https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiESisEL43c
Modern RP Truth #1)
"This all comes from the discredited leftist idea that gender is socially constructed. If gender is socially constructed and you are taught to be a boy or taught to be a girl rather than having a lot of that behavior genetic-- rather a lot of that behavior encoded within you [by virtue of your chromosomes]-- if gender is a performance and is a social construct, there's no reason why girls can't behave like boys and boys can't behave like girls.
Now we're beginning to see that social construct fall apart now. One of the ways in which it falls apart is the transgender debate. Now progressives are telling us that people can be born with the wrong brain. If you can be born with a female brain there must be such as thing AS a female brain so surely femininity can't be a social construct. Make your bloody minds up!"
TLDR above; If you can have a woman's brain then there is such a thing as a woman's brain. [It's a] biological basis for certain behavioral differences."
Conclusion: Gender psychology and neurology are the basis for RP theory. They are as gender defined and specific as the genes that define us as a species.
Modern RP Truth #2)
He later goes on to say this after it being suggested he might be a gay-raging misogynist:
"Why would it be misogynistic? I don't care! I don't have a dog in the fight! I don't care! I don't care if you're thin or fat as a woman I wouldn't want to fuck you anyway. What I want is for people to be happy, and I see people not being happy because I see that women are moving in a very very dangerous direction told lies by whacky far left feminist crazies who want to control other people because they are hurting inside... In many cases it's 30-40 year old bitter old women trying to lecture 20 year old girls on how to behave. It's an ugly woman-on-woman violence [modern feminism]... I see women get drawn into this and it is sad."
Conclusion: Hypergamy; jealousy, fear, competition... You name it, they are all a part of a regressive leftist post-wall driven biological sentiment, and they can be tied into RP theory seamlessly.
If you like this then I suggest the full interview on Rubin's site: http://www.ora.tv/rubinreport/2015/10/9/milo-yiannopoulos-and-dave-rubin-gamergate-feminism-atheism-gay-rights-and-more-full-interview-0_5jsyjhel5aps
Let loose. I'm sure this might be at very least a little controversial here. I'm interested to see how this is received.
Edit: I'm happy to say that this has been one of the most intellectually potent and stimulation conversations I have witnessed on this sub and I'm not surprised one bit because we're mostly fair, reasonable, and intelligent people here. You'll see future contributions here from me but rather than lecturing you all, I will open discussion and allow the intelligence and foresight of the subscribers here to draw inevitable conclusions. I still have much to learn and I'm excited to do it here!
getRedPill 10y ago
I like what Milo does, I don't care he doesn't like atheism (or how modern atheism are behaving, subtle difference there) or is gay. He speaks and holds frame like a manly man. Feminists can argue against him with logic because indoctrinated people have not been told How to do that and 2) they can't argue against him in their prefered way because insulting him is Polically uncorrect.
This gonna be fun. Hand me the popcorn.
Left in it's obsession to fight against the evil capitalist hetero-normative hegemonic rich white west (blah blah, you know the rest of trans-crap words) created a monster with many heads fighting in many fronts to do the battle for them, now each head it's beginning to attack each other so the trans-silly cis-monster is destroying itself.
Enjoy. You are witnessing an historic event that will be remembered for years, maybe centuries. This is like the Fall of Berlin Wall when (again) the left was shown to be a ridiculous façade of non sense. This time the Wall is not hard-brick, is "soft" but equally tyrannical.
This is like you are one of the firsts watching a top classic movies of all the times. Image you being one of the first watched a movie like Star Wars when first released, James Bond 1, Jurassic Park or Terminator 1. Little did they know back then what of piece of historical gold they seeing.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
I think the far left and right are well off the mark on so many issues. The truth lies off the ideological spectrum where TRP is right now.
getRedPill 10y ago
Left exists whether you like it or not.
__ROOSTER__ 10y ago
Right now Homos are just about the only people allowed to speak the truth about men and women. Not because they are immune to counterattacks, they aren't. They still need good frame to hold of the witches,.
The real reason they can speak the truth is they don't care about ever getting pussy. That lack of caring allows them to see the truth. All other male writers pander and couch there arguments so they can hopefully still get laid.
I doing know Milo much, I know Donovan and he speaks the truth and doesn't care what people think.
