I found this recent news article:
The stars of the Fast and Furious franchise refuse to look weak on screen:
http://www.darkhorizons.com/furious-male-stars-refuse-to-look-weak/
We are talking about men like Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, action stars whose masculinity and power can barely be questioned at all. They are the very image in our media of "a tough guy" or "a MAN". These men are among the least insecure and, most importantly, the least vulnerable to emasculation. They're portrayed as the very definition of masculinity and muscle.
And yet... their contracts specify how badly their characters can get beaten in a film. Because their image would suffer too much if people saw the FICTIONAL characters that they play getting beaten up like a sparring bag. Their agents don't want them defeated in a single scene, they can't be shown losing fights, and if the script truly requires them to lose a fight it has to be a "clean" defeat, not a violent beat-down.
Remember that these are FICTIONAL fights. And yet their image would suffer so much if they were shown taking a beat-down that their agents refuse to ever show them being vulnerable or weak in any way, because that would mean a drop in ticket sales, they would literally start losing money as a result of their image no longer being as imposing as before.
Female UFC fighter breaks up with boyfriend because he got humiliated in a fight and she refuses to date anyone who can't "be a man" at all times:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no7FuVwcn6w
Miriam Nakamoto tells Joe Rogan how she won't date a man who can't "be a man" all the way through a professional UFC fight. According to her, the dude was "great" in every way, but she still left him after the beat-down.
Guy loses fight, girlfriend fantasizes about the guy who beat him
This is the story of the girl whose boyfriend got beaten up by a larger dude and then she started fantasizing and masturbating to the dude who beat him up:
https://i.imgur.com/nXojmO3.jpg
"Dylan" is a douchebag who beat the shit out of her boyfriend in a fight. She no longer feels the same about her boyfriend and masturbates to the thought of Dylan and his body. The dude is an asshole, but domination is domination: the girl now prefers Dylan.
If any woman is reading this:
How would you react to your partner being humiliated/beaten up during a confrontation with another man?
The science behind these behaviors
You should all check out the biological principle of mate guarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mate_guarding_in_humans
This applies to men, but not to women
If Margot Robbie beat up Scarlett Johansson in a fair fight, men wouldn't give a damn and it wouldn't have an impact on each of them's attractiveness.
But if Jason Momoa beat up Chris Hemsworth fair and square, Hemsworth's role would go from "tough but funny dude" to just "funny dude". His sexiness would fall, even as adored by women as he is today.
DISCUSSION
Is it inevitable for men to lose attractiveness any time they lose? Especially when the defeat is humiliating or emasculating.

BlahBlahBlahSixNine 6y ago
This is the kind of shit that makes me want to go my own way. It's just not worth it. I'd rather enjoy my life doing things I like than pretend to be some sort of he-man.
baptistemartel 6y ago
well if you dont know the top dogs are actually redpilled but they play around the general public
vplatt 6y ago
When I was in high school and working at a fast food place, I very clearly remember try to tell a customer in person that the drive through was closed. This was at 3 AM and he was yelling at the order console over and over and getting progressively more frustrated that it wasn't working. The dude had to be in his twenties, was drunk, large, and obviously a mean large drunk because he parked his car in the drive-through, got out, yelled something at me, then proceeded to run at me to beat the living crap out of me. I hadn't even had a chance to finish saying "I'm sorry sir, but"; that's how fast this happened.
The gal that was working the front had followed me out the back door at this point, and so I yelled to her to get inside while I high tailed it inside as well to put some steel door between us. I just wanted to finish my shift and this guy was not worth my time. Crisis averted!
But, instead of just thanking her lucky stars that we avoided this guy, she flat out laughed at me for not fighting him. I remember that really hurt at the time because I thought she was really nice and cute. Heck, maybe I would work up the courage to ask her out? The possibilities made my head spin before that moment. That was all gone of course and I spared no thoughts on her after that.
I never understood the issue here though. I was worth her ridicule because I refused to thoughtlessly fight some asshole in a drive-through while working a job that paid little better than minimum wage at the time; and all this around 3 AM??? Sure... call me whatever you want, but I wasn't about to be literal dead meat for this poor excuse of a human; either of them.
Honestly, I didn't know RP at the time, but I had little patience for any girls after that point. I suppose I did the adolescent equivalent of MGTOW. It wasn't until years later that I ever bothered with girls again. Honestly, it was probably a good thing.
In the years since then, and I'm no spring chicken now, I've seen MANY instances of women expressing contempt for men who either refuse or fail to achieve, rising to the occasion however stupid it may be. I understand it now I guess, but I advise anyone guy out there to promptly dump any female that would waste their time, life, health, money, etc. with this kind of shit test. And let's be clear that's what these useless comparisons are. No woman has to let themselves be so weak that they go this way. It's a simple choice to not be the one that falls for some storybook fantasy. Go for the one that gets this point!
I posted this because I can see how guys take this kind of story to mean they just gotta "git gud" and train even harder and always be able to be the better fighter, the bigger asshole, or just plain old meaner. No... if being a better fighter or other kind of aggressor (bringer of lawsuits, harasser, bully, petty tyrants, etc.) isn't in line with your core purpose and someone looks down on you because you choose not to rise to that, then you've discovered someone in your life that you don't need to be there. Get rid of them!
BlahBlahBlahSixNine 6y ago
Reminds me of that bit in Loui were he is on a date and avoids a fight with a highschool kid and his date is turned off.
vplatt 6y ago
I'd say he dodged a bullet there. Who needs a mate who's simply going to pit you against every knucklehead out there? There's plenty of those after all.
TotalBasturd 6y ago
Weakness is never allowed for men. If you ever fail against another man, he just pushed you down in the social hierarchy.
Women are selectors, not caretakers. They need to exclude the weak men and only interact with the winners.
vplatt 6y ago
This is true. But a smart woman would immediately leave the asshole who drunkenly chased a fast-food employee through a drive-through and at least be nice to the guy who refused to fight him. If you want the dumb girl, then go ahead and have dumb standards and pit yourself against the other dummies out there. Women get to choose what weak means too. We can and should use this to our advantage to select into the best relationship possible.
I can honestly tell you this is true because I'm married to a smart woman now and I have been for just over 25 years. She likes muscles, machismo, and storybook fantasies as much as any other female out there but she would NOT hesitate to dump my dumb ass if I drunkenly started picking fights with teenagers and I very much believe she wouldn't have laughed at the smart kid who doesn't take on such a fight.
Despite RP and instincts that define AWALT, let's just acknowledge that women are all very different from each other in how they choose to express their sexuality. They're not all going to go for the biggest asshole on the playground. Only the dumb ones will.
lala_xyyz 6y ago
only if men let them. that's why women used to be married young by their fathers and brothers, with them having almost no say in the matter. and it worked. now they have "freedom" and western civilization is going the way of the dodo
vplatt 6y ago
In all fairness, this is probably only possible today because of the relatively prosperous conditions that allow us to extend life so far beyond where prehistoric and pre-industrial periods. If you're only going to live until somewhere between 23-40 years of age, then there's no time to waste and letting a woman choose from a parade of suitors would simply take too long.
All of the RP concerns we have today are simply a good problem in the sense that we're not absolutely scrabbling at every turn for survival. Personally, I'll take it because living through such harsh periods really doesn't appeal to me. You can still live that way today if you really want to downgrade; but I don't see anyone here opting into that.
lala_xyyz 6y ago
yes, we escaped the Malthusian trap and there is no more natural selection. there is only a sexual selection, but without extensive intaspecies pressures (no more wars, continual decline of interpersonal violence etc.) it turns dysgenic (the poor and dumb tend to reproduce more because they are subject to more pressures, and it pays to do so) and fertility-negative (most women of reproductive age in the West don't have children currently). it's an era of prosperity, but just before a big fall, like a big -89% market correction, before restarting on a more sound set of fundamentals (monogamous marriage, no divorce, vaginamoney and single momhood..)
vplatt 6y ago
The so-called predication about "market correction" is always true. Humanity has always experienced peaks and valleys, but so what? RP ain't gonna fix that and hypergamy isn't the cause. Blame the invention of indoor plumbing and vaccinations if you want to get closer to the truth.
