Feminists like to complain about unfair beauty standards (for women, of course) and objectification (of women) in the media. "Boobs and ass and hairlessness are all about looking young, ew men are pedophiles, childbearing, ugh patriarchy, amirite?????"
But what if beauty standards reflected something much deeper than just sex?
Take a look at the Roman statue of Laocoön. Or a Greek discus thrower.
Or Captain America, Thor, or Superman.
All of these, ancient and modern, have the muscular male as the standard of beauty.
As Little Red Riding Hood asked the wolf why his teeth were so big, we must ask why ideal men have such big muscles.
The better to hunt animals with.
The better to build things with.
The better to defend one's country with.
To mine coal, to drill oil, to compete against other men with.
Male beauty reflects our roles in society.
It was not the women in the phalanx. When Athens declared war, all the citizens understood that it was the entirety of the men who were to take spear and sword out into the field. Men who had spent years toiling on farms. Men who had grown hard and strong through physical labor. Voting to do so required the commitment of all eligible voters, so naturally, voting was restricted to the men who could afford arms and armor.
As the beauty standards of women (face, breasts, hips) reflect their fertility, beauty standards for men reflect our disposability. Who is more suited to the difficult tasks that keep a state functioning, to keep a state free, the strong one with big muscles, or the weak one without them?
As an addendum, beauty standards also reflect the amount of work that is expected from men and women. A woman simply is. How does a girl become a woman? She gets her period. Some cultures throw her a coming of age party when she turns 15, or 16, or 17, or 18. Simply aging is enough to make a girl a woman.
How does a boy become a man? In almost every society, age is not enough. He has a rite of passage. He cannot be passive in his journey to manhood, he has to force himself to go and do it. Difficulty is to be expected.
Look at the amount of work a man has to do to attain the ideal beauty standard. "Bench, Squat, HIIT..."
Look at the amount of work a woman has to do. "Don't eat like a pig and get fat."
No conspiracy of patriarchs invented beauty standards. Beauty standards were created because they represent the traits that make us best at our societal roles. A legacy of what got civilization to the modern world.
And yet, here the feminsts come, claiming that such things are bad for society.

surgeon_general 11y ago
The world is full of losers. And one thing that losers consistently like to do is complain about circumstances rather than take an active role in changing them. In this case, we have thousands of loser women complaining about skinny models in magazines.
Women have it so much easier than men that they actually get away with this, at least to some degree. But just imagine if you tried to complain about all of the male underwear models being young and ripped. Most men realize that even if they feel that way, they should keep that opinion to themselves, so as to not be perceived as a loser. A much higher percentage of men are actively trying to make their situation better, rather than simply complaining about it. Source? I'd like to call your attention to this chart.
TasmanianTigerBlues 11y ago
Love the chart. And the comment. After a long time swallowing the blue pill, this is all starting to make sense. Not only that, this mindset is actually what I'm naturally inclined to as a man, I've just been brainwashed into thinking otherwise and hating myself for having these thoughts.
surgeon_general 11y ago
The red pill means different things to different people. And that's how it should be- we are very different people. But there are certain universal truths. At its core, my red pill journey has been about understanding and accepting reality, and lots of self-improvement to put me in a stronger position to conquer that reality.
[deleted] 11y ago
This is something that I had to figure out after growing up in a house ran by women with no father figures. The normal and learned action was to try and get pity from as many people as possible. It doesn't work if you're a guy, you just end up at the bottom of society and no one will bother with you. You have to be your own strength.
surgeon_general 11y ago
Definitely. You won't feel nearly as worthless if you bring real value to the table. If you make yourself into the best alpha bucks man that you can be, I think you'll find that doors start opening.
TasmanianTigerBlues 11y ago
Love the chart. And the comment. After a long time swallowing the blue pill, this is all starting to make sense. Not only that, this mindset is actually what I'm naturally inclined to as a man, I've just been brainwashed into thinking otherwise and hating myself for having these thoughts.
squishles 11y ago
That's why when you ask women look down on gym rats. They want those muscles to come from doing those things to provide for them.
It's the same reason some guys go through a questioning makeup phase; they know it's the same mechanism and it pisses them off.
