TLDR Liberals are three times as likely to unfriend conservatives as vice versa. This is because opposing views trigger them emotionally. This is a good thing since is drives them into their safe-space and silences them.
Source http://acrackletsthelightin.info/2017/02/03/Driving-the-SJW-into-their-safespace/
Cut and Paste
Trump might be a malignant narcissist but he has achieved one thing, he has forced the politically correct, third wave feminist, Social Justice Warrior (SJW) and politically correct to openly fight. Trump's support has come from people who are fed up with political correctness being used to silence dissenting opinion. The inspiration for this post came from this article, Study: Liberals Three Times More Likely Than Conservatives to 'Unfriend' on Social Media Over Politics. What is happening is they are being driven into their safe space, this is a good thing.
An SJW's feelings are more valid than yours
A woman who is a psychiatrist and counselor posted on her social media account after Trump was elected. She stated that after Trump got elected, she has been having nightmares that she will be raped. She then added, her feelings are valid, they are not to be questioned. All of her female patients replied that they are also terrified of being raped due to Trump being elected. I then asked, are your fears valid? Just because Trump has been elected, doesn't mean that laws have changed. Now that Trump has been elected, if the police see a woman being raped in the street, they will just walk by?
She replied back, her feelings are real, I shouldn't doubt that her feeling actually exists. I then replied back that I feel her feelings are not based on reality. Her counter argument was that I don't understand how a woman is more vulnerable than a man, she is in fear of being raped. Here we are having a debate about whose feelings are more valid. Her feelings because she is a woman are more important than mine. Whether or not more women have increased because Donald Trump was elected are not an issue. On the other hand, maybe fewer men have been raped due to Trump getting elected.
Questioning her feelings resulted in her blocking me. I had driven her into her safe space along with all her patients, effectively silencing her. The problem isn't moderate liberals, it is extreme liberals silencing opposition by with irrationality.
The SJW defines what a safe-space is
Technically I could be defined as a visible minority, members of visible minorities who are demanding extra rights I find offensive. As I showed in How Limousine Liberals perverted the Left the Progressive have redefined they principles of Liberalism. The founding fathers of American where Liberal in that they argued for Truth, Justice, and Equality before the law. They were Liberal in that it went against the prevailing thought of the time. But their justification was the Magna Carta which dates back to 1215, this was the foundation of the modern western legal system.
Yes, the Magna Carta was initially limited equal rights to a small subset of society but the document itself was used to expand rights to other members of society. The American Constitution was based on the ideas of the Magna Carta. The American constitution expanded equal rights to all white men of society, later this same constitution was used to expand equal rights to everyone. The British Empire was not perfect but these principles were used to pass the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 was a start to banning slavery throughout the empire. People forget that it was white men who fought to pass these laws.
The SJW creates victims, I described how this works in Creating Learned Helplessness - Don't blame the victim. If you are saying women, blacks or other visible minorities need special privileges, indirectly you are saying these groups are inferior. This is a form of racism which is extremely dangerous. But if I state this in an SJW safe-space, I am the racist and I am making the other members of the safe-space feel unsafe. But if I state that it makes me feel unsafe, my feeling or opinions are invalid.
I feel it is unsafe because it causes animosity and resentment between groups. Until the 1950s, there was extreme racism against Jews, Asians, and Blacks. Mordecai Richler a child of an immigrant Jewish Family grew up in the 1940s to 1950s Montreal. The Catholic Priests would regularly give sermons how Jews killed Jesus which would incite Catholic children to throw rocks at Jews. He describes this racism in his fictional book The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz. Despite this racism, Duddy Kravitz works harder. There was similar racism against Asians.
Asians and Jews didn't get subverted like blacks did by the Limousine Liberal. They argued for equal rights but not for special privileges. By working hard, Eastern Asians and Jews on some levels managed to surpass whites. The irony now is some Asians and Jews want to profit in the race grievance industry which is causing animosity. They are now regressing. This, in my opinion, is unsafe and dangerous. Since I feel visible minorities demanding extra privileges causes animosity and hatred, does that mean it shouldn't be allowed in the safe space? According to SJW logic, my opinion is hateful, therefore I should not be allowed in the safe space. The SJW defines what is allowed in the safe space and it isn't dependent on logic only emotions.
