I'll quote something I heard a stripper say once "I just fuck men for money, I don't suck dick for money, therefore I am not a prostitute"

Stupidity is universal and is found everywhere.

Women will use beta males and orbiters for financial standing. Briffaults law in the sidebar will help you see this.

Women are programmed to be more Machiavellian and manipulating like this while having no logical recourse to the fact that she didn't really give anything to this man in return and then chastised him for it I suppose.

I think they mean she has good standards, not morals.

Like they know any guy who would do that is low value so when he wanted to escalate, ew no way. Reputation depends on standards. In these girls' minds being a good person is being popular/having a good reputation.

So the cognitive dissonance is substitution of moral behavoir with having good standards.

I mean some men and woman are stupid but I mean you can't generalize but in this case if you are dumb enough to get played well thats your own fault and as for the others being like "she has morals" She is also a moron simple.

Not all girls have morals that are this skewed and lie to that extent, although the vast, vast majority of girls lie to protect their reputation.

Woman are not moral, they don't operate on truth as men do.

100% of sugarbabies I've met claimed to have similar deals set up with their (invariably wealthy, powerful) daddies

it's complete bullshit. any guy successful enough to consider the daddy lifestyle is by definition going to be one who expects returns on his investment - whores just don't want to admit to being whores

Sounds like your typical ASD. Tell others X, while doing Y.

Yes, high school girls are fairly stupid.

I know at least 3 guys who are sugar daddy types and I'll tell you point blank that in no cases were any women "no contact" but bragged to friends that they were -- and the reason the women lost the sugar daddy is he found someone more flexible like an acrobat and nuked the one who started to get demanding.

Basically, women lie to protect their reputations. This gal was banging away and when she got boring, she got nuked and came up with "reasoning" that would make sense.

Sounds like she isnt stupid and the guy buying her shit is dumb as fuck

girls who claim to have sugar daddies only tell the side of the story that has them " winning " the situation to look like queen bee and to be loved and still look "innocent. "

they will never tell the part of what they had to do to keep him around. cause thst will make them seem less "cool" or in power depending on situation.

examples " I used him for his assets and that sick pig wanted to fuck me so I said nope , bye"

reality she traded sex for money and gifts then he probably got bored and left her.

example.

" I'm using him for his money . I'm just playing him

reality

she is loving everything in this deal and hope she can lock him down which normally doesn't happen. so to try to not look bad or like the loser here they do damage control to make it seems like they are the real player.

I have sisters and watch shit like this play out at least once a week. while some of these guys might be beta, one thing I will say is. they will shut that down . but when it's a guy who they want? they will make sure they keep that cash cow happy as long as they can and hope they can lock him up.

It's the guy who sounds like a fucking idiot here. All that money, and not even a kiss?

I once had a threesome with two gorgeous latinas, and it only cost me $160.

Honestly, who's dumber here, the female or the sugar daddy?

I am a nurse. I work with a majority women. I can confirm that yes, the stupidity runs deep.

When work your ass off in the gym to get ripped and hit new PR's or put in the work to get a high earning job that's exactly how women feel when they acquire resources using their looks.

Then they all go “yeah, she has good morals.” If she has morals, she wouldn’t have milked the dude for all his bread in the first place.

These are girl-morals. She got money "without having to give him anything", so she has good morals.

Girls see sex with betas as a cost. So this girl "got stuff without paying", which they see as "good morals" - partly overlapping with ideas about innocence/virginal/value.

Milking a guy dry doesn't factor into this girl's future value. Being a virgin does.

Mostly they are talking about themselves and trying to make themselves look good. In other words: "Yes, I totally support girls not having sex, so that you believe I am like that too".

when it comes to dealing with girls but I’ve just started realizing all of the dumb shit they say and do since I started reading TRP. Thoughts?

What they say/do/think/feel don't match up in the slightest, so you can ignore what they say and just look at what they do.

They are not communicating truth like we try to - it's all virtue signalling and public relations. 99% of what they say is about themselves and how they want appear.

Read the title, Yes.

Read the first sentence of your post, they learn how to at least try to hide their stupidity with age. Most of them either become manipulative and conniving, while the others stay dumb and ditsy and just coast on their looks.

But you witness the hamster and hypergamy in action. A sugar daddy is every chicks fantasy. To know that some dude wants you so bad that he will literally give you anything you want while you have to do nothing in return? That's heaven. If he's old and unattractive then he should be happy just knowing this Goddess is letting him give her stuff and pay her bills. It's not whoreing themselves out because they aren't getting all that stuff, or money for sex. As soon as anything physical is required then that makes the girl a whore and that's just down right shameful. This is the way they see things.

Is everyone on this sub in highschool?

Blame these dudes who have put me to the sword. Don't even bother man /r/nofap /r/learnprogramming /r/meditation and do your own thing.

a lot of women don't really know what morality is. Don't expect too much logic in that regard

didn't realize anyone ever claimed this was even a thing.

i suppose they feel they deserve free shit just for showing up.

Have you considered that they were just agreeable people and didn't want to debate the truth of the situation.

They do have morals. They don't pander to betas. She can use that beta for all he's worth but didn't consort with him. Smart move. She's under no obligation to give up her puss just because some loser bought her dinner.

All women are women. Accept it and live with it.

It doesn't sound stupid to me. She saw an opportunity to get free stuff and she took it. Allowing that low SMV fat fuck to kiss her is like forcing me to have sex with a post wall woman. Just ew.

Females lack morals tho. But lacking morals, or having a false sense of morality is not a sign of stupidity. They love to imagine themselves as innocent saints by justifying, denying or blaming others for their actions. Same goes when she tells you about her "low" n-count... If I remember correctly TRP calls this behavior "plausible deniability" or something like that.

Stupid? Why is that stupid? It's the gift-giving betas that are stupid.

She's getting free shit for basically zero work. AND it gives her an ego fluff and taps into her prime directive. AND she gets to play the moral highground ("I'm so virtuous and selective for not letting them kiss me").

As the other poster says they may be lying about the no-contact thing. But either way, these girls are not 'stupid' if they are getting what they want on balance. The word you're looking for, perhaps, is craven, or prostitute-esque.