Summary: A woman’s flakiness and a man’s ghosting behavior are in reality reflections of each other. Two ends of the desire pendulum. She loves the idea of you, not you. Steady but formless. Never too present. Never defined. For her candle to burn, it needs room to breathe.
In the end, too often men think they need a girlfriend to have their life 'complete'. The consequence is that these men will emit signs of desperation. Success is achieved first through the mind, then through the world, never the other way around. - Pook
Sometimes things stay. Sometimes they leave. Sometimes they disappear.
What is curious is that we only notice the things that disappear of which we had expectations of. When friends fade from our life, or a girl we’ve been seeing flakes out. They only matter to us because we allowed the expectations of those people or those relationships to define us. To cause us to take shape, rather than remain formless. Indeed, frame is not something you define, but rather the refusal to be defined by others.
A true TRP man is never able to be defined … he is always, in essence, “ghosting” on some level.
And you can’t flake on something that was never there in the first place. Some people refer to this as the Principle of Least Interest, i.e. “the one who cares the least controls the relationship”. But it runs much, much deeper than that.
Ghosting within dating interactions (aka Assume Formlessness)
Women want to catch you. To see if they can control you, cage you. And the worst thing you can do is to cage yourself. Women want to see if they can get you to the point where if they open the cage door, you don’t even try to leave. For only a wounded or needy bird would fly into a cage of its own accord. Flaking or other shit behavior is seeking to define the interaction on her terms, e.g. changing date plans or creating drama. Trying to take the lead.
So what does a TRP man do? He goes ghost … within the interaction.
Ghosting is the art of disappearing from social interactions, dating or otherwise. Abruptly and without warning. But more subtly, it is the art of leaving things undefined. Of letting them wonder. Of speaking thru inaction. Of being unpredictable.
A common refrain for girls I date these days is “I can’t figure you out.” I am an amalgamation of many things, often complete polar opposites. My texting patterns are chaotic. I purposely do things out of order, e.g. sometimes I’ll kiss a girl in the middle of a first date at a seemingly random time. I tease them relentlessly, even in moments that most men would be upset. I pull back just when it seems that I should push. Just when they think they know what I’ll do next, I do the opposite. Whether I am rapport breaking or push-pulling or shrugging my shoulders rather than chasing them when they pull away …
My frame is purposely being undefined. I am, in that sense, always “ghosting”. I am never truly present in any relationship. Because I know my presence is not what is desired by women. They do not want “me” … they want the idea of me. And I do both myself and the women in my life a disservice by failing to understand that. As such, my partial ghosting during a relationship is merely a manifestation of fully disappearing after one. It is not the food, but the taste it leaves behind, which they desire.
A man’s relationship work is largely done before the relationship.
There seems to be an epidemic of flaking with girls nowadays. There has always been some flakiness in the dating world, but it seems to have gotten worse in the last 10 years. Some blame it on feminism, or dating apps, or whatever. However, I posit this: flakiness in women these days is a really a reflection of the weakness of modern men.
Imagine if you left a major school project till the last second, and then tried to do weeks worth of work an hour before it was due. How would that feel? Certainly not effortless. No, it would be a lot of frustration and panic and confusion. And the end result would not be nearly as good.
The fundamental problem with men and dating is that many fail to understand that their efforts are largely based on what they have done before the relationship started. The work they have put into themselves. The mindset they have adopted. Those things not only create the initial relationship he may have with women, but continue to define the nature of the interaction as it continues.
Because a man who has already prepared himself, who knows that he is the prize, can ghost within the interaction. He is not chasing the girl, supplicating to her, or coming from a place of desperation. As Pook said: you must Kill that Desperation
Moreover, he is willing to walk away at any point. Law of Power #16: scarcity creates value.
A woman must feel that she risks never seeing you again. A steady low-level of dread creates excitement and respect. Indeed, fear is the heart of love.
A Real-World Example
I am gonna finish this up with a story. Not really a field report per se, and not a success story. No a story of failure, and from an EC no less. Even I still fuck it up sometimes.
So I met this girl earlier this summer. No big deal. I’ve gone through dozens of women this summer. But this one seemed different. Personality wise or whatever. We definitely clicked on that “wait a minute I kinda like being around you oh and childhood memories of puppy love” kind of impulses. Similar interests, backgrounds, hobbies, etc. The problem was that I actually liked her. Yeah I know fuck me.
