So superficial [Rant] | TheRedPill

I am by no means buff, I think of myself as attractive (Woo-hoo self esteem) so I decided fuck it tinder here I come. I got 3 matches all <HB6. And no reply's to my messages. So social experiment time, lets see if TRP is really right.

I have lurked for a while and everything makes sense but I wanted to believe, ... doesn't matter. What matters is that I decided to create a Tinder fake, using some random jacked white guy at the beach and some guy on top of a mountain as my images. My bio "I'm a serial killer. Just so you know." The matches are at least 3-5x what I had before (<HB8), they reply instantly, and they message first. What makes my angry is that I "knew" this was going to happen but I'm still angry about it. Guess its time to pray to the gods of Iron.

Lessons Learned:

Do not try tinder unless you are visibly "buff-as-fuck"

Go lift god-dammit

If you made it down here and you care I'm 17-18 about 6 months of lurking.

Edit: Formatting

Permalink

[deleted]

wtg2989 10y ago

Go read any article about female sexuality and it will say that they don't care about looks as much as men do. That includes any red pill literature. He gets a pass in my book

NightwingTRP 10y ago

6 months of lurking, and you didn't learn that women care about looks just as much as men do?

However many months of lurking and you haven't learnt that women care about looks more than men do?

It's not surprising given that they automatically place so much value on their own looks rather than trying to find other things to offer besides vagina. They can't get outside their own heads. Women are also excellent at running bullshit psychological warfare and redefining shit as they see fit and everybody believing them. The idea that men care more about looks than women is a load of shite. We'll fuck down by 3 points if we're desperate. A chick won't.

The real difference is that a greater proportion of the decision men make is based upon the woman's looks. A lesser proportion of the woman's decision is based upon the man's looks. Things like status, money/resources and game all come into play in similarly equal measure. (Except status tends to be the trump.)

Women have successfully equated this to "men are more shallow" when we're actually not. We won't disqualify for superficial reasons (well... not until we have standards anyway, now I do it all the time.) Women will always disqualify for the most superficial of reasons and then lie about it.

clavabot 10y ago

There is no greater teacher then experience, Truer words are hard to come by.

TheMGhandi 10y ago

Would like you to feel my truth smack you in the face?

hypno_disc 10y ago

Bitches and their hamsters like to complain about fat shaming, the objectification of women and men having impossible standards, but the truth is they are even worse than guys. Literally 90% of the male population aren't good enough for these cunts, their standards are ridiculous. Must be 6 ft tall, 80% of guys are fucked automatically since you cant do shit to change your height, must be a jacked bodybuilder, a figure that takes years of dedication and training to achieve, throw in the fact they need atleast a 6 inch cock and there goes another large chunk of the male population since 5-5.5 is around the average.

What do guys ask for? Wear some make-up and don't be a hamplanet. Fucking hypocrites.