She wants to give you as little sex as possible while getting as much commitment possible. While you want as much sex as possible with as little commitment as possible.

Yup, this applies to beta males. I guess this whole post was for beta males.

When she perceives you as a high ranking alpha or even "the best she can do", she will fuck you just to get your attention and validation without demanding any commitment.

you tell her you just want to fuck then you are demanding a very high price from her while offering almost nothing in return.

Women enjoy sex. Sex is the prize for women as well as men. The things that keep people from hooking up immediately all over the place are called 'inhibitions'. Inhibitions cannot fully be overcome just by having higher SMV. For example, most women would not leave their children behind to go be with Brad Putt or George Clooners.

From wikipedia:. A sexual inhibition is a conscious or subconscious constraint or curtailment by a person of behavior relating to specific sexual matters or practices, a discussion of sexual matters or viewing certain sexual material. To some extent such inhibitions may arise from cultural and social influences and conditioning, as well as from personal factors, including sexual orientation. In most partner relationships, the level of inhibition tends to decrease the higher the level of trust that develops between the partners. Such inhibitions also tend to decrease with improvements in a person’s confidence in their sexuality. A person may take a drug, such as alcohol, to reduce their level of inhibition.

Though a person can be regarded as being sexually inhibited if they irrationally fear of or are excessively averse to any sexual practice or discourse, the term is normally not applied to a person who refrains from certain sexual activities on moral and rational grounds (such as desire to avoid pregnancy or contracting a disease) or due to a psychological disorder. A person may also refrain from sexual activity with a particular person by choice or because of a simple disliking of that person, for whatever reason. The person whose advances are rejected may dismiss the rejection as being due to a sexual inhibition.

On the other hand, a person may be regarded as having low sexual inhibitions when they welcome a variety of non-conventional erotic practices. Hypersexuality is typically associated with lowered sexual inhibitions, and alcohol and some drugs can affect a person's social and sexual inhibitions

Hey, guys, a buddy of mine just went through a breakup and is literally “back on the market” struggling to understand what he’s doing wrong. Most of us have been there. I gave him a long and detailed explanation on SMV; he grasped the concept really quickly so I’m hoping it will help someone.

I have a few friends who could really use a good bit of redpilling, but it is hard to explain it without sounding super "mysogynistic" or whatever the fuck blue pill white knights love saying. I loved the way you just explained SMV. It's simple, there is no way to argue against it and no one can complain about it, not even white-knights. I'd love it if you keep us updated in case you do end up redpilling your friend.

This part:

"If a salesman comes to your door with a product that doesn’t make you immediately think “I want this” & you know nothing about, and he just says “Do you want to buy this?” You’ll say no."

​

So true!

One should always be increasing is own market value. Try like the devil to become unobtanium. Be a Berkshire Hathaway "A" class. Women want what they perceive as unobtainable. They want what they can't have. You do it by putting her at the bottom of your list of priorities. Be that guy, and you'll have your pick of the litter.

The whole 'wants to give you as little sex as possible' thing is a bit misguided. Girls want to fuck, but they can't fuck everyone lest they be a slut, easy etc. It's all reputation, if you can fuck her without her looking like a slut to people (yourself included sometimes), you're golden. Thats why these things 'just happen', and have to be your fault. It's mental gymnastics so she can tell herself she's a good girl really. She doesn't normally do this, remember.

If a girl tries to weaponise sex she's trying to gain control, either because she has a screw loose or she feels like she has none.

The rest is pretty spot on.

Above smv concept (invest to benifit) can be summarized on a decimal scale:

Low pointer girl: Either keeper or has higher SMV

High pointer girl: Either daddy's issues or has lower SMV

Low pointer guy: Either fuckboy or has higher SMV

High pointer guy: Either ideal beta hubby or has lower SMV

Agreed. If there is an obvious SMV imbalance with you being way higher up than her, she will be more motivated to fuck you to keep you around. The sex still qualifes as transactional sex. She only fucks you to keep you committed, not becoz she truly considers you to be a genetically superior man

What about women that do not look for commitment? That would be the ultimate goal, according to your argumentation. Then both offer and demand only sex. Would you be happy this way?

Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.

Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I love this explanation. Really put it together nicely, well done

If you're actually seeing the way you interact with women like 'put in friendly conversation/time/attention until a price is met and she gives you sex' I totally disagree, but it's an interesting topic to have a discussion about.
IMO SMV is (put very simplistically): (Looks + 'Money' + Status + some smaller things) * 'Game' (how do you pitch your value. Think for this as a number between 0 (sitting in a basement alone) and a number higher than 1 (you're actually overselling yourself with 'tricks')). How high your SMV needs to be a interesting to girl X depends on how high she perceives your SMV to be, the competition in your local SMplace and her own perceived SMV.

What about women that only want sex without commitment? How does this logic apply then?

I don't find this is entirely correct. You still need to be top 20% of guys to get laid. If a woman finds you visually attractive (Alpha), she would want your genetics, and fuck you unless you're completely autistic

For those that don't understand SMV, I point them to watch the sequence from Crazy, Stupid, Love - when Gossling ups Carell SMV by the wardrobe, gym and how he talks to women.

It is then on them, if they want to continue this path and research further/etc.

This is exactly why marriage is such a shit deal. Because a woman can renege on this market transaction by refusing sex while still demanding a man's commitment and if the man doesn't play ball then government will come in and fuck him. A deal only works if both parties do what is promised. If not and the other party is still forced to provide their services, this is the literal definition of slavery. Never get married.

Male SMV should be divided into two categories. Short term mating value( based on the quality of ones genes- depends on the level of physical attractiveness, alphaness (social dominance) or preselection level of the individual) and long term mating value( based on ability to provide and protect. Depends on the wealth,status and position in the dominance hierarchy of the individual)

IMO, the strongest thing to know here is women's side of the negotiation is typically measured by sight. No need for her to say a word because words are not what she's selling. Mens is time, and commitment which is demonstrated by being around and saying things with value.

I was considering writing a post on how women are not really the gatekeepers, it just seems that way. The above is why. Women are only the gatekeepers to men who think their bargaining power is via womans sight, as they know it is for women. This is why I like to frequent downtown places several times before I ever friend up with locals or bar staff. I'm anteing commitment without saying a word. It's then easier to build on top with words. Then social proof kicks in and makes it easier to talk to people who come in to the bar/establishment.

Largely, it appears that women are the gatekeepers because during a cold pickup men have to say things and women don't. Brad Pitt is the gate keeper based on looks. "The man!" at the bar is the gatekeeper by presence mixed with social proof. Patrice Oneil is the gatekeeper by gab. The later two are forms of commitment. Arguably Brad Pitt is too, women want even a moment of his time.