This is 54 seconds of pure gold. Those that know my posts know my Grand Unifying Theory - men have been gaslit into believing (through cheap-shaming by women) that they SHOULD pay for dates and drinks, and that this will somehow result in better pussy.
It will not. It will usually lead to less pussy. This short video explains exactly why. Women fuck men that they find attractive, and go out on expensive dates with men that they DON'T find attractive.
Keep your money for yourself. When you listen for even 10 minutes about modern 'feminists' railing about 50-50 guys, you will understand it exactly. And quite frankly, they (the crypto feminists) and modern culture and society, have shamed men into believing that paying for women is somehow 'good manners' and shows 'positive intent' and proves that they are 'traditional' and 'good providers'.
Don't fall for that trap. They can pay for their own dinners and drinks. Don't spend a dime on those girls. Tyrone didn't. Neither did chad. Don't be a chump.
If a woman is sexually attracted to you, she'll put in the effort to make herself available and accessible to you. She'll buy the drinks if it gets her your time. She'll do that drive across town to see you. She'll cancel plans with other people to be with you.
What she won't fucking do is risk you taking your time elsewhere by being a demanding bitch and saying "I'll only see you if you pay for things."
Edit: and, just so y'all can stay bitter, know that every time you take a woman out, buy her things, and show her a nice time, she'll be sure to tell the guy she's fucking how nice you were right before she swallows his dick whole.
Or they'll trot out BS like "proving that he is taking me seriously and will be there for me".
While oddly enough always leaving out that women somehow aren't obligated to prove the same. Always omitted.
Fellas, if she isn't taking you seriously enough to try to suffocate herself on your dick without needing you to jump through hoops like a trained circus bear, she isn't going to be there for you either!
FDS was created by women at the bottom of the dating market who are employing a "they can't refuse to fuck us all" strategy by making as many women undesirable to men as they can. They think that by lowering the collective bar, men will magically find fat, old, opinionated, ugly feminists appealing and that - finally - they can get some damn commitment.
The problem is twofold:
Ask any of these FDS women (if you can stand them) what their goal is and then ask them how many of them are getting there with their strategy.
There will always be women who will take advantage of the abysmally low bar and do basic shit like "don't be fat" and "don't be a slut" to rise to the top 20%.
I like it! You could also express it another way -
"When a woman truly wants to fuck you, she will behave like a dude."
I was once having dinner with a woman and she said "Are you going to have desert? Because I want to get back to the hotel ASAP because I want dick right now" It was one of the most sexy things a woman has ever said to me, because it was just like how men think.
true dat - it's almost odd that his stuff is still on youtube - he might get deplatformed any day now. Because he's a SEXIST, MYSOGINST PIG THAT IS RAPING THE WAYMENS.
I can't comment on whether he is 'ripping off' Rollo, because I don't know ALL of Rollo's content. But I can say I was impressed with how succinctly he made some points within 50 seconds or so for some of this YT shorts.
The particular point that he made, and the way he made it, about the inverse relationship between how much women want a man and how much you need to spend on a woman to get her in the sack, was a thing of beauty.
it's good that he's getting the message to more men.
But he is not groundbreaking, original, or even exploring new territory. I have yet to hear anything from him I didn't read years ago from Roosh, Rollo, Roissy/Heartiste, Athol Kay, Archwinger, Whisper, Human Sock Puppet, BluePillProfessor, Rian Stone, Dalrock, etc
Go through the red archive sometime, especially Heartiste. You're missing a lot of good shit if Dr. Taraban is impressive to you.
I will dude. If I, and others, get to Heartiste because I spent 50 seconds listening to a YT short by Dr Taraban, then surely you can see that Dr T is indeed 'a good thing'.
I do get what you are saying, and I lack the detailed knowledge that you have on these subjects, BUT perhaps you can see that there is plenty of room in TRP / manosphere / mens rights etc (whatever you want to call it).
When TRPer's start bashing content creators because they are not original, we risk getting into a debate that mimics monty python arguing the merits of The Peoples Front of Judea vs The Judean Peoples' Front.
I don't bash Mozart because he's not Bach. I can enjoy both.
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago Stickied
This is 54 seconds of pure gold. Those that know my posts know my Grand Unifying Theory - men have been gaslit into believing (through cheap-shaming by women) that they SHOULD pay for dates and drinks, and that this will somehow result in better pussy.
It will not. It will usually lead to less pussy. This short video explains exactly why. Women fuck men that they find attractive, and go out on expensive dates with men that they DON'T find attractive.
Keep your money for yourself. When you listen for even 10 minutes about modern 'feminists' railing about 50-50 guys, you will understand it exactly. And quite frankly, they (the crypto feminists) and modern culture and society, have shamed men into believing that paying for women is somehow 'good manners' and shows 'positive intent' and proves that they are 'traditional' and 'good providers'.