[deleted] 11y ago
[deleted]
Movonnow 11y ago
Yes, some can. Yes it's hard, yes it's unfair. But that's how it is. You can complain about it or find some time to do your best to be like those guys. But no excuse : as a man, you don't have any excuse and never will.
[deleted]
Movonnow 11y ago
Look at the amount of work a woman has to do. "Don't eat like a pig and get fat."
I don't agree. Look at all the time they spend shopping, looking for the perfect pair of shoes. It's like a porn addict searching for the perfect scene. All the make up they try, all the dresses they buy. It's hard work.
vengefully_yours 11y ago
Shopping is hard? Pushing a cart, touching clothing as you stroll around is 'difficult' for someone? I've heard some bullshit that tries desperately to make life seem unbearably arduous for women, but that shit right there is ludicrous. Its even worse that the often repeated trope that being a mother is the hardest job in the world. You would have to be exceedingly worthless and incapable for shopping to be hard.
Welcome to the state of female worship, population you.
[deleted]
[deleted] 11y ago
Women do that stuff for other women, not for Men. They don't have to do all that stuff.
Xemnas81 11y ago
I dislike this argument because it sounds like a lie, especially when the aim is out-doing other women.
Presuming you are a heterosexual woman, you desire men, and often 'manly' men (which typically is defined as the ideal male beauty). You dress up, and work out, to look good in public-claiming it's 'for other women, not for Men'. But you are aiming to impress and out-compete other heterosexual women, thus elevating your social status and perceived SMV, based off the fact that you have defined your social status/SMV off your worth as a sexual utility/object of the male gaze. Again, what are you competing for? Men. Or, women to think of you as pretty and sexy (i.e. attractive to men).
If you really dressed up to feel good regardless of external SMV based off levels of beauty and felinity, why choose a dress, the clothing of Western femininity and beauty for centuries?
I am yet to see how a woman dressing up in a dress is ultimately to do anything but impress men.
To reverse gender examples, if I had my way I could go out in a slightly grubby Final Fantasy/gimmicky t-shirt and comfy pair of jeans or jogging bottoms, all the time. But I can't. Why? Because women want me to look good, and society defines men who dress in grubby t-shirts as losers. For some reason (an assumption society has created and perpetuated!) men who dress like that are implying they don't take care of themselves, they are poor, they are lazy and without ambitions, they probably live with their parents, all in all they are undesirable to women.
There are 3 reasons, therefore, that I suit up:
to feel 'like a man', a rich man, a good-looking man, a successful man (this is a condition of patriarchy and the modern female's definition of attraction TBQFH)
to impress women with my aura of wealth and status
You cannot engage in activities designed specifically to enhance attributes that are only really applicable to SMV and use the argument 'I don't do it to look pretty'. Make-up has NO function beyond cosmetics and if you wanted you could wear jeans and a suit too. But you don't, because you are trying to impress men, and women (by being attractive to men and 'one of the girls') but claiming it's not for men at all. So I call BS.
I look toward the utopia where these double standards cease to exist. As it is, I am a pawn of the system, and have to play the game. And so are you.
[deleted] 11y ago
I think its about female hierarchical perceived SMV. Most of the stuff women do, men dont really notice or care about. If you have to choose between two equivalent women: one duded all up, or one in jeans and a decent top, who would you choose? I bet most men would choose 2. I would. Other things are more important to a man. It makes more sense in a womens hierarchy to me. And Id imagine women feel like they dont have to do those things to get a man. In the majority of cases if shes got her shit together, she doesnt. Its probably more about building some kind of network through her hierarchical status, to maximize resources, and limit competition. Those seem like the three top goals biologically.
[deleted]
[deleted] 11y ago
You think I give a shit about the price of a woman's shoes? Or her make up? If she only looks good in make up then it's not worth it anyway. Generally speaking a man just wants a good looking woman with a good personality. If they eat right, sleep right, and are higienic, then, generally, it's all ok body-wise. A woman needs away less to be attractive to the opposite sex. And don't compare going shopping with exercicing like a manic, saying they are both hard work.
