I hate society. This shit gets men hurt, physically and mentally.
It’s viewed as empowering to shit on men, BUT plainly calling out women’s bullshit gets you labeled as misogynistic/abusive/a threat/“hurt”.
From personal HORRENDOUS experiences with women, especially my single mom and whore sisters, I fucking hate seeing women throwing tantrums at their boyfriends/husbands in public. People love to watch it in silence. But if the guys stands up for himself, oh no. How DARE he!
I have long dealt with women being masculine as fuck and being disrespectful. Being nice/polite is seen as weakness. They don’t positively react to politeness or niceness.(Only if you are built like you could fucking throw her around)
Then the BP world wonders why we get school shooters and guys like the Las Vegas shooter or the Plymouth shooter.
These guys kill because they get disrespected so much, they say ok, fuck this.
It’s always a lose-lose situation.
MidgetSpinner 1y ago
The trick is to call women out when it's warranted, not at every opportunity. And especially without anger and loathing.
Also, anyone who's decent with women and has bothered to make something of themselves has been shat on and rejected harshly plenty of times throughout the journey of life, and yet they don't feel compelled to shoot up schools. Doing horrible shit like that is ultimately a choice. I don't care how bad they've got it, there's always a better choice available that they didn't take instead.
mattyanon Admin 1y ago
Weakness
Vermillion-Rx Admin 1y ago
MGTOW is largely addressing this. More men getting aware by the year.
Hamza99 1y ago
MGTOW is not the solution either. That’s similar to women who go ”fuck all men” and live the rest of their lives with cats(or dogs) instead of trying to fix their issues and acknowledge their fuck ups and horrible decision making/who they sleep with.
The thing is, what I’m talking about is inevitable. MGTOW’s complaints are inevitable.
But I want to fuck chicks(who want to get drilled by me), even though majority of them are becoming more and more delusional, more and more entitled, more and more powerful and untouchable. If can’t bring most bitches egos down these days, you won’t fuck them. Their ego is high as the sky, even the 3s and the 4s.
I thought about men starting a male-empowerment wave (similar to me too). But I doubt it will ever happen if men can just keep busting to OF models, and with the AI coming into play, it’s game over.
Vermillion-Rx Admin 1y ago
No it's not, men want women, women NEED men. Huge difference in reactions
This is untrue. I fuck off value and tingles enough. I do tease and banter them but i don't think I've tried to shatter any of their egos at all. This idea is just plain untrue if you do well in other ways
The more aware men just become to manopshere the better odds men at large will stop putting up with such shit behaviors from women
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
Durek_The_Bald 1y ago
You know the social convention that says you're not supposed to make fun of retards? Yeah, it's kind of like that. Making fun of retards, or criticising them, when you yourself are not one, is not socially acceptable. And it's easy to understand why: because it's considered "punching downwards".
We have all sorts of social conventions regarding the concepts of punching downwards: "Don't fight someone smaller than you", "be polite to the beggar", "it's like stealing candy from a kid" etc. Comedians too are very aware of the concept of punching upwards versus punching downwards. A joke or a piece of criticism generally works best, and avoids the social pitfalls, when directed upwards.
So when, say, a retard comes to you with a drawing he just made, you obviously don't go: "Well, the perspective is a bit off, and dogs are supposed to have four legs". No, you go: "That is a very nice drawing. Good job! Can I please keep it?"
Now, a lot of women and non-whites these days like to firmly place themselves in the same category as the retard, and to have the same social conventions extended to them. When women object to men criticising them, on the basis of her being a woman, and you a man, that too is based on the social convention of "don't punch downwards". Same thing when non-whites are adamant there's "no such thing as racism towards white people".
What these people subconsciously are doing, is to place you (as a man, white, or whatever) "up there", and themselves "down here". It's basically an admittance that they look up to you, that you are better than them, that you are the übermensch. And so more is expected of you, your space for navigating what's "in bad taste" is narrower.
So what do you do about it? Well, nothing. You shrug your shoulders, and take it as the compliment it subconsciously was intended as. If somebody wants to (whether they know it or not) put you in the category of "superior", and themselves as "inferior", why would you want to object to that?
ObliviousDuck 1y ago
That's an interesting perspective. However, the big difference between retards and women is retards don't have an agenda, or at least an agenda that can affect the power dynamics of our society.
Today's North American women don't see themselves as inferior. They think they are nobility and because of some historical accident, the patriarchy cast them as slave and now they need to take back their rightful place at the top.
You can see it in discourse about how the world would be a better place if it was lead by women. How women are better hunter than men. How the man is always the bumbling idiot in advertising. They truly believe that bullshit because that bullshit is what they were brainwashed with at school by the past generation of feminists.
Sure, you can't punch down, but you also can't punch at nobility.
Lone_Ranger 2 1y ago
Men are waking up. Even the mainstream media are reporting on it. They write articles like
"70% of young men under 30 not looking for a date"
"Men checking out of the dating pool"
Then they write some lame 1200 worder (that Ai could have written better) which totally misses the point. They equate men 'checking out of the dating pool' with men not being interested in starting families or having sex. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Men are just as interested as they ever were in starting families. But we're just not interested in starting a family with a woman that is covered in tattoos, has poor impulse control, debt, and a high body count. We're just not interested in 'modern women'. Because they make absolutely terrible mothers, and even worse wives. We are also just as interested in having sex with women as we ever were, but the introduction of asymmetrical after-the-fact consent withdrawal makes it too risky (women can just changed their mind about consent after they willing have sex with a stranger, and then its somehow rape).
And the biggest mistake of all that these 'social commentators' make is to conflate men withdrawing 'from the dating market' with men not being interested in sex and relationships.
'Dating' belongs in the 1950s. Modern men don't date. We don't take women out on the town, at our expense, so that we can be evaluated as potential mates. It's beta, and its simpy, and we're done with it. We're actually low-key embarrassed that we let women gaslight us into thinking this was a good idea for such a long time.
Women need to get this into their heads - you're not virgins any more, and we're not white nights anymore. We're not paying for your dinner, your drinks, we're not fixing your car for free, or mowing your lawn or any of that kind of stuff. Moving house? Yeah, you're going to need to pay for removal men. Not rely on simps to do stuff for you.
Acela_nextel 1y ago
Did you read about that dude who spent $65k on. Onlyfans whore? She didn’t even let him fuck. As long as dudes do shit like that things will only get worse.