And will continue to do so with reckless disregard.

I am old enough to remember when girls were testing more poorly than boys. What did this mean? Why, biased tests, of course.

Boys testing worse than girls? Something's wrong with those boys!

I have an 8 year old boy who would be totally fucked without me around. Its become fashionable and normal to attribute pathology to healthy male children's behavior.

Read the War against Boys to see how bad things are.

Girls behavior is the gold standard in schools now. Boys are treated like defective girls

These defective girls are not succeeding.

Books are fiction and poetry while boys prefer comics and non fiction. What do you think the 24 year old hambeast woman teachers are asking classes to read?

The writing assignments are about personal development and self disclosure and emotions ....things girls like to write about not things like baseball games or good guy bad guy tales

Boys are five times more likely to be expelled from preschool for things like restlessness and being " hard to manage". Things that used to be naturally assumed about boys

Recess is nice for girls but essential for boys yet unstructured playtime is disapearing and games like tag and dodgeball are forbidden. Tug of war is now tug of peace.

Boys are constantly subject to disapproval causing then to disengage

One day soon I intend to write a long post about the "meds" the school and my wife tried to make my boy take.

We can't have "equality" between men and women. Society should aim for "balance" instead. I mean, biologically alone, we're different, but we do complete each other in nature. If all the pieces of a puzzle were shaped the same, it would never be able to be pieced together. There needs to be a gap that has to be plugged in by an edgy part.

If men and women become "equal", then they're no longer "men and women". They'd become one in the same, which is against everything in nature. Nature thrives on chaos AND balance. Harsh fucking weather one day, to be replaced by fields of blossoming flowers. Excruciating natal birth pain, followed by an overwhelming joy of bringing life into the world. There are many examples of this. What we really needs is balance between men and women.

I'll just leave this here:

http://therationalmale.com/2014/12/05/teach-your-children-well/

Its funny reflecting now I realize how much more I enjoyed my male teachers to the female ones, at least in the earlier years. Id say there was still more enjoyment and enthusiasm later on as well but those first 10 years of schooling I was lucky to have mostly male teachers who knew boys would be boys and were there for you.

[deleted]

Thinking back the more then 10 years now. I remember every male teacher was more passionate about their subject. I remembered more about history and science when I was taught by a male teacher. The only reason I passed accounting 12 was because my accounting 11 teacher was male and taught me all the right and correct ways to balance everything. While the female they got to teach accounting 12 barely knew how to teach the subject and was piss poor at the job. Heck the reason I failed science in grade 8 was because the teacher never explained or showed up in detail how things work or react. It was all take notes and that is that. Woman if I wanted to just sit and write out the same crap you read off a book I would just buy the book read the info learn and practice the materials and be done with it. I re did science 8 in modules and such on my own instead of French and learned it way more better on my own then how she could of ever taught me. Took me 2 months and I got a b+. I have never been to my niece or nephews school so I have no clue what kind of learning environment they have to learn it. All I know is that my nephew is not having the best time and I can bet it's because of the shitty wall hitting single over weight oblasts that he is stuck trying to learn from.

I only feel bad for the young boys who are being fed this bullshit.

This stretches wayy further back than the 90's.

feminist lobbying and the feminist invasion of academia and educational system are waaaay more powerful and influential on family life than most people know or than feminists would admit. the changes in public education policy are obvious, and individual feminists teachers are often discriminatory against boys without even realizing it. i think we've all had a few man-hating teachers who clearly favored girls in terms of grades and disciplinary action, but we were too young to do anything about it. i remember being told that the world isn't fair and that I must do whats necessary to please my man-hating teachers to get good grades.

this is off topic, but another example of how influential feminist lobbies are and how dangerous feminist theory can be is domestic violence policy, particularly the Duluth model and all it's derivatives. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model

It is based in feminist theory positing that "domestic violence is the result of patriarchal ideology in which men are encouraged and expected to control their partners".[2] Critics argue that the method can be ineffective as it was developed without minority communities in mind and can fail to address root psychological or emotional causes of abuse.[2]

under this sort of policy, women are never at fault if they're abusive. this sort of policy makes it nearly impossible to identify and rehabilitate violent and abusive women, and children suffer the most from all of this. the results of writing feminist theory into law and into public policy have mostly been disastrous for everyone except for women with sociopathic tendencies.