[deleted] 10y ago
Ironically, one way young women truly are victims is that they are victims of feminism.
Seeing them in this light helps deal with anger phase.
ledditor_1337 10y ago
You people are unaware how much damage that queers have done to the traditional family unit? If he was truly RP he'd take responsibility for his own mental health and stop being queer. This thread is sliding to the max.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
You're lack of knowledge of animal nature is sidelining your progress. In some samples more than 20% of primates engage in frequent homosexual activities. It's a not a fucking mystery that gay animals exist. Homosexuals have their contributing roles to the tribe as do alphas. Biology is an enlightening science sir.
Edit: One of the reasons why we should embrace the male Homosexual community is that inherently they will be at worst AGAINST straight or bisexual female interests and at best FOR straight single and gay male interests. They are the most objective bodies we have to converse with, and they ask nothing from us except tolerance in return for their total support.
ledditor_1337 10y ago
I'd rather have a society worth living in.
RidleySmith 10y ago
I think he'll do more for men than anyone else in the manosphere... And he's not even in the manosphere. Honestly he's like fucking batman, because unlike the rest of us, they can't really touch him, he operates outside the normal rules, simply by being gay.
[deleted]
briggs-D 10y ago
A lot of the other guys who do this are absolutely fucking retarded. I've been watching YouTube videos of this stuff and its appalling at how bad some of these guys are. They cannot standup to ridicule, they cannot hold frame, and they certainly cannot argue at all.
I've seen more than enough guys go the MRA route and try becoming the victim - as if that's going to work. It makes me want to puke.
Love Milo though.
RidleySmith 10y ago
Yeah, I'm sad at how poorly Roosh comes off on screen
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
stickmandied 10y ago
When you have to say you're not something, you've lost the frame battle
J_Dizzle1000 10y ago
He's the hero we need, not the hero we deserve.
[deleted]
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
"Pull my finger."
Wait. Wrong movie. It's Michael Caine. Awesome scene though!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioTMlrCoU2E
americnleprchaun 10y ago
I don't get how people can say gender is a social construct. Gender roles; yeah sure, but gender is biology. Race is a social construct (we're all effectively the same with some variation in disease prevalence), but gender clearly distinguishes humans into two (now more) categories.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
Except race isn't a completely social construct. Eugenics are dangerous but science must eventually acknowledge advantage and disadvantage in both men, women and all other varying gene pools in order to provide fair and balanced treatment of all.
americnleprchaun 10y ago
Sorry if I was unclear, I'm not saying race is a completely social construct. I'm saying it is largely a social construct with some variation in disease prevalence. There is more emphasis in how we look than the actual biology of racial differences.
waynebradysworld 10y ago
You must be new here, nothing you just said is true. There are large physical and mental differences between races. Race is very real, and very telling.
americnleprchaun 10y ago
Please elaborate on the large physical and mental differences between races that are genetic and not cultural. AFAIK the biggest difference are bone structures of the face but feel free to enlighten me.
edit: Also something I said is definitely true. There is variation in disease prevalence based on race. For example, Africans are more likely to suffer from sickle cell anemia, so please don't go making blanket statements when you could actually contribute.
[deleted]
[deleted] 10y ago
But men calling themselves women are actually women and gay men are just as masculine as straight men, right? That's bullshit but race is real. Got it. Who is the really faggot here?
waynebradysworld 10y ago
Bruce will never be caitlyn, hes a man.
Gay men can be in great shape and have strong personalities. While I don't get off on violently fucking another man's asshole until it bleeds, that is certainly more dominant behavior than being the fuckee, as a woman always is.
Yes race is real. Are you ready to see how deep the rabbit hole goes?
__ROOSTER__ 10y ago
if you're going to take the RedPill you have to take the whole thing .....a little bit may help you get laid but its still not the truth.
Every single thing you have been told or believe that came from school, the media, the government, etc is a LIE.
EVERY SINGLE THING
[deleted]
xyzone 10y ago
Leftist? There's nothing leftist about emotional anti-intellectualism. That's right wing territory, at least in the modern scope.
I agree with the sane and honest principles of red pill, but the moment people start conflating politics into it, I check out. Stop trying to push your right wing nuttery into gender issues.
This subreddit is an echo chamber. Quite dull.
