I often hear all this talk about how spinning plates is foundational to TRP—maximize SMV, avoid oneitis, and boosting abundance. However, no one talking about soul ties and the biological/ psychological consequences of recreational sex, especially for women (less so for men).

Women bond through oxytocin during sex. The more partners she has, the harder it becomes for her to emotionally attach. This isn’t woo-woo—it’s science. That’s why so many women get alpha widowed and can’t pair bond long-term. Though you and I may treat a woman as a "plate", she treats you as a potential husband, if she allows you to open the key to her body, she is subconsciously affirming that you could be a suitable genetic contributor to her child, aka father-stock. When the time comes and the plate breaks off, she's left to start the cycle all over again, find another stud, soul bond again to another man, yet this past experience cannot be erased, some call it spiritual, other biological, but the soul tie remains. How else would you describe the alpha widow phenomena?

Teachman (2002) analyzed data from the NSFG and found:

  • Women who only had sex with their husband before marriage had the lowest divorce rates.
  • Women with 2+ premarital sexual partners were over 2.5x more likely to divorce than women with only one (their husband).
  • Women who cohabited with other men before marriage had a significantly higher risk of marital dissolution.
  • Even when controlling for education, race, and religion, the pattern held: more sexual partners = lower marital stability.

My point mentioning this being that we often criticize women for having a body count higher than Lucky Luciano - but at the same time encourage men to go out and create them to build abundance. But think of the cost benefit analysis; is the benefit of building your abundance sleeping with heaps of women a net-positive, or does it have more cost on said women's future ability to pair bond and have successful future ties. After all, there's no such thing as hoe without a man, we are the hoe-makers, they receive, we give. Rollo coined the plate concept, yet he himself has been in a monogamous marriage for decades now, but RP often gives him flack for that. Does anyone see the negative implications as well or contemplated the soul tie concept?

My answer: yes, on the one hand, men are responsible for creating "hoes" and further promoting hook-up/plate-spinning culture, however, women also play a part. Women have become more masculine "strong independent types" who chase submitting to an employer rather than submitting to a husband. In doing so, they have lost the ability to display traditional feminine values: cooking, cleaning, agreeability, modesty, and virginity. They made the conscious decision to sell their bodies to the feminist pipe dream, that they can have the cake and eat it too. They can be masculine at the office and feminine at home, they can do the bare minimum for a man, and some simp will eventually wife her up and pay full price for a used car. Sure, men are creating a breeding ground for hoes, yet it's the women who started it by veering away from traditional values on their own accord. Let's think back to Genesis and who ate the apple first, right, it's starting to click now.