Movonnow 11y ago
I don't think shopping is as hard as working-out. What I mean is, since women have lower tolerance for efforts, it is as hard to strive to find how to best choose their make up, find the clothes that suits her best than it is for us to work out. I mean, for them, all this thing of looking pretty is hard work. But I've tried to get a girl to work out with me once. You know, giving her easy exercises she could perform because she was too fat. She didn't even tried.
[deleted] 11y ago
Well, about the lower tolerance for efforts, I think that's a very debatable topic, so I won't go into that. By the way, I'm glad you mentioned that experience of yours with that girl. I find her attitude not attractive at all. This can be said for both men and women though.
Schrodingersdawg 11y ago
Have you ever gone shopping with a woman? It's their favourite activity. It's not hard at all.
MagicGainbow 11y ago
And why? the receptors in the brain give off feeling of pleasure for women when they acquire resources, a shopping trip to a woman is the equivalent brain boost wise to a guy making something/completing a task.
And as for clothing, women do that shit for other women.
let_terror_reign 11y ago
OP, what happens after in the video? What's the title? Post the link if you know it. Damn that was an interesting four minutes
GhostInTheRedPill 11y ago
Yeah it was and I massively respect the guy for trying that ritual out.
Bear in mind, in the tribal culture he failed the ritual for crying like a little bitch. Those men have to act as though it's another day in the office.
Still, the point was well made and I'm willing to bet that 99% of us on here would also fail that ritual.
T-bear96 11y ago
Just want to let you know, the statue of Laocoon was made by Bernini, a renaissance era sculptor. The very fact that you referenced this statue is awesome though. Great piece!
T-bear96 11y ago
Actually, after researching it, I was wrong. I apologize. To everyone else, it turns out that the great Baroque sculptor Bernini modeled his style of sculpture after the Laocoon piece. Bernini is amazing though, if you would like something to do sometime, look up 'the rape of proserpina.' The way Bernini managed sculpt folds of flesh in stone amazes me.
MiscManletKiller 11y ago
i doubt francisco lachowski did all that much to become attractive
My_Post_Is_On_Topic 11y ago
yeah and he's probably been rejected a fuckload of times for not being big enough
[deleted]
kanaduhisfruityeh 11y ago
Women put far more effort into their looks than men do. Fashion, makeup, even plastic surgery. Men, on the other hand, can get away with not being in shape as long as they have other things to offer. Even men's muscles are basically utilitarian rather than aesthetic.
feralkatz 11y ago
But doesn't that go against evolutionary psychology? Women MUST want men who are good hunters. Good hunter = good provider. The way men demonstrate that ability is by being youthful and muscular.
I tell you, it all goes back to the savanna where the human race evolved. Don't underestimate how much importance women put on a man's appearance.
[deleted] 11y ago
[deleted]
Soultrane9 11y ago
This is just half truth. You have to excersie your mind also to achieve male beauty standard. With just muscles you are a frat boy, not a man.
guraski 11y ago
With muscles and a 4.0, you're a frat star
[deleted] 11y ago
[deleted]
Soultrane9 11y ago
I disagree. The femininsts are the wall hitting sluts who coulnd't figure out value men will choose others to marry if they suck 100 dicks in their party years.
DavidTIntellectual 11y ago
Not all are wall-hitting. There are plenty of young, sometimes attractive, feminists who found out about "slut shaming" on Tumblr and decided to adopt feminism in order to excuse their own recklessness.
Ew, did I really just say #notallfeminists?
manwhy 11y ago
You're not wrong, but your presentation, your framing of the situation, is poor. Disposability is not the right word. Are women--caveat: young fertile childbearing women--comparatively less disposable than men? Yes; biology is a bitch. But that doesn't make men disposable, not even the lower 80%. Like it or not, we are all sustained by their sexual strategy--without it, we would have no civilization. What is unfortunate for us all is just how profoundly maladaptive that sexual strategy has become in recent times.
puaSenator 11y ago
I'm going to sort of drift away on this, but bear with me.
