Take a deep breath folks, clear your brains, and get ready for me to fill your body with my redpill acumen
Ready?
MAWAD.
Men and women are different
Men and women are different
Men and women are not the same
Men and women ARE DIFFERENT
Got it? Let's try again just to make sure
Men. And. Women. Are. Different.
You might be asking why I'm so adamant that you bloopies read this -
There was a post not long ago about a woman who had sex with seven guys in seven days. There was another asking the community whether they'd rather be a women (with the apt conclusion that you're better off as a man).
Neither of these posts were out of order and both contributed to the community with some decent points/information. The issue lies in the responses you little RP caterpillars made in the comments section, and until you understand that MEN AND WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT, you won't blossom into an alpha redpilled butterfly.
Listen again:
Men and women are different. When a woman sleeps with 7 guys in 7 nights, it's not impressive and she hasn't succeeded in doing anything. Women RECEIVE sexual attention and RECEIVE sex passively. This woman didn't fuck 7 men in 7 nights. She got fucked by 7 men in 7 nights. When a guy fucks 7 men women in 7 nights he is putting into practice a HUGE amount of skill, or at the least is very very attractive. By doing so, he's increasing his value to women via experience (which women do value - men couldn't care less) and preselection (men don't want a woman who can do this; women do)
An average woman could do this with little effort. It means nothing.
Men and women are different. When a man increases his n-count he is increasing his value. An n-count increase in women either maintains value or lowers it. In the case of this woman, she's decreasing it GREATLY. Perhaps a more important point is that men fulfil their sexual imperative by shooting sperm into as many different women as possible (efficiency and ethics aside). When women do this they are not. A man's life won't be fulfilled by fucking around, but it sure as hell isn't going to ruin his mental health like it will for a woman. Repeat after me. Men and women are different.
Would you rather be a woman?
This post was particularly interesting to watch because of how much solipsism and hamstering was contained within the comments - words we often use to describe the behaviour of women without looking towards ourselves for the same flaws in thinking. Men and women are different. When you see how easily women can get sex, and feel that twinge of resentment and think to yourself that being a woman is easy, you are being solipsistic by projecting your sexual imperative onto the other sex.
Let's take the male sexual imperative to a symbolic extreme - a harem of young, beautiful, sexually available women present only to take your sperm and serve you indefinitely. The female sexual imperative taken to an extreme is a dominant, physically imposing man of the highest status, to give her his top 0.0001% genes and protect her and her future child.
Men and women are different. The fact that a woman can and do have male harems means NOTHING to them, because that is useless in fulfilling their deepest biological desires. When you think it might be easier to be a woman, you're forgetting that, if you were, you wouldn't WANT that kind of sexual power because it wouldn't fulfil what you TRULY want. The male sexual imperative is only fulfilling when you've got a cock and balls.
Women get drinks bought for them? Doesn't improve their quality of life, doesn't make them happier, doesn't improve their relationships, doesn't secure their future. Women don't have to be intelligent? You should WANT to be intelligent (or at least maximise your intellectual potential). Women don't have to have hobbies? So fucking what, you shouldn't WANT a life like that. Men and women are different and you can't question whether you'd be better off as female because you simply don't know what it would be like to have their biology.
*Men and women are different. MAWAD. Stop comparing. Stop complaining.
lala_xyyz 5y ago
That's nonsense. It's objectively easier to be an average woman than an average man in today's society, by any metric that I can think of.
Kurush559 5y ago
I'm making a link between happiness and ease of living. The LACK of difficulty creates an abundance of suffering and lack of happiness in an unfulfilled woman who lacks family AND drivr
lala_xyyz 5y ago
How can an easiness of living create suffering? Women can live on an easy mode, cruising in life, until deep into old age. I'v seen countless examples of that. They are financially subsidized by the taxpayer, emotionally by endless amount of betas available on a mouse click, and by every facet of the entertainment industry. Life is not fair, but their "punishment" comes from the inability to reproduce.
BurnoutRS 5y ago
If a woman hung her bare ass out a window, she could probably rack up more lays in an hour than alot of members here will have in their lifetime.
Men gain value from sexual conquest. Women are devalued by sexual conquest. A man with experience is a better lover. A woman with experience has more to compare you to, more to be dissapointed by.
