I've gathered insights from every shit test thread I found on forums, my real-life experiences with women, and advice from dating coaches like Corey Wayne, AMS, and Atomic Attraction. The bot also knows the game—she's read books like 'The Rules'—so she gets bored quickly and has a short attention span. She responds best when you're cocky, funny, and keep the humor flowing.
HOW TO USE:
Simply write "Set the interaction" or "Set interaction at coffe shop, gym, school etc) and the bot will put you in a random simulation where you can approach a women and depend on the interaction it can either go good or bad. She will trough shit test test you and your boundaires like "I have a boyfriend" or "I don't think I can make it that time"
The best part: If you don't know how to answer a shit test or an interaction. Simply write "How to respond" and the bot will give you 3 answers to choose from depending on the path you wan't to go and pass her shit test.
I recommend using the voice function so that you get "Real life interaction" and can answer. Also say stuff like "I put out my hand waiting for her to take it "and if you're trying to tease her express it (I say it in an teasing way)
The programming includes every needy behavior from the books I've mentioned and how to counteract every interaction, from flaking to her saying she has a boyfriend. It’s up to you to 'Win the Game' and keep her engaged.
Message me if you have any questions!
The Average Guy
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-iBlmW2Oz5-the-average-guy
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-iBlmW2Oz5-the-average-guy
My youtube where I explain how the bot works. Working on the video for now!
Vermillion-Rx Admin 11mo ago Stickied
Same comment i left on r/TheRedPill. This is not a real woman, and ChatGPT is not designed to be factual, it is designed to satisfactorally predict language subjectively.
You can post stuff like this on the other side of this site because it is a less formal place for posting.
TheRedPill is an an official forum space for finding truth and ChatGPT is objectively incapable of reaching truths.
Thus, while interesting, and might help some social retards learn some hypothetical game, it is not capable of reaching truths and such posts, if allowed to be mainstream on here, would not be aimed at truth and AI examples is not a path that I'm willing to let the official forums spaces be used for.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
You're forgetting that AI can contain the entirety of human knowledge and there are truth-maximizing AI out there like Grok. AI is probably the most powerful productivity increasing tool mankind has ever achieved. I'm glad someone went and plugged in all the public red pill stuff which is red flagged by all the woke AI companies... because now I can use it to save time. My time, your time, newbie's time, etc.
I do still like having collective human wisdom and a place we can share new discoveries, but when someone discovers something, as the OP did, it's fair to share it with the rest of us where we usually hang out.
Vermillion-Rx Admin 11mo ago
I don't have a problem with someone doing it discussing it. They're welcome to keep developing and improving it on TRP.red
AI posting is not appropriate for the official TheRedPill forum specifically. It fails to adhere to the primary goal of TheRedPill by failing to be confirmable, testable, and capable of exchanging notes amongst men because there are zero tangible results. Unless he can have sex with ChatGPT and ChatGPT is a woman then it fails to adhere to that.
We can confirm how women will behaviorally respond to red pill principles etc, we cannot confirm how a language model will be applicable to real life women.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
Just click the link and test it. I did. I think you misunderstand the use case here. So here it is: it's a highly tuned google search of shit test material. Instead of a guy having to go on the forums, ask how to pass a shit test, and then have one of us point him to the shit test encyclopedia and various forum posts, this tailored AI just spits out the relevant section of whatever post or blog would be the most likely answer.
That being said, I think these things should come with a disclaimer that they can hallucinate and give false answers so it's wise to take it with a grain of salt and possibly confirm with a human who would know the answer.
Here's an example usage:
Me: set interaction at the supermarket
ChatGPT said: GPT
You're at the supermarket, pushing your cart down the produce aisle. As you reach for a bag of apples, you notice a woman a few feet away. She's dressed casually, maybe in jeans and a fitted top, her hair tied up in a loose ponytail. She's browsing through the vegetables, occasionally glancing at you out of the corner of her eye.
You decide to approach. With a relaxed stride, you walk over to her, stopping just before speaking, giving her a moment to notice your presence.
The next move is yours—what's your opening line?