I actually think OP's underlying foundation is pretty accurate, and is a pretty interesting observation: We find beauty in each of the sexes based on their ability to fulfill their role. For instance, male beauty comes from physical traits that highlight their ability to work hard, build, create, fight, defend, take, gather, and grunt. While women beauty is defined by their role, which is feminine, sensual, erotic, youthful, childbearing, and whimsical.
I mean, while a fit girl is attractive, a buff girl usually isn't, because her huge physical physical relays non-desirable attributes. Men simply don't want a women capable of building, fighting, and creating. And on the flipside, women generally don't like scrawny men who's body reflects the body that is unable to bring in resources and defend from threats.
Now this is sort of where I am going to go off which is almost completely unrelated, but I've heard a common feminist trope many times before which is, "All men are good for is defending people from the damages of other men." For instance, most male rape victims are victims of other men. Or men who fight and defend their families in war, are just defending themselves from, again, other men. That men are the common denominator in situations in which men are useful (IE, men are only useful for protecting people from problems that other men create. If there were no men to begin with, then there would be no men needed.)
However, man's problamatic nature certainly has a net positive. Sure, men go to war to stop other men from taking their shit. But at the same time, these characteristics are what creates farms, builds economies, plunders resources for their own people, and drives innovation. And you know what? I do think this roots from male disposability. Because in nature, species go into the directions they are pushed into. And in this case, when men are disposable, they don't inherently have value. So men have to go out and create value for themselves. They can't just exist and create children. No, they must instead become strong and smart to start a business, build a building, plunder resources, and so on...
Do you really think the world around us would exist if men weren't disposable? That a man could live a perfect life just doing nothing all day? I guarentee you, that if a man could score an 8 and not actually have to create a high amount of value in the world, then he'd just sit around playing video games all day.
Here I have to agree. I think the state of affairs within the gender dynamics is so fucked up right now because there isn't a balance. There is a huge push from the failures of both sexes to enforce equality among everyone, regardless of whether or not they deserve it. It's nothing more than a social version of Social-Marxism.
I mean, we live in a very free state (assuming USA) where anyone and everyone can do whatever they want within reason. If a woman wants to be a hardworking exec, she can do that. If a man wants to get into nursing, he too has that options. Realistically, the options are uninhibited. However, the confusion sort of gets all murky when no one is letting the dust settle, or the pieces fall in their place. You have women who want to be women, and do feminine things, by taking full pride in them -- only to get attacked by feminists telling them that they are victims if they don't try and act and do like men. And we have men who want to take control and do their own things, but are told that they are bad people if they don't praise women and bend over backwards for them.
Uggg... Honestly, I think I completely lost track here. It's 4 am, and I"m going to stop now.
[deleted] 11y ago
[deleted]
Patriarchysaurus 11y ago
this chart is perfect, it's bitingly ironic whenever it's said that "omg dating is so much harder for wimminz."
No perspective, none.
funkwillsmith 11y ago
Women are supposed to be coddled and loved for everything they are even with flaws.
Men are expected to either be a real man or a joke. But it's okay for us to be a joke because we are men and men should only adhere to the top body standard or none.
Venividivixii 11y ago
I think you have it backwards. When a society admires the beauty of the male, they recognize that the key to its success relies on the backs of strong men.
This society, however, worships women.
There's no denying that men are inherently disposable though. You should never make an illusion to the contrary. However, the men that do succeed, should be admired, just like they were admired and respected as reflected in those statues.
As always, men that achieve nothing will die without remembrance, just like the billions of women that are only known as being mothers.
stemgang 11y ago
Allusion, not illusion. (To make a reference)
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
Admired equals beta males trying to suck your cock so you throw them some crumbs. For females adnired means trying to get some of your genetic material and then getting beta bucks to raise your genetic material.
dallz_beep 11y ago
Little boys want to be sword-fighting, gunslinging, firefighting astronauts. Girls want to be princesses. See the difference? Men want to actually DO THINGS, while women simply want to exist and be important for free.
Women are born, but men are made. They get a free twat between their legs, some of them look rather pretty too, but we need to actually accomplish things, whether it’s physical, financial, technological, social, etc.
Superman, as you showed in your picture, is the one saving the day. Louis, on the other hand, pretty much just exists. Oh, and is young, slim and pretty(ish).