Seriously, I swear too many folks in here are like "shrug... enjoy the fall of civilization!" as if that has any relevance to their actual life experience. It could be several hundred years yet before anything like that happens. In the meantime, we can all go on pretending like we got shit figured out and that our opinion matters. Yeah, not so much as we might like.
lala_xyyz 6y ago
I see RP more as a personal armor, the set of skills you acquire to defend yourself against exploitation by the gynocracy, the state and other men. It can't solve societal issue because it wasn't meant to scale to that level. Not all men are even capable of red-pilling, especially not after a lifetime of brainwashing and conditioning. Hypergamy isn't the cause because it always existed, but only now at the end of civilization has it been unleashed. Read Glubb's Fate of Empires - the same shit happened countless times.
I don't doubt for a second that this era of prosperity that femtards took advantage of to push their agenda is temporary. If the western civilization doesn't reform, i.e. doesn't tame its women (including stripping them of voting rights), goes back to promoting nuclear family, cuts welfare before it implodes the economy..it will happen by other means. We will become demographically conquered by the traditional societies that do so. And no it won't take hundreds of years, it will happen in the 21st century.
vplatt 6y ago
Wow... it's no wonder this sub is quarantined. Just when a nice conversation happens someone has a misogynistic episode like this, akin to a seizure. You may as well be ranting in any forum about "pick your favored minority to hate" here with a final prediction of doom to top it off. Personally, I think we can do better. It should certainly be possible for the men of today, advanced as we may think we are.
Anyway, you picked a nice paper, but it's ironic that you picked a paper by a man who served so faithfully in a society which, at the time at least, at a phase predating women's rights and even the rights of foreigners. And has that society been successful as a result? Not especially. Without oil and forced colonization, it's debatable whether the area would be nearly the powerhouse that it is today. They no doubt do not offer any clear advantages as a result of their treatment of women. Given their over reliance upon imported dirt cheap labor and their relative poverty despite their advantages, I have my doubts. Oh, and let's not forget their over reliance upon foreign higher education of their elite; which is mainly only necessary because they do not educate the bulk of their women and so they force restrictions on the educational possibilities and scale, which in turn requires them to reach outside of themselves just for the basics required to maintain a ruling class; which in turn is only really necessary because they do not properly take advantage of all the human resources at their disposal.
And let's look at the origin of the man himself: Great Britain. Sure, the government in this nation has risen and fallen quite a few times over the course of recorded history; maybe even with the periodicity that Glubb states. And has it disappeared from view? Did they just evaporate? No, of course not. It has redefined itself many times, sometimes with some blood in the streets, but it persists.
So, if Glubb is right, sometime in the next 7 years, and maybe a bit later the United States as we know it will fall. I won't say it's impossible. I do know better than that. However, there are a lot of possible steps between where we're at now to a new order; and one would arise no doubt. You only have to look at Britain to know it will work out in the end. I guess we'll have to use our imaginations.
In the meantime, I recommend leaving behind rhetoric and discussion which places women's rights as a central cause of this cycle and / or characterizing the cycle itself as some sort of evil. At best, all that has been shown is that the former is correlated to a rise in overall wealth and leisure, not causative of the cycle. The cycle itself appears to be a completely normal part of the development of humanity and it seems to have brought us into increasingly advanced and capable forms of civilization. That hardly seems like a bad thing. I only wish I could witness the next 100 million years or so to see how it plays out.
lala_xyyz 6y ago
that book was published in 1965, femlib already happened for three generations at that point. white feathers, temperance movement, age of consent..they didn't have WAVA, imprisonment for not paying child support and the presumption of guilt, but everything else was set in motion, enough for the author to make parallels with extinct empires.
another geographic determinism moron. yes it would you dumb fuck. colonization happened because european societies were the most advanced on the planet and were scrambling for resources and lebensraum. industrial reolution happened, and before that enlightenment. it didn't happen in the shitholes that were the rest of the world, Africa, Americas, and Asia. their societies were not conducive to innovation, and didn't have institutions that fostered scientific thinking, nor the population biologically capable of it (and neither do they today, when still 90% of all innovation happens in a few countries of the West).
Not treating women well is an evolutionary advantage. Glubb explains it clearly, you should read it. The first symptom of a society with excess wealth and no new frontiers to conquer is internal redistribution, with the weak and parasitic (women, low-IQ immigrants, and generally dumb) voting themselves ever-growing share of the ever-growing state budget, paid into by the naive taxpayers. No society that keeps their women in line will ever grow extinct.
The labor is not "imported", laborers come and work willingly. Why? Because it pays better than stay in their shithole countries. Nobody forces Mexicans to come into the US, or Middle Easterners and African to take a trek to the middle of Europe. They do it out of their own volition. The flux is further facilited by corporations who wish to cut the price of labor. It's not necessary per se, but it provides better economic growth. It's a self-reinforcing process, not a matter of policy or a dire need.
Foreign higher education? The best universities in the world are in the West. Most non-Wester countries don't have universities older than 50 years.
Educating women provides exactly zero economic benefits. Their smaller brains are incapable of innovative and reflective thinking. 90% of them ends up with completely worthless degrees no even working in the area of study they were schooled for. The rest usually piggybacks on the back of some beta men who do their work for them. We were going fine until the mid 20th century without women "working", we will be fine after they've be confined to the kitchen again. Female brain didn't evolve do sole difficult tasks, or trailblaze new disciplines, it evolved as an emotional tampon for hypergamy, to gather simple food, spread gossip and take care of babies. That's why the happies women are the uneducated women in the traditional societies that didn't even attend high school.
London is less than 50% white, and 70% of school children are non-white. They are already demographically conquered. It's a zombie country living on borrowed time. Soon the only Whites in London will be either East European economic migrants or race-mixers, wiggers and liberals such as yourself. It's not "redefinition", it's extinction, but before it - a civil war.
Personally I don't see it as causative, more like an in-built mechanisms to kill of a society once it has become to weak, complacent and rich. It's an opportunity to recognize the mistakes and either undo them, or rebuild from scratch. All living organisms, groups, and systems work the best when they are in a war, or some kind of a race for the survival. Peace is an unnatural aberration. That's why Jews and Muslims function so well as groups - their leaders keep brainwashing them of the imminent perils of "Nazis" or whatever their closest nemesis is.
This is the last cycle, that is the problem. There will be no more resets because the inevitable conflict that is coming will be solved by total surveillance and control of all money and economic activity. It won't help if you're Amish or an Eskimo - if you want to enjoy the fruits of the modern world everything you do will be monitored. Just like you need to give up you social media accounts on airports when you enter US lmao. And the low-IQ morons will all vote for it.
vplatt 6y ago
To clarify, the "foreign higher education" comment was about the UAE, not Britain. Obviously, this is a strength in the West and it's not something you'll find a wealth of in almost any country that restricts its women in the way you favor.
As to your other points... well, let's put it this way: If you truly believe that Western men are truly the better breed in this modern world, then you could improve the level of your discourse to match. Most of what you've stated above is merely crude disrespectful generalizations that doesn't actually point to any positive direction. I don't know that anyone could benefit from your perspective in this form.
nofears 6y ago
Great post that serves as a reminder to never show weakness of any kind to your woman, regardless of how the culture tells you to share your feelings.
Nothing good ever comes of it, only loss of attraction.
INNASKILLZ2K18 6y ago
This is all very true, and part of human nature.
However it's going to be more fuel for some guys who see everything in black and white and need more reasons to hate women.
'Fuck her, if I got the shit beaten out of me she'd leave me in a second. Fuck them aaaaalllll'.
chazthundergut 6y ago
It's almost like we evolved in a brutal, kill-or-be-killed environment, and women's sexual preferences evolved to provide their offspring with the best chance of survival in such an environment.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Nah no way don't be ridiculous.
lugrulo 6y ago
I think it’s dubious to consider this canon.
For example the type of girl to date somebody in the ufc may (shocker) have a strong desire for an aggressive masculine fighter, and him losing broke that weird fantasy. Most women don’t have expectations that high in regards to fighting.
