TL;DR As the title says.
http://www.dangerandplay.com/2011/09/05/how-i-respond-to-shit-tests/
Mike Cernovich giving us advice that is probably far better than anything we've been learning here at TRP in regards to shit-tests.
I've always subscribed to the notion that shit-tests aren't real. Oh, women testing you is definitely real, don't get me wrong. What I say isn't real is the shit that girls pull today. That's not a fitness test, that's just bitchiness.
She's being a bitchy little CHILD. A child in need of correction and punishment.
I'm starting to think that the more men reward bitchy little princesses with attention and sex, the more we're feeding into their entitlement and narcissism.
Do your fellow man a favor, stop passing shit-tests, start crushing the women who engage in them, instead. Little by little, we will make women act feminine once more.
thenemaxofredpill 10y ago
I read this yesterday on the shitter and am coming back to comment because I have to.
There is a difference between a shit-test and a bitch.
"Oh. Well, how to you tell the difference between the two, nemax?"
I'll tell you how. You can't really tell the difference. You have to set your own standards on how much shit you will take. Me...personally...I have a very low shit "red-line". Meaning...I don't put up with much "bitchy" behaviour. If a chick is really into you...the shit-test will be easy and fun. If she is being a bitch and just trying to get validation...the shit-test will not be fun. In the article OP posted...you can read how the "shit-test" was not fun and was actually insulting and "out of the blue".
Remember, gents....the shit is easy if you are just a fun person and don't take things to seriously. So, if a chick comes up to you and "kills your vibe", then why would you even want to pass her so called "shit-tests". She is a buzz kill and not even worth your extremely valuable time.
Doctor_Mayhem 10y ago
I like what you got. I like crushing bitches, though. Also, if more men would act like this every time these cunts get bitchy, we'll start to see a more pleasant dating market.
rockumsockumrobots 10y ago
I'm going to do this from now on. I'm not looking for one night stands anyway so I may as well have some fun with power play.
[deleted]
favours_of_the_moon 10y ago
They're used to society kissing their asses.
NeoreactionSafe 10y ago
Very good point.
A Shit Test (unless you did something to actually bring it upon yourself) is a very serious act on a woman's part and should be punished.
If your girl Jane talks to her friend Betty and Betty convinces her that you have done some beta thing and Jane then Shit Tests you to find out if it's true you must place some penalty on Jane for giving Betty power over her.
The chain of command must have you at the top.
.
[deleted] 10y ago
That is passing a shit test, why do people not read the sidebar? It's right there under shit testing 101.
shadowz151 10y ago
This is mind blowing material for me. All I've ever read was cocky funny/ push pull/ ignore. If the chick is just being a cunt call her out on it. I enjoy the mental chess game of crushing a person's spirit. We definitely need more FR's about speaking bluntly to a chick and their response.
I'm currently in anger phase and have been overcompensating by destroying cunty chicks inflated egos for my own self gratification. Stay strong brothers!
sir_wankalot_here 10y ago
Would Patton, Romel or real men like that make the comments you are making ? A real leader of men does not get enjoyment from punishment. There is a difference between discipline and what your are doing.
You are a sick and disgusting individual, a real man like Patton or Romel would do to you what they do to dogs with rabies. Where I am that is how we deal with shit like you.
I would not get any pleasure from it, it is a job that needs to be done, like taking out the garbage.
vengefully_yours Senior Endorsed 10y ago
Patton and Romel were tank generals. Punishment of your own isn't relished, but what happens to the enemy is utterly irrelevant. If they surrender that's one thing, if they fight they recieve no quarter and the goal is to kill all of them.
I enjoy knocking some people down a few notches, when they've earned it. Not arbitrarily fucking up some random people, but if they do something that warrants a response, it's rarely in kind. I'm like the 8th Air Force, there's no such thing as a measured response.
dogextraordinaire 10y ago
Genghis khan did... Vlad the Impaler did... Countless Popes did (Urban I tortured heathens)... Many of the Spartan kings... Xerxes...
