The #metoo movement is obsessed with ruining successful men and has more in common with McCarthyism, the Spanish Inquisition, or the Salem Witch Trials than it does with any civil rights movement. But why now? These SJW's and feminazis have been around for years, why are they doing this now?
It's all because of Donald Trump. This isn't an anti-Trump rant so hear me out. When the Billy Bush tapes came out against the bell was rung and women began crawling out of the woodwork to say they were assaulted by Trump. Most politicians would have resigned or dropped out in shame and that's what they were expecting to happen, but not Trump. He defiantly stood up to them, didn't apologize for anything, and not only did he not lose his fame and fortune, he became the most powerful man on Earth! The same tactic that feminists have used countless times to destroy the careers of men they didn't like blew up in their fucking faces, and they can't handle it. As a result, they are lashing out at any all all successful men and tearing their careers down as surrogates for Trump. #metoo isn't some great cultural shift or civil rights movement, it's a bunch of crybaby cunts throwing a massive temper tantrum.

[deleted]
kagetsuki23 8y ago
The news site that published the story against weinstein would had never published the article if they were not given the green light from higher spheres.
maplemaximus 8y ago
Metoo is just what happens when women have too much power. Men care about everyone, women only care about themselves. Without a stable society, women run wild and are trying to find a way to get help concerning the situation they've put themselves in due to their hypergamy.
It's alright though, I'm going to put a stop to it.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
I agree. This has nothing to do with civil rights but is completely a repeat of the Crucible. The accusers are the same pink hatted wenches who are bitter because they never got grabbed by the pussy by somebody rich and famous.
RedPill115 8y ago
Can't believe I read through this entire thread and haven't seen this response.
This is a picture of the women who supposedly (according to feminists) started the metoo campaign:
https://qzprod.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/g3_burke-c.jpg?quality=80&strip=all&w=1920
The moment I saw her picture I recognized her type - fairly unnattractive but not quite over the line into where no man would sleep with her.
It's classic red pill theory:
He goes to leave - metoo provides a social tool to threaten him with if he leaves. You'd better date her, or get accused of rape or sexual assault.
A friend of mine will sleep with anyone, and this happened to him. This overweight girl who no one wanted to be more than casual acquaintances with was sleeping with him. He got a girlfriend, and that was the end of their friends-with-benefits arrangement. She shows up uninvited to a party at his house and confronts him when he's alone. That must have been rape the first time they slept together, because he didn't ask before he put it in. Neverthemind that she texted him afterwards saying she was glad they had sex. Neverthemind that she texted him every week after that to have sex. The implication was clear - if he dated her all this would go away.
metoo is the "poke holes in the condom" of this decade, a way to keep around a man who will sleep with the girl but not date her.
[deleted] 8y ago
There is also a narcissism epidemic, where females in particular use victimhood as a manipulation tactic.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
rationalthought314 8y ago
If musicians and male strippers posted their #metoo accounts of what women fans have done to them it would likely be more shocking than the "a guy said "nice ass" to me #metoo" accounts
[deleted] 8y ago
Yeah women are hypocritical bitches. They want all the things that men have but then they don't want to work hard for any of those things. The whole sexual harassment bullshit is a double standard on their part.
red_matrix 8y ago
I think the metoo hysteria/panic is the train wreck ending to hook-up culture. Women can't handle it anymore and rather than admit it they are lashing out in hopes that 'society' will put an end to it for them.
[deleted] 8y ago
This is a clever insight but it is only one piece of the puzzle. Most of the comments above have fragments of truth in them. I may write up a piece about #metoo in the near future. I think it presents an opportunity to do some extreme redknighting.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
Not to mention Black Knighting.
I like to stop the conversation towards METOO with a group of girls by asking casually "how many of Harvey's women were wearing underwear when they went to his room to discuss their careers at 2:30 a.m. after drinking all night." It really gets them pissed if you emphasize "careers" with finger quotes.
[deleted] 8y ago
I am going to use this. Another favourite redknighting/ Blackknighting quote I love to use is about the “rape culture” at universities, you just ask “do you think there is more rapes in universities or penitentiaries?”
[deleted] 8y ago
Or, “so you won’t be sending your daughters to university?”
voomer53 8y ago
Society is the book of women....they will fall all over each other following the leader to get to the front of the abused line to get validated for all their "suffering". They've already all claimed to be abused by their dads, uncles and brothers...they're just moving down the list to their bosses, coworkers, and exes until every woman alive will allegedly have been abused...unless we all can begin to consider the source and wisely just stop paying attention to them.
[deleted] 8y ago
No, the #MeToo movement was not started because they couldn't bring down Trump. It was started in 2006 by a woman named Tarana Burke as a way for abused women to have solidarity with one another. The #MeToo movement was then revitalized by Alyssa Milano in 2017 because of legitimate sexual abuse of several actresses by Harvey Weinstein. Trump was just used as an example of a powerful man getting away with sexual harassment.
What we saw after this was a mix of both legitimate and illegitimate sexual harassment accusations against men. I'm talking about legitimate sexual harassment accusations like Louis CK, Bill Cosby, Kevin Spacey and not so legitimate sexual harassment accusations like Al Franken, TJ Miller, and Aziz Ansari.
I don't know what the motives were for these women. They could have been financial, regret of having consensual sex with these men, or media attention or even a mix of all three. All I know is that I don't know for sure so I keep my opinions to myself and don't pass judgement until facts are laid out.
What can we take from this though? The #MeToo movement is encouraging common women to come forth with both legitimate and illegitimate claims of sexual harassment so redpillers should be careful. For example, a woman I've spun in the past texted me wanting to come over. I could tell from her texts that she was drunk so I told her no. I didn't say she couldn't come over because she was drunk. I just said that I had a busy day the following day so I had to sleep in.