I think it’s more important to observe the behavior after the loss. If his whole ego is shattered, then that is the real reason for unattration.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
You nailed it. You avoided attributing behavior of a specific group to the behavior of a general group, kudos to you
fds_1 6y ago
This. Girl has a fantasy about you and the moment you brake that fantasy she starts to lose attraction. It's important to point out that I said she starts to lose attraction not she losses it in a instance. Seeing you go through adversity and still come out on top will get you that attraction back.
LucidCunning 6y ago
Lugrulo, if you listen to 3:15 of that Joe Rogan clip, she essentially admits she needs a man BETTER THAN HER in some capacity to be sexually attracted to him.
She's still acting with typical female instincts, she's simply narrowed down the playing field hardcore because she's a fighter herself.
wanderer779 6y ago
My impression is most the dudes in here are young and immature and are hanging around immature club sluts. I'm old and if I got in a fight everyone would just think me and the other dude were idiots. If my gf loses attraction cause I got beat up I'm just going to make fun of her for acting like a monkey. And then go get an actual civilized woman.
I still think there's a lot of value for learning to fight but actually doing it outside of a gym is dumb.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Couldn't have said it better myself
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
AWALT. You don’t think all women would lose attraction if you lost a fight?
[deleted]
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
As far as I know you misunderstand the concept of AWALT
BloodSurgery 6y ago
Why do you think so? I think hes right, in a biological sense. Theres always going to be the "he lost a fight once" in her mind.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
There is no real proof to that. I'm saying the odds are astronomically low that it won't affect her mental state, especially in the state of dating we live in now, though there are some that don't care. Someone in this thread mentioned if two men get in a fight in his country then those two men are seen as idiots and the woman of one cusses out the other guy
lala_xyyz 6y ago
"I am finding myself attracted" - straight from the horse's mouth. women have no sense of agency, they are just leaves on the wind. environment entirely shapes them, to the extent that their instincts allow them
TotalBasturd 6y ago
This is like every post about infidelity they make.
"I couldn't resist him"
"I don't know how it happened"
"I don't even know how I ended up in his bed"
lala_xyyz 6y ago
and if the friends' and society's reaction is not positive to her infidelity, the story suddenly turns to:
"he made me do it"
"it was a rape"
"i was taken advantage of"
CoachOcelot 6y ago
Very good observations. This is all true and clearly demonstrable with every day examples. It obviously goes back to our ancestors and our biology, which hasn't changed much. Tribe 2 invades tribe 1 and Alpha 2A beats Alpha 1A to within an inch of his life. Which man is a more attractive potential protector, with more resilient and stronger genes, according to Alpha 1A's (former) wife/mate? Clearly, if she chooses to stand by "her man," her and her children are again at risk of being murdered, raped, assaulted, enslaved, etc. Therefore, it stands to "reason" (hypergamous reason anyway) that the solipsistic woman looks out for herself and monkey-branches to Alpha 2A and quickly forgets about Alpha 1A.
javiercer20 6y ago
Easy as this:
The more dominant you are OR at least you appear to be, the more tingles you’ll produce.
Treat women like sex objects, don’t worry about their feelings go for what you want and you’ll have endless sex nights.
INNASKILLZ2K18 6y ago
So, what you're saying is if I want to fuck Victoria Secret models whenever and wherever I please, I just have to beat the shit out of Leo DiCaprio?
What about Justin Bieber?
rimworld_warcrimes 6y ago
Reminds me of the Lobster thing Jordan Peterson talks about.
strengthcamp 6y ago
Yup. Rule 1: Stand up straight with your shoulders back. The story regarding the lobster's mating ideology is highly correlated with this post.
Basically, when two lobsters fought, the winner would gain a surge of serotonin, and an endless supply of female lobsters looking to hijack his genetics. The confidence would erect their posture and make them more likely to win another encounter.
On the other hand, the loser would experience a decline in serotonin, fall into depression, attract no female lobsters and ultimately have poor posture - they would most likely lose their next encounter, so none of females want to reproduce with them.
Pretty interesting how close our hardwiring is to lobsters.
novalentineforyou 6y ago
It's serotonin, not dopamine or testosterone. Serotonin is by the way the same chemical predominantly affected by depression and antidepressant medications.
strengthcamp 6y ago
You are right. My mistake. I'll make the change.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Kurush559 6y ago
this is why big dick energy became a part of modern slang
Satou4 6y ago
Check out hybristophilia. Women will flock to a proven serial killer, send him love letters in prison, and attend his trial just to get a chance.
TotalBasturd 6y ago
Study: Unempathetic, narcissistic criminals do better with women than other men http://archive.is/e6p19
Article: Why do women fall for serial killers? https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-the-self/201204/why-do-women-fall-serial-killers
Yeah, killers get more pussy than non-killers. Never buy any of that "Nice Guy" bullshit: straight up criminals do better with women than obedient puppy beta men.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Last time I checked necrophilia and pedophilia are severe mental disorders (notice the "ophilia" suffix) that only affect very few people. Very important distinction to be making by stating this refers to a select group of women, not all
Satou4 6y ago
Do you have proof there are women unaffected by this tendency to be attracted to violent men?
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Yes, actually. You also forget that many people don't know what they actually want
You can tell them all the traits they admire in violent men but when asked about animals and you were to say you killed some as a kid, many of them bail
I can tell you certainly that there are many women unaffected by the tendency to be attracted to violent men
Satou4 6y ago
We landed astronauts on Jupiter, see how that works?
I'm not doubting you but killing animals doesn't really fit into the violent badass stereotype. It would probably attract them if you said you beat up kids in middle school.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Considering I've sought out the truth about this due to curiosity I can safely assure you they don't know what they want in this regard. For the record someone killing animals is a trait more aligned with the mental disorder you initially listed
Brushyourteethm8 6y ago
What about Brad Pitt and Edward Norton in that film that time...
Both get the shit kicked out of them at times but it's how they respond - maniacal laughter and NGAF along with them bouncing back - were their SMVs affected by this?
How about the main character in Never Back Down?
Bond in Casino Royale?
I'd argue that it's their response to getting beat down that determines this effect.
The UFC fighter probably had his frame being built on "I'm the toughest guy" and this, along with her illusion of him, were shattered.
In the annecdote, it says the boyfriend who is beat down by Dylan is already blue pilling it up at 23 talking about marriage and that he acted like a resentful bitch for 2 weeks after being beaten. He also tucked tail and ran when Dylan turned up to play basket ball - avoidant and submissive behaviour. It is his response that battered his SMV, not the beatdown.
Jordan Peterson talks about how when the alpha lobster is beaten, they don't just lose the top spot. They completely demote themselves to the bottom of the pack by internalising the defeat.
Lesson to learn: Don't be a fucking lobster.
Jugurthajones87 6y ago
This. Saw all the things you mentioned but you said it better than I could.
TotalBasturd 6y ago
Pitt's character never loses a fight in the entire film. He is never shown taking a beat-down, while Edward Norton's character gets destroyed several times. Which is very fitting because Tyler Durden is an imaginary incarnation of masculinity and "coolness".
In Casino Royale, Bond even beats two dudes at the same time. He is a brutal fighter all throughout the film.
If you lose, you lose. You can "take it like a man" but you will just be a manly loser that women won't even talk to.
reddzeppelin 6y ago
no pitt gets brutally slammed by a mafia guy for using his building. but he laughs it off he isnt mentally defeated even when hes bleeding, he bleeds on him and pleads to keep the place, let us keep the place lou! he acts subversive instead of submissive in the face of oppressive threat of force.
Jugurthajones87 6y ago
Always thought that was one of the weakest parts of the movie. A mob guy wouldn’t be scared off by some Tyler Durden type bleeding on him.
reddzeppelin 6y ago
It wasn't realistic but it was funny and as a teen I thought it was badass. Because that wouldn't work on a monster but on pretty much anyone else. Later on I watch an interview and find out Pitt and Norton consider it a dark comedy. That part was but I'd call it a style film more than anything.
Yashugan00 6y ago
"If any woman is reading this:"
​
stop. I'm going to stop you right there.
​
If this sub has taught us ANYTHING at all, it is that you can't learn anything from what a women says on mating and sexual selection. They've been lying about their dual mating strategy for hundreds of thousands of years. The ONLY reason we all know now is that we have the irrefutable data to back this up now through social media.