You have a point of course, I just thought I'd better remind you that there were great leaders of men who reveled in punishment and slaughter.
In addition 'it is better to be both loved and feared, but if you cannot be loved then it is better to be feared'.
sir_wankalot_here 10y ago
Myth. Genghis Khan only killed priests and lawyers. Anyone of his warriros who harmed a craftsman would be severely punished. Genghis always have a city a chance to surrender, and he always offered good terms to the surrender.
The proof is 90% of Genghis's horde was not Mongol.
With Genghis he got smeared by the Catholic Church for propaganda reasons. Vlad it could have been the same case. Leaders who revel in needless bloodshed do not last long.
Genghis wioped out towns or cities but they where ones who where given ample time to surrender or betrayed him.
Redpillwhiterabbit 10y ago
While it is believed that the Genghis was large, read headed and green eyed with an uncanny aptitude for finding and enlisting brilliant leaders, the rest is simply false.
He claimed everything he ever had seen or ever would see in advance and declared anyone who opposed him as his mortal enemy. Those towns and cities that surrendered were a direct result of the 'salting of the earth' tactic (kill every living thing in a city and come back days later to kill all those burying the dead).
These were men who developed scoliosis from pulling the bow and rode a horse for well over 80% of their lives.
These were men who proclaimed themselves "the punishment of God".
These were men who obliterated an entire countries fighting force without so much as leaving a calling card. (Georgia couldn't send troops to the crusades because "some unknown forces" wiped them out.... It was a scouting force)
Check out "hardcore history wrath of the khans" for some very interesting accounts collected and from the secret history of the people themselves.
billsmashole 10y ago
They probably would if some person talked to them like that. One of the WW2 generals slapped a subordinate. I'm pretty sure most real men would either call people out for rude remarks or laugh in that person's face to show how little they think of them. Furthermore, your remarks to people who are here to let off steam are uncalled for and not appreciated.
sir_wankalot_here 10y ago
Not to let off steam dude ☺ Just stating a view point ☺
billsmashole 10y ago
I'm saying that they are here to let out their anger towards women. We all need our man space where we can vent without judgment.
[deleted] 10y ago
I don't think a man needs to insult a woman in order to prove his worth. If you derive pleasure or self worth from insulting her to that extent then you're missing something from your own self esteem. I'm not against putting a woman in their place, it's a win win situation when you do (it turns them on as well), I just think this is a little over the top.
thefisherman1961 10y ago
Terrible advice. Expecting women to not shit test is a fantasy that will never happen, because shit tests are AWALT.
Doctor_Mayhem 10y ago
You missed the point. There's shit-tests, then there's what modern women do.
Ben_Eszes 10y ago
I think this will appeal to someone in the anger phase.
However, reading this has prompted a thought: what if we are calling girls' actions "shit tests," when in reality the actions are just pure bitchy behavior? In this sense, are we 'excusing' their bitchiness by labeling it as a "shit test" and saying that it's just part of their nature?
For example, if this girl you are dating is acting rudely, we might jump to the conclusion that it's a test -- and that she is not to be held accountable for her actions because it's in her nature to test us. Perhaps she is just being an ungrateful bitch that needs some instant behavioral correction.
AllOrDeath 10y ago
The truth is, a lot of TRPs view on shit tests and even AWALT is just an extension of the natural urge to view women as hypoagents. It also plays into the sterotypical view that men are hyperagents by saying it's the man's job to deal with all these things in the right way. It's just a remarketing of the same social contract that TRP then condemns when straight talking about them.
Philhelm 10y ago
An idea I've seen floating around here is that women should be accepted as they are, since certain negative traits are in their nature. That does not resonate with me. If a rabbit is eating vegetables from your garden, you shoot the rabbit.
Ben_Eszes 10y ago
I share your sentiments. Perhaps TRP community is making everything a shit-test in their minds, to a fault.
