One of my earlier works gets referenced quite a bit on TRP: The Light Switch Effect. I've decided to rework it a little bit for readability. Here is The Light Switch Effect Revisited:
I was recently reading somebody's account of how women tend to re-write history towards the end of a relationship:
Re-writing of history - It doesn't matter that she was sending you love notes and texts a month ago. She has been unhappy for a long time now.
I call this the light-switch effect- it happens when a woman loses attraction and moves on, whether or not she cheated.
It’s not that she’s discrediting the good times; she actually believes they never existed. This ties into Briffault’s Law, which states:
The female, not the male, determines all conditions of the animal family. Where the female derives no benefit, no association occurs.
How Emotional Reality Works
Men and women process emotions differently. When a man feels something, he questions it: What caused this? Is it rational? He then adjusts his reaction based on reality.
Women, however, experience emotions as reality. If she feels sad, someone must have made her sad. If she feels betrayed, someone must have betrayed her. Her emotions don’t describe reality; they define it. This is why a man’s attempt to reason: "I didn’t mean it that way" falls on deaf ears. She wouldn’t feel this way unless there was a real reason, therefore, in her mind, she’s objectively right. If a woman tells you that "you made me sad." She didn't decide her emotional state, you did. Changing her own emotional state is outside the purview of her control.
This is where many arguments start, because the man tries to explain, "That's not what I meant, you misunderstood." But to her, reason doesn’t matter. She’s sad, and she wouldn’t feel that way without a cause. Her sadness is reality. If she feels hurt, then you must have done something to justify that feeling.
The Light-Switch Effect in Action
After years in a relationship, when things go south, you may begin to experience the revisionist history. She will claim: I never loved you. I was never attracted to you. You were always an asshole. You were always abusive. These always/never statements don’t reflect reality but her new emotional truth. Her new "objective" reality.
Her logic:
- True love is permanent.
- I don’t love him now, only feel anger and disgust.
- I wouldn’t feel this way unless he was truly bad.
- If he’s bad now, he must have always been bad (and I missed it / he hid it).
- If I never loved someone bad, then I never really loved him at all.
Just like that, everything you built together is erased. It’s not that she’s denying the past- it no longer exists in her reality. Like a light switch turning off.
This is why men at this stage fail when they try to bargain: "How can you throw this away? We can fix this!"
From her perspective, there’s nothing to throw away. If the relationship had value, she wouldn’t feel this way. Since she does feel this way, the relationship must have never had value. Her mind has rewritten everything about your relationship to rationalize her new reality.
Briffault’s Law & Relationship Contracts
Briffault’s Law, particularly its first corollary, explains this perfectly:
Past benefit provided by the male does not guarantee future association.
Men think relationships operate on implicit contracts:
- We’ll love each other forever.
- I’ll provide for you, and you’ll remember my sacrifices.
- We’ll stick together when things get tough.
But when things actually get tough, her emotional state rewrites reality. If she truly loved you, she wouldn’t feel this way- so she must have never really loved you. If she once valued what you provided, she wouldn’t feel betrayed or disgusted... so those things must never have mattered. Since she does feel unattracted to you now, the idea that you ever had value in her life must be false.
The light-switch flips off, and in her mind, everything you built together was never real. There was no love, no sacrifices, no good times... Just a lie she now sees clearly.
And make no mistake, even in a good relationship, with a good woman, when the chips are down, the switch always turns off.
Wintergreen 1w ago
Are you saying that she remembers feeling the opposite of what she feels now, but rationalizes that she missed the truth, or do you think that she thinks she never felt the opposite of what she feels now?
Lone_Ranger 2 1w ago
This is gold.
Have recently experienced it. Wife left and claimed that I had never done anything for her. It was amazing to behold.
You really have to experience the light switch effect yourself to believe it.
Vermillion-Rx Admin 1w ago
This is great and is a forum classic, however I'd like to see how you'd address the light switch effect in regards to women who love terrible men who treat them like shit. Oftentimes the light switch effect more commonly seems to hit men who bore their women and break frame.
I have seen and know plenty of women who finally can't take a low rapport man seriously enough any more and hit the tipping point (frequently mothers during an incident with the child or being ignored for a week, etc), but with much of the post focusing on "feeling bad" but not leaving and/or being drawn to such men for so many women, i think that could be addressed
pofkaf 2w ago
Great refresher. I have personally witnessed the light switch effect many times, through my own relationships and others relationships.
BimaryCode 2w ago
Amongst other things I was thinking, shouldn't one get a woman always to invest, keeping her in a loop of rationalising investments (always be hamster) rather than having the hamster looking for something to do.
The investment in this model should be calibrated this way to not to break the camel's back. Every woman differ.
Men always want to provide some value and be busy with things to do. Women might always need to work on something emotional.
This model was already well described, but I only recall the temprary solutions, like give the soup back in the restaurant etc, but it should require something that needs a constant attention and percieved levels, like the CandyCrush mobile game, women were addicted to (or chasing new chads)...
Source. I have created a leveling system for my plate. She can get achievments, fall off a ladder, buy a bonus life or superpowers. Dont ask its too complicated and there is no way to say does it really work or its my imagination.
MrSupreme 2w ago
I've seen it, once,and it sounds like a bunch of bullshit mixed with gaslighting. Every memory,every moment,every display of love becomes the opposite, it just never happened.
A good way to deal with it is to live your own story, stick with your version cause deep down inside she and you know it is all crap.
Kloi 2w ago
There's also the light switch flipping back on in my experience, after six months to eighteen months most of my exes come crawling back after running my name through the mud.
I've never dated any of these girls again but they sure do make easy plates to pick up and put down when they or myself enter and exit relationships.
Lone_Ranger 2 1w ago
This is true.
Women will leave, then they will experience the quiet and lonliness. If they are divorcing you, they still think that they are the same as when they got married, and assume that men will come running to them. They also totally fail to understand what men want from a relationship, why men are interested in relationships in the first place - to reproduce.
All women that divorce go through 'the shock'. They recall that in their 20s and early 30s, men would chase them. Then they 'settle' for you, and they cannot imagine that there will be less attention from men when they divorce you at 45. They divorce you, collect the cash, and then 'put themselves out there' (OLD).
They think that the world has changed, without ever considering that it is they that have changed. They think that men are interested in 'love and romance and companionship' and that someone else is going to wife them up. It very rarely works like that.
As a result, they will often 'light switch' back again.
Do not take them up on the offer.