I have always been conflicted on this. Girls are attracted to aloof Chads. Ones who dont text back or communicate and leave them on edge about the relationship. Ones who take what they want in sex. And then in BDSM, you have the Dominant who is constantly checking on her emotional state, asking for consent for bondage, communicating throughout the week between sessions. In the BDSM community its considered serious abuse to "abandon" a submissive and ghost them.

If you werent in BDSM and you did what the dominant does, you would be labeled needy and unattractive by a woman, constantly checking on her, asking for consent, not abandoning her.

I am currently more along the Aloof Chad, naturally, and have started dipping into BDSM with a few plates. The thing is that i realize so much confliction with what is considered redpill and have trouble distinguishing between redpill law and exception(s).

*For example i had a play session with a submissive plate recently, and the normal protocol is to text them the same night or day after to check in with them (aftercare). But the redpill me is used to not hitting them up and giving them validation, because it dries girls up when they know you will 100% call them next week. If i dont hit her up the next day, it can be considered a yellow/red flag as a "bad" dominant. If i hit her up i can dry her panties as well with so much reassurance. This is just one example. **

At the same time i realize that BDSM is super alpha, its the epitome of dominance. You can dominate a woman 99% more than the dominant criminal man she meets at the gas station that gives her tingles. And i realize that it is truly the best way to alpha widow a woman sexually.

I would like know what you guys think about this, and any advice you can give to clear confusion.