Physio_Tool 10y ago
Depends on how you look at it and your options. To get a 9, you got to deal with 9 behavior. However, if you are a dude who has options, even a 9's bitchiness won't be deemed Shit test but rather being bitchy and unappealing as you aren't willing to accept that behavior in exchange for her vag.
pookie513 10y ago
I have an acquaintance, likes to male shame. When she gets ahead of herself, "I'm only ashamed when I'm around you." Every time. Loves that I stand up to her.
NightwingTRP Senior Endorsed 10y ago
I don't think this guy actually understands shit tests. I think he misconstrues them as "girls being bitchy or giving you shit." Obviously he gets a lot of women who have SMV too low to get his interest and they know it. Standard female response to this is jealousy and throwing tantrums. Pretty much all of which comes out in his post.
He reacts like a similar child in the playground "if you hit me, I'mma hit you back harder because Gronk! be super alpha."
There's nothing alpha about throwing insults at women. The fact you need to insult her demonstrates she has got to you. I've never been a supporter of the nuclear response to shit tests because I believe a woman who is irritating you is the equivalent of a gnat. There's nothing alpha about swatting a gnat. There's a massive number of women out there... one brat shouldn't even register on your radar if you've truly internalised abundance mentality.
Occasionally you'll have to tolerate a brat... but here Cernovich fails the obvious test of his amused mastery... because he has no amused mastery. A lesson not to overdose on steroids perhaps? Or maybe he lost his humility a while ago? Or my personal favourite explanation: "you look like a freak" really gets to him... because there's a glint of truth in those words. He does look odd. (Personally I've always taken that as a reminder that attitude and status tends to trump looks.)
Mihawk01 10y ago
If a woman is being an obvious bitch for no reason, I see no reason not to be an obvious bitch back to her.
Its like if someone hit you for no reason, you can either ignore it, or you can fucking hit back. Ignoring it will only lead to more punches thrown. If I knew 100% that all the punches I throw will not lead to any fight, or anything else, I would be punching people left and right.
NightwingTRP Senior Endorsed 10y ago
Sinking to her level?
I think this is a false equivalency that gets drawn often. Remember the golden rule: men and women are not equal. If you are the prize, you are superior. If you are superior, lashing out at a bratty inferior... you're basically acting like a sadistic bully rather than the benevolent leader you should be striving to be. The difference is, the bully loses frame to the person taunting them, while a benevolent leader does not.
There is no need to smack women into place mentally. Shit tests occur naturally to test your own level of dominance. Lashing out physically and verbally are losses of frame. You have entered her frame when you respond on her terms. This is why shit tests are to be treated as the unserious nonsense they are - you respond on your own terms. Maintain the frame of the interaction. Whether ignoring it is the right move is up to you... but don't enter her frame by trading insults. It's not alpha.
Fighting other men is a different matter and not to be compared - because as I said before: men and women are not equal and not comparable.
Mihawk01 10y ago
Both strategies can work, but sometimes I do feel it is best to lay down on them, and call them out on their behavior.
So let me give you an example, about a month ago, some girl made a joke playing on negative Russian stereotypes (I was born in Russia), it was funny, (a couple of people around laughed) even if a bit too much for a work environment... I also felt a bit offended.
Usually I would just tell them to fuck off after such a joke, but considering this was at work I chose not to.
Guess what happened the next day. Again a similar kind of joke from her. This time I didn't hold back, and called her a cunt in front of everyone. Not heard anything remotely rude from her from that moment. Actually she is going out of her way to be nice to me.
If I just ignored her again, it would have kept coming. Sometimes it is best to lay the smack down. You will say that my example is different, and it is, but it shows really well, that if you do not let others take the piss, they won't.
NightwingTRP Senior Endorsed 10y ago
Thank you for this, I needed a good laugh this lunchtime.
Yeah, if you've described this accurately, it looks like you've overreacted to some banter. She probably only stopped because of fear of SJW style accusations of racism or xenophobia. i.e. she could lose her job, so of course she'll be nice to you. Women are fairly natural Machiavellians. Not because you were the big bad alpha.