Active vs. passive. Our gender role, rooted in biology, is to get things done. Not simp for a ho. Never forget this.
kindlebluemoon 11y ago
This is just not true. "Don't eat like a pig" just gets a girl to alright. Hair, makeup, and gym are all necessary for a girl to reach the ideal. Plus there are a lot more women than men who will just simply never be "hot" without plastic surgery.
The OP just sounds like the male version of feminist whining. The gym ain't that bad, c'mon son.
Aerobus 11y ago
The sad part is this is too difficult for women these days.
DirtyNamesGetBlocked 11y ago
Feminists (and women in general) are just lazy. Fight for actually oppressed women in the middle east? Fuck that, too hard. Lose weight? Fuck that, too hard. Get a firearm to protect yourself? Fuck that, too hard. Women want everything handed to them because thats what they expect. Women believe that they have intrinsic value, therefore, beauty standards shouldn't apply to them and everything should be given to them because they deserve it. Men understand we have no intrinsic value. Therefore, for us, beauty is utility. Cars with powerful engines, men who can perform day in and day out and not tire, bodies that don't quit, art that delivers a complex message. That is beauty.
Women don't have beauty. Their standard of beauty comes men. Their standard of beauty is how attractive they are to a man. Why do you think women find other, beautiful women rivals? Because to them, beauty isn't something to aspire to and admire, its something to tare down.
Men see the mountain top and want to be there, women declare wherever their standing to be the new mountain top.
Snivellious 11y ago
I'd never quite realized that point about beauty. People (women) ask why I think the Lotus Elise is such a wonderful car when it's so ugly. I can tell them that it's beautiful because it's functional, but I can never truly convey that feeling to someone who doesn't live in a reality where quality and function determine what something is worth.
[deleted]
[deleted]
el_Technico 11y ago
The women in the middle east are not oppressed.
puaSenator 11y ago
If you actually believe that, you are reading way too into TRP. I can't imagine an argument that exists that can convince any rational person that women aren't oppressed there.
el_Technico 11y ago
Are you middle eastern ? Are you muslim ? Have you ever lived in the middle east for a prolonged period of time ? Or do you just watch western propaganda media reports ?
Since this is TRP I'll give you a little insight into what it is like in the middle east if you are looking for a mate.
If you are a woman, you basically just have to avoid being a very fat whore, but if you are a whore it is okay because you can do anal. Even if you are too stupid to avoid vaginal sex, they have surgeries to repair the hymen now. Eventually when it is time to settle you will find a good BB who can AFFORD to pay your BRIDES PRICE. If you are Iranian that means about 200K, which will be paid out in case of divorce. Also you have the ability to initiate a divorce. But it gets better, because legally a man must provide for his wife's shelter, food and clothing. In modern times this has turned into basically a man has to share all of his wealth. The woman however does not have to share any of her wealth with her husband. Similar to the west the women work and expect help with the housework unless they are very traditional, which is a rarity.
If you are a man you better hope that you are born rich. Or you better get rich/status. Then you can afford a wife, who will place you in the BB role, which you will have to fight out of. Still you are responsible for everything, and can be divorced by the woman. What about AF ? They are rich, very very rich. Good luck with that.
Btw, before the bleeding hearts chime in that women have to wear clothes in the middle east, and are not permitted to walk around naked like western sluts. You should know similar rules apply to men (minus the head scarf), which is why you will never see a man walking around in shorts, unless he is at a beach.
I will admit the salafi/wahabis are retarded, but they are a political creation of the west, and not truly middle eastern in origin.
puaSenator 11y ago
Yes I am, and you're just trying to cherry pick it and make it look like hugs and kisses. It's not. The oppression starts out from a very young age and as they grow they sort of normalize it and continue to live happy lives.
Thankfully most of the women in my family have left that lifestyle ages ago, and only keep connections for the sake of family and the safety net it provides.
Just because the man has all the responsibility doesn't mean it's all great and dandy for women. You're argument is akin to, "Why are you complaining about the fact that you can make no decisions, are told what to do, required to listen and obey like a dog, restricted where you can go, can not talk to men, and so on? I mean, I pay for everything! I put a roof over your head! Stop complaining! You don't pay any bills!"
