Background:
Up until recently, there was a few thousand illegal migrants from the Middle East and North Africa parked in a camp outside of Calais, France called "the Jungle"... All of these men were trying to smuggle themselves across the English Channel to get to the UK and get themselves some of them free gibmedats.
Body:
Drawn to this Jungle was a married English woman. Needless to say, hubby isn't happy with her spending thousands of pounds on her newfound social justice cause - money which, stastically speaking, he most likely earned the majority of because he more likely worked longer and harder. But I digress.
Wifey divorces the chump because she wants to work amongst squalor to give charity to illegal migrants. Lo and behold, she falls in love with an Afghan.
I have no info on hubby, so I can't say whether he's a beta or not for certain, but if he were the captain of his ship, his first mate wouldn't be trolling on a foreign shore without his permission. Just sayin'.
What's interesting to me is that while this broad wanted to ditch her hubby she didn't go find some chav down at the pub... Rather she ran off to find what she percieved as a more Alpha male - an Afghan. And Afghans, in my experience (and I've met a lot of them) have a much more assertive culture in regards to their treatment of women.
Lessons Learned:
-
The men from cultures that don't adopt the blue pill mindset will always be more attractive than the men from that blue pill culture who buy in to the illusion. This is because western civilization failed a societal-level shit test sometime around the late 60s.
- Don't marry. And if you must break this rule, goddamnit don't wife up a fatty.

flavourrush 9y ago
since women are allowed to vote, world politics are made with feelz. the refugee crisis could only happen because of an installed feminine, nurturing approach to life, flanked by thirsty orbiter weaklings, who think they gain pussy by helping out.
the agenda is a identyfree work drone. destroy the family by pulling the women out of the house and shame men at the same time and see community burn to the ground. war brides are just a small stroke of a big painting
[deleted] 9y ago
"Hubby" is a lucky man. Look at the state of her. Who was minding her kids while she was off getting pumped in Calais? And the new man is now in Lyon and loves it there. I bet he does, out banging hot French women.
antariusz 9y ago
Thank god there are some people in the u.s. Willing to stand up and say, "enough!"
[deleted]
[deleted]
slothsenpai 9y ago
Do German women actually fuck and sleep around with migrant Arab men?
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Yes. Many do so willingly, but many do so unwillingly.
slothsenpai 9y ago
Any articles or anecdotes of native German women who love migrants and Arab men on a sexual level and think that German men are beta?
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Plenty of anecdotal reports...
The prevalence of unwilling interaction (Taharrush, or gang-sex assault) seems to be the more reported phenomenon.
Then there is this:
http://www.returnofkings.com/82674/german-government-cuckholds-its-men-by-teaching-migrants-how-to-sleep-with-german-women
slothsenpai 9y ago
Ooohhh very interesting articles, thanks a lot for that!
legendslayer 9y ago
Nigga gonna marry her then run once he gets into UK
[deleted]
redolas 9y ago
Translation: I really don't care what they do. I have found my man, now I'll keep myself busy turning him into a beta provider. When he's done, I'll come back to get a fresh one.
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Good catch, I failed to notice that.
[deleted] 9y ago
[deleted]
Hillarysdilddo_2016 9y ago
Yup. You get it.
Liberalism = Leftist ideology (democrats and republicans in the us) = Marxism = globalism.
Destroy all nations. Destroy all cultures. Destroy all identities. Destroy all rational thought and supplant it with limbic thought.
Eradicate any and all power structures that threaten blue pill/ globalist ideology.
Family. Religion. Race. Culture. Heritage. Identity.
That is their goal.
LordThunderbolt 9y ago
Please stop using the word hubby around here, it makes u sound like a faggot. Chicks started using the word to further domesticate and pussify their men. It squeezed all the testosterone out of the word husband. The word is husband, say it as such. Hubby sounds like the name of a cute little fucking pet.
[deleted]
[deleted]
CosmicSoul777 9y ago
Just because it is your perception does not make it true, I am sure there are many terms you use people do not care for like faggot.
[deleted] 9y ago
Tubby Hubby. That's female fuckery right there.
reddymcwoody 9y ago
Tubby hubby who at best can get a half chubby.
[deleted] 9y ago
Holy shit you're right. They do this on all their little relationship blogs and it is a way to trivialize that entire half of the relationship. "I told hubby I'm fat and not going to change but he still tries to get me to eat right wtf gals am I right?!"
