself an uneducated woman with no more aspirations than being a mom.

Women are part of humanity. Cannot disregard what they want because of and grandiose idea about saving humanity which includes them.

Have some perspective. Yes, Western societies are aging. We will figure something out (or not). Controlling women (or any sector of the population) is a step back.

And I don't know if women are happier now or not. It's not my problem nor my responsibility to deal with that. They are free enough to find what makes them happy.

I guess Saudi Arabia or Pakistan is your ideal country. Fuck off. Cunt