Let's take some basic tenets of 3rd wave feminism and say we were to accept them at face value.

• women have been oppressed for thousands of years.
• women and men are equal in every way.
• men have a moral responsibility to promote the interests of women to compensate for their systemic disadvantage.
• in spite of political progress in the last 100 years, women are still not occupying %50 of the management and executive positions in the workforce.
• that political appointments do not reflect at least %50 women shows a systematic bias against women, which men and women in power have a moral obligation to correct.
• when men create male-only environments, it excludes and necessarily oppresses women, gays, and basically everyone else.
• male only environments create and encourage "toxic" male behaviors, and this can be remedied by the presence of women.
• heterosexual white men have historically, and continually conspire to exclude women, and pretty much everyone else, from their networks of capitalist power.
• the presence of women in these networks would disrupt capitalist oppression.
• laws and regulations that require the presence of women, or really anyone who isn't a hetero white male, in any and all political and commercial endeavors, is necessary for a just society.
• people, but mainly men, who use sexist, homophobic, transphobic, or any other language that expresses contempt for cocksuckers of any kind, must be de-legitimized and expelled from their job or role in society through public criticism.
• racism is a disease of the white mind, and resistance to the lawful diversification of white spaces and power networks is violence, it is the right of the oppressed to respond to this violence with violence.

If this were about any other group, like if you were to replace "women" and their comrades with an ethnic group or the working class, these tenets are no different from any other authoritarian revolutionary group. Instead of building their own businesses, networks, or nations, they want to insert their own loyalists into the existing system and police it.

It is no different from the Chinese communist party requiring that all businesses include a party member as a political representative who ensures compliance with party doctrine. This guarantees jobs for people who are by most objective criteria, retarded, which makes them extremely loyal to the cause, and ready to denounce their co-workers for the smallest transgression, in exchange for promotion within both the party and the business.

When any company these days gets past a certain size, you see the appearance of some fat dykey woman, or a weaselly gay guy, usually associated with HR, but sometimes with ties to marketing, who is basically crap at what they do, but they are there under the aegis of promoting "diversity." One who identifies as "trans-" is the exact tactic used in the early 20th century in the various putsches where crippled, mentally ill and other socially marginalized people were given extraordinary powers as political "surveyors," and local party officials. Their jobs and resulting social status positions were contingent upon their ideological purity, and had no real performance criteria. This had the useful effect of making them dangerous zealots who always needed someone less ideologically pure to denounce to ensure their position. The party needed relatively few of these people (less than %10) to keep the rest of the population docile and fearful for their jobs.

What they are really there for is as appointees from an unofficial revolutionary party who are there both to police the organization to ensure employees don't develop a camaraderie that would create a power network that might exclude party members. They also act as an informal (and sometimes formal) channel to academia, which enables politically supportive students and professors to get internships and jobs.

This is not just in China. Companies in the middle east have long had to accept giving jobs to political appointees. It is impossible to do business in many of those countries without hiring members of the royal family or the children of bureaucrats and politicians.

You could say that this is just the way power works in the world, and I would say you are right. "Diversity" has nothing to do with women, oppression, racism or whatever other pretext these people use. It is part of the standard playbook for an emerging "deep state" in a country to acquire and consolidate its hold on power, and reduce the number of people it needs to manage to stay in control.

Companies like the academic connection because it qualifies them for "research" tax credits, and it reduces their exposure to random public attacks from party members. Let's just say that no company with a black, green haired dyke heading up the diversity committee will ever have to worry about political activists undermining or creating uncertainty in shareholder meetings.

Given the largely hollow and tenuous valuations of tech companies, and the catastrophic brand damage an outrage scandal can cause, valley companies are accepting these SJW police to reduce their exposure to political risk. Public companies whose CEO's are compensated based on share price are particularly vulnerable to political scandal, and many of them have accepted these diversity police into their organizations.

Lesson Learned:

• Diversity and Feminism are pretexts for an ongoing political coup.

• Academia is the protected staging area for authoritarian regimes.

• History is full of examples of how coalitions of cocksuckers want to regulate access to alpha dick.

• Do not underestimate what SJWs will do to keep their politically defined jobs, they are dangerous.