Ignore the #MeToo movement but take measures to protect yourself
Jigsus 8y ago
How was the Louis ck accusation legitimate? He got consent
[deleted] 8y ago
He owned up to whipping his cock out multiple times in front of women without consent. It was an open apology letter. You can’t get more factual evidence than him fessing up to it.
Louis C.K. Responds to Accusations: ‘These Stories Are True’https://nyti.ms/2hreoUH
RedPill115 8y ago
Louis C.K.'s response is the blue pill beta response. His response is "feminists told me to say so":
His response is the typical blue pill beta male response - he's internalized the message that being male, or white, or attracted to women is bad and wrong. So when women tell him he's bad and wrong he goes "Yes massa, I do greatly apologize for my inherent sinful behavior of being a black man and looking in the direction of a white woman!" wait...I mean "being a white male trying to be sexual with female!".
P.S. "I have power over them because they admired me" (he wasn't their boss or anything similar) is the equivalent of having big boobs for women. Women admire you -> some of those women will want to sleep with you.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
The women are free to look away or drop to their knees. It's just a friendly invitation. Are we prosecuting women for exposing themselves ala girls gone wild? Nope. Only men. Interesting.
[deleted] 8y ago
You should try it out with women and let us know how that turns out for you
kagetsuki23 8y ago
It work better with a pack of money.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
Not my style. I don't want to scare anybody....
Mckcon 8y ago
How stupid are you? I choose to go to girls gone wild, I don’t choose for a man to whip his cock out at me, there are laws against that apply equally to men and women.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
This is an absolute lie. You are totally aware that the laws do not apply equally to men and women yet you try to peddle the lie to men who know you are full of shit.
Mckcon 8y ago
The law applies to everyone regardless of gender - whether individual judges apply equally or not is another question.
Fact remains that what he did was harassment and there’s no reason to be whipping your cock out at women - do that to my daughter and ill rip your cock off.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
Are you retarded, inexperienced, or just stupid.
No kids. The law does NOT apply to everyone regardless of gender. Try again.
Mckcon 8y ago
Equality before the law is a well established principle, if this principle is ignored by a judge then that is misconduct; this type of misconduct applies on a case by case basis and is not enshrined in law otherwise the whole concept of equality before the law would not exist.
Individual cases of misconduct do not change the law and for every ‘pussy pass’ I can find you an example of where the law was applied equally.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
You want to go tit for tat in family court? Hah! The atrocities are 9 to 1 against men, maybe more.
Or did you have in mind the field of "domestic violence" where 99% of the time the man is arrested no matter how much blood is running down his face from his wife repeatedly assaulting him with a deadly weapon.
Or were you thinking of general criminal law where men are given sentences 70% greater than women who commit the same offense?
Or did you have in mind child abuse, where women commit twice as much as men and kill far, far more babies than men (not even counting abortion) yet men are twice as likely to be convicted and receive a sentence nearly 4 times as long on average.
Or were you thinking of Child Support laws which are RIGIDLY enforced against men at the point of a gun but NEVER enforced against women.
Or were you thinking of Child Custody laws where abusive mothers routinely are awarded custody over loving, caring fathers. Even a crack addict whore is likely to get custody over a young child no matter how together the father is.
Equal Justice Under Law is even engraved on the Supreme Court building so it MUST be the case, right?
Sure! About as much as "In God We Trust" is still a thing.
Equal Justice means: Women get the rights, Men get the Bill.
We are done with "Equal Rights" because there is no equal Justice.
[deleted] 8y ago
[--removed--]
Hjalmbere 8y ago
metoo isn’t a diversion, the #timesup movement creating a fund for legions of mattress girls is:
http://people.com/movies/times-up-legal-defense-fund/
[deleted]
rationalthought314 8y ago
the amount of entitlement the Hillary camp had in the primaries was a good indication that things were not going to end well for them. They smeared Bernie every which they could despite him trying to play nice (because he knew "duh! you're going to need the other side in the general election") and dragged his supporters through the mud then had the gall to demand and cajole their support in the general election because "it was her time."
When she lost to a reality star blowhard, they quite literally lost their collective minds. When #metoo came along they jumped on it like a drowning rat on a piece of driftwood. It's their way to get back not only at Trump but everything they feel he represents and at the same time get back at every man who hurt them in some way real or imaginary.
At this point hardly any man is safe because all it takes is an anonymous accusation and the harpies will rip him to shred. Even with the ridiculous Aziz story, you still have crazies blaming him for not reading non-verbal cues (whatever the fuck that means) or saying while he's not guilty per say, he's still wrong (because he's a man).
What I feel will happen is more men even blue pill ones and white knights will find it too dangerous to be visible and start fading into the background and let the #metoo movement burn itself out hopefully by turning on itself. Meanwhile companies will hire fewer women who have feminist rhetoric on their social media and separate the quota-filling female employees as much as possible while doing more out-sourcing with companies that don't have these employment regulations.
BurnDownTheMission68 8y ago
Companies are going to hire MORE women now, not less.
That was a goal of Me Too: to make everyone remember women as victims because the BLM movement was getting all the attention (and therefore the benefits of affirmative action)
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
meetoo started because the journalist son of a well known movie director experienced that said father molested his sister. This dad then married and had children with his adopted sister.
Being first-hand witness to the decadence and hypocrisy of the movie business, he sought out to take down the easiest person to take down - serial rapist over many years: Harvey Weinstein.
[deleted]
[deleted]