The way you probably came across was more like an autistic with poor social skills. Since your views come across as so black and white, you can do whatever you like with this info. Your coworkers have no doubt gossiped about that event behind your back. Not unrepairable or anything, but that's the way things go in the modern world. The feminisation of everyone is putting social skills particularly high priority and the responses tend to be the childish teenage girl gossiping and bitching. It's useful to be aware of it gong on.
Mihawk01 10y ago
I knew you would like this story!
It was banter, but it was racism as the same time. I am not one to shout racism, but if she made a joke like that about some Arab or Nigerian, it wouldn't be alright. I don't see why it should be alright with me. Actually, that is the whole reason why I was pissed. If I did joke about other nationalities, I could get into trouble with the HR department. Plus I didn't want to hear it again.
She might have bitched behind my back, although considering that we work with HR department right next to us, I don't think she would have dared. Plus, tbh, I don't mind one bit if she did. I've gossiped a fair bit about her.
My point still stands, sometimes being blunt is the best way.
laredditaccounts 10y ago
No, but as he says, it can be very beneficial, and importantly, it also made him feel better. He did all of that without losing frame at all too. He's a badass and he knows it, so it's no skin off of his nose. And since it also makes him feel good, there was literally 0 possible downside to what he did
Mouthpiece 10y ago
TL;DR: When someone insults you without cause, take the bait and get in a flame war.
What a waste of energy that is.
agrafes 10y ago
Their social standing means nothing to you. Their favors, their status as a woman (HB10/mother/whatever) means nothing. This is what you're saying to them when you refuse to allow their bitchy behavior.
I highly encourage incorporating corporal punishment for a plate you're with. You can allude to it while gaming a potential plate, I've found it's a good way to polarize while creating an environment of submission on her part.
One of mine - If she mouths off, I say "that's one". Simple. I don't engage, I don't retort, and I don't change my demeanor.
She's getting spanked later, and she knows it. And she behaves accordingly.
pookie513 10y ago
I do this with female and male friends. Expressing ones value in the form of "you start it, I end it" is invaluable. Depending on the situation, I'll wait to get get back to treating them with respect. It can be minutes, or days.
SmirkAddict 10y ago
Finally. I have been saying this all along. I've seen a lot of PUA videos. Honestly, it's quite impressive to meet a rude and dismissive woman and turn that around to some type of sexual experience. So respect to guys who do that. But I just don't have the patience for that. I just feel like a chump or fool pursuing sex with a woman that has inflated value. And if these woman are chasing you it's because they feel you have enough status that they can get some validation when having sex with you. So I think it's never about you and you are just rewarding her.
This is why I also have some disagreements about guys saying you don't owe women explanations when you cut them off. I really think it's important for women to know you can't treat self respecting men a certain way. I don't even bother with women who can't respond to my text in a complete sentence. Call them out and hopefully she will be better to the next guy. We just have to all get on the same page. I am not talking about some butthurt tone. Just being direct and speak as though you are just as much as a prize as she feels she is.
Honestly, taking this approach you may not have as much sex with different women as guys plowing through "bitch shields" or whatever. But you'll have less headache and generally more positive experiences as they'll come around or you cut them off.
Doctor_Mayhem 10y ago
Also, when you take the Cernovich approach, what you lose in sex, you gain in both control of your own life, and dignity that you deserve.
Control and dignity, far better things to have than a fleeting piece of ass that you don't even plan to call back.
Whisper Vanguard 10y ago
The mistake he makes here is to construe the shit test narrowly.
ALL women shit test. It is part of instinctive female behaviour. Bitchy women throw bitchy shit tests, kind and gentle women throw kind and gentle ones, flirtatious women throw flirtatious ones, standoffish women throw standoffish ones, playful women throw playful ones, shy women throw shy ones.
They don't usually even know they are doing it.
What he is talking about isn't crushing shit tests... it's crushing bitchy behaviour.
