This came up today as i was trying some daygame in the streets. Maybe you guys already know this and i am a bit of a slow learner in this regard, but something has changed after i realized and i'm finding myself totally disconnected from this "matrix". And yeah, this maybe a rant, but i don't know why i'm enthusiastic about writing this and sharing this with you guys.

Anyway, to start, i'd like to quote the venerable rollo tomassi from his blog therationalmale.com

"Learn this now, you will never achieve contentment or emotional fulfillment in a blue pill context with red pill awareness." - Rollo Tomassi, A New Hope (September 29, 2014).

I urge you guys to look it up, if you haven't (most probably you have). I always used to wonder in what sense he uses the word "context" and what does he precisely mean by that? Is it society? Is it culture? Is it the feminist propaganda machinery?

When i was gaming today (on the streets, not on the couch), i had a thought - I'll only get laid after so many rejections. So am i a looser or a winner?

That's when i realized the dichotomy. I'm a looser, cause i'm getting rejected so many times. I'll be a winner, since my notch count will be higher than other normal plugged in men. And that's when it hit me.

The game is rigged guys, you just can't win. As we can see, we just uncovered a contradiction, a glitch in the matrix. But if that is the case, why do we fall for such blatant contradictions, and nobody seems to notice and question them? Because their is a pattern.

For something to exist in the feminine imperative(FI for the rest of the write up), it's necessary for it to be reconcilable with it's opposite in and only within the bounds of feminine primacy.

For instance, take the above contradiction. A man being rejected is a looser. A man getting laid is a winner. So if both of them are valid statements in the feminine primary society, then the consequence would have to favor the fair sex. Which it does in this case. If both are true, then the only way for a man to approach the problem of women is to become someone who gets laid with multiple women and is rejected by none.The first introduces social pressure on sizing women up sexually, and the second increases the competitive nature of the sexual market in favor of women by pitting men against each other. Mixed with the monogamy trope (read beta bux when my tits are sagging), this deduces to, becoming rich, looking handsome, buying her gifts, and making "sure" that he hears a yes from her before she says it, it encourages white knighting, pedestalization, beta-droning and most of all a feminine primary frame. The man's self esteem goes down and he becomes the selected instead of the selector.

But while everybody knows that "beta bucks", curiously this also keeps the alpha's under check. Do you think that the alpha doesn't get rejected? Fuck no, he gets loads, it's just that he doesn't give a shit about them. So while they'll enjoy the alpha better gene cock-tail, the alpha will always be labelled as the looser that he is, a good for nothing brute whose only accomplishment in life was to ride pussy and lift weights. This will be especially convenient when she hits her epiphany phase and wants to do "the right thing".

So as we see gentlemen, the contradiction makes perfect sense to you if you are able and willing to aid the FI. So where did our fault in this lie?

This is where the "context" comes in. I realized that all the red pill truths that we've crammed till now are useless, if we try to keep applying them with blue pill assumptions, expectations and blue pill benchmarks.

So here's how it plays out. I've a problem A. I swallow the red pill. I try to fix A using red pill knowledge. Won't work. So now i realize that A wasn't a problem at all. It was a blue pill goal designed to be impossible to achieve and milking out advantages till the time i realize this. Most such problems are just that - labels.

Your notch count shouldn't be a factor in your self worth. Treat sex like you treat hunger. The feminine doesn't want you to since that is it's only agency. But disregard that.

On more practical terms, this solves a lot of my game problems. For instance, new inner game : I'm not qualifying to her, and so whatever i say is right. If that doesn't work out, it's not my problem that she's not seduction worthy. So maybe i'll even walk away mid sentences, if i feel she's a waste of time.

I plan to treat game as a workout session from now on. Sometimes plates will spin, most of the times they wont. The good thing to do would be regular, approach clean and in a totally non fuss way and get out completely after an hour session.

I'm not really sure if i can express myself properly here. Apologize to all if this seems nonsense and gibberish.