I had an ex who would blog about me on live journal and called me "boy". "Boy found us a hotel and we had a great time in Cabo". "Boy did this boy did that". So of course to the echo chamber I was just some accessory or pet. Not her partner.
[deleted]
[deleted] 9y ago
[deleted]
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Kind of the way I see it. The two words are equally emasculating
LordThunderbolt 9y ago
The term husnband had meaning back in the day when men were allowed to be men, and women HAD to be provided for or else they would starve to death because they couldn't work. Its only in the turning of the last 4 decades that it started going to shit with the radical "you go girl" movement.
shonthered 9y ago
Although I would otherwise agree with your observation regarding the emasculation of the word "husband", I'd say the guy from the story isn't really a testosterone fueled guy, so by that logic the word "hubby" fits perfectly into the description of the said guy.
LordThunderbolt 9y ago
Whether pr not it does is not the issue. Its using the word as a respectable mmale that it. Would u as a straight man refer to s kinny guy as twink? I dont think so (or at least i hope so for u)
Original_Dankster 9y ago
It's an emasculating term, for a man who's willingly placed himself in an emasculating position. I see no disconnect there.
LordThunderbolt 9y ago
Using the term in itself sounds fpvery weak and feminine. Like calling another man a twink. It's sus af.
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Sorry it got your panties in a knot. You'll recover eventually, I promise.
OmegaMan2 9y ago
If I were the "hubby" I would be glad that she divorced me. She is what one would charitably call a "sexy horse".
I actually feel sorry for the poor Afghan who will now have to put up with her shit.
TelemachusRising 9y ago
The decision to use the word "hubby" makes sense because of the emasculated state of the cuck. OP is using terminology that reflects the dude's (ex) wife's devaluation of him.
MattyAnon Admin 9y ago
"husband". There you go, beta for sure. He signed a providership contract in exchange for nothing.
The_Red_Paw 9y ago
"He signed a providership contract in exchange for nothing."
Nice. I'm totally stealing this.
[deleted] 9y ago
The anti-marriage people are getting absurd.
Alot of men out here aren't ready to give up and lose on our purpose. This is the reason feminism exists, to limit children, this is its ultimate end game and why the government supports it so heavily.
You're not being a bigger man by not getting married and having kids, you're being a coward and a loser. You LOST. Women and the government beat you into not fulfilling your biological goal.
You're a loser because you lost and refused to get up, you stayed down.
sailorJery 9y ago
Does it make you a loser to not play a game that's rigged against you? Trying to shame us for enjoying the decline? You can't change the ocean current.
MattyAnon Admin 9y ago
Marriage is anti-family: it bribes the woman with cash, prizes and alimony to break up the family, and a majority do so.
I am pro-family, and that means not offering women money to break up the family and alienate the father.
[deleted] 9y ago
You can't have a family without marriage.
Without a feminine mother in the household your kids will be lacking---not as much as they would without a masculine father, but lacking all the same.
Without marriage, no good woman is going to have children with you. It would be foolish and make them bad decision makers and thus not eligible for marriage in the first place.
[deleted] 9y ago
You are correct, everyone else is wrong. Even a minority of one can be correct. However there is little point in trying to explain to the kids in here that they will never have kids, and they are the genes which will disappear from the gene pool. I had kids, and had the divorce. May even do it again, but the betas in here will never hear you. They are too busy with their McCarthy like female paranoia. I gave up trying to talk about kids in here. Most of these guys think women only exist to con them and they have no role in raising a child. They think that a man can do it alone. This is ass backward logic, otherwise we would all have tits!!
MattyAnon Admin 9y ago
You can't have a family with marriage.
Marriage confers no ownership nor advantage on the man. It puts you at a disadvantage, it puts a loaded gun to your head.
Agreed.
I'd say the opposite. Any woman who demands a providership contract from you that literally enslaves the man .... is a woman that is inherently exploitative.
"I will bear your children, but I want the right to contractually/legally exploit you for alimony later after you pay me to leave." Yeah sure.... fuck that.
Another reason not to get marry: the marriage contract gets retrospectively worse every year as the establishment piles more responsibility onto men and takes if off women. Retrospectively. It's not like any other contract where the terms are signed at the start, this one gets adjusted over time. And so far every change has gotten worse for men. No thanks.