The difference is Muslim women obey out of fear of cultural retribution, where non Muslim women obey out of respect of leadership. It's like having a boss you choose to follow because you respect them, vs a boss you are forced to follow because they threaten you constantly with retribution.
el_Technico 11y ago
No I didn't make that argument, and what you are saying is simply not true for the majority of women. The far majority of women have just as much control over their lives as western women. The restrictions in clothing or interacting with the other gender rules ARE ALSO PRESENT FOR MEN. You brought up limited mobility rights, most don't follow that rule, and if it was a real concern for women they could have it withdrawn by including it in their marriage contract. "Listen and obey like a dog" tries to paint women as victims, unfortunately no woman puts up with that in the real world where most middle eastern husbands bend to the every whim of their wife.
Life isn't all hugs and kisses anywhere. There are different laws in the middle east but the women are not specifically being oppressed. They live far easier lives than the men.
thesaltysoup 11y ago
Well, the entirety of the middle east is not of the same values as the Taliban, or ISIS Iraq. I had a plate from Kuwait, and she told me about how western it is there. Women can vote, hold office, have birth control, do whatever. They dress western, and two thirds of Kuwait's population is non-native (business people from all over flock there).
Interestingly enough, she said that the women who most clung to the "oppressive" ideals of Islam were the high class rich women. They wore headscarves, dressed well (but modestly) and did not feel a need to show excessive skin or act like an american girl to be attractive. They held on to conservative values. Completely blew me out of the water. Changed my view of what the middle east is like.
mcdehuevo 11y ago
Right. Lots of places have become Westernized. What /u/DirtyNamesGetBlocked was referring to, I'm sure, was the parts of the Middle East that are still Middle Eastern. Women are treated like trash in those places. I don't believe in "rape culture", but I do believe that if a woman is forced to have sex against her will, she should at the very least not be stoned to death for it.
iluminatiNYC 11y ago
The Middle East isn't a monolith either. You have places like Kuwait and Jordan where it's pretty Western in terms of women's rights. On the other hand, you have places like Saudi Arabian, Yemen and United Arab Emirates which are very conservative to the point where women can't travel most places without escorts, not to mention not being able to vote. In the middle you have places like Egypt and Iran. (And yes, I said Iran. It's probably one of the strangest societies on the planet, mixing conservative attitudes with what one could term random progressiveness on certain issues.)
thesaltysoup 11y ago
True story. I would love to visit the Middle East and see what everything's all about.
AKnightAlone 11y ago
http://i.imgur.com/pGIMRie.gif
[deleted] 11y ago
[deleted]
SeekingAlpha 11y ago
Wollstonecraft's "Vindication" was written in 1792. Mill's "Subjection" was written in 1869.
Feminism is an English invention, not an American one. Of course, America is also an English invention.
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
Technology influences society. And technology has changed the status of things.
Because of technology, a smart woman no longer needs a man around for protection, brute strength is not really that important anymore. Smarts and social skills are far more important for personal advancement now days, and in these areas women excel.
One man can impregant countless women, but 1 woman can only make 1 child per year. Because of mass production from a biological perspective men are less important then ever.
Beta bucks should be happy that he is only raising 1 or 2 of alpha fucks bastard kids, and that Beta Bucks is allowed to create a few of his own kids.
3rdweal 11y ago
Ah, but who creates and maintains technology? If men for example decided tomorrow to stop all their involvement in the extraction, refining and transportation of fossil fuel - how many smart women would take up the slack?
When the artificial womb becomes a technological reality, what then?
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
The elites will clone millions of men with beta like traits to extract fossil fuels :-)
Soyala 11y ago
It is already possible to make sperm cells from female skin, allowing females to impregnate females. And yet somehow makes arent being tossed out as obsolete yet. What exactly is your hope for the artificial womb?
3rdweal 11y ago
I'm surprised I haven't heard of this, link?
I think that if men could have children without women, and when technology is sufficiently advanced to offer men an artificial sexual experience that is affordable and indistinguishable from the real thing, the structure of society would change radically.