Me: suggest a line
ChatGPT said: GPT
You could say with a smile, "Any tips on picking the perfect avocado? I always seem to get it wrong."
This line is light, situational, and opens up the conversation naturally.
Another use case is this:
Me: how do I pass this shit test? I bet you say that to all the girls...
ChatGPT said: GPT
When a woman says, "I bet you say that to all the girls," she's testing your sincerity and confidence. The key here is to stay cool, avoid getting defensive, and show that you're unfazed by the challenge.
Here are a few ways to respond:
Playful Response
Response: "Only the ones who can keep up." Why: This shows you're confident and don’t take the bait seriously, keeping the mood light and fun.
Confident and Direct
Response: "I don’t need to. You’re the one I’m interested in right now." Why: This directly addresses her challenge while reinforcing that your focus is on her, making it clear that she’s the one who caught your attention.
Humorous Deflection
Response: "Only the ones who ask me that question." Why: Humor diffuses the situation and turns the challenge back to her, showing that you’re quick-witted and unbothered.
Each of these responses maintains your composure, shows confidence, and keeps the interaction positive. The goal is to show that you're not easily thrown off by her test, making you more intriguing and attractive.
Vermillion-Rx Admin 11mo ago
It isn't a real woman. End of story
As i mentioned already, there are other more appropriate places on this site to discuss and work on that bot
No-Stress-Cat 11mo ago
This is an interesting concept from a Red Pill Programmer's perspective.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
It's not a concept, it's finished and ready to use. I just tried it. It's pretty good.
First-light 1 11mo ago
It would be very interesting to see how this played out in real life. Could a guy with an earpiece linked to a chat bot become a great seducer or is it a case of actions, looks and resources not words?
While its easy to dismiss with "real women are complicated and not push button" it would be very interesting to see where the limits of this were. What can really be solved by the right answers by "game" (essentially salesmanship) and what is controlled by market fundamentals.
I would love to see it run as an experiment with guys who were better and worse looking, richer and poorer and so on all linked to chatbots chatting up many different girls in real world situations and seeing how they got on.
One could try it with OLD making different profiles for the chatbot and seeing how many dates it could set up. This is not real world but its halfway there and would be insightful if not the whole story.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
The tech isn't there yet. Maybe in another year or so we will have rock solid AI smart glasses. At that point, any guy will be able to have ultimate game. Another fun AI to do would carfax reports but for women. HoeFax. You meet a new woman, snap a photo with your glasses, and it runs a report, hacks her phone, scans all her accounts, comes up with a plausible body count, mental problems, medications, etc.
First-light 1 11mo ago
HoeFax is an awesome idea. Couple that with a smooth talk app that bases its suggested responses on hoefax findings and real world data on how the average woman would respond and men will find life a lot easier. Women could also get apps for men that were similar. It would not harm either side if they gave the other what they would better like to receive and if they knew who to avoid.
The user would just need t know where their red lines were -where they would not go where the app led and over time they would see if their red lines actually helped or hindered them. Its a great idea.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
Oh it would definitely harm women. Their entire identity is based on manipulating men.
First-light 1 11mo ago
I understand what you mean but I prefer to think it would not harm them, it would just limit the harm they could do.
At the moment they can play guys easily, line up a string or monkey branch without mercy.
It does you no harm to play fair it just stops you getting the benefit of playing dirty.
First-light 1 11mo ago
I mean running this concept the other way around, red pill chat bot to provide answers for guys. One could even set it up against a blue pill chatbot to see who scored more dates.
Real world scientific proof would really screw a lot of liberal published liberal academic doctrine over and also show the limits of red pill techniques versus market fundamentals.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
Aren't red pill techniques based on market fundamentals?
First-light 1 11mo ago
I would say that in some cases yes and in others absolutely not. Its a bit like are matches won on athletic ability? Usually it goes that way by the end of the match, so we train to be fit. On the field though, it not always the fittest team that wins, its the team that makes less mistakes or makes the other make more mistakes or has the best tactics and teamwork. Usually this is the fittest team but not always.
