Or why everyone confuses "alpha" with "asshole"

Once you swallow the pill you can't not see it. AF/BB is everywhere and there are few exceptions, if any. But was it always this way?

My understanding of a basic RP concept is that women shit test as a mechanism to determine fitness as a mate, and that this has been going on since right around the time men figured out how to make fire.

I also understand that feminism has created a schism by teaching men that women want a guy who's sensitive, etc. The majority of men in Western culture have been taught (brainwashed) this by our single moms and by television going on several generations now...and we attempt to emulate the "nice guy" because that's what we've been taught....and of course we get shit on, rejected, divorce raped, etc.

So you have a small percentage of "alpha bad boys" nailing all the women. But perhaps that small percentage simply represents the percentage of antisocial rulebreakers you see in any society. Whether they are sociopathic, completely selfish and narcissistic, just plain don't care, or are just mean, these men simply represent the percentage of men who won't follow the program.

Since modern feminism has set the rules against men so they fail, only the minority of rulebreaking assholes end up passing the shit tests and generating the tingles. The majority of decent guys get shit on.

Was it always so? There seems to be this idea in RP thinking that AF/BB is the norm and has always been. I'm not so sure.

Seems to me that before feminism, you didn't have a majority of men attempting to be the Nice Guy™ because you didn't have feminist brainwashing and you had strong fathers that stuck around and taught their sons to be strong men instead of doughy pushovers. As a result the majority of men could pass the shit tests and generate the tingles...and here's the shocking part...without being an antisocial, bad boy, asshole!

Perhaps in bygone eras the paradigm of the Nice Guy™ couldn't have existed because you had a majority of genuinely nice men who were alpha at the same time...men who kept frame, passed the shit tests with flying colors, kept in shape, and generated the tingles.

These men would know how to be nice without having an orbiter's hidden agenda. These men could stand up for their women without being white knights because they weren't trying to suck up and get in some woman's pants....they would have already won said women and already had that pussy on lock because they were already alpha and could hold frame.

Moreover, these men would have provided for their women without being shit on. They wouldn't have had laws stacked against them allowing them to get divorced raped. Their women would be held accountable by society for bad behavior. These women would not be conditioned to equate human ATM's with sexless doormats because they'd be used to real men to whom they were primally attracted, but in whom they could count on to provide as well.

In other words, in a functional society where men aren't disposable second class citizens, shouldn't alpha fucks and beta bucks be the same fucking guy!?

Seems to me that the division between AF and BB is the result of the feminist matrix from which us TRP men have unplugged. Seems to me that strategies such as PUA, MGTOW, spinning plates, etc. are, at best, adaptations to a broken system. To put it in IT terms, these strategies are "patches" and "workarounds" but not actual "fixes." They allow for short term, individual solutions but they don't truly fix the larger problem.

I think those of you working on LTR game are the closest to having it right. You may have "oneitis" but you're applying game to keep her. Perhaps that's the way that God/Nature/whomever intended... you keep her safe and provide for her but you brook no nonsense and keep frame, causing her to desire you instead of ride the carousel.

Under such an ideal, the "bad boys" work for it just like the rest of us.

Thoughts?

TL;DR Is the fact that "bad boys" get all the 'ginas tingly due to AF/BB being an artificial schism instead of the ideological norm? Should both archetypes ideally be the same person?