Expecting women not to shit test is like expecting men to answer personal ads without photos. You cannot be attracted to someone without evaluating the characteristics that make them attractive.
[deleted] 10y ago
I concur, but in some instances the best response is no response.
Would you respond with 3 sentences if someone asks you "Do you like to eat your own excrement?", of course not.
The point is some questions are so nonsensical that they don't even deserve acknowledgement.
The girl called her a freak, then implied that he smells/looks disgusting and that he needs a shower. His response, "Must suck to be you...came to the big city with big dreams....are dimwit"
If you ask me, he gave too much fuck.
If the same thing had happened to me, I wouldn't even had acknowledge the girl's existence. I'd look right through her as if she's transparent and order myself another drink.
[deleted]
UrsusG Endorsed Contributor 10y ago
This is the truth and this post needs to be the top reply to OP.
Seriously you guys, start upvoting this.
PanzerBatallion 10y ago
I wrote an article about all the shit I wish I had the balls to say in public.
Everyone is an alpha on the internet.
[deleted]
SmirkAddict 10y ago
I think this post deserves more upvotes because you admittedly struggle with asserting yourself in real life but your online persona may be quite different. It's like that for so many of us. That's real.
[deleted]
[deleted]
TheAloofCat 10y ago
It IS a shit test. One in where the entitled little shit deems herself so way out of your league that scorns you for being an unpleasant presence to her eyes. These kind of tests are unacceptable, and require going nuclear on these bitches, stomping their overinflated egos into the ground so that they learn their true place in the value market. With luck they may actually become decent human beings. With luck.
augizzz999 10y ago
Maybe she meant that he's left the humanity behind?
Cmbchrst 10y ago
4 scoops, 5 times a day, C'MON!
[deleted]
Physio_Tool 10y ago
Its only an insult if you take it seriously and get butt hurt. If a homeless person called you a freak would you get butt hurt over it?
peoplearejustpeople9 10y ago
If a woman even looks at you you can get into her pants. If he put her in her place correctly she would have swallowed his cum.
Women don't even give a shit about how a man looks, they care about his social status (which may stem from his looks but not necessarily).
This WAS a shit test just a really bitchy shit test, so obvious even a high schooler could pass it.
[deleted]
peoplearejustpeople9 10y ago
Holy fuck you're delusional. A man can have scarring, be overweight, bald, and still score big time if he's an alpha.
Mobrowncheeks 10y ago
Unless he is rich what woman would listen to anyone that looks like that said who is gaming her
vengefully_yours Senior Endorsed 10y ago
To a certain extent yeah. The key to that is having zero insecurity and playing on the insecurities every girl has.
Yeah men like me can get laid by hot chicks, I'm short, old, gray, look fat in the wrong clothes, don't show much income outwardly, but I know how to talk to them. If I were taller, more symmetrical, and showed my actual status rather than going everywhere in my 'work on the car clothes,' with my game it'd be easy.
Looks and statue matter a hell of a lot, but you can overcome the shortcomings with enough effort. A better looking taller man won't have to put in as much work, but so fucking what. All that matters is you and what you can do, earn, achieve, and build. Work with what you have and be the best you can be while pushing your limits outward.
I'll never have it as easy as my friend Chad (yes he is really Chad, 6'4, looks like a Viking) but I can fuck just as many hot bitches as he can, it's just harder for me. That's OK, I like difficult challenges.
[deleted]
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
laere 10y ago
Welcome to current and future parenting. Entitled kids be everywhere these days.
Parents literally let their kids run around at my workplace, I am lucky I haven't had to write an incident report yet either, but I do give them dirty looks that pretty much sends the message to watch their fucking kids.
RICCIedm 10y ago
I think OP's core idea (shit testers must be punished) still applies, though your example shows a better way to discipline spoiled girls. OP should remember that the best way to punish a woman is by WITHDRAWING your ATTENTION, which is your most valuable asset.