UrgotMilk 5y ago
I dunno, having all of society cater to me sounds pretty nice ngl...
Kurush559 5y ago
Did you read anything? Fuck right off
mindplaybyneo 5y ago
Damn that was a good post! I just had this convo with a 20 year old university student, and she was enrage to hear from me that we care about numbers. I feel kinda sorry for those who can’t read with this narratives. The women who was casualty of the society, and some of us men from molding our daughters to be a great fit for a life full of endeavours.
sebastianconcept 5y ago
Of course. I can't recommend enough to read the book "Sperm Wars" it speaks of hypergamy down to the cellular level.
Hombremaniac 5y ago
I did wonder, what will be the reaction to " Would you rather be a woman? " post.
Was a bit surprised, how some dudes openly expressed their thoughts about wanting to be a women, which to me, is rather weird.
I mean yeah, I certainly know how resentment towards certain female behavior feels, but that hardly makes me want to join their tribe.
It's certainly nice to get laid without even trying, to get free booze, but what is the price, right? To be ruled mostly by emotions, to not have greater ambitions or drive and to feel like life is ending after 35+ or so..is this really worth it?
Fuck it, to the gym I go and even if haven't wet my dick for few months now, it will not make me want to grow a clam between my legs.
​
VisiblePlan 5y ago
They don't really want to be a women, they want the status that having a pussy comes with.
Hombremaniac 5y ago
Well said. Yeah, to have chicks to flock to them, offering them free booze and more importantly their clams. It sure seems enticing, but it's not in men's reality, unless you are some kind of rock star and that's why it's idiotic to dream about it.
KeffirLime 5y ago
Women don't care that they can have sex all the time, they care wether they can get an alpha male to be emotionally attached to them.
This is why you'll see miserable women, with tons of sex available to them. They have thousands of men who wanna fuck them but none(of the men they want) who want to commit to them.
Hombremaniac 5y ago
Miserable and I guess worn out, which in turn decreases their SMV even further. Seems like a cruel joke, but hey, it's how the life is. We can only accept & adapt I guess.
Kurush559 5y ago
That's it man.
sebastianconcept 5y ago
I have to say that this notion about an n-count in women lowering their SMV versus raising it for men made me think quite deeply into this. I think you have a point there but even that isn't that simple.
I had a recent experience with a girl that was totally transparent and somehow proud about how many other dudes she was fucking after breaking up with her last LTR (conversation rolling by her initiative in a weekend where I was having a sex marathon with her, go figure). We were having a great time together but when she dropped those too-much-information bombs she didn't realise how she lowered my feelings of attraction towards her (even just sexual) hence subjective perception, hence her SMV in my eyes.
At the same time she was openly fantasizing how she would drop all her plates for me "because and alpha is an alpha" (her words and she said that many many times). Kind of expecting that I'd celebrate that. Which didn't move the dial in me about her SMV after knowing what I knew from her.
About 4 days after that sex marathon, out of the blue she asked me if I had had sex with another girl. I evaded that telling something like "man, look at what are you asking me, why would you ask that?" (I knew why she asked that, she, insecure as fuck, wanted to know if I got passionate about her and fucking some other girl positioned her above or below her). Right after that she told me that 48h after leaving town, she went to fuck another dude to take me out of her head and it failed. I was like, is she really trying to tell me that she likes me so much that she fucks other dudes but still thinks in me... WTF??? I couldn't believe the experience.
So, back to the original question. With Tinder, a man has to be a 7 or an 8 with money and time available in his hands to barely be as active to a student girl that is a 5 or 6 but moves fast.
Monogamy is so dead that I can't barely believe what the next generation is going to be.
Here is why:
For the old books, a female n-count lowers her value in man and other female's eyes.
But the younger girls are encouraged to think and pushing themselves the idea that a female n-count is as fine in them in new books as for dudes in old books. With the hyper-abundance of betas and other females relaxing, that mindset will keep growing and the new book's rules might become the new normal.
Rollo and some of you guys talked about the normalization of the cuckold.
There are forces pushing us to be like the bonobos society.
Currently I'm feeling nihilistic and successful with women but also lost in the long term. Not considering for a second the possibility of an LTRs and forever vaccinated against marriage.