I’ll be really clear, this was NOT a plate. I never slept with her. We made out and fooled around a few times. Hung out 4-5 times over a month or so. Never sealed the deal, either because of logistical issues or hesitation on one or both of our parts. I admittedly was moving slowly. During this time, I was dating and sleeping with several other women.
But this girl gave me pause.
Even for an experienced Red Pill guy like myself, that happens. Eventually she faded out. I felt it happening, and let her go. Maybe she’ll be back at some point, who knows. I still have several other plates, I don’t necessarily need her.
So why did I tell you this story? Because in this case, for that moment in time with that particular girl, I stopped being the ghost. I allowed myself to take shape. She was pretty flaky during that month, and I let her be. I still had my RP principles in gear … was never too available, always counter-offered a reschedule with my own. But the truth was I began to subtly embody the things I desired from her, to subtly chase her … simply by going so slowly. My hesitation and body language spoke volumes, where normally I am impossible to figure out.
Like all men, the tendency towards oneitis is strong, ingrained in me by evolution … I will never destroy that tendency, only learn to control it. And the earliest warning sign of those impulses in a man is usually the woman’s behavior. Often before you even notice those impulses or feelings in yourself … it is insidious.
The great Anti-Dump once said: You must treat all women the same for the first two months
And he was right, but as the case above shows, sometimes it’s not how you overtly treat them, but the mindset with which you show up, that matters. Sometimes it is not what you do externally, but how you behave internally, that makes all the difference.
To reiterate: A woman’s flaky behavior and a man’s ghosting behavior are in reality reflections of each other. Two ends of the pendulum.
Many of the tactics we promote at TRP – push/pull, rapport breaking, amused mastery – are simply methods for maintaining a balance in that pendulum. Some may say such tactics reek of manipulation and dissimilation, but I would contend they are actually a form of authenticity. Simply a man being a man, doing the counter-intuitive things necessary to create an environment in which both he himself and others can flourish. Even when faced with ridicule and scorn for doing those very things. That is the Way of Men.

PantsonFire1234 9y ago
If you get good at ghosting (cutting the bond) with someone you will have a stronger relationship for it. You take dominance in the interactions and become the leader.
I've found that the less I cared about any given relationship (be it family, friend or sexual) the more the relationship swung in my favor. Yes sometimes I ended up driving people away for a while, but they always returned with a deeper respect and happiness for my presence. More importantly though is that you become outcome independent.
Eventually I completely switched my interactions to favor staying illusive and it worked for the better. Honestly the only thing that has suffered is my long term prospects with women.
Especially the more insecure ones simply can't stand me. Because I trigger ever fear impulse in their body. They can somehow sense how easy it is for me to let go. How I could just drop them regardless of the times we shared. I'm still trying to figure out how I can camouflage this. It's still a great skill to posses regardless.
You can't really learn how to let go. When personally reflecting on how I came to be this way I figure it's because of the vast amounts of people that left my life early on in life (be it by death, personal differences or lack of feelz). I've got a few friends who've equally had to deal with loss in such a way and they act exactly the same.
The human body and mind can adapt to anything given enough time and perseverance. If you want to become a ghost you need to get used to the feeling off loss.
[deleted] 9y ago
This is some of the best advice I've read on TRP so far. Thank you.
CQC3 9y ago
I agree that unless you possess a genius level talent for acting and putting on a facade--this is a very valuable and rare skill, for someone to so wholeheartedly embody the persona they wish to, it is wise to understand that what happens within you in even the subtlest ways can manifest itself in external ways.
Pre-TRP the one concept that seemed to me most important even in my earliest beta days was a fascination with how absence and unavailability affected others. Even in the smallest of ways, there are these sort of intangible qualities others possess that our abilities to sense far surpass our ability to articulate them.
Hence true internal freedom is hard to fake. You have to have an almost sort of disrespect or detached appreciation for any of your bonds. This used to really irritate and bother me in a very deep manner when I was younger, when the rare other displayed such abundance or individual strength towards socializing. I thought, why do I feel so shitty about this persons way of seeing friendships? I thought it was a sort of insidious thing almost, but then I realized it's almost never what others do, it's really what it incites in us that really gets at us.
A person who displays such qualities as I've outlined will not make you feel insecure because you think deeply they don't need you, but rather--for me at least, it was the realization that codependence in any way only masks the fact that we are alone, solitary. This solitary nature of ours in relation to reality is really at the heart of many crisis, and accepting this will make dealing with women that much easier.