Don't ask a women anything, she'll only tell you what she believes you want to hear or what is best for the image of women in general: the so called halo effect.
​
"Don't look at what they say, look at what they do"
lala_xyyz 6y ago
nah, they truly believe the shit they, and behave completely opposite. it's evolutionarily beneficial for women not to understand their mating strategy
Yashugan00 6y ago
That is a good point. Explains why they don't understand it and are constantly bewildered by their own behaviour (guy is perfect, why can't i love him. Guy is an asshole, why do i like him)
Andgelyo 6y ago
Amen
[deleted]
[deleted]
TotalBasturd 6y ago
Very true. I had the hope that a few of them would for once say what they think instead of what makes them seem morally better.
[deleted]
Protocol_Apollo 6y ago
Women are herd creatures, you will find that typically if you ask for their advice about a girl, they will try to side more with the girl than you.
They will try to cover her back as much as they can inconspicuously.
Yashugan00 6y ago
absolutely, and that too has been proven. women's come to the defence of each other 4x more likely than a man for a man.
[deleted]
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
Even mothers, sisters etc. Towards women that are ruining your life. No loyalty.
swagswag1000 6y ago
lol so true hahaha. my mom got pissed at me for wanting to dump a girl that was driving me insane.
surethingjanet 6y ago
Mate your username. I know what it refers to and I default love you for that. What are the odds on trp
Yashugan00 6y ago
what can i say but ... j'adore le flan! (I love flan!)
;)
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Project_Zero_Betas 6y ago
Just observe any girl's behavior and how it corresponds to the amount of likes/comments she gets from beta orbiters.
Yashugan00 6y ago
okcupid published all it's data, tinder data is also available.
CollaterLDamage 6y ago
Link? I only saw a small place of the OkCupid data. Didn't see it all and didn't even know there was data for tinder.
crimsonpowder 6y ago
I don't even think it's lying anymore. The same way that a lot of dudes on here promise themselves they're no longer going to beat their meat but 5 hours later find themselves staring at midget donkey orgy 14, they just can't help themselves. People believe a lot of things tentatively that aren't really true.
Yashugan00 6y ago
is "midget donkey orgy 14" any good? asking for a friend.
crimsonpowder 6y ago
I didn’t like the part at the end where they missed a good chance for the midget bitch to get double teamed by two goats and one of the goats just stood there. Like come on billy this is your chance get the fuck in there.
Yashugan00 6y ago
see... these things just don't happen in Goat Simulator: you know you're always going to get good activity. Can't wait for VR.
crimsonpowder 6y ago
Someone should write an analysis of what all of the girl goats are going to do once we have goatbots
RightHandWolf 6y ago
There's a Midget Donkey Orgy 14?
Dear Santa . . .
BloodSurgery 6y ago
Wait until you see Midget Donkey Orgy 15
​
Xornor 6y ago
They ruined it. The story is dull and poorly written.
RightHandWolf 6y ago
I also read Playboy and Hustler, just for the investigative journalism. (They still can't beat The National Enquirer, though.)
187oddfuture 6y ago
Rich Cooper said it best: Men have to compete. Women just hang out at the finish line and fuck the winners.
TotalBasturd 6y ago
That's pretty much sports in high school and college for me. The guys all tried to out-perform each other because they wanted to prove they were the strongest, the fastest, the everything. Basically flexing in front of the girls. They all wanted to be number one and brag about it.
The gals didn't do shit. Only one or two even tried and the other 40 just walked to the finish line and never lifted anything. They didn't need to: the guys would only get laid if they excelled, but the gals would get laid whatever they did.
thebadguy89 6y ago
Yeah, it might seem unfair but imagine if you were an ugly chick. Then you just go through life completely miserable.
Furthermore, once these girls hit the wall their life basically plummets.
the99percent1 6y ago
School is nothing compared to competing in business. Nothing gets a kick than beating your competitors and winning a 50million dollar contract which feeds the people working in your organisation.
187oddfuture 6y ago
It’s every social situation really. Guys are cursed to compete, it’s our nature. It’s our biological purpose. Just look at a bar or a club. All the guys are competing with each other, visibly uncomfortable and always scanning the room. The only people genuinely enjoying themselves are that one group that’s in the back corner of the bar that just came there to get a drink, not meet people.
TheRedPillRipper 6y ago
It's not a curse; it's a blessing. How else would you know how good you are if you don't test yourself? As one of my old coaches used to say when it came to game time; what's on display is what's ingrained. Competition exposes you to a reality check. That type of honesty can only help you. Fighting. Pick-up. Competition; and training for it; is only ever beneficial.
Godspeed and good luck!
Protocol_Apollo 6y ago
As stated by the other comments, biologically it makes sense to lose attractiveness if you lose a physical confrontation.
However, I think it’s more HOW you go about the defeat than the defeat. If you acted like a bitch after you lose, that’s more damaging than the loss itself.
I hope my reasoning makes sense otherwise all fighters (MMA, boxers etc) are screwed since next to nobody has ever been undefeated.
Everyone is bound to lose a match unless you purposely choose opponents much weaker than you/worse than you
letsgobish29 6y ago
only if you allow women sexual freedom. you should never tolerate this crap from women and try to navigate it. no man is dominant in such a sphere, we are all submissive to female desire. if a muslim was interviewing that mma bitch do you think he would just observe and laugh about it? no he would tell her off and put her in her place.
Bing_Bang_Bam 6y ago
I feel like Chris Hemsworth has a higher IQ than manoa.
trele_morele 6y ago
Here's a bit of practical advice for the people who got all amped up after reading this and are about to step out into the real world and start swinging clubs and bashing heads. Avoid fucking fighting. Out of all the possible outcomes only a few really benefit you even if you win. But if you have no other option than to defend yourself then I guess it's a moot point, might as well smile for the camera
xNightly 6y ago
I really don't want to sound like a pussy but shit like this makes me want to not even bother. Why play this shitty game when you'll get fucked over one way or another? I've been part of this community for a while now and I'm still struggling with accepting womens hypergamy instincts and why I should even play along with it just for some sex?
chopping_livers 6y ago
You play it for yourself. If you are going to give up on trp, you will give up on yourself. Women are an accessory, not purpose. You make your purpose.
TheEarlobe 6y ago
I know it’s fucking retarded. Especially when you see fucking brad Pitt, Elon musk, and Jeff bezos getting divorce raped.
Let’s say you want kids. That’s like 22 years of holding frame and having to do everything perfectly so your wife doesn’t cuck you or lose attraction etc.
No wonder so many guys kill themselves at 45. Imagine pulling 6 figs and having a 2 plate bench with a big house and having your wife leave you cuz you don’t give her tingles anymore.
IMHO. You need to have children in order to be happy and have purpose, at least later in life. But in this current non monogynous cucked era of law you’re fucked.
AshyLarry27 6y ago
You're reading too much into extremes. Frame is the key component to most of this. Maintain your frame, your confidence, and overall game skills and you'll be fine. How often do you see fights in today's day and age? Unless you expect to get jumped and your ass whooped every time you go to take a girl out, this really shouldn't affect you, nor should you look at it like some shocking revelation.
This is ultimately the problem with most people on this forum. They read everything on the forum and absorb it like a sponge instead of going out and talking to girls. Since this forum has an aspect of divulging hard truths, a lot of Incel/MGTOW Black-pilled types read into it and just give up on everything. They spend their days "reading" TRP instead of practicing it. They just let their defeated ego's eat up every negative post and go "oh maaannn women are too hard to pleeaasseee"
AdeHMar 6y ago
Of all the times I've seen guys get beaten up by other dudes, every fucking time their women would be extremely supportive and go on a hate crusade against the other violent dude.
Your women are fucked. Your society is fucked. And sadly, that's coming to us.
420KUSHBUSH 6y ago
Where are you from if you don't mind me asking?
[deleted]
TotalBasturd 6y ago
That is rare. Where do you live?
red_matrix 6y ago
Obviously not in the real world.
AdeHMar 6y ago
No, that is not rare, that is what is expected about any half decent person.
I live in Argentina.
