Why Globalism is a natural fit for Women | TheRedPill

Masculine polarity is defined by separation from the herd and the development of a strong Frame that acts as a firewall against the herd. His goal is the restriction of Access or inner Freedom.

These are opposing energies.

If you had just one man and one woman and the man was masculine and the woman was feminine then you would create the natural polarity which would attract and hold together opposing forces... much like a capacitor.

Globalism merges the entire world so that there are no borders.

This means that a women can dream of Access to the ruler of the world.

Hypergamy seeks the highest male... the globalist Chad Thundercock.

Conclusion

Men just want to be "King of the Castle" and rule over something even if it's just over himself. Ambitious men seek larger and larger areas to rule and the psychopaths become entirely obsessed with expanding their power and this is how we get the globalist elites. The desire for absolute power has existed since ancient times, but we see it becoming more possible only in our time. (so we live in unusual times)

Globalism is a natural fit for women because it means a woman can dream that there is the chance she can get the highest value man on earth... the full realization of Hypergamy... the ultimate female desire.

Men naturally will prefer boundries of all kinds that define the limits of their power. Frame is our boundry. Freedom is our desire. However, all men desire to expand and we call that Liberty.

Permalink

[deleted] 9y ago

Tru dat.

Just look at NYC: A lot more women than men in Manhattan, all dreaming to get with some hot shot and lock him down and if that doesn't work at least have sex with top tier guys in terms of looks.

They don't mind sharing a single room with a couple other girls as long as they have potential access to top tier guys, while there are more guys who don't see the benefit of hustling hard in the city just to live in a room in a shared apartment or living hand to mouth and due to this low skilled jobs are filled to the brim with the underclass (blacks from the projects and illegal immigrants who can't get anything better).

Globalists love illegals and welfare dependents, as they're cheap labor without options or leverage.

[deleted] 9y ago

I disagree. Globalism has and will continue to be an unmitigated disaster for women and lazy men.

When men go down the globalist path, they do so because they are being denied any other viable option by local elites. When women go down the globalist path, they do so as a result of exhausting the unrestrained access to the resources made available to them by those same local elites.

Unfortunately, what is good for the gander is not always good for the goose, as globalization demands all compete in an environment of resource abundance. Women conditioned to receive as a courtesy given their sex, stagnate when expected to work. However, most men thrive in those same environments when provided that same unfettered access in a global environment denied them in a local one. In fact, many express greater restraint in a globalized environment than their female counterparts did in a localized one.

This is why many women prefer socialism and its various offshoot ideologies as opposed to capitalism. One has others do all the work for them, while the other demands you do the work yourself.

TheGatherHunter 9y ago

This is an astute observation and I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees it. Women may wish for globalism, but it won't be good for them. We already see the consequences of that sort of thinking start to bear fruit in places like Germany.

larrythetomato 9y ago

We already see the consequences of that sort of thinking start to bear fruit in places like Germany.

And Sweden! I want more people to bring that place up. Just 5-10 years ago, it was being lorded as the ultimate socialist paradise. How quick has it fallen.

GuitarHero07 9y ago

I believe that in the coming years, the West and poorer developing countries will converge until they look basically the same. You will have a minority of global elites who will prosper while the rest of humanity struggles. On the whole it will still be a better deal for poorer countries like India and China because their populations are acustomed to poverty. We will have real problems in countries like the U.S, Canada, Germany etc. where for decades citizens have benefitted from barriers to the outside world. Now they simply can't compete against cheaper foreign labor. Even if countries like China become more expensive, there are plenty of poor countries left to exploit....Africa has barely been tapped.

As we all know, the world is not necessarily a kind place. What this means for us is that we must be prepared to compete in the global economy. Most in the West will suffer, but those of us that have our eyes open will be positioned to join the elites. Just as you stated, lazy men and women will suffer the most.

[deleted] 9y ago

I believe that in the coming years, the West and poorer developing countries will converge until they look basically the same.

I've lived in a developing country for 3+ years, and I travel back to the US about once a year. I've come to much the same conclusion, and I feel like I see the US trending downward a bit more every time I return.

smokecheck1976 9y ago

That's because the US of the 1950s and 1960s and the west (including some Asian countries such as Japan an South Korea) of the 70, 80s, and 90s are a historical aberration.

In the 1950s, the US prospered from being the sole industrial power standing after war had devastated almost every other developed nation on the planet. from the 70s through the 00s, countries that allowed markets to largely determine resource allocation had a large advantage over countries with either no industrial base or being ran by a corrupt regime.

Now, countries that didn't have an industrial base are developing one. Almost no one accepts the notion of a controlled command economy. As the others countries have caught up, the west has grown lazy and fat. It doesn't have to be, it just means the west is going to have to work harder, and more intelligently, and students are going to have to be taught things that haven't been taught in years.

NeoreactionSafe 9y ago

My post was done in such a way that you could interpret it to mean I was in favor of women being inclined towards globalist thought, but that wasn't my point.

The desire for wider access to resources is the woman's nature, but there are dozens of examples where women's desires create wreckage.