ShadedSummers 5y ago
“When a guy fucks 7 men in 7 nights” lol
reversec 5y ago
Equivalent of a perfect game in baseball.
majaka1234 5y ago
It takes a real man to fuck another man in the ass.
BACONisKEWLEST 5y ago
Too Alpha to fuck chicks.
TyroneTheDriver 5y ago
Fucking women is for faggots.
BACONisKEWLEST 5y ago
The only reason I don’t fuck men is because I could never fuck something I respect.
Kurush559 5y ago
Yeah cos you're fucking someone that's fucking a guy. Gay.
Don't tell me taking two 9 inch BBCs at the same time isn't manly
TyroneTheDriver 5y ago
You know who loves dick? Women, and thats gay.
[deleted]
[deleted]
nevalutionary 5y ago
First of all let's talk about your opener. I don't want anyone filling my body up with acumen. I mean wtf kind of metaphor is this? Lol I'm forming a theory about some of you.
[deleted]
zyqkvx 5y ago
Filling one's body with OPs TRP acumen is only part of it. Internalize it.
[deleted]
msslav 5y ago
I mostly agree with what you are saying, just two comments.
​
Or simply just wasn't that picky/asked enough women. It's a numbers game.
Only to an extent, it doesn't grow indefinitely. It can actually be a huge turn-off if the number is too large. Women compare themselves with others and if your sample group is not "up to the woman's standard", she will assume you just go with whomever is available. No one wants to join the "club of mediocres".
MadChestHairYuKnight 5y ago
That's why you never tell a woman your n-count.
[deleted]
TRP_Introspection 5y ago
When a guy can and does have sex with lots of women (especially if hes not attractive), he's demonstrating either solid social skills, or unique and refined alpha behavior. The former correlates with social proof and the potential for social status/power, and the latter is just the subconscious behavior that women desire. These 2 traits correlate to good genetic offspring potential to women (even if they are both learned vs DNA driven).
Kurush559 5y ago
Nice one, you explained it more succinctly than I would have.
sebastianconcept 5y ago
I'll just that, yes. It would be a signal of what you mention as long as he isn't paying for that sex.
TRP_Introspection 5y ago
Haha man i totally forgot about that. A very viable option for the man who cannot attract females yet still bones a lot.
[deleted]
IRunYourRiver 5y ago
I agree with all of this, but I find that on occasion it does help to put myself in a woman's shoes for perspective. For example, think about openers with women and how we tend to overthink them. What you say doesn't really matter. It's how you say it and simply the flattery of attention that matters. The best way for me to conceptualize this is to picture an HB6 or so that comes up and starts a conversation with you. First, she increases SMV just because she's doing a lot of work for me. Second, what should she say? Honestly, it would be hard for her to bomb. I get that she's nervous and your personality doesn't really come out in 10 seconds. Now, reverse roles. Women want to be approached and 90 pct of guys out there simply don't do it.
Kurush559 5y ago
Trying to imagine how she feels is useful - in fact, this kind of empathy/emotional reading is useful for other men, children, family, older women. It's just a useful way of calibrating your actions. Has nothing to do with whether you think about YOU not being a man
omega_dawg93 5y ago
the way I look at it:
women are responsible for genetic quality: they have a certain amount of eggs and can only have 1 child every 10 months. men are responsible for genetic diversity: we can "spread our seed" to multiple women daily, every day and can father several children in a year.
evolution needs both to make the species stronger & based on that evolutionary basis, a woman has no business trying to catch as much cum as possible. just ask one: "what are the top 3 good things that can happen from you getting as much dick as possible?" most can't answer... and bragging about how much dick they're getting isn't good socially for women to men and especially among women.
she is responsible for quality so she should be very careful about who she allows inside her womb. catching cum from Chad, Tyrone, and Felipe... and from her hubby, two coworkers and a guy on vacation ruins her natural duty for quality control. but with birth control and abortion, they don't care... let the cum fly.
simply put, women are valued for their feminity and fertility... men are valued for our ability to provide and protect. she controls the sex... we control the level of commitment. like it or not, females are judged for what they do with their sexuality and men are valued for how we commit (distribute our time, attention, & resources).
females that give up easy pussy are called sluts. a male "slut" doesn't give up easy dick... he easily gives up his Non-sexual TAR (time, attention, & resources).