_iisu 6y ago
Yes, insecure low life people will go out of their way to appear "decent" to others in exchange for the safety of being a part of the herd, because they can't face their life in solitude. They trade their lives for other people's acceptance. I strongly advice you to change who you surround yourself with.
[deleted]
reddzeppelin 6y ago
low lives show loyaly? he makes a good point you should seek a woman who wont turn on you if you lose a fight. building your frame around fighting is for movie stars, and well, low lifes.
_iisu 6y ago
If she won't turn on you, she's not true with her nature as a woman. Run from her before she bores you to death. If either of you settles down for the mediocre, they take the other person down with them.
reddzeppelin 6y ago
I'm not sure you understand how fighting works. The best fighter is often the guy with a crooked nose mangled up cauliflower ears from getting slammed around and losing rounds or entire fights. I've gotten good at boxing ( not for a boxer but 3 times better than your average person) and it's been a liability almost like carrying a weapon I've realized now I can no longer afford to get into fights. Because now I have to worry about actually hurting them any educated person knows knocking someone unconscious is not safe. A mature woman does not want you to be Chuck Norris.
_iisu 6y ago
Fighting is not all there is. There are countless other activities where you can go beyond your limits and grow. Even sitting in place and doing nothing – we call it meditation. There are people who mastered it to the point where they can stay completely still for weeks and months.
It is women's nature to seek the best opportunities and do the least effort, and it's men's nature to create their own opportunity. You don't need even to be a fighter to end up with a crooked nose and mangled up ears. Life is full of risks. Should they stop you from doing what you love?
A "mature" woman wants you to provide for her. Even if she doesn't jump on cocks left and right out of silly "decency" or because she hit the wall, she will still pull you down because she wants you to provide. If you dare to alpha your way up, there's a huge chance she'll flee.
HBenedek38 6y ago
This is why some MMA fighters refuse to let their wives or girlfriends watch the fights in person, and if possible, watching it on TV or video either. Best if she knows fuckall about fighting, because then she probably won't watch you.
Because (almost) everyone loses every once in a while - but many (most) women expect you to be 100% every time. So the only logical solution is to pretend that the losses never happened.
Honestly, this is why I think it's better if men remain peaceful to each other, physically and socially too. Because the moment there is confrontation, one person always loses. Meanwhile if there is truce in place of confrontation, the power balance is ambiguous, and both men profit.
And this is also why martial arts should be a prime directive for men to learn if they want to be attractive to women - muscles are nice, but fighting teaches you a lot about dominance.
I love how under the article about F&F starts' gimmicks, every comment is about how childish it is - which is EXACTLY an attack at their character for not wanting to be weak. This is the most meta part of this all - that even WANTING to not appear weak is perceived as weakness. Weakness is weakness, and fear of weakness is weakness too.
At the end of the day the solution is to put on a jester's profile, and suggest your surroundings that you are hardcore. This way you appear approachable, but dangerous. If you appear only dangerous, that makes you look like you are afraid of losing, because all you HAVE is being dangerous. But if you play the comedian in the meantime, you have a diverse set of skills, and as such, you don't IMMEDIATELY get the accusation that on account of being a one trick pony, you must be insecure about your one trick.This is why people like Dwayne Johnson take comedic roles too - it makes them look like they are just doing this for fun, and that they have nothing to lose. And this is why I think this kind of info leaking out is a PR disaster on their part.
This kind of mental jiu jitsu is what men have to put up with on a daily basis, and this is what women don't want to acknowledge, even though they are the ones who generate it. When you are in a group of acquaintances, and you KNOW deep in your mind that you HAVE to say something funny or noteworthy every 5 minutes or so, because otherwise they will start ignoring you, and you will lose from your immediate status. It's fucking ridiculous.
EDIT: Also, as Papa Fedor said:
https://youtu.be/A33Bb59M9-0
Protocol_Apollo 6y ago
It’s a bit hard for the girlfriend of any fighter to know fuck all about the fights since they are with them all the time essentially.
Them being a fighter is huge part of them: it’s their career etc. Not to mention there’s always pre-hype before each match eg press stuff etc
I think the only solution is to act like the losses never happened regardless of whether their wife/gf knows about it or not.
Their wife/gf almost have no choice: they will know about the losses either through her own efforts (out of curiosity) or from her passively scrolling on social media or browsing the news
HBenedek38 6y ago
Well, I should have said she isn't invested in it. Make it "honey, so you came back from work... who did you beat up again? Oh yeah, that guy! Well, I am glad you are OK. Remember to turn off the lights in the hall!", while she's watching fucking Desperate Housewives or something - just make sure she doesn't see some guy nearly beating you to death.
Which you don't have to involve your wife in. Seriously, do we actually know anything about the wives and girlfriends of certain MMA fighters? Not much. I know Gustaffson is married, but that's because he made it public. But others... even a hypeman like McGregor didn't advertise that he has a girlfriend/wife. I haven't seen her anywhere near the octagon. And I have a few competitive MMA fighter friends - neither of them allows their girlfriends anywhere near the octagon on fight night. They just don't like to be seen beaten up by their significant others.
And of coruse she knows about the loss - the thing is, it's HOW she knows that matters. If it says "loss by rear naked choke", OK then. If she sees that you were completely manhandled like a bitch, well...
Obviously, but yeah.
grimmygrimgrim 6y ago
McGregors girl is regularly in the octagon. She was there when he beat Mendes, she kisses him right after
HBenedek38 6y ago
Hm... Maybe I just haven't paid attention. But still - can you name more than 5 UFC fighters who bring their ladies in the arena?
RP_Br3 6y ago
DJ, Stipe, Mike Perry even had his as corner, DC, who can forget the banshee shouting Eddiieee (Alvarez), Gustafsson, Bisping, TJ, Cody Garbrandt. Basically any family man can also be added to that list
It's quite common to forbid your kids from watching, but as someone active in the scene on a national and European level I have yet to see anyone forbidding their wives from watching. Working security for 2 ufc events I've also been put on the "friends and family" section, where many are SO's of fighters. I'd say it's more common for them to attend than not, unless you're for example dagistani. I have seen multiple times girls refusing to see their partners fight since they don't want to risk seeing them be beat up, but never seen them outright forbidden from arenas by their partners. MMA is such a huge part of the competitors lives that a partner often has to support you both financially and emotionally, especially at the start, so many fighters prefer to have them there.
Personally I preferred to not have my ltr attend, but that's not the norm, at least in the Scandinavian mma scene.
redpill77 6y ago
Women will always push the men to compete until it is clear who is higher status. She HAS to know.
BumblingBeta 6y ago
What tactics do they use to push men to compete? If no other men are immediately available to compare you to, how does she determine whether you're high enough status/dominance/masculinity for her?
Project_Zero_Betas 6y ago
When does this ever realistically happen? Even if there's no guys in the immediate vicinity, she's mentally measuring you up against guys from her past.
redpill77 6y ago
If she doesn't have too many past guys to measure you against, she might actually be content. That's when she has babies and when the boys grow up they will fight for dominance.
HBenedek38 6y ago
That's why men have to be smarter. If you feel like there is tension, and you want to get physical, suggest a friendly wrestling spar. It's way better than a head on confrontation, and most women have no idea about wrestling anyway, so they can't tell who would have won if you stop before the tap.
redpill77 6y ago
Yes, it is good to avoid the relational vicissitudes involved with a woman seeing you lose. If two men can 'settle their differences' (which essentially means define the hierarchy) respectfully, things will end up the same, just with less mess.
I live in a very feminized city, hinting at violence is very faux pas. Because of this I can stare down guys twice my size, because the dominance struggle is most often relegated to eye contact. This is one benefit to the takeover of the feminine imperative: you can use it if you understand it. When a strong man is taught to defer to the judgement of women, you can play women's aversion to violence against him, because he's in her frame, and she's in yours.
HBenedek38 6y ago
I understand this, but I do not condone it. This is how women think, and frankly, I am disgusted by it. You are playing by women's rules - you are their toy.
I know you can't exactly move like that *snap*, but if I were you, I would still prefer to live in a more masculine society, and engage in typically masculine hierarchical rituals, like physical confrontation, friendly or adversarial, than to having to play the backstabbing mindgame of women.
redpill77 6y ago
I am working with the idea that I can pick and choose, and it seems to work. If a man is stronger than you, but you will become more motivated and ultimately stronger by bedding the girl, why wouldn't you employ all available tactics.