[deleted] 9y ago
The one spot we agree is that they've taken away alot of the incentive for men to get married.
Where we disagree is that it's something worth fighting for.
There are millions of people married who haven't gotten divorced or been taken for alimony. Which means there are millons of women out there who still are good women.
Is it easy finding them and keeping them? No, they've made it hard on purpose. But that's all the more reason to fight.
MattyAnon Admin 9y ago
The other more subtle issue is how many men out there are compelled to stay because of our draconian anti-male laws.
If you take two people are married, but divorce will hammer one of them while rewarding the other .... the deal that each can negotiate within the marriage is very different. That nature of relationships is a function of the alternatives to that relationship. If you've got great options, the girl treats you well. If you've got no alternatives, the girl treats you worse.
Extend this to marriage.... women paid to leave, men losing everything if she does. That means the deal the man is compelled to offer her is better than she'd get if she leaves. He's literally competing not with other men, but with the deal that HE would have to pay her if she left.
Paying her to leave.... also therefore means paying her to stay.
Most of the marriages that I have seen that do stay together, is at the man's expense while the woman capitalises handsomely for doing sweet fuck all. And there is nothing the man can do about it - he has no bargaining power, no leverage. Quite the opposite, he operates entirely at what Dalrock calls threatpoint.
Couple this with the female tendency to withhold sex as a further bargaining tool, the female bait-and-switch model of relationships (hot sex until she has "got you", then the real woman comes out), and their general tendency to put on a good act and then to change....
I can only see marriage making everything worse not better, because it confers no obligation on the female, only the male.
I don't see the point of making my life needlessly hard. If I wanted to make things more difficult with women I would tattoo a large ejaculating penis onto my forehead and remove an ear. That would be playing life "on hard mode", but for what benefit? The gains certainly wouldn't be any bigger, the only thing that changes is the difficulty level. If I'm going to play on a harder difficulty level, I want higher rewards - not to be kicked in the teeth for it and to pay alimony to an ungrateful bitch for the rest of my life.
[deleted] 9y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 9y ago
Never date a woman who makes more money than you or is cooler than you
gnark 9y ago
Guess you'll have to go gay then...
Stythe 9y ago
Y'know, just like TRP exists because men have lost their masculinity and want to get it back, I assume that many situations like this occure because women have lost their femininity and try to get it back.
Just like many guys end up here while looking for answers of what went wrong in their lives, often having ignored their subconscious impulses, you could likely assume that women end up with stronger men because of similar reasons.
ssr401 9y ago
A single anecdote doesn't prove anything about Western civilization one way or the other. There are millions of English women so you can always find at least one who has done anything you can think of no matter how stupid, evil, or perverted. The same thing applies to any other populous country: USA, China, Russia, Argentina, Egypt, etc. If you want anyone to take you seriously then forget about confirmation bias and quit over analyzing sensationalist stories in the media. Learn some statistics and focus on actual data.
[deleted]
RedSugarPill 9y ago
If that's your take, then you're making missing what's really going on from a cultural perspective: the BBC ran a story on it! What does this imply? That mainstream media is publishing stories that promote the idea of destroying the family. If you can't see the forest from the trees, then you're just as fucked as every divorced family on a the planet. The agenda is clear: attack the family bond and you control the people.
[deleted] 9y ago
Religion too, anything people are loyal to before the state
Rocky_Bukkake 9y ago
you believe we are under attack?
RedSugarPill 9y ago
Mankind has experienced psychological warfare since the beginning of recorded history. We can overcome this by understanding their tactics.
Rocky_Bukkake 9y ago
this is true, but does the media necessarily aim to destroy us? certainly in some cases which blatantly propagandize or polarize, and i personally find media to be dangerous if relied on too much. i agree with you on understanding the opposition; it is necessary in order to survive. i know this well, actually, because i was raised in a divided family, with one half run by a sociopathic person.
well, i do suppose we are under attack. but at what degree? i find it to be very insignificant, at least when compared to goodness.