the issue with women today is that they want to be devalued sexually ("don't judge me") while demanding commitment when they want it... while asking not to be judged for their sex-based decisions ie, yrs on the cock carousel, STDS, multiple abortions, bastard kids, etc. "we come as a package deal."
then they say, "you're not man enough for accepting me as i am (+ all this emotional and sexual baggage)."
fuck that package deal. and fuck the USPS, FedEx, & UPS for trying to deliver that shitty package to me on your behalf.
strong, independent women that life to fuck around need to financially support themselves and locate the closest sperm bank. that's the best thing for them imo.
philltered 5y ago
Your first three paras formalize hypergamy at the sex cells level quite well
FereallyRed 5y ago
A master key that can open many locks is a valuable and rare item.
A lock that can be opened by any old key is just a shitty lock.
Imperator_Red 5y ago
I don't really like this phrase because it is a silly metaphor that can easily be dismissed. We should tell the truth, which is that the concept of sluts exists for a woman but not a man because she has a womb that can only carry one man's baby at a time, and she needs a man's help to raise the child.
redpillschool Admin 5y ago
My favorite reaction to this analogy is when bloopers go:
Women aren't fucking padlocks bro. You don't get it. A shapener that sharpens many pencils is a good sharpener.. etc. SEE? MISSSSSOGINI!
Bloopers don't understand metaphors. You can't debunk an analogy as a way of debunking what the metaphor was describing. That's not how that works.
FereallyRed 5y ago
Staring at the finger, not what it's pointing at.
Kurush559 5y ago
You'll need to repeat it 50 more times for anyone to internalise it.
redpillcad 5y ago
Repeat isnt shit
Live it
FereallyRed 5y ago
"There are many fat, ugly sluts, but no fat, ugly studs"
Jim Jeffries (pre sellout)
ChewableNazi 5y ago
Lmfao fr. I’ve read this a shit ton of times
DreamExpedite 5y ago
Hey man, I really liked the perspective you offered on this post but I had a question related to the topic - how do you go from reading content like this to internalising it?
Kurush559 5y ago
Lots of things go into it - firsthand experience is probably the best. Meeting VERY attractive women, all of whom had male harems, helped me because it was easy to see how genuinely depressed and unfulfilled they were. You just need a mixture of experience, time (I've been here for close to half a decade now, and still feel like a noob sometimes) and the active interest to improve and change
DreamExpedite 5y ago
Thanks!
TyroneTheDriver 5y ago
It's impossible.
Having a debate with the vast majority of women is pissing in the wind. They simply cannot conceive of things existing and being objectively real outside of their own emotional experience. It is impossible for them. Its like they can smell colors.
This is why game mentality has to exist, because to have a philosophical debate centered around objective logical thinking is nearly impossible for the majority of women, and its only gotten worse since society embraced new wave feminism and the psychotic age of gender fluidity has come about.
Kurush559 5y ago
I was talking about getting men to internalise it - you're right though
clouddevs 5y ago
This should be quite useful : https://www.memri.org/tv/qatari-sociologist-abd-aziz-khazraj-ansari-demonstrates-how-to-beat-your-wife-islam
TyroneTheDriver 5y ago
My dude, no.
[deleted]
bwoodski 5y ago
Ha! Yup! I've used the same analogy while explaining this to my BP friend
jamesistheman7 5y ago
This is very true, what you realized that most people don't understand is that not only are men and women different, but the relations between men and women are also different, which is the key point that you recognized in your post.
People say that calling a girl who sleeps around a slut, but then not doing that to a guy is a double standard, but that would only be true if the relations (sexual relations) between men and women are exactly the same. Men are the seekers and fuckers, but women are the receivers and judges of men's sexual advances, which is why when a women sleeps around it is a sign of her being a poor judge, but if a man sleeps around it shows that many women judge him well which adds value to him.
The lock and key analogy nails it head on.
___Lana___ 5y ago
Absolutely true.
I’d just add that, although MAWAD, it doesn’t mean that ones are happier than the others. There’s no point in wanting to be on the other side. In my opinion, the closer you get to your gender nature, the more comfortable in your life you’ll be.