The other thing that bothers me is that it's all in the name of preserving a good place for learning, but most kids come out of high school having learned jack shit anyways. Sure, the top few kids have some real applicable skills in sciences, writing, math, etc. and they use them when they go to college. Yes, some kids learn time management and other relatively important stuff. But by and far the things teachers spout, and punish kids for "interrupting" is rehashed shit year after year. I learned the difference between there their and they're at least 40 times through high school. I learned how to make fucking clay pots. I mean seriously, the problem isn't that kids are slowing down the process, it's that the process is slow. They're taking a car thats got a blown transmission, pouring in more gas (and blaming mostly boys for the gas running out) and wondering why it won't move.

And while all this is happening, the government is slowly but surely chipping away at the rights of parents to send their children to alternate schools, be they private schools, charter schools or homeschools.

My male teachers in junior high and high school were some of the best and most memorable I ever had, with one exception, my BP, white knight english teacher during my senior year. They always engaged me, made me think and challenged me to do better. I believe that without them, I would have been double the BP that I ended up as. Conversely, every woman teacher I ever had was hormonal, applied standards inconsistently, censored and limited topics and generally told students what to think instead of teaching us how to think. Girls were always favorites and boys were generally seen as challenging most womens' authority.

Their are two points of view in the TRP community. One side understands the ins-and-outs of the system and is content with only getting pussy, while the other side wants to use this knowledge to change society to be more balanced and male-friendly.

Gentleman, we will keep getting the shaft generation after generation unless we find a way to fight back against the excesses of feminism.

Did you know boys nerve endings in their fingers develop later than girls?

That trying to learn to write while your nerve endings are still developing results in the brain constantly re-learning how to write.

This is why boys handwriting is so crappy, but was beautiful before women started teaching boys.

Yes, basically I was always taught that being beta is good and attractive and that's what girls really like.

I was really surprised when all the dirty scummy assholes were getting laid in college. It was almost like a culture shock. I knew something was wrong right off the bat. I was always focused on scholarly pursuits and thought that's what females found attractive as well. I thought a good looking smart guy > buff dumbass. Boy was I wrong...

To be fair, being in the cubicle is prolly a good place to hunt for financially stable men. So it's pretty smart to hang around cubicles instead of malls/bars/restaurants when it comes to mating choices

I silently boycott anything anit-me.

These establishments don't get my money, but I'm more than happy to spread rumor about them.

Fuck hollywood. Fuck pop. Fuck lefty news. Fuck them all. They don't get a dime. I will do my part to starve my enemies. I will silently discriminate.

Anything pro-me will be supported by my excess. Allies.

Big sister is watching... I really fear for the next generation. When I will have a son in probably 5-10 years, I won't even know how to raise him in this pussified society without him getting bullied by feminazis and getting suspended from school all the time for just being a normal boy. He will be a Harrison Bergeron, oppressed in a politically correct world for being too good. I fear that he wouldn't be able to have normal bros to hang out with, but instead have a bunch of SJW acquaintances who are biologically male but low test white knights.

Feminism is the worst terrorist threat of our generation. It's not a bomb threat or anything, but it's a threat that poisons the next generation and destroys society from the inside.

Fuck, I remember a whale lord of a teacher when I was in high school that told me to fix my frayed pants, when I replied,"Oh, I'll just ask one of my aunts who sow if they can fix it."

This ham beast then yelled like I just fucked and stabbed her young cub to death, "THAT'S SEXIST!!! I CAN HAVE YOU EXPELLED FOR THAT!!!"

That was some pretty fucked up shit to drop on a sophomore. Either way, my motto became "Bitches be crazy" soon afterwards.

There is a saying in Sanskrit: Vinashakari vipareeta buddhi. Which means that "Behaviour/thinking/actions become more and more extreme as you approach (self) destruction".

Not just that. It ruins girls, too.

As Frost once wrote, [feminism is causing the female depression epidemic.] (http://www.thumotic.com/feminism-depression-epidemic/) Women are now being encouraged to reject the sort of lifestyle that works towards their biological best interest (ie, slutting around, acting like a dude, cutting her hair short, and wasting their fertile years as a cubicle monkey), and this is making them miserable.