In fact must everything that women desire tends to bring things to ruin, both today and in the past.

...all I was doing was exposing the inner mechanisms at play.

Just flashing a view of the old Rubik's Cube.

[deleted]

[deleted] 9y ago

No, no. I get it. It's the conclusion that I had a problem with.

Yakatonker 9y ago

I wish people could at least read the economic theory by Marx, Keynes, Ricardo or Adam Smith because these explanations here and through out the red pill forum are obscenities to reality.

People are choosing globalism particularly the elites and the working class consumers because its a superior value added system, especially in comparison to that which it is replacing. There are many other reasons to choose Globalism over existing systems of which are more observable in the advanced economies of Europe which do not suffer the same levels of corruption the US does.

The other thing which you and others fail to notice is the systemic collapse of one Gynocentric pillar called Marriage. The dark harvester of the powers of male economic production collapse everywhere a nation develops within the framework of Globalism. But then again most men if they had the economic ability would pay to play even if the market was full of post wall cum dumpsters. Globalism has freed a lot of men from women but a lot of men seem uncomfortable with a framework devoid of woman at its core, I suspect because most men are still captured in the biological thirst and the skews which that entails.

EatmyShorts59 9y ago

I'm trying to follow this debate.

Any way you could simplify this into some actionable advice for us troglodytes ?

Yakatonker 9y ago

I could simplify by saying globalism is a vastly better system of value for the working class and a viable system addressing many issues of human economic corruption. However you will really need to do your homework as in read the base literature or listen to the audio books till you understand it. Globalism is a massive framework with a great deal of component frameworks, not just economics but it bleeds into many aspects of social engineering.

An easy example of engineering is Feminism which has gated lower caste betas from the market and caused a nominal shift in dating habits. The big one which is not obvious here is the proliferation of the alpha fucks strategy amongst men and women and the retrograded effect which prevents the harvest of the multitude of betas. Marriage as a result which is the viral insertion of woman into a man's framework is slowly being dismantled while women are being forced into a sort of subsidized equality where they too will suffer from economic disposability, as well as being forced to dispense their productivity into the coffers of plutocratic governments. Consider it a comical balancing of production accounts where women have long been in deficit to society. It's a good thing I would think, especially if you as man who wants to live his own life outside of the work grind wherein in nations most progressed in globalism have the highest emphasis of quality of life. People here can knock such examples as Sweden all they want but the men there have it finitely better then the multitude of men who suffer horridly under the corruption ridden American economic system.

You will have to cross many boundaries you're uncomfortable with in order to truly bridge the many great divides of this all encompassing framework. It would also help to say that a great many people here have not read the economic thesis's of those mentioned above whose treatise are building the global framework, meaning it'll be difficult to research. Consider TRP just one framework amongst the many which is actively affecting people.

[deleted] 9y ago

Are there any people who wrote on economics prior to the enlightenment?

Yakatonker 9y ago

I haven't really researched prior to that so its something I don't really know of. My focus has been mainly on those who've affected the present system.

gonorealover 9y ago

Nothing needs to fit women because women are adaptable to anything. They have no male traits such as honor , loyalty , principles , dignity , shame etc.

You are delusional if you think women will never betray their families, race and people . They have and they will .

This is why civilization never gave women the same rights and credibility as men . Equality is a shit test for men . The blue pill men won and the redpill men just let things happen .

There is no solution , cure, antidote for the mess we are in . All is left is just the fall/decline . It needs to happen if we want to get out of this .

DforDeadpool 9y ago

When The Decline becomes The Crash, resulting in worldwide economical, social and literal disasters, some open-minded people will get why and how things went wrong. But most of the people will die saying "It was all white cis males' fault we weren't liberated enough" as their last words.

[deleted] 9y ago

Agreed the faster the decline the faster we can resolve out of this mess. What women want is options and access to the best resources they can find. Globalism allows this as it opens up free trade and an equalitarian fantasy world that demonizes loyalty to the mother land.

When the Nazis took control of Paris in WW2, many of the French women slept with the Nazi soldiers. They naturally gravitated towards the more dominant men at the time. Once the war was over these women were publicly shamed for their actions.

This would never happen today and that's why most western nations aren't able to make the tough decisions for their own prosperity.

Scottyzredhead 9y ago

When the Nazis took control of Paris in WW2, many of the French women slept with the Nazi soldiers.

Do you have a source for this?

[deleted] 9y ago

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html

[deleted]

MajorStyles 9y ago

Most women have a combination of tremendous egos and low self-esteem. A curious combination, no doubt.

The end result is that today's lumbering land whale - 300 lbs. with two arm-sleeve tattoos - feels that she is "entitled" to the world's tier one men. After all, men are shit (which she learned in her Sociology class at the community college) so out of the goodness of her heart, she will allow the best of the lot to feed her Maple Bars on a Saturday night. It won't be easy, but she will make the sacrifice.

And then...reality hits (much like when she dares to step on the scale). These Tier-1 men actually have options, and many have exercised them for hotter, skinnier broads.

