It's telling that governments feel the need to repress things severely. There'd be no need for that if cuckoldry were what Europeans actually wanted.

The Euro media heavily censors information about citizens pushing back against the Islamic invasion.

Don't believe for a minute that news article blaming the Arzon event entirely on "right-wing"/"identitaire" people.

The pushback is getting out there on social media and YouTube, though. This is one of my favorite YouTubes. This guy in Germany is amazing. Takes down 4 guys, (mind you, with a bit of help from the girl, who distracts them at key points and even manages to get in a few girly punches of her own.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzWtxI-QK2U

The theory behind incarceration in the criminal justice system is that it is supposed to accomplish four things: (1) actual punishment of the malefactor (2) in addition to actual punishment, the malefactor must be seen to be punished (to discourage private retribution/vigilantism by family) (3) rehabilitation, if possible (4) public safety, by separating the predator from the flock

If society, by the rules it promulgates and attempts to force upon its citizens regularly fails in (1) or (2), the likelihood increases that the offended person, or the family of the offended will exercise their "right of private action" with the attendant risk that the wrong person will fall victim to private justice and that private justice may well be far more severe formal justice.

A society that fails to protect its citizens and punish those who mistreat them will eventually see the populace turning to private justice - how long that will take depends on the culture of that society, including how feminized it has become.

"According to Ouest-France around 100 members of far-right 'identitaire' groups travelled to the village to hold the protest. Reports say very few locals joined in."

Doesn't seem like it was local people mounting the pushback.

/u/neoreactionsafe

Trump train is going full blast! Aasshahahhahah what's next huh

I don't condone or recommend initiating violence or vigilante justice

The founders of our Republic gave us the right to bear arms for a reason, having to initiate a rebellion of their own against a distant and disconnected authority. An anecdote from my own local area is how in the early 19th century, the local authorities wanted to toll a previously free bridge over a rather unimpressive river. The locals weren't happy because some of them had to pass 3-4x a day, so one night they burned the toll gates down. It was free again for a short while but they rebuilt the tolls and again it was arsoned. The authorities learned and didn't try a third time, even up to today and it's still in use.

Or if you want the Gandhi route, his was called passive resistance, however it was anything but passive, just not armed. It was active disobedience. Governments count on people falling in line for their edicts to work; there just cannot be enough police forces around if half the population . When enough don't, the dominoes don't fall in place. Simple as that.

It would be fine if republics and politicians actually represented the people, but much of the time in economic societies they are in some stage of regulatory capture by one special interest or another.

As usual, police ABSOLUTELY stands for the criminal migrants and throws tear gas to natives who dare to protest. How typical would that be?

The only solution for French to survive is take over the power through a mass rebellion throwing all "diverse" scum back to the gutter it belongs to.

I don't agree with vigilante justice or violence either OP but that is what the men of Europe are being pushed towards. Our governments dont listen to us, our police don't protect us or our countrymen, there is so little left we can do

We cant even use democracy to create change in the most problematic areas, because the worst areas are inner cities, which are filled with immigrants, who vote for the leftist parties who let things get this way

Most of the Europeans didn't became soft. They simply live in a world where media marks any non-liberal-faggot behavior as extreme fascism.

So people hide what they truly think on the matter. As soon as they figure out they are not alone, and that most of other man think like them shit happens. In a positive way :)

I'm avoiding the liberal/conservative politics of mirgrants in this comment. I read the entire article. The kid came on to the woman. He tried to kiss her a few times and grabbed a boob. You can't be doing that, but the kid isn't a rapist. This is the type of crap you see on college campuses. A guy comes on to a girl, she reciprocates. Then her boyfriend finds out. Time to avoid responsibility for her actions. The next thing you know, he's called before a tribunal denied due process or a defense. Boom, he's a rapist and expelled from university.