What really pleased me in TRP is that it’s all about the human nature, what is in our genes and how we are meant to be because of pure biology. And then when you get to see the human race as any other animal specie, it all makes sense.
I can’t remember if I read this on TRP or somewhere else, but it I really understood sth with that one : If you put one single male on a remote island with 100 females, most likely in one year and a few months, you’ll have about a hundred babies. If you put one female on the same island with 100 males, if you’re lucky you’ll end up with one baby. MAWAD because our biology is different.
22oregon22 5y ago
And a lot of dead men. Competition would be fierce.
[deleted]
totoro_make 5y ago
Haha, I used this exact phrase a few weeks ago to help put one of my girls in her place. This is the first time I've seen it spelled out elsewhere! MAWAD. Gold.
Buchloe 5y ago
I was just thinking about this like yesterday. Girls boasting about getting dudes, and I'm like bitch all you gotta do is say the word and 20 dudes will line up to fuck you, wipe their dicks, and walk off. It ain't work for you. Now, getting a cool dude that sticks around for a while that isn't a total shmuck- THAT'S the hard part for these washed up Tinder hos
Beugmanz_55 5y ago
if nothing fufills women eg. sex, hobbies etc. then what does? do they have a main goal to chase after (speaking from a subconcious or evolutionary standpoint)?
Venny_1 5y ago
Making babies. That's it. The biggest impetus of our biological existence is reproduction, so you will see most of our intersexual dynamics geared towards it. For women, it's getting pregnant, and not even the sex part in isolation. So their hobbies and goals should revolve towards that, including their nurture side.
Although if we men are honest with ourselves as well, we would also realize that our hobbies and goals have a big sex-component attached to them, if not being the biggest of all. Playing music, hiking, building a business empire, waging war ect. all of that just to signal to women that AYE'VE got a big dick.
Kurush559 5y ago
They can be fulfilled by a career or a passion, don't get me wrong. It's possible. But women need men.
22oregon22 5y ago
Women absolutely cannot be fulfilled SOLEY by a career— you can argue quite successfully that a man can. High level and well-paid women (e.g. lawyers, physicians, etc.) always revert back to their natural biological tendencies — reproduction. If they don’t, most likely will be miserable.
Kurush559 5y ago
I said they can be fulfilled - but still need a man/baby
TyroneTheDriver 5y ago
Just a heads up OP you wrote:
And I laughed
Kurush559 5y ago
Haha I don't judge (fixed it anyway)
IvanReilly 5y ago
True but for a guy to fuck 7 men in that many days isn't nearly as impressive as for a guy to fuck 7 women in that many days
womans_algorithm 5y ago
Depends what kind of women. Prositutes? Ez gg
[deleted]
MattyAnon Admin 5y ago
MAWAD should be as commonly repeated as AWALT
Most women maintain a "harem" of beta providers, they have an alpha they're fucking, and they have their eye out for other alphas too.
She's ensuring her needs are met now and will be met in the future. A steady supply of validation, money and emotional support from as many beta providers as possible, an alpha or two for hot sex, and backups there too where possible.
This is extremely easy for women to do.... just figure out from each new man which slot he fits into and then respond to all the attention when she feels like it. If any part of it is drying up just send a text saying "hi" or "miss you" or something small like that and watch the validation flood back in.
You can't prevent this happening, but you can make damned sure you're in the sperm provider category only.
This is the best answer (as OP said) to when a girl says "but but but when a man sleeps around it's impressive, when I slut around it's not, this is sexist and unfair!"
Damned right it's sexist and unfair, biology is sexist and unfair. MAWAD.
FereallyRed 5y ago
I shoot MAWAD into every slot I can fit in, too.
[deleted]
thernis 5y ago
This is tangential to your second point but I constantly find girls trying to lock me down after they’ve been plated. I’m very “cute” (classic American good boy look, average height at 5’11,) and I constantly get shit tests regarding family and social commitments (come to this family event with me!) - so most of my plates move on after a couple months because I have no interest in an LTR . I have a steady job at a Fortune 500 company so I cant really tell if they want me to be their beta bux but most girls I meet are bedded within one or two meetups. Women never expect anything from me financially either. I guess what I’m wondering is whether I should be worried about their strategy too. Are they still fucking Chad while fucking me and actively trying to get commitment from me?
p3n1x 5y ago
Worried about the wrong thing. That has a tone of outcome dependence.
