it misses the mark of the end goal of red pill that people teach here - complete self-reliance and absence of seeking external validation/detachment.

My biggest criticism of red pill criticism posts is that dudes doing it don't even know what the red pill is trying to achieve

The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

I finally watched this blue pill slop and it's comically wrong

First of all, he says TheRedPill is the easy choice and the blue pill is the hard choice. He says red pill is some kind of hero fantasy. What the actual fuck is this slop? TheRedPill is predicated on the lack of morality in sexual strategy

If anything, it unlocks people to the villainy and anti-hero cutthroat nature of sexual strategy

Additionally, he says the blue pill causes people to grind. Wut?? As what a corporate wage slave? I've seen endless discussion on here about being free and independent of that bullshit and actually grinding the hard shit. This video is cringe

Secondly, he calls TheRedPill an ideology. It's not an ideology it's a praxeology. It's about human behavior not an ideology. Every ignorant moron that says the ideology trope has no idea what they are talking about

Third he goes into a rant about how all red pill men want to do is go spread their seed and how they just hate bodily changes after their wife gives birth.

Yeah no, men who genuinely like the woman that has birthed their children tend to actually keep liking their wife unless that woman starts treating them like trash, which is largely an important sexual strategy knowledge base men can use to avoid

This video is complete slop and I'm questioning your motives and intentions of being here

It appears you are just as ignorant of red pill as this gamer slop creator

Oh look, another person who thinks they can tell me what to do, using shaming language to try and push me into it.

So let me get this straight: if I don’t buy into your idea of adulthood -being a good workhorse, paying a small fortune to marry a woman who’ll inevitably divorce me, working myself to death to afford two cars and a house with the white picket fence, and making sure I pay every cent in taxes- then I’m not responsible?

Here’s the thing about taking the red pill: it makes you very good at spotting the language used to control you. “Man up” and “take responsibility” used to work when men actually got something in return for it.

We’re not responsible for failing society. They made that bed all on their own.

Using concepts meant for self improvement and understanding of human nature as a weapon to attack a concept one doesn't understand only creates an illusion of it being profound.

(I'm talking about Jung's work, just so we're clear. I'm criticizing the YouTuber)

Mature = doing what women want

This is what we mean by the Gynocracy: everything is defined in terms of doing things that benefit women.

This person criticizes the Red Pill and even mentions terms like spinning plates, non-committance, as basically just being the inability to take responsibility for life and not accepting that life is not always fun and games.

This is all the classic piece of female manipulation where everything that men want is defined as "immature", while giving things to women and doing what women want is called "growing up".

Multiple women? Immature

Spinning plates? Immature

Not paying for women? Immature

Playing sports? Immature

Having your shit together, own house, own car, living a great lifestyle? Immature

Not committing all your past, present and future resources to women? Immature

Raising someone else's children and paying the mother while asking for nothing for yourself? Now that's grown up.

Once you see this pattern you realise how pervasively women have managed to determine male acceptable behaviour and label it to suit their own purposes.

This guy has no idea what he's talking about. He's all over the place, but when he finally starts to allude to what he thinks redpill is he is actually talking about something more like the madonna-whore complex. Which is actually something TRP gets guys away from, since that is just pedestalizing by another name.

That video creator discovered it's easier to argue against a selectively understood at best strawman than it is to understand what is actually being said by TRP.

Sure, men can use info from TRP to "Peter Pan".

If society has a problem with men choosing to "Peter Pan", then society needs to self reflect and realize that all the other options that it offers men are worse instead of blaming men for opting out. That's just sociopathic blame shifting.

Don Juanism, which was described in a psychology book 100 years ago, which basically, as I understand, means catching oneitis for new girls, which would be the opposite of red pill though.

Pook writes about don Juan a lot, and this is absolutely not what a don Juan is

I haven't seen such an ignorant post in a long time here, you very clearly came her to argue with RP, not understand it

And it's very clear you latched on to an equally ignorant YouTuber to satisfy your confirmation bias

This person criticizes the Red Pill

No, he criticized a made up bunch of crap that he labeled "Red Pill". Fucking moron didn't even make a token effort to understand it.

Biggest tell: calling it an "ideology". It's a praxeology.

and even mentions terms like spinning plates, non-committance, as basically just being the inability to take responsibility for life and not accepting that life is not always fun and games.

1) spinning plates is the starting point. If you find a woman worthy of more, you upgrade her. My wife of 20 years started out as a plate.

2) speaking of, according to that moron I should have divorced her years ago to go bang younger women.

take responsibility

Responsibility without commensurate authority is slavery.