Let's suppose a girl shit tests you "Omg, your hair is so weird"
You can give three kinds of responses :
1) Oh hahah really? I hadn't realized, oh my god, let me go to the bathroom. Is it better now? (cringe worthy beta accepting her shit)
2) Well yours is all fucked up too (switches pressure to her, shows u won't take shit but still not dominant enough to shut her up without effort)
3)Well, my mom likes it [holds eye contact, hand in her shoulder or taps back](this guy really does not give a fuck about her opinion. Any answer around "well guess I can't do much" is great.)
cheeky_throwaway101 10y ago
These were great examples, a good post for some newbies to truly understand the differences, especially between 2) and 3).
[deleted] 10y ago
You got your point "cunts not tolerated" across without even saying a word. Excellent work.
Now just imagine if you had thrown an even bigger tantrum, called her names, commenting about how she wants to sleep with you, what would your behavior be called?
Because that's exactly what this guy did.
As soon as I started reading his response "..you came to the big city with big dreams..." I cringed.
If you go around bad mouthing every person who insults you without cause, the last thing you should do is giving them the satisfaction by arguing with them and expending your energy.
[deleted]
musclebound92 10y ago
What all of the people commenting on this post, and my recent one, about how it's a "waste of time to say that or this to her" fail to realize is that they look so pathetic commenting that.
In how the link ends, he mentions he is doing the world a favor and punishing people for their shitty personalities and ego's. And that is an awesome approach. The approach of backing down and letting women continue getting away with their hyper inflated egos that men have watered and let blossom through the years because of our apathy, which the haters that commented on my post and others are completely guilty of, is the reason these women ARE THE WAY THEY ARE.
Punishment through experienced and intelligent men is exactly what is required to stamp out these parasitic women... all it takes for evil annoying bitches to prevail in this world is for good smart successful men to do nothing.
[deleted] 10y ago
People who write here that "A fish is going to be a fish, what can you do?" in this context are cunt-enablers.
Dronelisk 10y ago
Well I have better stuff to do than to try and fix this world. I have my own interests and need to work to achieve my goals, so I can't give a fuck how this society fares.
ChadThundercockII 10y ago
Your goals will be easier to achieve in a well arranged world. Don2t you think ?
throwawayyourliberty 10y ago
The boat has sprung a leak and you try to prevent the inevitable sinking by bailing water out of the boat.
I do understand you. But you are not messiah, and you should enjoy the decline.
ChadThundercockII 10y ago
What are you expecting after the decline ? The establishment of a system similar to the old one ? Can it be without our intervention ?
throwawayyourliberty 10y ago
A complete systemic reset. Gender relations are completely rebalanced and our socialist state structure will implode.
If there is no state and law to protect your weak existence, you will either die or you will need to search for protection. Women are useless on their own in times of war and hunger.
I do not endorse such happening, but life is cyclical and our western empire will subside like any other empire, especially if we are so foolish and let a useless minority lead our system.
If you want to dig deeper, just research what happened with the Roman Empire.
ChadThundercockII 10y ago
The weaklings will not survive, and the strong will. What if those who survive are liberal fags ? They reappeared after Rome fell.
throwawayyourliberty 10y ago
"Liberal fags" is quite vague and i do not know your definition of liberal. However, i think many fags are more manly than most Bluepillers nowadays in western culture. There is a reason Europe gets taken over by muslim traits, they got a more feral, animalistic cultural approach. As we can experience in Europe right now, the weak get demolished even without war or economic depression. In economic depression or wartimes, people who act for their family and "tribe" are successful, but i consider libertarianism as a viable political and liberal approach of reality. Unfortunately, liberal thinking got hijacked by the left and feminism, not being liberal at all anymore, but favoring few minorities over the majority.
[deleted] 10y ago
Less guesswork, more experience.
I guarantee they are tests for fitness, I've been dealing with them for 15 years now, but try it out, post your results
aherne18 10y ago
These weren't shit tests, but something out of a combination of modern entitlement (a display of power from her behalf not expecting any retaliation) and complete lack of attraction for the guy in question. The "correct" way to answer depends on situation, but one thing remains constant: they feed by your weakness. It is your weakness display that made them feel powerful enough!