If you are using "blah blah Fortune 500 blah blah" as part of your "pick up", then you get what you deserve. Keep the mystery for as long as possible.
DiscipleBrown 5y ago
Every woman wants commitment from Chad in your case it sounds like you present as a Chad and they are trying to get you to commit, but you flat out refuse to even play the “game”, so they quickly move on. Dangle the carrot, don’t snatch it away and hide it, then be curious as to why interest was lost. But always be on guard, Brother, don’t let yourself be trapped.
KeffirLime 5y ago
You're the Chad. Just because she has beta providers on tap doesn't mean she isn't still trying to lock down Chads too, that's her prize A.
It's just that he has a ton of other options so it probably won't happen.
RightHandWolf 5y ago
tangential?
Why are you tanning your genitals?
Sluskarn 5y ago
If she's your plate, you're her plate.
AlfredKinsey 5y ago
Woah. Bro. Yes.
Mad ups, saving this.
This is the covert contract of casual sex.
[deleted]
MattyAnon Admin 5y ago
Right, happens, accept it.
But there is a middle ground where you can be "LTR" enough and keep them around for years without commitment.
They do.
Ok, it's simple. Give them no money and no commitment. If they are after your financial or emotional support let them move on. If they want dick, they'll stay.
I don't know, but also know this: it's very natural for women to want to lock down a guy they find attractive who fucks them well. This is rare for women to find, and they want to keep it. Later they'll lose attraction and start the exploitation phase, but for now it's often more about security than wanting your money.
It's still a terrible fucking deal for you though.
p3n1x 5y ago
Can you expand on this?
Isn't it 'really' difficult for them to move away from this guy? Especially if he holds the 'greatest fuck ever' card.
MattyAnon Admin 5y ago
Commitment kills attraction. But she still feels entitled to his resources.
Yeah, it is. Especially if she's invested a lot in him.
[deleted]
OldPeopleLeather 5y ago
Orthodox Jews are based in this respect. Men thank God every day for not making them a woman in the daily prayers. The temptation a man may feel to be female is him rejecting the burden of performance. The religion necessitates that, not only you take up this burden, but come to love this burden, to emphatically appreciate it and be thankful that you have it.
​
I have suspicions Transgenderism is rooted in the anxiety associated with taking up the burden and it goes to show the absolute horrors produced when one rejects it. In rabbinic law it's also strictly forbidden for a man to dress as a woman, I might add.
​
Whopper_Jr 5y ago
Thanks for the comment. Over the past two decades there has been a massive push to normalize homosexuality. I realize this is stating the obvious, but I want to tie it to what you mentioned about temptation as well as “anxiety associated with taking up the burden.”
When I was very young, I rejected the idea of homosexuality, not even 100% consciously. It was like a mental reflex. I was naturally repulsed by it. However, I was told (both directly from teachers/adults/classmates and indirectly through society/culture/media) that this type of behavior was a personal defect, caused by any number of things:
A. Lack of exposure to gay people
B. Social conditioning that reinforces negative gender roles about masculinity (this could fall into the “patriarchy” category, but that term didn’t really exist in common parlance)
C. Something approximating “internal bigotry” that had to be excised, though that exact term wasn’t used either
D. Repression of my own homosexual desires/using projection to hide them (similar to how people make statements that boil down to “Mike Pence is gay because he is anti-gay”)
I was a fairly empathetic, impressionable kid, so I really took all of this to heart. I felt guilty about the reasons listed above. Each year in school was another round of social conditioning, until I had internalized each of those things. In order:
A. Gay culture is always represented as this big, never-ending party: colorful, high-energy display, humor/hilarity, excitement. It becomes an attractive lifestyle, almost as if to say, “look what you’re missing out on”
B. I became something close to being a male-feminist, at least outwardly. I chided people who reinforced “negative gender roles,” stood up for wymyn, etc. I embraced the idea of toxic masculinity
C. I was always dissecting reality (as I had been taught to do) for bias: books, TV, radio, conversation. I found racism/sexism/homophobia everywhere I looked. At first it felt like the correct and dutiful thing to do, but then it became a means of self-preservation (censoring my instincts, thoughts, and speech to appease “societal standards of decency” i.e. you immediately become a pariah if you say something that strays from the gospel of political correctness)
D. I started to believe that I might be gay (around ~12-14), or perhaps bisexual—and in a funny way—despite the fact that I was disgusted by such thoughts (and never physically aroused, which should have been an obvious cue)—I had now been drilled into distrusting my natural disgust mechanism “because it was a social construct that was preventing me from being myself.” So according to the scripture of social constructionists, the natural disgust I was experiencing was actually “evidence that I was repressing my nascent homosexuality.”