When the SJW can't silence opposing opinions they run away
Earlier I cited the article Study: Liberals Three Times More Likely Than Conservatives to 'Unfriend' on Social Media Over Politics. It stated:
Nearly one-quarter (24%) of Democrats say they blocked, unfriended, or stopped following someone on social media after the election because of their political posts on social media. Fewer than one in ten Republicans (9%) and independents (9%) report eliminating people from their social media circle. Political liberals are also far more likely than conservatives to say they removed someone from their social media circle due to what they shared online (28% vs. 8%, respectively). Eleven percent of moderates say they blocked, unfollowed, or unfriended someone due to what they posted online...Only five percent of Americans say they are planning on spending less time with certain family members because of their political views. Democrats, however, are five times more likely than Republicans to say they are trying to avoid certain family members due to their political views (10% vs. 2%, respectively). The pattern among political independents mirrors the general population.
The SJW is passive aggressive and they project their feelings and emotions onto others. If you make a statement which differs from their concept of reality, they will call you bitter, angry etc. They are thinking how they would feel if they had that version of reality. Their solution is to avoid alternative belief systems. By causing an SJW to unfriend you or block you, you are driving them into their safe space.
Driving the SJW into their safe space means you are silencing them
The SJW usually works by misrepresenting or re-framing the truth. An example of this is the Violence Against Women laws. The SJW and hardcore feminist will frame it as men beat women. Men beating women is unquestionably wrong. Therefore anyone who opposes Violence Against Women laws wants to beat women. The hardcore feminist denies the fact that women abuse men. The law itself is sexist because it mentions gender.
People who want rights without responsibilities are like adolescents who want the rights to the car without the responsibilities for the payments, the gas, the insurance, or the repairs. A person who talks more about women's rights than responsibilities is not an adult feminist, but an adolescent feminist. Does Feminism Discriminate Against Men?: A Debate
The hardcore feminist or SJW wants extra privileges without responsibilities. If we go back to the original principles of the United States, Truth, Justice, and Equality before the law. Even if women are more likely to rape and abuse women, the question is do they have equality before the law? The fact is, hard-core feminists have intentionally suppressed facts like this How male victims of domestic abuse often end up getting arrested themselves. Even in countries where Islamic law exists, there is evidence to show that men there are just as often victims of domestic abuse.
You will not change the opinion of a radical feminist but you are fighting over the views of the moderates. Once the moderate has seen the facts, there is a possibility he might change his opinion. If you have already driven the SJW into their safe space, this means they can not counter your arguments with lies or shaming tactics.
How to drive the SJW into their safe space?
So don't wait for anyone else to do anything. Talk to a few friends. Kick around a few ideas. Send a few emails. Create a few Twitter memes and see if the spark happens to catch anyone's interest. Don't expect your target to come tumbling down, just start the process. Whether you succeed or not – and remember, #GamerGate has had far more abortive ops and ineffective failures than successes—the point is that you have taken a stand and you have struck a blow. And because you have done so, someone else will do so as well. It's impossible to know which one action will turn out to be effective, just as it's impossible to know which straw will be the one to snap the camel's back. But you do know this: the only action that is completely ineffective is the one that is never taken. Because SJWs are primarily dependent upon other people's money, that is a weak point that should always be your first target. Dig to discover where they are obtaining their money, then focus your efforts on the funding source to cut off the flow of funds to them. Sometimes this will require political pressure, as many SJW institutions receive state, local, or federal government funds. Sometimes private pressure and a persuasive word in the ear of the relevant executive will suffice. But regardless, remember that every journey requires an initial step, and no one can take that first step except you. SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police
A Vox Day states, from their comments on social media, most SJW appear to be suffering from a mental illness where they are easily triggered. According to their social media accounts, they often are on some sort of antidepressant etc. Probably they are on these medications since they have problems facing reality. Just posting memes on your social media account can cause the SJW to block you. This then serves a second purpose, SJW depends on appearing to be the voice of the majority. If you post a meme, if other people like it or share it, that breaks this illusion.
No one likes to look like a fool, this includes politicians, business leaders etc. Even if you do not vote, it can still have a profound effect. All leaders, even in dictatorships are worried about status. For decades, China denied having forced labor camps or what they called re-education through labor. As China's trade with the outside world increased, some of the products of these camps thought being exported. Some of the prisoners started to write on the products, this product has been created with forced labor. Finally, China has admitted that these forced labor camps exist and now they, amazingly enough, have officially abolished them. China abolishes its labour camps and releases prisoners
Possibly these labor camps still exist in China but they no longer can detain as many people. The point is even the elite of dictatorship regimes need to worry about self-image.
Further directions
You can create your own memes and see what happens. It just takes a few minutes, post the meme online see how far it goes. Experiment with it, have fun. You read an article on the internet, make a meme from it, see what happens. Major social media sites are caught in a bind. If they start to censor too much, they will start to lose users. Loss of users means loss of revenue. Feminists and Progressives have fifty plus year more experience fighting. This doesn't mean the battle is lost, it just means we need to catch up and develop better tactics.