Sdom1 10y ago
Leftists aren't emotionally driven? Leftists are never anti-intellectual? And the whole reason gender issues have gotten so fucked is leftism, so who exactly are you telling to stay out?
Also, is it dull for you because it's an echo chamber or dull because people don't agree with every belief you hold dear? My money's on the latter.
walkingthelinux 10y ago
Stop trying to push your left wing nuttery into gender issues.
xyzone 10y ago
A well reasoned, nuanced and thoughtful response. Well done.
MrJugsMcBulge 10y ago
In my experience, "anti-intellectual" is just a left-wing code word that means "someone who disagrees with anything a liberal says". It's like that "hate-speech" idea that liberals push - just an attempt to silence and belittle anyone who dares to disagree with them and point out the problems with their ideas.
xyzone 10y ago
The fact that you speak in absolutes and begin assaulting strawmen says it all. Nobody said anything about hate speech.
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
xyzone 10y ago
That's your take. I disagree. The right's base gets summarily wrangled by fear and anger, at the ringleaders' leisure. Most scientists and scholars are considered left leaning.
ELLEN_POO 10y ago
What if a feminists replies to Milo about the whole transgender thing "Yeah, gender is a social construct, but sex is not. Transgenders can identify as female (gender) but they have a male body (sex). I don't think actual feminists (not people like Laci Green) discard the idea that prenatal hormones and such form how you are. Just trying to play devil's advocate here.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
Gender and sexuality are invariably tied whether we like them to be or not. Without gender we have zero sexual motive.
2012Aceman 10y ago
I get that you're trying to play devil's advocate, and you represented their point well, but I'd like to ask you to read that again from our perspective. Their arguments don't make any actual sense. They think that changing the definition of words somehow alters reality. It does not.
apackofwankers 10y ago
Yes, feminists have absorbed the post modernist dogma that reality is a social construct. I see this idea taken to extremes in the new age movement - the idea that all reality is but a hallucination - then I slap them and threaten to do it again to see how they react. They don't react as if it is an illusion.
2012Aceman 10y ago
My problem with the "all of reality is an illusion" mindset is that it's usually those people who complain about everything all the time. Like, seriously, you believe in live in an illusion crafted specifically for you, and yet you spend all your time bitching and moaning instead of doing something cool? It never made sense. And those people are never internally consistent. When they say "reality is an illusion" what they really want to say is "I wish that actions weren't tied to consequences". Slapping some sense into them as you do is probably the best way to get them to accept the facts.
redpillschool Admin 10y ago
Let me see if I can break it down to make sense.
There's sex - male and female. Refers to which giggly bits you have.
Then there's gender - totally unrelated. We use the terms "male" and "female" to denote genders because the male gender is the archetype of behaviors and preferences typically present in the male sex. The female gender is the archetype of behaviors and preferences typically present in the female sex.
Gender is totally a social construct, which means that you could be male sex (have penis) but a female gender (feel like a woman). To feel like a woman you must then identify as the archetype of the people who commonly have vaginas. In order for that archetype to even exist and own the name "female" as a gender, however, it basically needs to be assumed that while gender is a social construct, the construct itself is so well ingrained in society that the female gender will always correlate to the typical behaviors of those who have vaginas, even though they are completely unlinked qualities.
But gender doesn't actually indicate sexual preference. You can be a sex-female gender-male who likes men, so the gender doesn't indicate sexual preference, so why we used sexes as basis for the archetype actually makes no sense, since sexual preference tends to be the point of sexual dimorphism in the first place.
So why don't they just say that instead of gender, you have hobby clubs? I'm a sex-male, but I enjoy knitting, which people with vaginas tend to do. I also enjoy having sex with women, but that isn't a core component of gender, so it's unrelated, therefore I must be gender female- unless, of course you could better describe me as gender-knitter. As it does just as much (if not more) to describe precisely what traits I am to derive from a gender unlinked to my sex with no bearing on sexual preference.
If I'm sex-male with heterosexual preferences, but I identify as gender female, what data have I actually gained by defining my gender outside the norm? I cannot link my sexual orientation to my gender, and I cannot link my physical qualities to my gender. The only thing left to include would be hobbies? Or perhaps a predilection to cry often?