Sounds like satire, but it’s sick to think that I was conditioned to think this way. When I have kids, I will never ever send them to public school.
This was primarily between the ages of ~12-22. I had not yet discovered the alternative narrative; and by “alternative narrative,” I mean anything outside of leftist orthodoxy. Hadn’t even heard about libertarianism, had never heard “conservatism” explained by an actual conservative—instead, my understanding of conservatism was based on how people who hated conservatism defined conservatism; go figure (thanks Cenk Uygar, et al!). Concepts like The Frankfurt School/Cultural Marxism, Postmodernism, Hypergamy, The Game, etc. weren’t even remotely on the radar.
All of that changed in 2015 when social media began circulating videos of the Harvard Halloween Costume incident. Seeing that happen in real time was bizarre, because actually watching someone get vilified for articulating a reasonable position on video was insane to me, and way more real than reading about it. I knew that people like Ben Shapiro were very racist and bigoted, so protesting them from speaking on campuses was fine, but this professor seemed to be a really reasonable guy. I began following the campus situation closely, and shortly thereafter the first Jordan Peterson clip where he confronts the mob was uploaded, and reality began to peel away in front of me. Every time a lecturer was protested on a college campus, I looked them up in YouTube. As someone who grew up in one of the most liberal/progressive areas in the country, this was like stepping through the matrix.
Back to the topic at hand: I think lots of straight men see the social validation and attention that girls give to gay men, and in light of this, they begin to rationalize their lack of success with girls. In addition, lots of gay men actually possess some alpha-male characteristics (such as unfettered crude humor) because they are a protected class from PC retribution. Lots of gay guys are actually really funny because they are, in a way, insulated from otherwise taboo subject matter. I’ve heard gay men say the most outrageous, inappropriate, non-pc things that the average guy would not touch for fear of retribution. It’s like a free pass to be uncensored, which is ironically an attractive trait to women.
If you take my case as outlined above and amplify the severity, you more than likely wind up with some men in similar circumstances being driven to homosexuality as a sexual outlet due to frustration. It’s ultimately an admission of defeat: taking an easier route instead of bucking up and becoming a desirable man. But if your objective is the affections of a woman, and women seem to heap positive attention on gay men and gay culture while simultaneously demonizing straight, masculine men (“toxic masculinity”) and shrilly condemning anything that has to do with Game/pick-up/hypergamy/TRP etc., then you’re going to wind up one confused motherfucker with no tools, because all of the useful tools have been put in the misogynist category. So you eventually just say fuck it, I’m into dudes now.
My stream-of-consciousness comment turned into a meandering essay with too many intersecting threads and unrefined thoughts, but you brought up an interesting topic. Some of it might just be my internal pendulum swinging back too far to overcorrect for the bullshit that I was fed for 15 years.
Here’s some additional food for thought, and an interesting interview (despite click-baity video title): https://youtu.be/7NyX5CxGraE
I. Deep neural networks where AI is able to pinpoint—with non-trivial accuracy—whether or not someone is homosexual based on facial characteristics alone (does this indicate that homosexuality is genetic? Does it indicate a weakened civilization where being hardened and masculine with a furrowed brow and set jaw is no longer necessary (like the emergence of that weird nümale open mouth smile trend)? Could there be natural/genetic homosexuality as well as socially influenced homosexuality?)
II. Historical similarities (Weimar Republic, writings by Camille Paglia on sexuality, the fall of Greece and Rome as society became so prosperous that the people became weak and indulgent)
III. The switch from gender dysphoria to transgenderism, as well as emerging research showing that the rate of transgenderism seems to be socially driven within friend groups (and celebrated)
Thanks for reading
[deleted]
blr1998 5y ago
The problem is that boys and girls are taught that they are different. If we teach them they are equals, we can reduce violence from men to women
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
AutoModerator 5y ago
Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.
Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Pezotecom 5y ago
In conclusion, men and women are the same because we all seek sexual gratification in some way.
Wait, are there different ways of doing it? I guess we are all different then.
Thanks OP, what an insight on social relationships!
Kurush559 5y ago
You'd think it's obvious and easily understood by observation...i would've thought the same before seeing the sheer amount of guys whining about issues as if women are no different from men
masterpiece00 5y ago
Why are you so concerned and sour about what women do and that they can go out and fuck and fucking X number of guys is not impressive? Yes a women can get fucked by 10 guys, so what? she's promiscuous, guys are different in that no man can fuck a number of girls in a day (unless they are in professional porn and fake it), it is nature, women can keep getting off, we can ejaculate once or twice.
Why do you care if what your perceived value is to women? they don't know what they want, their perception of you changes constantly, so there is no way a man has "value" to women, you're not building up your value to 'all' women over the years if you lift and read rp, may be to one particular girl but your value never changes in life.
p3n1x 5y ago
Speak for yourself. Fix your diet.
[deleted]
Kurush559 5y ago
Bro, this post is about why no one should care at all what women can or can't do, because their life is incomparable with a man's. Idk how you came to the perception that I was promoting concern.
Your second paragraph is difficult to understand. Are you asking why one should care about the way women value them?
BACONisKEWLEST 5y ago
Our schools are failing, work on that reading comprehension.
Nighthawk_Black_ 5y ago
I'm not sure about everyone else but if given a chance I could at least fuck five times a day
masterpiece00 5y ago
Aint no one got time for that.
Uesugi1989 5y ago
That is not always the case, I had sex with women that were very aggressive and proactive at sex
Kurush559 5y ago
You misunderstood completely
max_peenor 5y ago
They read too many magazines. I remember a bird that tried to shove something up my ass because one of her magazines told her I'd be impressed or something. No, it wasn't a ping pong ball. This was my punishment for yielding control evening a moment. She didn't succeed and after I took control back, I guarantee you she had a better time after than she was before.
heronmarkedblade1984 5y ago
That's not the point he was trying to make. He was saying that even if a woman did fuck a different guy every night it wouldn't make her happy, because her underlying NEED is for a strong dominant man. Not a bunch of whoever she can get to fuck her. Shes looking for the feel, the tingle she can only get from an "Alpha" mate.
LandoChronus 5y ago
The girl will always be the receiver. She's being penetrated. She has to submit and let the man in, literally.
You put a stick in a hole, you don't put a hole around a stick.
anthero 5y ago
Unless youre putting a ring on it. Really illustrates the table-turn that is marriage, huh.
donkeydodo 5y ago
He might have gotten pegged, hence why he's on TRP
[deleted]
BlackPillHolocaust 5y ago
These dumb ass American abbreviations are starting to piss me off.
Kurush559 5y ago
1) I'm from Central Asia, vasiliy and glo are Eastern Europeans, and our Lord and Saviour Plantain Nationalism is Igbo. Using acronym has nothing to do with being American. Acronym is a useful way of distilling an analytic concept (I.e. A concept that won't ever change due to circumstance or context) into a single verbal expression saving time and energy.
2) no one is forcing you to read this.
[deleted]
max_peenor 5y ago
I admit I think it is kinda dopey, but what is American about it? Does it come with an exotic loan and cheese sauce?
BlackPillHolocaust 5y ago
Only Americans come up with those dumb terms
p3n1x 5y ago
Shhh, Don't let the Brits know about "acronyms". Then you will have to complain twice as hard.
ThrowFader 5y ago
deleted ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.1564 ^^^What ^^^is ^^^this?
Kurush559 5y ago
I remember seeing GLO post about TRP demographics and, whilst most active posters/commentors are American, I'm pretty sure that at the time, only half of the sub overall were from the States
max_peenor 5y ago
That sounds about right. Off the top of my head I can think of at least 6 ECs that aren't American and that's just from those that have declared where they are from. In terms of ethic background, it is FAR more diverse than anyone would expect, so much so that it makes the blooper claims of racism absolutely idiotic.
[deleted]