Let's suppose that you wake up tomorrow and a controversial channel gets banned from youtube. Why was it banned? Was it because youtube is run by SJW's and they ban channels they disagree with? Was it because random SJW's living in their mom's basement created "faux outrage" on other platforms such as reddit to bring a lot of attention to that channel? (including mass reports?)
Let's assume the latter -- what causes millions of brainwashed SJW's living in their mom's basement to form collective groups on the internet and serve as volunteers of the democratic party and liberalism? If we assume they are selfishly motivated, what does the democratic party give them for their unpaid labor? What does "liberalism" (which is an intangible "thing") give them? (liberalism is an ideology and an ideology cannot "pay" people for spreading it unto others)
Here are two sources that hopefully communicate that Rush Limbaugh has said "Liberalism is a disease" though I'm having trouble finding him using those 4 exact words:
https://www.quora.com/What-do-conservatives-mean-when-they-say-Liberalism-is-a-disease-What-do-they-find-so-disagreeable-about-it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kfLSLJiIwM
Moving onto Lawrence Lessig -- he wrote a book called "Rootstrikers" which attempted to find the "root cause" of corruption in the campaign finance system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootstrikers
Why does everyone that works in big tech (FAANG) from programmers to CEO's all drink the same "liberalism koolaid". Surely Rush Limbaugh (in his video) is wrong about ultra-smart people like Mark Zuckerberg or Bill Gates, right? Surely these men don't let their feelings/emotions guide their beliefs about politics. Surely they use their brains and engage in "critical thinking" right?
Before he died, I wish Rush Limbaugh left a memoir for someone like me on how to destroy liberalism (and if he wanted to create a DT-version for psychopaths only -- that would be a cool memoir also). Obviously Rush Limbaugh can't reveal the "cure" to liberalism if doing so would ruin his career and make everyone think he is one sick, demented fuck...
After all, his "brand" is too entrenched in the republican party and if Rush's legacy was extremely tainted (let's say he was a confirmed pedophile like the Jeffrey Epstein guy), then it would harm the political party which is trying to defeat liberalism.
Basically -- I see liberalism as a self-reinforcing system. If you hack 500 losers living in their basement who spend all their time mass-reporting youtube channels that hurt their liberal feelings and they unfortunately "go missing" then there will be 500 more losers to replace them. If you terrorize liberal politicians, it will just backfire and make "normal people" feel sympathy for those liberal politicians and draw more people to that side of the aisle.
Basically, I'm extremely fucking smart (albeit not as smart as Rush Limbaugh) but I honestly don't know what the "solution" is to defeating a massively powerful ideology such as liberalism.
Bulba 2y ago
Money is what makes the world go round. After a certain level of money you can do social programming and make society believe whatever you want them to believe. That’s how the Matrix works.
Liberalism is being promoted by a certain group of rich people who want to decrease the population in Western countries. Some of them are Jews but Reform Judaism is just a small part of the problem. Notice that most liberal ideas result in population control: feminism, homosexuality, abortions, and so on.
If they decrease the population, then they can import cheap labor from other countries. They can hire an Arab or an Indian that will accept to work for a fraction of the income of a local citizen. So it’s all about maximizing profits and making the top 1% even richer.
Maybe a strong nationalist political force will rise in the West, but I highly doubt it. I think the whole thing is destined to collapse and to be replaced by something else.
Peter_Henderson 2y ago
The argument that rich people rule the world and utilize liberalism to make themselves richer is a weak argument if the "giving pledge" is actually true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Giving_Pledge
A lot of famous billionaires (Zuck, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet) effectively pledged to give away 90% of their money to charitable causes. Maybe after they die, the money will all go to their children and the fake pledge was to simply maximize their happiness while alive in such a way that nobody will find out the truth until after they are dead (in which case, nobody can successfully hate you if you are dead).
Call me crazy but I kinda/sorta believe that liberalism is a self-perpetuating and/or self-promoting ideology. Once liberalism infects someone's brain, they unknowingly spread it throughout society like a cancer. Maybe you're right though. I don't claim to be an expert on how society functions.
I just hate how 90% or more of society chooses to believe nonsensical bullshit over the truth.
Note: Compulsory public education DOES NOT teach critical thinking. Maybe these 2 facts are connected?
Bulba 2y ago
Tech billionaires are not the richest people in the world, they are just a small fraction of the rich people out there and they’re not even at the top of the hierarchy. Lists like Forbes are a joke, there are Arab and Jewish families with several times more money than Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos, not to speak of people like Vladmir Putin who never declared their true fortune to anyone. By the way, Putin is probably the actual richest person in the world.
There are people injecting billions of dollars into liberal propaganda, this is not a secret to anyone. George Soros and Bill Gates are two famous examples of people who promote liberalism worldwide.
Peter_Henderson 2y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7tmOAZ0vEA
I don't expect you to watch the 100 minute video by "Think Before you Sleep" but in this video he responds to unfair attacks that liberals use (such as labeling him a misogynist or alt-right) and engaging in character assassination even though he's neither misogynist nor alt-right. Call me weird but I truthfully believe that the people engaging in the unfair attacks & character assassination don't even realize they are doing it. I feel like they are just "putting on a show" for their audience and acting in the way which their audience expects.
By dismissing the opposing side's argument, you put yourself in a "win/win" situation where you cannot lose because you don't allow yourself to be wrong. Yet the entire video makes it seem like the narrator doesn't understand this about other people, maybe?
The whole video makes me believe that the YouTuber I massively respect (think before you sleep) is engaging in bad faith (by manipulating his audience by not mentioning the 900 pound elephant in the room -- i.e. that the unfair attacks aren't him aren't meant for him -- but for the attacker's own gullible audience) or that the YouTuber I massively respect is dumb by not being aware of this.
I plan to infiltrate some liberal groups & communities and pretend I'm one of them. There's that saying "know your enemy" or something along those lines, right?
https://quotefancy.com/quote/14892/Sun-Tzu-To-know-your-enemy-you-must-become-your-enemy
[deleted] 2y ago
[--removed--]
whytehorse2021 2y ago
Bruh! This is some real SPERGTOW stuff. You can't defeat anything because women are the majority of voters and turn out to vote more often. Liberalism has been astro-turfed for a long time. Go read "The Death of the Liberal Class" by Chris Hedges. Then you'll understand how society works.
Peter_Henderson 2y ago
Thanks for the book recommendation. I'll search online and try and find a copy.
whytehorse2021 2y ago
He's also got a lot of youtube videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-aVr6H0c3U
I kinda think the liberals were taken over starting with Clinton. They called themselves center-left but really they were just sellouts.