And I compliment this (which is more for strangers) by cultivating more masculine friendships in my inner circle.
HBenedek38 6y ago
This is what I was talking about. Because certain tactics end up advancing your goal, but overall act as a negative to men as a social group.
By accepting women's terms, and playing by their rules, you are strengtening their hold on masculinity and men, and you are making life worse for men in the future, including yourself.
As the Romans would say it - divide et impera.
BumblingBeta 6y ago
Do you think humour and playful banter is a good tactic to use with guys who are obviously higher status or physically more dominant/masculine/better looking? I feel like this is a good way to slowly creep into being higher status yourself. Instead of avoiding head on confrontations.
Or is this a bad tactic?
redpill77 6y ago
If you encounter a man who impresses you, your best route is to befriend him and learn. Banter and humour can work well for this.
You want to learn as much as you can from him. Try to act as equals as long as you can, but if he really outclasses you, you can annoy him by acting equal, and he won't want to interact with you anymore; you've made it more work than it's worth. So sometimes acknowledging his superiority will allow a mentorship situation. You must at this point be diligent to enforce boundaries and digest your lessons alone. It is easy to slip into a more powerful man's frame. If you find yourself doing that, try to set a boundary. If you find yourself relying on his judgement or unable to set a good frame (with you as a dignified student) then it's time to give space. You're now just acquaintances, but you've hopefully both gained.
You can learn a lot from other guys. Try to optimize it. If he abuses you, blame yourself and learn better frame, and cut ties, but avoid making an enemy. Even if you realize the guy is a piece of shit, try to keep good rapport, you may be able to help each other again at some point. This time have better frame.
Realize that both of you are always doing cost-benefit analysis, and that despite the coldness of that, you can still joke around and vibe. Every single person and every single time you interact with in a good vibe will strengthen your frame.
HBenedek38 6y ago
Definitely.
I don't think that helps in becoming higher status - but then again, I openly admit that I AM NOT a high status male, so I have no idea how you become one. I suspect it has to do a lot with how extroverted and confident you are (which doesn't come naturally to me). But banter definitely helps you become more confident and witty in social situations. I feel like the easiest way to become high status is to constantly position yourself in the center of attention. I have no patience for that though.
BumblingBeta 6y ago
Placing yourself in the center of attention is really high risk/high reward. It can go really well, or you can humiliate yourself badly and you're seen as a weak man to women and other men. Which I suppose is what this thread is all about.
Damn, being an introvert is such a nightmare as a male.
HBenedek38 6y ago
Well, yeah. Being high value means you are dominant. And dominance is high risk, high reward by definition. There is no way around that.
I often read criticism of men from women, saying men are stubborn and never admit their mistakes. THIS is why. Because if you pretend the mistake never happened, it goes away faster, and you can regain your status. Self-flagellating and apologizing does the opposite.
redpill77 6y ago
I am a proponent of correcting mistakes and moving on. Correct other's mistakes privately so that there is a culture of fixing, not blaming. When you make a mistake, you correct it quickly, and allow people to remember that you do not need to apologize, because they are already benefiting from your leadership.
I believe ignoring an issue or pretending it didn't happen only works in terms of: "it has been corrected, and there is no need to discuss." If you're actually pretending something didn't happen you've created a weak point for someone to attack your frame.
HBenedek38 6y ago
Yeah, that's a good mentality towards others, but you can't expect the same to be done to you. So you ignore it outwards, and try to correct your mistakes, unless someone is nice enough to talk about it with you.
red_matrix 6y ago
Well....we all know by now that poor guys girlfriend has already blown, and probably fucked Dylan 10X within a week of writing that. Two year relationship gone down the drain. If that doesn’t red pill you - nothing will.
Cryptoguru777 6y ago
This is typical alpha-male behaviour that we see in nature. Two monkeys, lions, birds or whatever start fighting and whoever beats the shit out of the other one is simply the one they will want to have sex with. I guess it goes back to strong offspring and this being a showcase of that.
​
Now that males no longer have to fight and need other ways to attract women (like financial stability, status and being able to provide a certain lifestyle) it is interesting to see this is still profoundly present. I feel like I have overlooked an element of todays life where this is still active to this day.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Cryptoguru777 6y ago
In a way, shit tests happen for a fact. To me they are simply ways for a woman to determine if you are more emotional than her and thus not fit for being a partner.
sea_weasel 6y ago
Perhaps outside of technology and art, there is nothing new under the sun.
[deleted]
monsieurhire2 6y ago
The woman muay thai fighter is sooooooo DUMB! Maybe that's why she is single at age 43. And everything she said is probably her own insecurity and doubling down on her failed sexual strategy to preserve her ego. I've met women like her IRL, and I just roll my eyes and move on.
That's why I find hilarious about all of these fighter types. They never seem to realize that no matter how much you prepare, or how tough you are, even if you are #1, some pencil-necked dweeb like Kip from Napoleon Dynamite can kill or cripple you for life with a deadly weapon. So then, all their "preparation" was so much water poured on sand, and really just a way of coping with their own fear and insecurity of INEVITABLE AND INEXORABLE DECLINE AND DEATH. Like, you can be a 100% badass, but you will still get old and die (unless you choose the go out in a blaze of glory route, but endlessly opting for suicide missions). This doesn't mean that you shouldn't train and be somewhat prepared, but many of the people who go all the way with it, aren't doing it because of a pure love for it, but because they have a neurotic fear of being made weak, or being forced to submit, or being murdered, etc. Meanwhile, as subjects in a modern industrial society, they submit on a daily basis. They pay their taxes, their fines, they go to their jobs, they do what they are told. They follow laws. They submit. They do this, or else the paid killers and kidnappers show up to put them in a box, take their wealth, and or kill them.
Unlike this broad, many women actually realize this to some extent. These are the women that don't want their men going off to a war and getting killed. They are the ones that don't want their men in a dangerous profession. This woman would rather have the appearance of masculinity, the illusion of it, than the actual man.
Edit:
If you feel you have to compete with other men for them, you are doing it wrong. It's true, technically, that it is a competition, but by running around trying to one-up other guys, you are probably distracting yourself from your mission, entering into her frame, and not practicing abundance mentality. She should be competing with other women for YOU. These fighter guys are mostly never high value enough, because they are picking a very shallow metric of competition that is PERISHABLE, and most of them don't make that much in terms of income. Also, one or two injuries, and that's it for their "careers."
NormalAndy 6y ago
Funny- that jogged my memory. I remember reading an article about Jean-Claude van-Damme getting the shit kicked out of him outside a bar about 10(?) years ago. Aparently he was all show and no go.
...and that's the last thing I remember reading about him at all!- sunk without trace.
frey88 6y ago
I'm in love with these kind of posts. Because regardless of how I feel like reading them, they force me to see reality for what it really is. Very enriching. Thank you very much.
nofears 6y ago
Same here. No justification... Just reality. Defeat or weakness of any kind is unattractive, regardless of how you feel about it.
Brushyourteethm8 6y ago
Don't just take it at face value otherwise it can be just jumping on board with a narrative - a critical eye is always needed
[deleted]
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
TotalBasturd 6y ago
That is a concept called War Children https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_children
Dionysus-VIOLENCE 6y ago
that’s enough trp for the day
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
Why? Women specialise in rationalisation and justification of their own emotional reality.
saveTheFirstWorld 6y ago
If we didn't have extremists we wouldn't have centrists
ManicMuffin2 6y ago
I think people overestimate how much the French Resistance did and Free Frances role in the war.
France was the only country to send forced labor through the law of their own government. Darlan wanted to fight the British but was rebuffed by the Nazis because Hitler didn't trust the French. The French really didn't do much until the Nazis had already lost. Hell the first French troops into Paris weren't French, they were Spanish expats who had fought for the Republicans.
Fun history facts.
soulmysold 6y ago
And one fatal design flaw on French tanks. They only move backwards.
RightHandWolf 6y ago
There are some almost flawless French Army rifles available from the World War II era. They've never been fired, and were only dropped once.