For those who still rely on codependence in any way to mask this pain, you will always feel a slight annoyance towards others who appreciate you but don't always stay in contact with you, or show independence in that manner, men or women. This can be a slight annoyance or it can bother you greatly depending on how you are. The thing to realize here is that this is in a way the mark of failure as a man. The very root of this feeling is that one is too involved or concerned with the affairs or presence of others REGARDLESS of whether you are best friends, or it is a female lover, or just a friend either way. For you to feel this way means you aren't taking enough direction in your own life, doing enough things for yourself or progressing your own personal plotlines. It's subtle, but sometimes people switch the focus off of their individual selves and instead incline toward seeing themselves as part of a group, thus losing their own individuality or agency to strike out on their own.
What does this have to do with this post? Well in essence this sort of subtle shift in mentality is at the heart of the ability of the person who can properly ghost others in the way OP is talking about. Most people see ghosting as spitefully removing their presence, but it's more than that. Far more intangible, this lies in the realm of the unseen and abstract. This is much like chess and two people imagining the moves upon moves ahead of time, and when a person senses they are enveloped by counters it is almost like your aura is leaping out at them and encasing them. Thus ghosting is more ironically about presence and is not spiteful nor aggressive. It's a passive denial of any type of ownership. If you want to master ghosting and proper unavailability you must do that by understanding your own individuality and not seeing yourself as a pair or part of a group. You must be the individual in the group or pair, not the group itself.
CopperFox3c 9y ago
This is very, very well said and insightful. There is a subtle but fundamental difference between ghosting out of spite, and partially ghosting to maintain proper presence. Healthy relationships require a certain degree of freedom, not co-dependence.
If it wasn't my own post, I'd give you a point for this comment.
TheRedPhillip 9y ago
The inverse relationship of the ghost and flake is indeed an extension of the masculine/feminine polarity.
I agree. This becomes clear when you realize the nature of sexual dynamics is amoral.
Vril_Thought 9y ago
I imagined a cartoon where the OP is in the middle of sex, finishes first, says, "turn over bb".. then ghosts her in the dark hardcore lvl 5 Chad ghost aka Casper the Savage.
matryoshkabomber 9y ago
Really enjoyed reading about the dynamic this implies. I think the idea of ghosting (to many people) is negative in connotation. This is due to the general use of it being a negative reaction. Being able to control the usage of ghosting within the context of a relationship (whether it be friendship or LTR) makes it less of a reaction and more of a social tool.
The personal story was insightful, but not needed. The theory that you presented can hold its own weight without the support of an anecdote. Many of us on here have already experienced what you describe in your story and thus are familiar with how being too invested subconsciously can cause issues.
That being said, it was a great post that I thoroughly enjoyed reading.
CopperFox3c 9y ago
I remember back in my earliest days in the Manosphere, back on Sosuave around 2005 around the time Pook was leaving. Someone asked him in a thread why he wrote the things he did. Pook's response (paraphrasing):
"I mostly write them as a way to get my own thoughts out, to work them out in my head. As a way of understanding. I don't write them for others, I write them for myself."
Same here.
UrsusG 9y ago
You're an EC, so I read your post carefully from beginning to end and all I got was:
Girl flaked because I chased a bit too eagerly
Okay...
She probably got the validation she wanted, and was done. Or she flaked for one or more of over 9000 reasons to flake.
If that's all that happened, then why wrap it in so many words and make it look more complicated than it was? This isn't high level philosophy.
tl,dr: Pls don't write like Neoreactionsafe, think of the newbies.
CopperFox3c 9y ago
Think you may have missed my broader point. Chasing externally is something you obviously shouldn't do. This is more about the nuances of Inner Game ... how external behaviors in both the man and the woman are really reflections of internal dynamics. Look at the Pook post linked within, many of the same ideas.
TheRedPhillip 9y ago
I think he was also writing based on his ability to maintain the opposite dynamic in all his other plates. I commend his ability to notice when he fucked up, but I think everything above his example (assuming formlessness, remaining undefined, and the work/mindset done before a relationship starts) is what drives his point home.
Horus_Krishna_2 9y ago
I didn't know what ghosting was, I thought it was getting someone killed so they become a "ghost" but learned in dating concepts it's ignoring someone which I had done in the past. I felt bad but I noticed I didn't like it either when a woman did ghost me, I got over it though when I realized the reason she ghosted me was valid, I was acting beta.