TRP.RED: Home | Blogs - Forums.RED: ALL | TheRedPill | RedPillWomen | AskTRP | thankTRP | OffTopic
Hot New TopControversial
Login or Register
- Hide Preview | 74 Comments | submitted 2 years ago by [deleted] [Post Locked]

Using links to photos, can you describe what you mean if you label someone a HB5, 6, 7, 8, 9? I know everyone's tastes are different but I'm curious as to what people are talking about when they provide an attractiveness rating on TRP.

[-] redparadigm 23 Points 2 years ago

There is this:


[-] A_Medical_Physicist 14 Points 2 years ago

I'm honestly not sure many of those girls are 9s in my book.

Maybe the first blonde one in the top row.

[-] druganswer 4 Points 2 years ago

Agreed, this is a TERRIBLE scale.

I would guess that scale was made to make girls feel better about themselves.

[-] MUTHAFATHAGENTLEMAN 1 Point 2 years ago

It's from 4chan. I doubt it.

[-] Lil_Dick_McFarts 3 Points 2 years ago

Wtf most of those 6s are hot. I've seen enough dating pics then compared to the girl in real life to know some of those 6s will be 8s in person.

[-] RemyPrice 1 Point 2 years ago

The 9s on this chart would be 7s on my chart.

[-] RPthrowaway123 1 Point 2 years ago

Really? Even Sara Jean Underwood?

[-] RemyPrice 3 Points 2 years ago

I don't know who that is.

All the 9s on this chart are average by Manhattan standards.

[-] RPthrowaway123 1 Point 2 years ago

Google her. Specifically, google "Sara Jean Underwood naked yoga" and then judge!

If those are all normal in NYC though, I might have to move. God damn, they make the women around here look like farm animals.

[-] RemyPrice 2 Points 2 years ago

I'll take your word for it. I don't look at porn.

[-] A_Medical_Physicist -1 Point 2 years ago

Top left and bottom right in the nine section would probably have to approach me, I wouldn't bother going up to them. They are 5's with good lighting and a solid makeup job.

[-] TRPAlternative 3 Points 2 years ago

Solid makeup job doesn't make them any less attractive on the day.

[-] Shuado 1 Point 2 years ago

Bottom right redhead, other than that they are all 6s or 7s to me.

[-] monkxae 6 Points 2 years ago

Full of White Girls. Unrealistic graph. And I like white girls but come on.

[-] dabayer 5 Points 2 years ago

The second girl in the 7s


[-] Leastohm 4 Points 2 years ago

Damn, I've been grading very harshly compared to these standards.

[-] MUTHAFATHAGENTLEMAN 3 Points 2 years ago

mfw he doesn't post the complete version

[-] [deleted] 2 Points 2 years ago

And I think this is an excellent link. Part of what motivated my question was to see the interdindividual variation in these judgements, and that's not something this link hits at (although, yes, it answers my question).

[-] RPthrowaway123 1 Point 2 years ago

Man, maybe I need to raise my standards a little bit. most the the girls 6 and up are pretty attractive to me, but mostly in that cute kinda way as opposed to straight up hot.

[-] fnordsnord 1 Point 2 years ago

I was going to try to answer this. But /u/redparadigm nailed it. I have nothing to add. This is a great standard guide.

[-] Asoka11111 21 Points 2 years ago

Try the Hard/Soft binary:

Hard 0: would not fuck with your worst enemy's dick

Soft 0: would normally not fuck, but suffering a slump/her personality/alcohol could make it happen

Soft 1: would probably fuck on any given day

Hard 1: would sell your soul to fuck

Edit: autocorrect will never cease to amuse us

[-] dooblegoo 16 Points 2 years ago

Where do you find ducks that purchase souls? I've yet to find one.

[-] alpha-game 7 Points 2 years ago

i am duck, collector of souls

[-] Red-Zen 3 Points 2 years ago

Ad a point between you Soft 0 and Soft 1, and you have a 5 point scale. Double it, and you have a 10 point scale.

[-] AFPJ 3 Points 2 years ago

Hard 1: would sell your soul to fuck

If you believe any woman is worth your dignity or you bending over in any way, you put too much importance on women. KISS to a 0/1 binary. It'll change, a 0 one day might be a 1 another - it's for now, not for a wide theory.