The point is ALWAYS to be powerful and command respect! How do you demonstrate when they've made up their "minds" that you aren't worth shit?
If she happens to be attractive (VERY VERY unusual, it's usually frustrated uglies behaviour), just ignore, boldly approach and start touching her FACE with MANLY AGGRESSION written into your eyes (a look of pure SPITE and SUPERIORITY). She's now an official ass-to-mouth target!
If she's not attractive, call her what she is: a frustrated ugly nobody (of value) gives a fuck about. A simple "sorry but you're not my type! let's just be friends" accompanied by a "friendly" pat on her shoulders to make her pass the "bad news" is more than enough to make them spin. If they try to save face (remember that even uglies have orbiters), remind them it's only an army of desperate men (worthless in her eyes)...
We can continue ad infinitum, but aggression is measured on actions not on words! So why not be aggressive from the beginning?
Woosh29 10y ago
I was with him until his speech to the last girl. No way was she worth all that time and effort, and I think he would have looked bad by engaging her in such a conversation. Surely there had to be a quicker way to shut her down and let her know she's not even worthy of a conversation with him.
sir_wankalot_here 10y ago
The guy sounds like a bully who gets off on hurting others. Caesar or any other great military leader did not resort to large amounts of punishment to get men to follow him. Watch how Ceasar Milan trains dogs, same story.
shadowz151 10y ago
If a dog ran up and bit Ceaser Milan in the leg he would kick it in the face not try to whisper it's jaws off his calf. This is to destroy cunts not train LTRs. Spare the rod spoil the princess...
Batou_Red 10y ago
Caesar's career rested more upon making friends than destroying enemies. He was clement as a part of political platform, but would kill his opponents without mercy if they returned to their activities after receiving his mercy.
NightwingTRP Senior Endorsed 10y ago
This is a reasonable point. The fact it's been downvoted so much demonstrates how stupid and closed minded half the new crowd are.
sir_wankalot_here 10y ago
The entire post is weird, it almost seems like a troll. The hamstering going on is amazing.
For a leader the use of violence is a tool. If OP ever met any tough guys in real life, he would find out that most of them are really easy going relaxed guys who have firm boundaries.
So idiot tourists like OP wander into the wrong bar. They decide to play some pokey chest with the tough guy. The tough guy politely says could you please stop doing that, OP sees politeness as a sign of weakness, continues on in his silly behaviour. So the tough guy pulls a gun shoots him three times, after OP bleeds out some one takes his body and throws it in the garbage.
OP then becomes a satatitistic and said country gets another travel advisory against it.
The tougher the guy, the more easy going they are. They have nothing to prove.
Doing senseless violence for the sake of pleasure does not earn respect from others.
Teatach 10y ago
Romans did have their decimation's though. And it's not punishing to get soldiers to follow, it's punishing the ones who fall out of line.
[deleted]
Svarthofthi 10y ago
Decimation punished the whole army, not just the failures, every tenth man and what-have-you. The math doesn't add up here. Point being, his way of handling shit tests is to aggressively dismantle a woman's ego. Up to you if you want to use that, he somehow thinks that this will indirectly get you laid by creating a hot mess. Also, his ego seems to imply that he's the alpha and that most men won't really bother trying to fight him, but really, all it takes is some dude with a little cunning and no morals to knife someone like that or get jumped. You run a lot of risks when she goes running.
Batou_Red 10y ago
Typically the decimations were rigged so that it was mostly the troublemakers who were killed. There is an interesting note of this in the commentaries if you care to read them.
musclebound92 10y ago
You threw yourself away right there when you said "he somehow thinks that this will indirectly get you laid by creating a hot mess." Maybe he isn't so desperate to be a pickup artist and trying to get laid every chance he gets... If that is how you define alpha hahaha well then good on ya. This guy is 100% correct, he is doing the rest of the world a favor. What is sad is that you people seem to think that because you got a girl who is drunk in a bar with a cunt personality to sleep with you that this somehow has added points to your "alpha-ness." It has done the exact opposite in the eyes of real men. It shows you are willing to compromise your views just to get your cock sucked by some inebriated bar fly. Keep on doing that, but don't ever think you are somehow an alpha cause that is the farthest thing from it. That is the mentality of a beta blue pill boy who can't control his dick.