Vikingcel 6y ago
The French didn't have bad tanks at all. They were definitely up to par with their German counterparts. The issue for the French was that their tanks were spaced out across the front and thus outnumbered by the German spearhead. That's why blitzkrieg was such a genial idea.
TheImpossible1 6y ago
Meanwhile, in 2019, we have to hear about how women helped defeat the Nazis.
bulkbroo 6y ago
Didnt they help produce munitions in factories?
red__Man 6y ago
the man is trolling bros.. you can say the same about automated machines
Vikingcel 6y ago
You are out of your element.
bulkbroo 6y ago
How tho? If most of the men were at war them there had to be someone in the factories making bombs and ammo (women) without women making bombs and shit the war couldnt have been won its common sense. And nigga it was 1940 I’m 90% sure they had no automated machines
Brandono99 6y ago
Reads like typical reddit fanfiction that has mental masturbation in mind- it's literal fiction for the cuckolds who upvote that shit because it gets them off. I wouldn't take it too seriously nor devote a post to it.
Jugurthajones87 6y ago
Okay, so we all understand the value of fighting. TRP decrees it.
Now who here is learning to fight? Anyone? Or are you guys just talking about it?
quazimodo_007 6y ago
if these woman were getting good dick they wouldnt have left
lobstergenocide 6y ago
it's not about good dick, it's about being the best dick. if you get your ass handed to you that sends a subtle message that his dick might just be a little thicker. doesn't make it true but that's how the woman's mind works
quazimodo_007 6y ago
i spoke to somebody about just this this will only really happen to blue pilled chumps not red pilled men
lobstergenocide 6y ago
Yeah? Tell that to the woman’s pussy. Doesn’t matter how hot, how big, how toned, how RP you are- there is always someone better. You do the best you can and keep your frame up but you’re naive if you think you can’t or won’t have a moment of weakness, because everyone does. If you’re RP your chances go down but don’t ever assume a bitch won’t up and leave you for someone better because you can never know for sure. Unless you’re perfect 100% of the time there is always that chance. You just mitigate it as best you can. The second you think you’re too big to fall is the perfect time for life to come along and kick you in the nuts
randomTATRP 6y ago
i wanted to ask you what if there was a person which would be a combo of trump (RP), brad pitt (hot) and old school arnie (big/toned), you get my point...
but then i remembered, women would probably STILL cheat because of feels. ....or?
lobstergenocide 6y ago
The point is not that someone like that couldn’t exist, he totally could and almost certainly does. The point is, if one man can achieve all that then another man could too. No man is perfect this no man is impervious to getting cheated on. Even if you’re hot shit you can’t guarantee you’re the hottest shit. And if you’re the hottest shit it’s only a matter of time before age wears you down and someone hotter takes your place. So what I’m saying is you gotta try to be the hottest shit you can be but understand that no matter how good you get you have to realize 1) it ain’t gonna last forever and 2) forces completely outside of your control can tear you down and ultimately you can’t stop that, you can only try to mitigate your losses as much as possible. RP is not about becoming infallible because that is impossible. It’s about putting yourself in the best position you can. You can only steer your ship, you can’t control the weather.
quazimodo_007 6y ago
if your from a small town or city there isn't always somebody better
lobstergenocide 6y ago
then there's someone younger, someone gunning to be you. and when you slip up he'll be there. you can be the best around today but nothing lasts forever. Power is never permanent, that's why you always gotta keep pushing.
and you really wanna be stuck in the same place your whole life, a big fish in a small pond just so you can pretend you're the shit? have fun with that
quazimodo_007 6y ago
i dont mind im a grown ass man with roots, responsibilities and assets!
TerribleCoast 6y ago
I think this applies moreso to certain social circles i.e "Testosterone" driven circles and not so much more intellectual or artistic ones although what other people think about you does matter to a large degree; It's just kind of sad that as much as we've progressed as a race, we can't override these primal instincts and aspire toward a higher value system.
Also, that posts by the other girl seems to almost be trollbait.
[deleted]
[deleted]
swagswag1000 6y ago
so you're telling me that if you get beat up by a dude through no fault of your own even if you fought your best fight, there's just no way around the fact that you're relationship is fucked.
Like that's so fucked up. Cos the reality of life is that there PLENTY of guys who can absolutely woop your ass and what your saying implies that no matter how cool or alpha your mindset is, that just by whooping your ass, you lose your girl to these guys. that basically means it's completely out of your control which I don't believe.
I don't believe it,
​
I believe that if you get your ass beat by some dude but take it on the chin like a champ, don't get your ego bruised and don't lose your frame, then you won't lose your girl. The guy in that story who got beat up clearly was very butthurt and lost his frame to that guy completely, so how can we know if that wasn't the major key in why it fucked his relationship up.
i mean it's the same with anything, if you lose your job, you can't control that and if your GF saw you as alpha prior to that, she won't just drop you as soon as you lose your job, she'll drop you if you cry about it and shit but if you take it like a champ and keep moving forward and show strength in defeat, you'll be ok.
That's what I think anyway.
it just seems that if girls are this way that you describe them where if you get beat up, you're done with zero nuance, then your relationship is built on RIDICULOUSLY weak foundations. I mean Rollo tomassi has been married 23 years, say he got beat up in front of his wife one night by bad luck by some huge dude who can fight well, what is it over now, they get a divorce because of some random bullshit that he had no control over.
​
I don't buy it OP, I think it's about maintaining frame in defeat, not just never being defeated.
lobstergenocide 6y ago
you don't have to believe it, that's the point of the red pill. it's true regardless of your opinion. girls like winners, girls like guys that can protect them, ergo if you get beat by someone don't be surprised when she upgrades you for him. it's all in the game
now you can mitigate the damage by taking it in stride and not getting all pissy like the guy in the linked story, but that doesn't change the fact that your status will take a hit in her eyes - it will just be greater or smaller depending on how you deal with it. as always, the best step when it comes to confrontation is to take Sun Szu's advice and never enter a fight unless you've already won (by being bigger/stronger/quicker/more adept than the other guy). unfortunately you can't always be in a winning position, but that's just life.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
swagswag1000 6y ago
yeah no that girl is not a bench mark for women i'm sorry lol. like comon, this post might actually have some points but that mma fighter chick is a terrible example.
cos it's great that she's masculine enough to say what she means and means what she says so we can get a look inside the female mind. However, the fact that she is an MMA fighter chick means she is not a good example of the inside of the average female mind.
when she said you should be saying "fuck you" on the way down, I'm just like bruhhhh how the fuck are you using THIS GIRL as an example like really bro.
metallica11 6y ago
im with this guy here. its not black and white, and its more about frame.
if this were true, 6'5" bouncers would get laid easily just be going around kicking everyones ass.
swagswag1000 6y ago
yeah I doubt it's a black and white thing but also I'm sure getting your ass kicked will to some extent reduce attraction BUT i reckon you can recover from it. i don't think it's a relationship death sentence though.
AdeHMar 6y ago
For real lmao. People here can be so delusional. Like, the top comment is comparing women that left their bf when they got beaten, with french women fucking the nazis.
swagswag1000 6y ago
i do feel like sometimes people are just straight up cynical on the red pill in the name of "realism".
Just cos what you said is dark and negative doesn't mean it's realistic lol.
​
i will say though, that they could have a point to some extent but I doubt it's as dark and evil as they make it.
GodOfDinosaurs 6y ago
The female UFC fighter said she was upset by the way her bf lost. As in, he kind of acted like a bitch while going down. She said she would have been fine if he went down like a man.
I also think that IMGUR reddit thread is fake. I've seen a few like that.
empatheticapathetic 6y ago
Stick to your delusions if you want.
[deleted]
ex_addict_bro 6y ago
This reminds me of an AskTRP post, where a dude got himself in a situation when they were attacked and his gf (who carried) shot a perpetrator... and he was having second thoughts for all the next week or something.
Anyone remember any follow-ups?
redalterego 6y ago
The world of men has always been about domination. Turn the clock back to the caveman tribes - the leader of the tribe was the strongest male. As much as we’d like to think otherwise, we still possess a lot of primal instincts and this is an example of that.