No immediate interest in fucking a woman = she doesn't exist ...until there is. Think about it only when there is.

[-] Asoka11111 1 Point 2 years ago

I was being hyperbolic and assuming that it was easy to see through such an extreme exaggeration, especially within the context of what the main sub stands for.

[-] TheInkerman 0 Points 2 years ago

Both Soft 0 and Soft 1 categories are way too broad to accurately 'rate' girls, if that is the intention.

[-] Asoka11111 1 Point 2 years ago

How so? I can see how Soft 0 and Soft 1 may overlap a lot, but not that the 0 zones are too broad.

Edit: I kind of see it now. The personality boost should be a characteristic of the I zones. It is most critical in distinguishing between the soft zones.

[-] TheInkerman 1 Point 2 years ago

If you're trying to say one girl is more attractive than another, it's not enough to say you'd sleep with both.

[-] Asoka11111 2 Points 2 years ago

The whole point is to stop pedestalizing girls in general by reducing them all to the equal value of attractive, rather than saying some are more covetable than others and encouraging a scarcity mentality.

[-] TheInkerman 1 Point 2 years ago

Ah well in that respect I understand then. Perhaps the issue I have is that I don't believe in the 'conditional' lay. If you wouldn't sleep with a girl sober you shouldn't sleep with her drunk.

[-] Asoka11111 1 Point 2 years ago

I agree 100%, but these things happen (especially at the college age)

[-] OscarWhisky 14 Points 2 years ago

How about just 0's and 1's i.e. I am not attracted and I am attracted?

[-] flying_cumshot 3 Points 2 years ago

but sometimes there are girls who you wouldn't fuck at first glance, but their personality makes up for it which makes them more attractive

[-] life_manager 17 Points 2 years ago

So they're a 1.

My friend and I play the binary system, it's no bullshit to us. You either would, or wouldn't fuck that girl and that's that.

[-] flying_cumshot 3 Points 2 years ago

No.... my point was that there are girls you would not fuck at all, but may fuck if you got to know them.

Creating an absolute of 0 and 1 is not accurate at all. A girl you just met would be a 0, and then you decide later that she's a 1? then what is the point of that system? might as well keep 1-10 then.

Patrice O'neal also proposed that a scale of 1-30 would be even more accurate.

[-] A_Medical_Physicist 2 Points 2 years ago

No.... my point was that there are girls you would not fuck at all, but may fuck if you got to know them.

I'm not saying this isn't true for people in general but I don't think you will find many of us are at a point in our lives where we consider this to be true for ourselves.

[-] life_manager 1 Point 2 years ago

I have not once in my life met a girl I would call a 0 then "get to know her" and she becomes a one.

What is this, /r/relationships?

[-] flying_cumshot 1 Point 2 years ago

You never met a girl that you weren't attracted to at first and then became attracted to later?..... that's bizarre.

Like if you saw a chick that's a 5 with regular clothes on instagram. You would probably think, "I would not fuck her", right? But let's say you saw her in person and her personality was feminine and good, and she dressed better. Then she might be a 6.5 in your eyes and you would think "Ok I would fuck her".

Making it 0 and 1 makes it sound extreme as fuck. Well, whatever, if that binary scale makes sense for you then who am i to argue? It doesn't make any sense to me so i'll just stick to my 1-10 scale.

[-] life_manager -1 Point 2 years ago

Eh. Odds are if you would fuck her, period, she should have never been a zero in the first place. It's more a is she fuckable scale than a how-much-do-you-want-to one. I think you're probably more picky than I am so I can also see it not working out for you as it does for me and that's a-okay :)

[-] OscarWhisky -1 Point 2 years ago

How many girls are you trying to meet that you aren't attracted to? What you are saying just doesn't sound congruent.

[-] FelixCopy -1 Point 2 years ago

You're missing the entire point. Your feel good bullshit aside as the Op said in your situation that would just be a 1. There's no decree that you can't change numbers as she becomes more attractive and your situation probably happens once a year unless you're maximum beta orbiter chaser of fatties.