Almost_legit 11y ago
Do you think smarts and social skills makes that pussy wet? No, it's muscles that makes her drip like a percolator
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
Puppy my smarts will knock your muscles to the curb literally :-) Probably you are more then half my age, and you probably are stronger then me. But I have done almost every dirty trick in the book and the one's I have not done I have seen first hand :-)
When you are young, you are idealistic, and you rely on brute force. As you get older you need to rely on experience, cunning and patience. And that puppy is what gets her pussy wet :-)
Almost_legit 11y ago
I don't think you are 60 years old, but yeah I am a smart man myself. As for the dirty tricks, don't bring a knife to a gunfight :). I'm sharing this because I land the girls with my money, but the muscles gets her purring.
whitey_male 11y ago
Governments intervene in the market to give women employment.
Not enough workers to employ all these women working in HR? Bring in more immigrant workers and create another bank that we didn't need, another supermarket that's only needed because we brought in more people.
For every person that does real work, there are multiple people riding on his or in some cases her back.
Another reason why the "left" is so militant and the right does nothing about it, and is in fact working with them. Because the mega rich make more money out of pointless growth and if we cut out all of the bs jobs out of society women's unemployment would be at least 50%. Then women would have to go for well to do men instead of being able to ride the cc, and house prices would be much cheaper so banks wouldn't make so much from mortgages.
That's why you see so few women working in silicon valley, and why they're getting attacked by the left so much at the moment. Because a tech company has to be lean and mean and have people with real skills.
I'm not sure that really has much to do with your post I just thought it would be interesting.
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
Both posts are about economic reality.
Exactly :-) Now you either have two choices, sit in the corner and have a good little cry, or figure out how to use the system to your advantage.
After hand guns became effective weapons, having skills as a good swordsman was useless. A lot of swordsman cried and said that guns are unmanly or some nonsense like that, but then they usually ended up dead from a gun.
Personally I would rather use an unmanly gun then being a dead manly swordsman.
Average_Black_Man 11y ago
If guns and explosives (for use in violence) hadn't been invented, there would be a lot less bullshit going on. It takes a lot more effort and courage to march an army of spears axes and swords into a foreign land than to press a button and wipe out a city. Pretty disrespectful and unmanly if you ask me. But yeah I agree with what you're saying.
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
You get my point. Technology isolates people from even simple realities like how was that piece of meat you are eating made, what happens to garbage and shit.
In western countries the few remaining jobs where people are exposed to these things have to be filled with immigrants because most westerners can not hack these types of jobs.
3rdweal 11y ago
I'm sure when bronze axes came about there were similar complaints. I see the point you are trying to make, however you seem to be deliberately ignoring the fact that "smarts and social skills are far more important for personal advancement now days" within a system that is sustained by the brute force of strong men.
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
What has changed is the man to power ratio. You need less men to maintain this brute force system. Simple example. How much did a US Sherman tank cost in WW2 ? How much does a M1 Abrams cost today ?
With the advent of drones this man to power ratio is getting higher. For all intents and purposes you could be a cripple in a wheelchair, control 10+ of these drones and rain down hell 10,000 km away.
3rdweal 11y ago
That is a very small window on the unbelievably enormous infrastructure that goes into designing, building and maintaining these drones. Do you think that for example the materials used to build them were picked from trees? You could regress to the argument that for example a lot more heavy equipment was used to mine and transport the metals in the drone than raw manpower, but again, who designed, build and made the mining and transport equipment?
sir_wankalot_here 11y ago
You are 100% correct but you are missing my point. 100 years ago you needed a higher percentage of alpha males to make society function. What percentage of the population 100 years ago where miners, lumberjacks, soldiers, farmers etc ? What is the percentage today ?
Certain types of technology are "equalizers" as in the more alpha males as in after this technology is developed it will increase the need for alphas. Other types of technology have the opposite effect. We are now in this point in history.
The "elites" want to maintain status quo, and the fewer alphas out there the less competition there is. Generally speaking the elites do not like technology because it can be a game changer and change the status quo.
Modern society has more beta males, so for an alpha it is the best time to be alive :-)