When you believe in this nonsense while simultaneously believing that the genders are equal and therefore crying isn't an inherently male or female thing to do, then you take away any wind the gender construct's sails have, and what you've got are meaningless words.
2012Aceman 10y ago
None of that information actually does anything though, as you pointed out. There isn't really a difference in that case between "gender" and "personality". What makes you you isn't what other people who look like you do, it's what YOU do. So if gender is indeed just a social construct, and gender stereotypes aren't real but are real enough for transgender to be a thing, then why even bother with the distinction at all? Gender is just a vague nothing of a word now that doesn't define your sex, your sexual orientation, or what you act like.
Ubermensch33 10y ago
Exactly. Every classification is too general - that's what classifications are. If gender is too broad, everything is too broad, when you get right down to it. Why not just skip to the end and say no single word/classification can perfectly describe anyone?
WTF are they fighting for? Wear what you want and do what you want to do and stop acting like you're special.
It's all semantics and seeking validation.
IAmAnIrishCanuck 10y ago
This is the final goal isn't it? Complex self-evaluation is where this gender identity shit is headed in the future. Yeah, we are all clearly different (maybe not so special) snowflakes. Our intelligent future selves are looking back on us going, "how the fuck did they not know that labels fail to describe the complexity of us all?"
You get it. We all get it. We're just living in the infancy of human introspective understanding. We'll grow up as a species. Hopefully soon.
[deleted] 10y ago
How did you manage to infiltrate Red Pill? Shouldn't you be lurking in SRS or twox or something? Male = man, female = woman. Anything else is a birth defect or mental illness/delusion.
Paid_Internet_Troll 10y ago
Read what he said again.
He's using their terminology to deconstruct their own ideas, because they don't make any sort of internally-consistent sense.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
+1
He did a good job of exposing the meaninglessness of labels (Girl, Guy, Straight, Gay etc.) as they pertain to the intense complexity of subjective human identity.
Paid_Internet_Troll 10y ago
That too.
The thing about applying easy and convenient labels with a really broad brush is that even really stupid people can instantly recognize which role they're supposed to play from among the four or five "accepted" roles made available to them.
You have big muscles and a penis? Great, now you're ultra-masculine man, who defends the tribe and hunts tigers and screws 12 plates at a time on rotation.
You have small muscles, a penis, and a large brain? Great, you're funny-sidekick provider man. You get to wife up one of Ultra's plates when she decides to settle down and have you raise his kids, and maybe one or two of your own while you're at it.
You have a vagina, but no real hobbies or interests? Great, you're one of Ultra's plates until you get too old, then you can be Sidekick's loving wife and homemaker.
The thing is, these are all bullshit labels that don't encompass 1/10th of what a real, intelligent, self-actuated, human being is all about.
They're the paint-by-numbers personalities that everyone and their brother tries to shoehorn their self into, like they've been programmed to by society.
The good news is, that once you've seen behind the curtain, swallowed the red pill, pierced the veil of illusion, or whatever other metaphor you like, knowing what all the little labels are makes life so frikking easy.
Just go lift, put on some muscle, wear some decent clothes that fit, take care of personal hygiene, and get some interesting hobbies, and now you're suddenly Ultra-Masculine man yourself, and everyone falls all over themselves to play their subordinate support roles like they were taught to do.
Just don't make the mistake of thinking that any of it is real.
[deleted] 10y ago
When you realize that what you call reality is a transient interpretation that varies by every persons' perceptions, then you'll understand the power of redefining language to meet your ends. How you speak and how you think changes what you see
2012Aceman 10y ago
I won't deny that manipulation of words is a powerful tool. Orwell in particular does a fantastic job describing how altering word choice can manipulate others (bring them into your frame). However, all the manipulation in the world doesn't change the facts of the Objective Reality which is explainable using your own senses. A woman is a woman, a man is a man. Any attempt by a man to become a woman will result in a mutilated man, it will NEVER result in a woman. The mutilated man may have more estrogen, he may have gotten rid of his penis, he may even have gotten breasts, but he'll never bare life. Everybody around him can call him a woman, and they can all agree that he wants to be a woman and thinks like a woman, but all of these lies and deliberate misstatements don't change the facts. All he can ever become is a man TRYING to be a woman.