TwentyEighteen 6y ago
It wasn’t necessarily the strongest male that was the leader. Strength is definitely a factor which helps to climb the hierarchy, but an example from Jordan Peterson: in a tribe, just two guys can conspire and take down an overzealous leader, no matter how strong he is. So, strength is important, but so is leadership skills if you want to be at the top of the hierarchy and stay there. This is also true if you look at the leaders in history, they weren’t the biggest and strongest. They were definitely masculine but they possessed amazing leadership ability
redalterego 6y ago
I agree with your points, but I’d like to add that strictly with reference to UFC, the stronger man = better genes in the eyes of the woman. Leadership is a question of power, and your example of two men conspiring to take down an overzealous leader reflects that.
TwentyEighteen 6y ago
Of course strength is an indicator of good genes and as such more attractive to women. So is many things, including leadership skills
This still does not support your claim that the leader of the tribe was the strongest male, which was the whole point of my comment
redalterego 6y ago
The strongest male has the capability to beat up those above him in social status, and thus was able to climb the social ladder. However as you have pointed out, leadership skills are key and are necessary to stay at the top. This has been shown in chimpanzees and in other instances. I hope that this clarifies things a little.
Edit: I acknowledge that it was factually incorrect to say that the strongest male WAS the leader - more accurately, strength was a trait used to attain leadership.
eboyster 6y ago
I have an average looking friend. This dude had the hardest hands growing up. I’m talking the dude would punch 3 people in the face back to back and knock them all the fuck out. Constantly had women all over him and fucked all his friends ex girlfriends too
RhysHarp 6y ago
You don't wanna be friends with that guy
DirtyBastard13 6y ago
Chaos is a ladder. many who try to climb it fall, never to climb again. The fall breaks them.
[deleted]
sebastianconcept 6y ago
Fascinating. The girl wants to not feel the way her body make her feel.
Hypergamy doesn’t care about anyone’s rationale.
10211799107 6y ago
Even if you're being attacked, you have to show equal and no more aggression and just enough to stop the fight. Otherwise the law will see you as the aggressor and its jail time for you. (yes cops get called in non-shithole countries).
You also have to hope if you fight back and you knock him over that his head falls right and not hit it in some way where he falls, hits his head and dies, then it's manslaughter.
It might be the hardest thing to do for a man, but you must not engage in a fight. Even if your woman will leave you. Prison time is not worth it.
muff_marauder 6y ago
"Mate guarding" explains why successful leaders' wives get fucked by one or several of their honor guard.
When you're the king, you're probably too old to defend yourself and your family physically, so you offload that responsibility to your personal guards. Since you're a successful king, you have the best, biggest, brightest guards. Since you're a successful king, you have a pretty hot queen and/or girlfriend. And since you're away often for diplomacy, that's a lot of free time for your buff guards to spend with your wife.
Therefore castration became the norm if you wanted to be a highly paid guard in the service of the king.
Jugurthajones87 6y ago
Queens didn’t cheat with the guards, they cheated with noblemen or generals. Only male royalty cheats with the help.
AdeHMar 6y ago
Exactly, people talk and assume shit they never read about.
throwlaca 6y ago
>There have been no such reports of concern about appearing weak on screen by actors like Keanu Reeves or Tom Cruise
​
They are not action stars. Also Keanu as Wick or Neo basically kills everyone elses character to the point he's the most feared character in the whole movie. He win the fights.
TimeTimeTimeTimeTime 6y ago
Not trying to be pedantic but they're definitely action stars.
reddzeppelin 6y ago
ya i dont get the point. tom cruise and Keanu reeves also appear strong in their films, even if not as much so as arnold does at all times, sometimes they appear to be superhuman.
jonadragonslay 6y ago
Have you ever seen the movie where Hulk Hogan got his ass beat in a tutu? Difficult to watch.
Yosharian 6y ago
I had a similar issue, with someone I wasn't even dating, but was sort of courting, I suppose. A bunch of guys approached her when we were sitting in a (very noisy) bar and tried to chat her up. I took one look at the situation and decided not to bother, and left the situation. I wasn't even dating her, anyway. My (unspoken) strategy was: "I'm leaving this situation, you can stay if you want, but I'm not your personal bodyguard."
As we left the bar later, she basically asked why I hadn't intervened in some way. I had to explain to her, as one might to a child, that it's foolish to risk losing your life over confronting a gang of idiots being boisterous in a bar.
She didn't get it, because she had never been beaten up by such people, never had a bouncer refuse to lift a hand to help deal with them, etc.
TheImpossible1 6y ago
AWALT as always. Getting into fights over women isn't worth it guys.
RedPillAlphaBigCock 6y ago
This is a good thing. Without this the human race may not have survived - accept this and keep growing stronger.
selfeduhated 6y ago
I don’t think this applies in all cases. Just take a look at Andy Ruiz the short fat Mexican boy who beat an Epitomate Alpha Male Anthony Joshua for the heavyweight boxing belts. I don’t really see AJs woman or female fans branch swinging for man like Ruiz.
However with regards to the chick in your post she probably feels that way because of context. They are all MMA fighters which puts them in the same social circles hence she likely already has some relation or “access” to this other guy and once he beat her boyfriend she got the feels for him because he got one up on him status-wise.
An idea that crosses my mind is if they had a rematch and the boyfriend got his redemption, would she jump back on his dick?
Onidramon 6y ago
Only if they missed the fight
HBenedek38 6y ago
Yeah, but that's because
papertowelfreethrow 6y ago
Lol the Ruiz is 6'2" Joshua is just huge mofo
BumblingBeta 6y ago
Dwayne Johnson had to take a shit ton of steroids to get to the level of masculinity he is today. That's what it takes to be masculine in today's society now. Just lifting isn't enough, you have to take some form of exogenous testosterone if you want to look properly masculine - simply because most casual gym goers are on steroids these days. Instagram is full of "fake natties" i.e. lifters who take steroids, but pretend they're natural.
AshyLarry27 6y ago
What are you talking about? The bar for being masculine is so low in today's society. You act as if there are so many Dwayne Johnson-esque muscle heads walking over the planet that you need to hurry up and order your next shipment of steroids before all the pussy is gone.
The-Peter-Principle 6y ago
Absolutely agree. Everything has been pushed to the extreme in the west in terms of “beauty” which I think of as the socially mediated part of sexual attraction. Men and women both are creating caricatures of themselves based on comic book depictions of “hotness”. Women - fake titties, silicon bags put in their asses, Botox for the lips, eyebrows PAINTED back on, layers of skin paint, spray paint tan. Korean women getting their eyelids literally slit open to make them round, then having their jaw bones SHAVED down to look more China-doll-like. Horrific....
Lord_Teapot 6y ago
you can avoid it by avoiding women
[deleted]
AutoModerator 6y ago
Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.
Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Foend 6y ago
Doesnt make sense. By this logic manny pac was one of the most attractive people in the world up until his first defeat.
ratpoison987 6y ago
It’s biological. Dunno why we need to reenforce this or why OP has this fact lost on him enough to write this essay on it.
It’s in the sidebar. Over and over. This is nothing new.
_do_not_read_this_ 6y ago
You can tell someone something 100 times the same way and they just won't get it.
Say it a different way and it's like a light bulb going off.
ratpoison987 6y ago
That’s true. Not to say it’s not mentioned 100 times already in the side bar.
But you’re right.
Pezotecom 6y ago
Yes, it is inevitable. You end up being responsable for every little aspect of the fight; not being prepared, choosing it in the wrong time, not knowing if you're going to win, etc.
That gets the tingles on the ladies. But, if you were to be assaulted or beaten by a huge guy out of nowhere, I'd say even thou you may lose atractiveness, it wouldn't be relevant because you couldn't have done much.
So it's important to clarify that there are different outcomes, some of them not even worth discussing.
uber_kerbonaut 6y ago
Seems like Hollywood is made of aliens sometimes.
This applies to a type of man I know know almost nothing about. If I, and men like me are engaged in a power struggle, it's one to be the most confident, and secondarily unique and interesting.
Go ahead and say, found the guy who doesn't lift, but it's true I don't, none of the guys I know do, and we are all doing fine, most in happy relationships.