Svarthofthi 10y ago
I could really give zero shits if I go home alone, I was looking at what he was saying. He's doing YOU a favor by doing what he does, which is classic egotism, I know the dark triad is something that many regard as good but this is delusional. He's over-aggressive in what he believes in necessary in handling a shit test. I never claimed to be alpha, my point is that it is not a good behavior and is good way to end your night getting your ass kicked.
metalfan381 10y ago
"I did get to hurt another girl". Wow what a cool guy, putting all these cunts in their places...
Seriously though this guy sounds like he has some serious self esteem issues. He feels like he needs to go around and be the arbiter of who's a bitch and "punish" women for their behavior. You're not going to make the world a better place by being a bitch to bitches. Besides the fact that he seems to be targeting women exclusively (I personally meet a lot more male assholes than female), this sort of behavior just serves to make you look like a bitter little cunt with mommy issues.
hebola4lyfe 10y ago
^ found another female poster in this sub
[deleted]
HumbleEngineer 10y ago
Jesus, I understand the message, but the link is full on neckbeard talk.
TRPhd 10y ago
This dude is either 1) a liar, or 2) a piece of shit. I actually hope he's a liar, because otherwise they are going to find human skeletons buried under his backyard someday. Seriously fucked up.
grachuss 10y ago
I was a bouncer for 10 years. This is grade A cunt behavior. They got what they deserved.
musclebound92 10y ago
Your username should honestly say TBPhd.
J_AsapGem 10y ago
It would work awesome towards the bitchy ass girls, but i think playful banter and agree and amplify and better for girls interested in you.
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
human_enquirer 10y ago
Where does one draw the line between cunty behavior and shit tests worth passing using previously mentioned options.
[deleted]
IllimitableMan Vanguard 10y ago
All women are bitchy to a degree because women are more immature than men are. Women who behave well and fairly docile were raised in the presence of strong men, it's more a reflection of the men that raised them than it is the nature of women. Basically, well-raised/trained women are docile, typically boring, but respectful. The crazy ones that can be a lot of fun had fucked up upbringings, they resent authority (and hence men) because there was none present in their formative years.
Sometimes women act like a bitch precisely because they're into you. You can't distinguish over Reddit whether a girl is being bitchy because she's annoyed, or if she's giving you shit because having a mental game of chess with a guy is how she finds out who she's attracted to. IMO, this is context/girl dependent. The more aggressive/head fucky girls are more likely to do this. Generally speaking, more fucked up girls do this. If you shut her down, you will almost always increase her attraction to you because you increase her respect by showing dominance. Ironic how the authority they come to resent is really something they secretly crave and lash out at because they never had it.
What one is missing here is that hate is still interest, even if it poses as disinterest. True disinterest is indifference. Some chicks love to hate you, they love the conflict that comes from the both of you mentally going at it with one another, this is the mental foreplay that precedes having sex with them. A man that can't reign in the bitchiness and fight back isn't even worthy of getting into her panties as far as she's concerned because "he's not a real man" if he can't fight her, how can he protect her from the world?
Of course it's like Patrice said, there are 3 kinds of women: bears, dears and bunnies. Bears as I previously described, think of ghetto black women who are combative by nature as well as girls higher on the crazy scale from other races. Dears will be a little bitchy, but will apologise when you put them in place. Bunnies are women raised in the presence of strong men, your typical submissive Asian girl or conservative upper class WASP girl stereotype - they never had to be independent or really suffer, men in the family always took care of things, so they still preserve a childlike naivety.
[deleted]