RedSugarPill 9y ago
Depends on which part of the media: The news anchors, like the police and military, will do just about anything for a paycheck. So they worship the dollar bill above all else. But their owners (of which there are only 6 major network owners) have a very dark agenda. They have their own interests in mind, and I believe they are the same owners pulling the strings on everything from politics, to military, banking, food and water supplies, and medicine. It all started with banking cartels, and then surged with big oil. Check out this documentary: "JFK to 911: Everything is a Rich Man's Trick" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM
Rocky_Bukkake 9y ago
i will watch it later probably. i am interested in this.
undoubtedly these people have influence on my life one way or another, being from a position of power. so obviously i wouldn't prefer this... but hey. something i notice among manipulators is that they mess up things quite often. in a sense, it's a poor strategy to get things done.
more than anything, this just makes me a little disappointed in some people.
RedSugarPill 9y ago
If you're seriously interested in learning about this type of information, check out the works of Mark Passio. His YouTube videos are a good start, and his podcast series is amazing: http://www.whatonearthishappening.com
This information will take you on an epic journey from the plane of effects (the red pill) to the plane of causality (i.e. the Laws of Causality and consciousness itself). Everyone should know this transformative information. Start with his Natural Law seminar on YouTube, and then move to podcast #1.
NeoreactionSafe 9y ago
Brainwashing
The Globalist Tyranny wants to erase all culture and tradition so the television and other media pushes the race mixing agenda.
Just turn the television off.
But women are very easily manipulated... so that's why they are going this way now. Until the people can regain control of the media the brainwashing will continue.
[deleted] 9y ago
The dog-whistling in this thread is amazing. Stephan Molyneaux's book The Culture of Critique is always a good place to start for red-pilling on the Globalist Tyranny.
Rocky_Bukkake 9y ago
thank you, i am going to save this for shitposting purposes later.
[deleted] 9y ago
[deleted]
NeoreactionSafe 9y ago
Just watch the Game.
Black Lives Matter was funded in large part by George Soros.
The cultures are being played as pawns against each other.
Know who is the "magician" and who is just the fool.
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Indeed. I've seen it myself many times. If you present any sort of unconventional view of the world it's repellant to women. They're easily manipulated because being part of the in-group (going along to get along) is an evolved survival strategy.
BENDERisGRREAT 9y ago
Men are too. I mean I agree with you but its all of society not just womens downfall
NeoreactionSafe 9y ago
It's literally:
Monkey see, monkey do.
We all imitate as children because that's how we first learn about life, but as males we separate from the herd at some point to become masculine men.
Women never separate from the herd.
So if there is brainwashing that says a woman will find clowns sexually desirable they will gradually begin to absorb that suggestion. (the clown meme has grown rapidly lately)
Women can be influenced by Game... and when done through corporations by globalist elites that is called the Blue Pill emotional indoctrination.
Race mixing is part of a plan to destroy all culture and weaken the ability for any nation to oppose global control.
This would be rather funny if it wasn't literally true... the "magicians" trick us into silly behaviors.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
So you're saying that when someone immigrates to the USA, they should keep their culture entirely, rather than assimilate to the country they live in and live by it's laws?
Culture is regional. Race is geographic based on mating traits and proximity to the equator with its more direct sunlight. Not every culture is advantageous to the whole of humanity, some deserve to fade into obscurity, some don't, most will eventually because that's how it works. Mixing races is largely irrelevant, it's the culture that clashes, unless of course you see yourself as better than others because you have more or less melanin in your skin. If that is the case then you clash with everyone, like the elves of middle earth seeing themselves as superior to everything else.
AlerioX 9y ago
Race is not just a matter of melanin but also of average IQ and THAT makes it relevant.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
Don't feel bad because Asians are smarter than you are.
AlerioX 9y ago
At least I got a bigger dick. That's also what blacks say to whites.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
I have a tiny little guy, half eaten tictac sized.. It's amazing.
NeoreactionSafe 9y ago
The migrant thing is a separate issue.
The Globalist Tyranny is on one hand inventing reasons to destroy nations (literally funding ISIS as Wikileaks and other sources have exposed) and then taking these people whose lives have been destroyed and forcing them into places like Europe and America.
It's a "Win-Win" for the dark powers of globalism.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
I'm not in disagreement with you. Not at all. One global economy means they can manipulate it and enslave us all. However, with us united against them, they can't do it. They try to make it sound like a global community working towards a common goal is the same as a global economy, it isn't.
NeoreactionSafe 9y ago
I was being sarcastic...
"Win-Win" for globalism means we lose.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
I got it. I agree. There's a distinction I made, you should be able to grasp it easily.
NeoreactionSafe 9y ago
Yes, you are right.