Don't fall for that trap. They can pay for their own dinners and drinks. Don't spend a dime on those girls. Tyrone didn't. Neither did chad. Don't be a chump.
Problematic_Browser 1 2y ago
This is so FUCKING true.
If a woman is sexually attracted to you, she'll put in the effort to make herself available and accessible to you. She'll buy the drinks if it gets her your time. She'll do that drive across town to see you. She'll cancel plans with other people to be with you.
What she won't fucking do is risk you taking your time elsewhere by being a demanding bitch and saying "I'll only see you if you pay for things."
Edit: and, just so y'all can stay bitter, know that every time you take a woman out, buy her things, and show her a nice time, she'll be sure to tell the guy she's fucking how nice you were right before she swallows his dick whole.
Overkill_Engine Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
Or they'll trot out BS like "proving that he is taking me seriously and will be there for me".
While oddly enough always leaving out that women somehow aren't obligated to prove the same. Always omitted.
Fellas, if she isn't taking you seriously enough to try to suffocate herself on your dick without needing you to jump through hoops like a trained circus bear, she isn't going to be there for you either!
TRPDuryodhana 2y ago
Wait. So you mean those FDS chicks are wrong!?
Problematic_Browser 1 2y ago
FDS is working as intended.
FDS was created by women at the bottom of the dating market who are employing a "they can't refuse to fuck us all" strategy by making as many women undesirable to men as they can. They think that by lowering the collective bar, men will magically find fat, old, opinionated, ugly feminists appealing and that - finally - they can get some damn commitment.
The problem is twofold:
Ask any of these FDS women (if you can stand them) what their goal is and then ask them how many of them are getting there with their strategy.
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
Rollo Tomassi said it best over a decade ago regarding genuine desire (paraphrasing from memory):
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
I like it! You could also express it another way -
"When a woman truly wants to fuck you, she will behave like a dude."
I was once having dinner with a woman and she said "Are you going to have desert? Because I want to get back to the hotel ASAP because I want dick right now" It was one of the most sexy things a woman has ever said to me, because it was just like how men think.
AbusiveFather1 2y ago
PsycHacks is the man; I fear they might cancel him
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
true dat - it's almost odd that his stuff is still on youtube - he might get deplatformed any day now. Because he's a SEXIST, MYSOGINST PIG THAT IS RAPING THE WAYMENS.
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
Eh.
I have yet to see him say anything original or groundbreaking.
He's just repeating stuff Rollo and other Red Pill guys have been saying for over a decade, and not giving any credit.
He's cashing in on a niche.
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
CC: @Lone_Ranger
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
I can't comment on whether he is 'ripping off' Rollo, because I don't know ALL of Rollo's content. But I can say I was impressed with how succinctly he made some points within 50 seconds or so for some of this YT shorts.
The particular point that he made, and the way he made it, about the inverse relationship between how much women want a man and how much you need to spend on a woman to get her in the sack, was a thing of beauty.
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
it's good that he's getting the message to more men.
But he is not groundbreaking, original, or even exploring new territory. I have yet to hear anything from him I didn't read years ago from Roosh, Rollo, Roissy/Heartiste, Athol Kay, Archwinger, Whisper, Human Sock Puppet, BluePillProfessor, Rian Stone, Dalrock, etc
Go through the red archive sometime, especially Heartiste. You're missing a lot of good shit if Dr. Taraban is impressive to you.
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
I will dude. If I, and others, get to Heartiste because I spent 50 seconds listening to a YT short by Dr Taraban, then surely you can see that Dr T is indeed 'a good thing'.
I do get what you are saying, and I lack the detailed knowledge that you have on these subjects, BUT perhaps you can see that there is plenty of room in TRP / manosphere / mens rights etc (whatever you want to call it).
When TRPer's start bashing content creators because they are not original, we risk getting into a debate that mimics monty python arguing the merits of The Peoples Front of Judea vs The Judean Peoples' Front.
I don't bash Mozart because he's not Bach. I can enjoy both.
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
I'm not "bashing" him so much as trying to get you to take him off the pedestal you have him on.
Roissy wrote Be a Skittles Man back in 2009, and I share that link all the time in the Public Square, sometimes along with this backup link.
Taraban's YouTube short said nothing new.
Not a good analogy, as those two composers did their own original work, and neither one just copied the other.
Fucking splitters, all of them! Cast off your shoes and follow the gourd!
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
The only people I hate more than the Romans are the Judean Peoples' Front!
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
Yeah! Splitters! And the People's Front of Judea, splitters!
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
I mean, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
Aquaducts?
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
Yeah, well apart from the Aquaducts.
Typo-MAGAshiv Endorsed Contributor 2y ago
Roads!
Lone_Ranger 3 2y ago
Yeah, well apart from the aquaducts and the roads.