[-] look_good -1 Point 2 years ago

Lol, get the fuck out of here with your horse shit. Personality has nothing to do with whether or not a guy would fuck a girl, that's how a girl's brain works. I'm guessing you're young.

[-] 648262 0 Points 2 years ago

And a scale of 1-99999 would be even more accurate, but a system that has 1 and 0, but room for changing those numbers based on level of information is more useful.

You would fuck a hot chick, but change your mind if she has aids as an example.

[-] Knehmo 2 Points 2 years ago

Would you now?

[-] 648262 1 Point 2 years ago

You got me..!

[-] [deleted] 1 Point 2 years ago


[-] TheLife_ 0 Points 2 years ago

1-10 creates a comparative valuing system, thereby putting the pussy on a pedestal.

If you don't know what that means, stop posting on TRP and go back to lurking a while. You still haven't got the basics down.

[-] [deleted] 1 Point 2 years ago


[-] life_manager 0 Points 2 years ago

It's a couple of guys shooting the shit. If you want to get nerdy and technical about what it means, then that's all on you. Zeroes and Ones are all we need.

[-] Overzealous_BlackGuy 1 Point 2 years ago

Just because she was ugly befote doesn't mean you're doomed from wabting to fuck her ever again.

[-] RemyPrice -1 Point 2 years ago

their personality makes up for it

You can't fuck a personality.

[-] Gencooil 3 Points 2 years ago

Nonsense. A great personality has the potential to move a woman up the scale in my book. I don't care how pretty a woman is and what her body looks like, if her personality is horrendous, down the scale she goes. I've turned down some solid 9's because of their terrible and obnoxious persona and character. Huge turnoff.

[-] look_good 0 Points 2 years ago

Turned down 9's? Some 9's? 9's don't initiate. You're full of shit.

[-] Gencooil 2 Points 2 years ago

9's don't initiate with you.

[-] look_good 0 Points 2 years ago

Stop trying to be a cool guy on the internet, TRP is about helping guys, your horse shit doesn't add value

[-] Gencooil 1 Point 2 years ago

Whatever you say.

[-] machimus 1 Point 2 years ago

The binary scale is my favorite for plates. Rate them on whatever scale you want, but it all boils down to would-I-or-wouldn't-I.

[-] needless_pickup_line 8 Points 2 years ago

I'm very much of the opinion that there's no such thing as an HB10. There are just 9's thst fit people's niches/tastes/fetishes. So for example if you like Asians then an Asian 9 would be a 10 to you. Likewise if you liked redheads, mixed girls, goth chicks, etc. Secondly, take everything with a grain if salt on TRP. There's a lot of bullshitting going on in FRs.

That said, no one is giving you any examples so here are mine. Excuse the few examples since I'm on mobile. And disclaimer, I'm not really into blondes and Asians which I feel is counter to the usual TRP preference. Furthermore, while I like thick girls as much as the next guy, any girl who is overweight can never be more than a 5.

HB5 - Totally neutral/average face and body. Neither attractive nor unattractive.

HB6 - Slightly attractive. Nothing special, but will pass the boner test for most guys. Can also be a girl with a HB5 face but a nicer body aka butterface.

Also take note here how difficult it can be to be objective about these things. I'm essentially using the best possible photo of the HB6 girl compared to a pretty shitty photo of the HB5.

HB7 - A solidly attractive girl. Not gonna stop traffic or anything but there will be a unanimous concensus that this girl is sexually attractive. At this level is where personal preference really comes into play, which can make her a beautiful 8 or an unimpressive 6. Can be girls with pretty faces but whatever bodies, and vice versa where a slightly cute face has a banging body.

HB8 [1]( 2 - A universally beautiful girl. This is a girl that turns heads and garners attention. Guys will congratulate you for pulling her. Most IG models and video girls are at this level.

UNLIKE previous levels (6 and 7), both an attractive face and attractive body are necessary. While tastes differ (thick and curvy vs fit and toned vs slender and petite etc), there's no average skinny-fat body that most western women seem to have. The first example is an HB8 whose main asset is her body, while the 2nd is an example of a solidly beautiful face.