[deleted] 10y ago
I think we disagree epistomologically on what "reality" is. I'm saying that reality doesn't exist in and of itself. Yes there is an objective reality, but with no subjects to experience it, can you say it exists? Think Schrodinger's cat. What I'm contending is that what one perceives IS their reality, without any respect to how accurate they may or may not be in their interpretation of those perceptions. "Reality" is dependent on somebody being there to experience it. And in that experience the objectiveness of that reality is lost ... what we get is subjective objectivity. Fuckin paradoxes and shit you feel me
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
True objective reality, if we're using Occam's Razor, is here whether we want it to be or not, was here before us, and will continue on after we cease to exist as the poor observers we are.
Furthermore...
There is no subjective objectivity. Even though science has allowed us to observe and understand the universe in ways our bodies are not capable of, the mere concept of objectivity depends on an objective body that simply can not be proven to exist with science in it's current state. Some people feel they can take a leap of faith to suggest that true objectivity can be measured in a fundamental sense. Let's call those people Deists. Those people are fucking fooling themselves.
Objectivity is like saying God or "the entire universe". How could we truly know the extent of any one single thing without knowing how everything relates to it or depends on it or doesn't depend on it? It's pure arrogance to argue that we know in our primordial reality what true objectivity is or even can be.
2012Aceman 10y ago
Oh I understand you, and I totally agree with you that whatever YOU perceive IS reality. It's just not anybody else's reality. What really drove this home for me was mental illness. Schizophrenia makes people see and hear things that aren't there, to have thoughts that aren't "their own", and worst of all nobody else can possibly perceive "their" reality. Everything that is happening to a hallucinating person is real, and to everyone else watching them the only thing that's "real" is that person's reaction to their hallucinations. In the normal world it looks like somebody is just flipping out, but in the crazy world everything they're doing is perfectly justified and explainable.
However, I've shifted away from this "Master of Your Own Reality" thing. The reason being is that it becomes extremely difficult to work with others when everybody is perceiving their own reality, and everybody is "right" in their own view. That's why I try to stick to the Objective Reality that everyone can see and agree with. It's a great concept for helping to maintain your frame (since everything is as you perceive it), but it encounters problems when nobody can agree on anything, and everybody refuses to budge, because their "logic" is superior.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
The T in Trans really stands for Trying. There is no shame in trying to be a gender one knows their brain correlates with. I agree with you on the point that (at least until massive DNA manipulation and surgery) gender replacement therapy will only ever be "trying".
[deleted] 10y ago
Your gender/sex is not a feeling. It's a biological classification. How you feel is a personality issue and gender roles are socially constructed but for the most part reflect our evolution. Wtf are you smoking. When did TRP become a forum for "gender theory"
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
I don't subscribe to any "gender theory" in the context of a nonscientific discussion. I subscribe to biology and psychology findings and I'm very happy to change my mind should further evidence suggest that personal identity is not linked to the goings on inside your brain.
[deleted] 10y ago
So you admit its a delusion. Psychological.
[deleted] 10y ago
I like Milo, but his religious views are preposterous
moose_war 10y ago
Me too, but I really dislike his view on circumcision. It's selfish and stupid and I imagine it has something to do with his religious views.
But he does enough good otherwise to make up for it.
[deleted]
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
Very true. I have just discovered him weaseling out of any meaningful questions on religion with witty distractions. Smart escape, but an escape none the less.
[deleted] 10y ago
Yeah, I noticed that when he was on JRE too. Joe asked him repeatedly "you believe in what?" and all he would say was something like "uhh, I believe in, uhh, you know, Catholicism".
He didn't actually say he believes in God/a god so I'm actually very curious to know what his true beliefs are. I'm not completely sold that he's actually a theist.
larrythetomato 10y ago
What if his reasons are: I have a bunch of friends in my church and I'd like to keep seeing them. Me expressing what I feel about the religion is less important than my relationships with those people. Not necessarily saying that this is the case for Milo, but you never know.
tallwheel 10y ago
Those had better be some fucking important people for it to make him compromise his views on display to the entire world.
[deleted]
Gemini142 10y ago
Agreed, he has good views on Gender Dynamics. But the rest of his belief system reeks of desperation and lunacy.
[deleted] 10y ago
no one is going to 100% adhere to your wishes and worldview.
