Early today I watched this video in which a single, working-class mother was talking to her son and the public while admonishing a teenaged girl who seemingly used him as a food date: worldstar.com/videos/wshhH77hqjp9Yh6fshr4/mama-lays-down-the-law-on-sons-first-date-says-hes-being-used-as-a-meal-ticket
In the video, she rightly states that females should not be using 1st dates as means to be taken to steakhouses or other functions they themselves aren't used to, can't afford, and/or have never experienced before, that those dates are reserved for committed relationships, and that 1st dates are for the sole intention of the man determining if that woman is worth dates like that in the future.
Despite the minor embarrassment her son faced in the video, his mother did him a huge favor: taught him an important tenet of red pill ideology instead of him having to be red pilled by an unsavory experience with a female who definitely doesn't care for him like his mother.
Like this boy, I was fortunate enough to red pilled, not by a horrible relationship experience with a woman, but from lessons from older acquaintances and from the bad experiences of others. Like this boy I also come from a working class background. As I grew up and came across individuals of wealthier backgrounds, I saw, to my surprise, that many men did not have the privilege of having mothers actively teaching them what to expect when dealing with women in this society. It became obvious that men from solid middle class backgrounds and wealthier were often left to the wolves by their in all other aspects loving mothers when it came to the dating world. Many posters on this website can attest to this observation.
From this observation, I've thus concluded that the wealthier one's upbringing, the less likely his mother will be to teach him the game when it comes to dealing with women and the more likely she would be to keep her lips shut, opting to preserve the feminist sisterhood over improving the dating and, by extension, marital success of her own son(s). What I'd like to know is if any of you have any theories as to why this is the case.
GeorgeIII 1 2h ago
My guess is that mothers in wealthy families won’t teach their sons this for 2 reasons.
1: poverty is what teaches you to cover your ass in the first place.
2: the source of wealth of these middle and upper class mothers is usually the success of a wealthy man. So for a wealthy mom to teach her son to not get used, she would essentially be admitting to her son and herself that she is leeching off dad. Not good for her ego, and certainly not good for the her relationship with her son and father.