Women cannot be held accountable. The very idea of being held accountable is, to women, horrifying. The above quote is from the top comment (+4200) in an AskReddit thread, which whines as such:
Also, you hate having to initiate with women: I hate that I have to emotionally manage all of my relationships with men. [...] Everything I do near a dude, I'm accountable for, and if someone gets the wrong idea they get to call me a name and blame me for it.
As much as I love accidental honesty, I don't feel like stopping here to circlejerk over another confirmation of what we already know. Bitches confirm RP truths all the time. Let's get some logical analysis going instead:
^¨
The Core Statement
I, a woman, should not be held accountable for everything I do near a men
The Equality Implication
If men and women are equals, men should not be held accountable for everything they do around women
The "Conclusion"
Since men can't be held accountable for what they do around women, sexual harassment isn't real
^¨
See how quickly I took the premise an proved a feminist-contradictory statement? It wasn't hard. But for women, it's damn near impossible. Why?
Women lack foresight. You need foresight to develop basic logic. You know, the "IF A, THEN B" kind. But if you're a woman, B doesn't exist. Only A exists because A is right now.
Women are not accountable because they live in the now. Like it or not, women did not develop foresight. They lack the agency for such a skill to be useful. Their biology has instead developed skills for attracting a mate who can be responsible for the future on their behalf. Do not lament this reality, but rather, accept it and adapt accordingly.

PM_ME_TYRANITARS 10y ago
It would be better if you could reference the thread where you got the statement, to add context
TonyZ554 10y ago
It was some askreddit thread where the question was "what do men not understand about being a woman?" or something similar to that.
Jaques_Fury 10y ago
Bonus Content
Some extra choice quotes from said woman's account:
Having cancer is apparently not a valid excuse for being in a bad mood. People have standards y'know.
Oh, and look, she somehow has PTSD. The poor thing, life must be so hard. Bless her heart.
b2813006 10y ago
I disagree with the first part of your comment. Being in a bad mood because of an illness does not give you the right to be a shitty person. Everyone (and that includes women) has the right to refuse shitty treatment from another person even if that person has cancer. It is also possible to offer sympathy without kissing someones ass.
evileddy 10y ago
I can guarantee that she doesn't have any of these "illnesses" diagnosed by a real doctor.
And find me one woman that isn't on some kind of depression pill.
joseph_fuzzco_Jr 10y ago
Translation: I don't always feel happy, so I have a dozen illnesses that aren't my fault.
KartagoPill 10y ago
Solipsism all the way.
CANCER DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING BECAUSE I'M FREE OF IT.
joseph_fuzzco_Jr 10y ago
And I thought my ego was big...
[deleted] 10y ago
Women can't argue logically, the only thing they know is their emotions and how the feelz think about a certain situation.
[deleted]
Entropy-7 10y ago
SJWs redefine sexism as what men do to women and racism as what whites do to everyone else. So objectively identical behaviors are only bad when white men do it.
(And according to the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal, there is no such thing as hate speech against Christians.)