Even the founding fathers had slaves
Gemini142 10y ago
I don't expect them to. But its more like I agree with 5% of what Milo says and the rest is 95% horseshit. Joe Rogan had him on the podcast and the guy has so many views that directly conflict with each other that I find it hard to believe that he isn't just some master troll.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
What if I believed in owning slaves? Why do you make that assumption. ;)
nzgs 10y ago
He's a gay conservative, so while he is very useful in attacking the idiosyncrasies of the Left, he still has the shortcomings of most conservatives, namely an inability to think critically. I imagine he believes everything his parents believed, just with a gay twist.
[deleted]
ELLEN_POO 10y ago
A "gay twist" would be a feminist twist.
Gemini142 10y ago
The whole littany, no global warming, no evolution, being gay is a choice, drugs should be illegal(while he partakes heavily apparently) etc... Hilarious really.
nzgs 10y ago
Seems I hit a raw nerve with the "redpill" conservatives. The general theme with conservatives is a total lack of internal consistency with their beliefs and Milo is such a good example of that. Less government when it comes to taxation, more government when it comes to victimless crimes like drugs. Less government in business, more government subsidies for the church. It's a mish mash of retardation that has never been held under philosophical scrutiny.
It's even worse with gay conservatives because they take all the usual conservative retardation passed down from their parents and try to assimilate their homosexuality into it with a good serving of mental gymnastics and hamstering, oblivious to the massive internal inconsistencies.
The people who downvoted my comment should have a hard think about why they are here because if you support government in any shape or form then you are heavily plugged in and bluepilled, doesn't matter if it is liberal statism or conservative statism.
Red_August 10y ago
Keep in mind that Milo is cultivating his brand to fit the TV conservative pundit mould. He's clearly fishing for a career podium at Fox, or something similar. I'm sure he genuinely ascribes to much of what made him known in the first place, but I suspect that some of it is decoration for the grandstands. He just has to toe the stereotypical line, the full package. He's got talent though, and he knows full well that being a snarky sassy homo is the perfect Trojan horse needed by the cuckservative media (ironically) for use against the libtards. Cuckservatives need to appear "inclusive" whilst deploying a provocateur that for the time being appears libtard-bulletproof because he likes sucking big black cocks.
Laura Southern is another rising star of the same ilk. Fairly attractive, blonde, willing to disrupt the safe-spaces of the armpit-haired. Great TV eye candy.
Do remember that all of this is product. Politics - armchair or real - is product. Packaged to provoke, rustle, and get you to polarise. The echo chambers it creates, whether libtard or cuckservative, just fuels the fire to sell more product. The libtards have their own such as Anita Sarkeesian, and that short one showing off her cleavage all the time, what's-her-face. It's a cottage industry.
There's nothing wrong in taking a position, to be entertained by it all - bread and circuses - but all of this is the equivalent of sugar as far as mind nutrition goes.
apackofwankers 10y ago
Laura Southern is an agent for the Von Mises institute. A lot of the right wing thinktanks are trying to take control of the manosphere.
Sdom1 10y ago
Generally, if you're a part of the manosphere you fall more in line with conservatism, like it or not. And I'm not sure if taking control is the right word. They are trying to support, grow and influence what they see as a natural ally, just as leftists do with their allies.
flyercomet 10y ago
But somewhat ironically it's current day conservatives that want change and progressives that want to keep the status quo. I think most people are sick of the two major parties and have a spectrum of issues they care about. Scratch that, most people don't think critically about this stuff at all.
Sdom1 10y ago
Wrong. They both want change. If you think leftists are anywhere near to realizing their vision (Communism 2.0) then you're mistaken.
Fuck_shadow_bans 10y ago
His Joe Rogan interview was equally interesting.
jaimewarlock 10y ago
Feminism is kind of like Female Genital Mutilation in Africa, it's main supporters are the older ladies, not the men.
Zinamam 10y ago
I don't understand how they can say "gender is a social construct" when basically every culture around the world has the same roles for men and women.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
Its unbelievable how absent minded the far left (and right) can be.
[deleted] 10y ago
I loved this guy on the JRE. He's vocalizing what the West is thinking but the fatfempansexualmixqueered cunts can't do shit because he's a figurative minority.
Another recent JRE ep with the co-founder of Vice (not Shane) has a lot of unapologetic truths in it too.