They have portrayed globalism as innocent in order to hide the fact it's a consolidation of power into the hands of the elites.
A "win" for globalism means someone or some country must give up some type of power.
Freedom (separation, sovereignty, independence) declines as the Globalist Tyranny sucks the life out of the People.
At root the People want "self rule" or as Mark Passio would say "anarchy" which actually means the very lack of a tyranny or rulers bearing down on you from above.
To lift the Globalist Tyranny off of the world would create the potential of a truly free future... something unlikely in the near term.
[deleted] 9y ago
would you rather have tasty and flavourful food in separate plates, or a giant clusterfuck of dishes mixed in a blender?
vengefully_yours 9y ago
Depends, I like all kinds of stuff. I've had every color and shape of pussy on the planet, sans really big fat chicks. I've had fun discovering the differences in people and the similarities. There is no way we will all be one big boring race, too many people in the world for that to happen.
Right now my main slut is Apache Mexican and I'm a white guy from a Nebraska farm with German ancestry. Different is fun.
[deleted] 9y ago
well yes, there is no such thing as a "pure race/culture", but places like Canada I know are kind of... boring, since they don't really have their own culture, just a mish mash of everything. It's basically in the middle... androgyny.
If there would be a global government in place, they would actively try to make it like that because without identity there is no community, and without community there is no possibility for separation, and without separation there can be no revolution.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
That is one side of the coin. The other is tribal tendencies, to think yourself better than others for whatever reason. The others who are different because of where they live or what color they are. To realize we are all the same people under the pigment, and enjoy the difference without the need to feel better than others is the side of the coin I like.
It's not ok to kill people from your tribe, but you can go over the hill and kill the other tribe, that is ok. That is the human trait that is being exploited. Someone will always end up exploited, because they are too weak, trusting, or gullible. That's human nature and it can be used many ways to enslave or empower people.
Together with the rest of the world the rich elites will end up swinging from nooses, but as long as they can divide us with the idea that those brown people are the devil, they're safe from revolution. I'm not a hippie free everything type, I'm a power in numbers type.
[deleted] 9y ago
this is a good point, because before 1700s, slaves used to be any race/color. Did you know that? Many people don't for some reason... racism pretty much was manufactured by the elites of the time, in order to further political or economic agendas.
vengefully_yours 9y ago
I'm aware, hell the bible gives instructions on how to properly enslave people. Color isn't even mentioned.
meninistMD 9y ago
That can be understandable, I'd like to add a thing though, what about market? SMV? think about it, this woman if she would go in a bar in her own town she would attract only average looking men, she wouldn't have access to highly qualified men, while in Calais, the ratio is 1:1000, so the man who would be unique in this group of men would be indeed the alpha (looks, education, genes .. etc), and he would be so limited in his choices, but because of the situation he could only settle for this woman. So I don’t really think she is attracted to his cultural values, you have to standerize all the other factors (same envoirnemt, same ratio, ..etc)
[deleted] 9y ago
Women flock to whichever culture is most dominant.
It's why Western women flock to Islam, why Euro women fuck immigrants, and why American women are getting butt implants over tit jobs.
maniclurker 9y ago
Every time I read these articles, the only thing I pick up is: don't be a piece of shit man, find a decent girl, you'll be alright.
Basically, don't become a fat ass, deep dick your girl every night, plan the activities, be in charge, don't back down from challenges, don't be dirty.
[deleted] 9y ago
That would be the sexual revolution. "It's morally good if it makes you feel good sexually."
exit_sandman 9y ago
Well, at least her SiL is pretty hot, even with the scarf.
mojo_juju 9y ago
I agree. She looks pretty bangin. Though she probably has some make-up caked on.
Still though... some middle eastern women. b . d
aazav 9y ago
Hubby? Are you a writer for People or the National Enquirer?
Do you also use qutesy wootsey hubsy wubsy to describe the male member of a marriage?
Jesus fuck, you also use wifey.
Thanks for making me vomit.
Original_Dankster 9y ago
Go ahead, not stopping you bud.
CosmicSoul777 9y ago
Talk about overreaction over a silly word, get over it dude.
Master1176 9y ago
I agree - those are silly words. The words we use are extremely important, and affect how well others understand us and perceive us. I now perceive you as a silly man, because you say 'hubby' and 'wifey.'
We're giving you constructive criticism. If you want to get your back up and not listen, that's up to you.