And what do women do when they get miserable? More feminism! Obviously the reason she's feeling this way is because they don't have equality yet; maybe if the Patriarchy would give her just one more Equality, then she'll be happy.

It's a negative positive feedback loop which won't end until all women are completely miserable, and yeah, boys are getting dragged down with it.

Feminism is a viral infection that ruins things for everyone.

This tends to be one of my lines of argument when discussing things with harder-core feminists, particularly when they go off on rants about what "society" is telling young girls.

I will usually ask them how they feel about what society is telling young men with much of the anti-rape, anti-harassment, anti-abuse materials out there. That the message that's being put out there is that just by virtue of being male, they're already seen as some slavering beast, beholden only to his hormones and base desires, that cannot be trained or educated, that must be feared lest he find some crack in her armor and rape her at the slightest opportunity. That he, as a male, will be seen as being sexually harassing just for approaching an attractive girl, even with an opening line as gender and intent neutral as "good morning". That, particularly as a white male, he is automatically guilty for the sins of his forefathers and must bear the burden and guilt for all socio-economic disparity. That if he is sensitive and emotional and cries, he will be labelled as a crybaby and/or homosexual, but if he resists those things, and tries to act more traditionally male, he'll be labelled as a neanderthal, misogynist, unintelligent meathead. That no matter what he does or how he acts, he's doing it wrong.

Then I ask them how the harm of that message stacks up against "I'm not pretty enough" or "girls are bad at math".

Destruction of the family unit has been more damaging than what's happening in the school system (and that's saying a lot, because the schools are fucked). Feminism cause broken homes, and broken homes produce broken children

"It's not that grownup society is hostile to boyishness as such. On the contrary, grownups eagerly encourage risk-taking and adventuring -- provided only that it's done by girls. There's no shortage of books for young readers about wars and western exploration, about mountain-climbing and bravery during floods and hurricanes. But the protagonists of these books are usually 10-year-old girls.

"Stories for boys are no longer permitted to be so exciting. Here is a publisher's blurb for a book about a boy who courageously 'defies teasing to remain enrolled in ballet class.' Here's another about 'Lame teenager Shem' who 'finds manhood in the Michigan wilderness with the help of an old Indian woman.' And a third: 'Doing volunteer work at Santa Barbara's Sidewalk's End, a day-care facility for children of the homeless, Ben witnesses an instance of physical abuse and -- for the best of reasons -- decides to take matters into his own hands.'" "... boys must always have girls with them, doing everything they do -- indeed, almost always doing it better. You hear many complaints that boys today don't seem interested in reading. Who can blame them?"

http://www.illinoisloop.org/gender.html

But according to a feminist, who argued with a study, the stories are still boy favoring since more boy characters are the protagonists.

I know I did. In eighth grade, my English teacher wanted us to draw a representation of love and a representation of friendship. I remember ripping my hair out, thinking to myself "wtf does she want from me?". At the end, I decided that the best way to do it is to draw a heart and to draw a happy face, inside the heart/happy face I would write what characteristics I would want in someone that i'd like to be in a romantic relationship with and what characteristics I would want in a friend. When I got there in class, everyone compared their assignments. One girl had a similar idea. She drew a flower for love and a dog or something as a friend. My teacher gave her an A and not only failed me, but decided to single my assignment out in front of the whole class and repeatedly tell everyone how stupid the assignment is and how much of an utter failure I was. This was in a school in Canada.

That same teacher had a class exercise where she told us one things. The first was "a woman cannot rape a man, only men can rape a woman because if a man didn't want to get hard, he just chose not to". It's funny, looking back, I was 12 years old. Topics like romantic relationships and rape were things that had never even crossed my mind.

It was pretty much always drilled into me from a young age that women are superior in pretty much every way. I grew up being afraid of girls and putting them up on a pedestal. I think it ended up leading to a lot of anger for me in my teen years as I slowly found out I'd been lied to.

It's also sickening to know so many women think everything is just fine, especially those reading the sub. They want their "balance" of pussified men vs self actualized men to the maximum.

I can not handle this big dose of red pills all at once ;)