Thank you for your donations. If you like my posts you me donations to my bitcoin address <a href="bitcoin:3NgksauCyuLcVRqLHVLbAnhP2UqmqspJVQ">3NgksauCyuLcVRqLHVLbAnhP2UqmqspJVQ</a>. If your are in the Philipines and need a bitcoin account you can sign up for one at coins.ph.
You can also follow me on twitter at @sir_wankalote, I also have an account on gab @sir_wankalot_here the free speech alternative. If there is a post or topic you would like me to write about, feel free to contact me via twitter or Reddit.
Source http://acrackletsthelightin.info/2017/02/03/Driving-the-SJW-into-their-safespace/
newName543456 7y ago
SJWs are basically extreme solipsists. Their thought process: "I think X is a big deal and it doesn't matter if anyone else thinks otherwise."
It's well known as "straw man fallacy" and needs to be called out when it happens.
As for leftists being more likely to block people for opposing PoV, well, there goes their ideal of tolerance.
thisornothing 7y ago
Badly written garbage, that has next to nothing to do with TRP.
Sdom1 7y ago
Shove your concern-trolling right up your ass. I clicked on your history and the first thing I saw was "I'm completely anti-trump."
So, you're an SJW hoping to silence people by concern trolling them.
Hovus 7y ago
Not all heroes wear capes lol. Thank you for smiting that troll.
thisornothing 7y ago
Fuck me. It's like you're not even aware of how you sound.
Trump is irrelevant to sexual strategy. I'm not "concerned" about him, or this post. I'm disinterested in it. It's badly written garbage that doesn't belong in this sub.
Try stringing a coherent point together sometime, and maybe I won't call you out on writing crap.
Sdom1 7y ago
So disinterested that you bothered to comment on it? See, that's how I know you're concern trolling. When I see something I find uninteresting, I just don't fucking read it. I don't bother telling people they shouldn't be discussing it. See how easy that is?
You know that simply saying that I'm not making sense doesn't make it so, right?
thisornothing 7y ago
Nah. I can disagree and be disinterested if I want. I'm just embarrassed by the faux-alphas on here that can't see that the only real reason they like Trump is because of the "feelz" he gives them.
Sdom1 7y ago
Why would liking Trump make one a "faux" alpha? Do you really think that no actual alphas like Trump?
"Feelz" are the only real reason anyone likes any politician. Being able to make people feel the things you want is pretty much a working definition of charisma.
thisornothing 7y ago
I didn't say all. But definitely the vast majority of guys I've seen here and in real life, sure. He appeals to the powerless, and that's what most guys are these days.
Feelz are the reason idiots like politicians. Policies and plans should be your focus. Hell, not even just in politics - but in life, generally. It's weird that I need to explain that.
Sdom1 7y ago
What, do you think there was some mythical time when the common man wielded actual power? People have always been powerless. The liberals who desperately wanted Clinton to win are powerless too.
You didn't need to explain it. It hadn't entered the discussion yet. You introduced the topic and then sighed, "why must I explain everything?" Newsflash - you aren't as smart or as insightful as you seem to think you are.
Feelz are the reasons EVERYBODY likes politicians. Feelings might not be the reason you voted for someone -- many people voted for Trump and Clinton but didn't like them -- but generally to "like" someone means you have affection for them. Affection is a feeling.
There were and are legitimately huge issues being contested at the moment, including the demographic trend the entire West will take. Next to that issue, things like pipelines and tax policy are fucking trivial, and that issue is what propelled Trump to power. It's what caused Brexit. It's what is taking Geert Wilder's party from a sideshow to the most powerful party in the Netherlands. It's causing the rise of a fucking Nazi party in Greece. All this and much, much more.
But go ahead with your shallow, self-serving analysis. Dazzle me with that intellect.
thisornothing 7y ago
What the hell are you even talking about?
Carry on making decisions based on your feelings, then. See how that works out.
Utter horseshit.
Sdom1 7y ago
Can you seriously not parse what I said? You're not that smart, are you? Look, the only reason anybody LIKES anybody else is emotionally based. I've seen plenty of people who like someone else for no apparent reason, and dislike someone else who treats them well. It's not rational. No human being is completely rational, not even a super genius like you. Additionally, you can vote for a candidate and not particularly like them or find them compelling. Vote for != Like.
So, to say that only an idiot likes a politician for emotional reasons doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
sir_wankalot_here 7y ago
Your thinking is flawed, similar to the feminist. The people that count are the moderates who will not ignore her. You make a valid point, the crazy feminist can't shame you since she has ignored you, meanwhile the moderate can hear it.