So I can agree with you in many respects - today's woman is delusional enough to think that she acutally has a chance with an English prince, Australian rock star, Canadian tycoon, etc.

james-watson 9y ago

Most women have a combination of tremendous egos and low self-esteem. A curious combination, no doubt.

This is absolute gold. I believe the massive ego serves as a shield for the fragile self-esteem underneath. Also known as the "bitch-shield".

isaac_svs 9y ago

Works for men just as well --> importing Eastern European women or SEA women, which plays on our desires to get a "normal" or "feminine" woman.

WeedDaddy 9y ago

Only for a while, until the gap between the West and the East is closed.

The veterans in the mail-order bride scene will tell you how great it was in the 90's. Then a Westerner had the infamous "White God Factor" in Eastern Europe.

Ironically, the yellow feverish are ambassadours of feminism. Some say that one reason why Asian women are interested in them is because they allow women more liberty.

Thelyckyfrour 9y ago

Women adapt to new environments far better than an average man.

In my personal experience, the vast overwhelming majority of EE/SEA woman who comes to US becomes exactly like any other American slut in a matter of time.

[deleted] 9y ago

[deleted]

Thelyckyfrour 9y ago

I don't know if it's really as simple as that. I feel like foreign conservative girls find themselves a whole new level of undiscovered narcissism within them when they try to integrate with the liberal American slut culture.

Meh, who knows.

[deleted] 9y ago

[deleted]

Alanranks7 9y ago

The thing is almost no women come. In fact it is almost exclusively fighting age males. That is the refugees Europe is getting.

I hate the idea of globalism because it causes environments to become hyper competitive and often only is enforced or propagated in the first world. Meanwhile nobody ever immigrates to trashcanistan because it is a shithole let alone help develop it. Most of these third world countries are only useful for resources and little else.

But once they get third world people into first world countries they gain voters and voters can be used to destroy any national sentiment because they are not of that nation.

Tl'Dr the third world is useless unless for raw resources or voter production.

[deleted] 9y ago

It's not about voters really. People from all kinds of third world shitholes coming to Germany and Sweden these days can't speak the local language and have zero interest in learning it. The average IQs in these countries is pretty low (lots of people that can't read or write) and the cultures are corrupt cronyism. These people will never vote.

It's a globalist tool to sow distrust. Only deluded women trust their neighbors from shitcanistan and aren't concerned about groups of 5+ guys roaming the streets. Globalist run PC media encourages a PC culture which creates the distrust effect as you don't trust your shitcanistan neighbors, but anybody voicing nationalist opinions is getting publicly crushed as well, so people see grinding hard in the globalist hamster wheel to afford a tiny studio in the safer part of the city as their only option.

Classic divide and conquer.

[deleted] 9y ago

[deleted]

foldpak111 9y ago

This resonated with me on a deep level. All I want in life (and I'm sure most RP men feel the same way) is the power to be fully in control of my life. To do as I please, within reason of course.

PantsonFire1234 9y ago

No offense to most women out there. But I don't see any the women I know gaining access to 'the ruler of the world'. Women have value limiters just like men do. She might fuck up her head by slutting it up but she will never get commitment of a man 'out of her league'.

If a woman can't accept that reality then the only reality left to her is the one with allot of cats.

[deleted]

hores 9y ago

Women would have much more competition under a globalist system. Definitely not in their interests.

[deleted] 9y ago

Globalism isn't bad as long as it's voluntary. The free market benefits everyone more equally than any other system. It is a global monopoly of force - a one world government - that we should be afraid of. That would lead to nothing but absolute tyranny over the entire planet.

INTJokes 9y ago

Men don't want to be ruler of the world? I gotta disagree with you there

[deleted] 9y ago

I disagree. I think women are misled to believe globalism is a fit for them, same as how "feminism" is supposed be some kind of happy lifestyle.

The truth is nationalism is a natural fit for women. You'll have a hard time convincing them of that, but if you want an LTR ever, part of your job is to unplug them from the vortex of lies and rhetoric swirling about them. You need to sell a woman on a philosophical blueprint. If you can't, move on to the next girl.

Globalism is the gateway to one-world communism. Globalism is the rape culture, and communism is the complete annihilation of the nuclear family. Ask Europe how they feel about the goddamn rape and mess they've let in.

fukushima1whois2 9y ago

I think its more like ants.

TheRedStoic 9y ago

I disagree. It seems to be the case at first look, but it's actionably and demonstrably the opposite. Just look at women's happiness ratings, declining decade after decade. Look at the increasing number of single mothers and depressed women past the wall.

Globalization has lied to them. They're only a fish in a pond, fighting for 20 out of 100 guys. They aren't genetically equipped to handle having 100 options instead. Let alone a thousand, a million, etc. The illusion is that high quality guys are more common than they really are while the woman is young, until its too late and they begin seeing the rest of the pond after they're discarded.

I_Need_More_Space_ 9y ago

Very unique perspective. Pretty rad thinking there.

But, Globalization may help the cause. We as men are no longer locked into relations with our local sluts. We can find a lesser slut in another country to spread our seed with less risk of ruin than domestically.