[HB9]( - Probably the most difficult to quantify. Even trying to be objective, personal tastes always come into play. Basically, an HB9 is a prime physical specimen. No physical flaws. An all around a striking individual. Not just "hot" or sexually arousing but truly aesthetic. Just statistically, these girls are exceedingly rare and I'm always a bit skeptical when guys bring up HB9/HB10s.

And finally my personal example of an HB10 is Lianne La Havas. This is less to show you an objective example of an HB10 and more to show you just how much personal tastes can differ.

[-] redpillmason 3 Points 2 years ago

I do like your descriptions, but the images are way off. Your first and third HB8 are closer to HB6 and HB5, the second one is on point. Your HB10 looks like a HB6 to me.

[-] needless_pickup_line 2 Points 2 years ago

Yeah even when I was trying to be objective it's still kinda hard. The first HB8 was supposed to be an example of hotness mainly based on body. Anel Rodriguez is a much better example of an HB8. I can't really excuse the 3rd HB8. She's a legit model who I think is a 10 (at least in her other pictures) and I thought I was being objective rating her an 8.

[-] trp12 1 Point 2 years ago

I too think the HB10 is inaccurate. u/needless_pickup_line should check this out

[-] poisonsmoke 2 Points 2 years ago

That first paragraph of yours was the exact same as the one in the picture linked above. Did you copy it?

[-] needless_pickup_line 4 Points 2 years ago

Ahh I've seen that picture before. I guess that paragraph was just subconsciously in my mind, but I didn't purposefully copy it.

[-] teeay 1 Point 2 years ago

It's still pretty subjective. I'd rate your HB6 and 7 as better than all of your 8s. HB8 #3 is a 5 at best, if you ask me.

[-] needless_pickup_line 1 Point 2 years ago

Yeah in retrospect it still wasn't objective. Went through and made some changes. Just goes to show just how much personal taste varies, but bear in mind that the HB6 had a much much higher quality photo than any girl save the HB9.

[-] legit_tortilla_chips 5 Points 2 years ago

I equate it with effort I'd put in to fuck her and the risk that I'd subconsciously put her on a pedestal.

5 is barely attractive enough to consider, she'd have to straight up tell me she's down to fuck whenever I want

6 is someone who I'd fuck if the effort to do so was very limited

7 is someone I'd take out for some beers and put moves on

8 is someone I'd premeditate a gameplan for fucking her and keep aware of a tendency to pedestalize

9 is someone worthy of a creative gameplan and who would require some caution on my part to not put her on a pedestal

10s don't exist

[-] machimus 3 Points 2 years ago

I consider it a bell curve, since the population is very large it's a valid approximation. I let 5 be the mean and each number up or down is a standard deviation. That way it really means something when a girl is a 2 or an 8.

[-] DOCTORxTEETH 2 Points 2 years ago

What most guys find attractive is gonna be different. I've posted what I consider a ten before and her body was called "trashy". I don't go by all of those numbers, I just put them into four categories: Wouldn't Fuck, Would Fuck Secretly, Would Fuck, and Mah Lawd.

[-] SURVEILLANCE_CAMERA 1 Point 2 years ago

Couldn't relate more to the "Would Fuck Secretly" thing.

[-] BeautyQuark 2 Points 2 years ago

Very subjective. However, my rule of thumb is a 10 is a girl damn near any guy would find very attractive (basically unicorn). A 9 is a girl that 90% of guys would say is attractive. An 8 is a girl that almost no man would turn down for a ONS. A 7 is a girl that is doable and some men would fetish. A 6 is doable but no guys would have a normal fetish for. A 5 is a girl that you might do (possibly requiring alcohol) but you would not want others to know about. A 4 is someone that you might do if you were smashed/wasted. 3 and under would be someone that you never would ever have sex with under any circumstances.

[-] TheInkerman 1 Point 2 years ago

As an aside, 6+ are generally considered 'fuckable', with 5s maybe under the right conditions. I'd also say 6 is the level where personal taste begins to impact the rating. A 6 should never be an 8 or 9, but one person might consider her a 7, while another may not.

[-] michael6795 1 Point 2 years ago

I know this is less important, but is there a guy chart for personal reference?