The reverse hold true, moderate says 25% of women are raped, you can refute that point without the feminist jumping in.
NapoleanBoneTO 7y ago
What a waste of time. You have 813 followers on Twitter, you are a nobody.
Barvazon 7y ago
So you don't value your time much.
I value mine.
This thread is bullshit.
Sdom1 7y ago
You value it so much that you decided to post on the thread that doesn't interest you?
NeoreactionSafe 7y ago
A minor correction... but a very important point.
The original idea was that only Alpha Males who owned property were to be given a vote.
Lower class white men without property weren't allowed to vote.
Children weren't allowed to vote.
Slaves weren't allowed to vote. (indentured or permanent)
The original vision was to only permit the highest functioning people to participate in government and by using checks and balances no one man would become a tyrant over the rest.
Otherwise the post has a lot of good stuff in it.
[deleted] 7y ago
Children: dependent on their parents
Women: dependent on their husbands
Slaves: dependent on their masters
Lower-class Whites: dependent on the ownership class for employment, protection (via policy/military), etc.
Alpha Males: Sovereign. Creation "starts" here and flows outwards.
We're taught that the Alpha Males (a.k.a. the colonial government) were being dicks by not letting other people vote. In reality, though, the dependent classes are dependent in nature. The Alpha Males merely observed this and designed the Constitution accordingly.
The standard rebuttal is: "So you're saying chattel slavery was natural. You might be a disgusting racist."
No, I am against slavery. But the point is that only a small group is sovereign in all social systems. This fact will never change. Kids will never not need their parents. Masculine and feminine polarity will never fizzle out. And so forth.
Abolishing chattel slavery was good. But, it didn't mean blacks all became alpha males (i.e. free).
NeoreactionSafe 7y ago
The crime was permanent slavery of certain ethnic groups.
It was and still is perfectly fine to have wage slaves or indentured servants.
The modern indentured servant is called a Home Mortgage payer.
sir_wankalot_here 7y ago
It's a thought piece. Many economists argue that only people who are responsible should be able to vote. The problem is how to determine who is responsible.
redolas 7y ago
Not allowing people who directly benefit from government to vote, would be a start. This includes people on social aid, government workers, politicians, etc. It also makes sense to allow vote only to people who pay taxes, it's their money after all.
NeoreactionSafe 7y ago
Well the first step would be to delete all the stuff inverting reality now.
Child Support
Alimony
...once you wipe the slate clean then the Alpha will assume the position of head of household and property owner again.
What the Blue Pill has done is inverted reality.
We can't find the "great men" until we destroy the Blue Pill laws.
It's in the absence of inversion that we can build.
This is why we "Enjoy the Destruction" of the Blue Pill mythology because we recognize that until Truth is restored all efforts will fail.
Truth is a distant light at the moment... at the end of the tunnel.
Sdom1 7y ago
You're getting close to the core of the matter, which actually also ties in most of our complaints about women:
-They think their thoughts define reality, and thus;
-They think that, simply by desiring it, they can be "liberated" from any facet of reality they don't like.
This is why I'm never surprised when SJWs say buttfuck insane shit with a straight face - they are making it up on the fly, and truly believe it. In other words, they're fucking nuts, but it's a learned insanity.
And, because it's a form of insanity, there's really no way to talk your way through it and refute them with logic or facts. It's an exercise in frustration.
Sdom1 7y ago
In addition, not even presenting them with evidence works; they'll just claim the source is lying, no matter how reputable. It's an impenetrable wall of idiocy.
edwardhwhite 7y ago
What does this have to do with fucking women?
Sdom1 7y ago
Why not just, I dunno, NOT click on the thread with the obviously political title? Jesus, this place has been taken over by whiny little fucks.
360_no_scope_upvote 7y ago
TRP is traditionally a sexual strategy sub, not in real alignment with mens movements because here most people are exploiting the current regime. This article is more fitting in the mens rights movement sub.
Sdom1 7y ago
Jesus, are you combing through old threads? Do you not understand what concern trolling is? If the mods had found it objectionable, they'd have removed it.
sir_wankalot_here 7y ago
It has a flair on it, what does the flair say?
max_peenor 7y ago
FTL; DR - Flair To Long; Didn't Read
Yeah, you are going to catch some shit because of the political slant. If Chad were to ever start sobbing, it would be because his candidate for congress lost to a decade old muddy door mat that said "Welcome." No avoiding that. However, I think there are more than one of us that are getting tired of the "where da hot fuk!?!" postings. The red pill isn't about women. It's about sexual strategy and more so accepting a reality that 6000 years of civil order has tried to hide from us.