Simple example women like high value men. in red pill training men are encouraged to raise their value in a number of ways. In the actual dynamics of say courting though, men practise imitating higher value behaviour than they actually have. This is against market fundamentals in favour of the individual. So men act with confidence, they dress smartly, they seem obsessed by having big muscles -to indicate good genes and good health but actually for example taking PEDs to increase muscle size is the absolute opposite of increasing health and one is aiming to make one's genetic value seem higher than it naturally is. If it were down to market fundamentals guys would dress in uniform ways and present bank balances and cvs to girls along with medical tests and dna tests and girls would find this exciting.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
I think you're confusing market fundamentals and marketing. The fundamental here is hypergamy(AF/BB), which is what red pill is based on.
First-light 1 11mo ago
Hypergamy drives the market for quality men.
Short term relationships with people who are not in your social circle creates a niche for quality presenting men (she can't tell the difference in the short term between quality presenting and real quality).
There are always salesmen who take advantage of market fundamentals to sell something crappy as if it was the thing that the market actually values. This is where "game" really comes into its own. Chad the rich handsome athletic guy needs very little game -he is fundamentally valuable. This gives him confidence and a sense of his worth. He has had plenty of encounters with women from a young age and knows how to handle them. Fake chad with his pimped up car, pumped up muscles and books on game is not fundamentally valuable, he is at best selling an entertainment experience to women beyond his real SMV. He needs to learn all the game to act like he has innate confidence and learn the tricks of handling women. But he only exists because of the modern world. He can only exist because women do not know enough about men to know their actual value like they would in their home village. He is just a response to the cock carousel where women enjoy indulging hypergamy with no consequence.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
You're conflating red pill with PUA. We're not faking anything.
First-light 1 11mo ago
I think that all depends who "we" are. A lot of the questions asked here are by young men who just want PUA skills. A lot of PUA is just marketing and a lot of the red pill techniques people talk about for managing women are just hitting loopholes in their psychology and weaknesses in hypergamy. These are usually temporary fixes -hence the "plates" thing. Plates break because at some point she has had enough of not getting real value.
To me Red pill is the view of reality that affects the decisions you take in life but to a lot of young men its a short term route through girls' underwear.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
Sure enough but the sexual marketplace is what it is. I'm not so sure plates break because they're not getting real value. These women set themselves up to fail. Plenty of women have no trouble getting upgraded to LTR/marriage.
benzino 11mo ago
I tried it. It's not bad but it is detrimental imo. Or at least whoever uses needs to know this should only be used at the very initial stages of learning game.
A big part of it is reading the atmosphere, body language, and nothing replaces real conversations. Failures are also a necessary part of growth. Practicing game includes accepting losses and moving on quickly. You cant do that with AI
First-light 1 11mo ago
Not at the moment I think but I think that a time may come where Ai actually read people better than we can and when this happens it may actually help us improve our relationships. Not just for PUAs but for people in LTRs -too see where the flash points are coming before they fire off for example.
NeoSpartan 11mo ago
I typed it open bobs but it didn't show me bobs.
wtf?
0/10 sexbot
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 11mo ago
It's a neat little toy, but I think something like this can stunt or retard the progress of guys who need to get off their asses and go out and experiment.
Not to mention, most real world communication isn't the words said, but rather how they're said: a mixture of body language and tone of voice. All of that shit is missing here.
For any newbies who stumble across this: mess around a bit, sure. But you're going to need to do this IRL and deal with rejections and moving on.
whytehorse2021 11mo ago
First the AI came for the journalists... then the call center workers... then the programmers... then the musicians... then the artists... and now the manosphere.
I need to figure out how to add this on my phone. Nothing comes up if I search for it in the chatGPT app. My son is starting high school so I want him to have it.
I'd recommend adding all of Rollo's blogs as well for the underlying explanations of the how and why of it all. It's the difference between giving a man a fish and teaching him how to fish. https://therationalmale.com/tag/rational-male-blog/
For future security against cancel culture, and believe me this is going to go viral, I'd recommend training an open source model based on truth(Grok 2?) and then publish on github so people can run it locally with something like LMStudio. Maybe some of the red pill authors would offer up their books in the future to make it super-human in terms of red pill knowledge.