Rollo has been warning about this for a while now and it's connected to the election cycle. Most of us left reddit, facebook, and other platforms after getting rando-banned and falsely reported. So that left a bunch of social justice warrior armchair activists with nothing to do. So they got bored and started following us around.
The latest incarnation has been to take down youtube channels, get people demonetized, and go after viewers in the comments sections. Some content creators are going to alternative platforms like locals, patreon, and rumble. I'm one of those viewers that was recently falsely reported for harassment/cyberbullying. I wasn't told what the comment was, who reported me, there's no appealing the decision, and my channel could be taken down. I promptly deleted all my comments and will never comment again. Any of you could be next. It's not just the big guys anymore, they're going after everyone.
Are you prepared? I can guarantee they will come brigade this forum at some point after they've scared everyone off every other platform.
Edit: For those who don't see the connection between youtube/media and the elections it has to do with the fact that the lions share of ad revenue comes from political parties.
[deleted]
andreen 10mo ago
When using any online platform, it's crucial to understand the platform's community guidelines, content subway surfers online policies, and reporting mechanisms.
[deleted] 10mo ago
[--removed--]
Kevin-Logan 10mo ago
Yeah, this is no breaking news. Any type of manosphere related content was always censored in mainstream platforms.
whytehorse2021 10mo ago
True, but it goes in waves. What's really scary is how integrated corporations, political parties, and the media are. It's going to be nothing but feminist narrative for the next year. Then they'll start passing laws to take down sites like this. One day your cloud host will just pull the plug and not tell you why.
AskingUncomfyQuestions 10mo ago
I might be new here but can you guys tell me why you worship Rollo so much when has been dunked on so many times.
He couldn't define what a high value man is to Destiny and Sneako and he was humilated in that debate.
He says men that marry in their 20s are not hvm while he married his own daughter at 20 to another man in his 20s.
He looked at a sculptor on twitter and out of nowhere claimed that women can never come close to making anything of that sort but it turned out it was made by a woman and he got ratiod hard.
Durek_The_Bald 10mo ago
For a lot of guys in here (including myself), The Rational Male was the book that made things go "click" in the head.
Rollo's not perfect, and haven't always practiced what he preaches. He gets wound up and emotional, has a bit of a Messiah complex, and easily gets sucked into 'beefs' and drama.
But he once changed my mindset and life for the better, and for that I'll always be grateful, always root for the guy to make a good showing of himself (which, admittedly, he doesn't always do).
whytehorse2021 10mo ago
There's no worship. He's been doing this for a long time and has a lot of expertise in marketing, psychology, and women.
Destiny cited a debunked study that claims there's no such thing as hypergamy. None of us ever heard of it before because it's junk science.
With men in their 20s a woman is basing her decision on his future value, not current value. Remember, it's women that define what a high value man is, not Rollo. For evidence you can look at the age of first marriage for men and women. It's currently 31M and 29F. But it wasn't always that way. If you go back to 1950 it was 25M and 23F.
The only questionable data in Rollo's SMV chart, and he admits this, is that men peak at 35. He pulled that out of his own observations but he could have backed it up with marriage age. One could even take women's current criteria for a marriageable man and project how long it woud take the average man to become that baased on education, experience, raises, etc.
I don't use twitter so can't comment.
[deleted] 10mo ago
[--removed--]
Kevin-Logan 10mo ago
Who the fuck is rollo?
Sam88 10mo ago
They need manosphere, because it will fulfill elitist agenda.Due to really think they care about feminists lol.They need single mothers,so the children can be easily brainwashed. They see manosphere as an opposite reaction to feminists,so in long term,it will help them for depopulation..Yeah they may crackdown on few individuals, but in large context they need manosphere to fulfill their agenda.if they want to ban all the youtube channels and sites,they could already did it long time ago..
whytehorse2021 10mo ago
Why would they need the manosphere?
Sam88 10mo ago
Due to know feminist magazines funded by big corporations and three letter agency..They only care about their agenda of depopulation and controlling the state ,women and children.They only pander to women because they can easily control them.Manosphere will benefit them ,when no marriages will be conducted and father of children of single mothers and divorced.mothers are the state(government).And most importantly they discuss the concept of universal basic income which will be easily accepted by women in future,when AI humanoid robots will be introduced who will be ,much more efficient than human laborer in any field.In future ,they need women because they can be easily manipulated and they need less men.So they love manosphere in secret,otherwise it will be banned from internet a long time ago.