RedPillduNord 10y ago
Was it Gavin Mcinnes? He certainly leans RP and writes hilarious columns at takimag.com.
[deleted] 10y ago
Yes, that's him. So unapologetic and honest in the podcast I heard. I'll be reading his articles, cheers.
garlicextract 10y ago
Milo is an ultra savage. His opponents can't say shit either because he just lets em have it, that he's gay, and it usually wrecks their beta-shaming argument. Because he only argues with facts and logic.
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
I love it! Save for his religion issue Milo is a full time Christopher Hitchens-Like badass.
[deleted]
RP15 10y ago
Aaaaaand the pendulum is picking up speed in our direction.
[deleted] 10y ago
Why do you think only outsiders are doing well in American politics currently,
With the world news the way it is, and the way events are unfolding, our increasingly tense race and gender relations, record un happiness, stagnant economies etc, etc. I don't need to go into it.
There is going to be a hard backlash.
moose_war 10y ago
It helps to have guys like him on our side. Being a sexual minority, feminists can't be too hateful towards him because his priv level is pretty equal to theirs. And him being gay, none of their shaming tactics work on him (and they know that their pussies probably gross him out more than anything). So when he uses logic and wit, they're pretty much done for.
nzgs 10y ago
He's still a white male evil British colonialist, which cancels out his gay points.
PaulAJK 10y ago
With a surname like his, the "colonialist" thing doesn't work.
trinitys_dildo 10y ago
Milo outright says this in a video...can't remember where I saw it. Might have been the Joe Rogan podcast
rp_valiant 10y ago
he's mentioned it quite a few times, along with the fact that he uses self-deprecating humour to offend the "right type of gay" (i.e. gay pride leftist "LGBTQ community" advocates, as opposed to just guys who fuck guys).
His cheeky attitude is also a great example of DGAF mentality for those that are stuggling to grasp the concept. The "Big Question" interview where he derails a particularly rude and patronising feminist by saying "Sorry, I'm talking about men darling" knowing he can play off of the word's use in both "male chauvinism" and campy gay culture. She explodes in a fit of offended rage and he's sat there giggling like a naughty child. You can't not love the guy for his outrageous attitude and that's a great frame to adopt.
shzftw 10y ago
Based milo
Dank version
laere 10y ago
It was a podcast with another guy, but he repeats it a lot.
Found it, here
EscapedTheMatrix 10y ago
I could listen to this guy all day. He's endlessly entertaining and very intelligent. He has very accurate viewpoints and is basically a RP spokesman. Milo is my new favorite gay guy.
[deleted] 10y ago
He is a smart guy, but a gay guy (submissive to other men) can never be an "Alpha".
ShounenEgo 10y ago
Apparently someone hasn't read "the way of men" yet.
magus678 10y ago
You are retarded and obviously have no idea what you are talking about
[deleted] 10y ago
LOL... butthurt much? I'm trying to be consistent here. If Alpha males means mating dominance, how is a gay guy that submits to to other males dominating the mating strategy? If being Alpha means being masculine, how can a feminine man be masculine? Suddenly striking a nerve with RP LGBT apologists?
J_Dizzle1000 10y ago
If you look at what Jack Donovan spoke about in his book "The Way Of Men" it would be more a flamboyant gay that would lean towards the rejection of masculinity that men despise. That fact that he's gay doesn't necessarily mean he is not masculine.
tallwheel 10y ago
You never know. Maybe other men submit to him. That's pretty fucking alpha when you think about it.
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
GuidoBandito 10y ago
Straight, it's the new gay... That clip was brilliant!
[deleted]
WillWorkForLTC 10y ago
I hear he wears the pants and is quite the sadist. Sounds Alpha enough to me.
[deleted] 10y ago
"wearing the pants and being a sadist" sounds more like a psychopath than an Alpha. How can RP possibly boast about masculinity and then champion an effeminate male as Alpha? I'm not saying I have anything against him. As far as politics go I tend to agree, although I reject religious belief. He himself has said if he could start over and choose not to be gay, he would do so. So how can you possibly say a gay guy is Alpha when he himself won't even say that. Seems like inconsistency in RP theory.
waynebradysworld 10y ago
You should change your username to "generallyanignorantfagget" you big fagget
[deleted]