I was going to tell you this is feminist rhetoric until the last paragraph.

Politically speaking on one hand we have older men in a stable relationship with kids. They dont want to challenge the status quo. On the other hand we have young incels watching how their female counterpart having the ride of their lives. The winner is...??

In my eyes the real winner here is the cat food industry. Those fuckers will make billions in the coming decades due to the influx of childless women in their 30-40s

At my job there is a 40 year old woman and she is batshit crazy. I mean i have seen a whole lot of crazy bitches in my life but that woman is just too much. She is so fucking destroyed by the fact that she cannot have children and that the opportunity has passed. She openly admits it. Her stare is just so empty. Sometimes she has a huge fit of rage and starts flinging shit even TO THE BOSS and the next few minutes later she is calm again. I feel sorry for her sometimes because sje is miserable but at the same time one must ask how the fuck did she misd the opportunity to find a suitable male and make kids?

Not to have schadenfreude for women of my age (27). But i am glad that everything in life has a consequence. All that power women have comes at a cost, and they will fail miserably.

As for me. Focus. Improve. Dont marry.

Realizing a woman's basic nature is the first step to a better life. I learned that a long time ago. I think this:

Female nature is her quest to find the best men, with the best genetics, to have sex with. We call this hypergamy, or the female instinct to trade up

Is about as succinct a description of a woman's primary goal as I've ever read. And the lengths they'll take to "trade up" are just obscene. Promiscuity is one thing, it's whatever. I'm talking about women who betray their friends, who abandon careers, who lie and cheat, who intentionally trap men into marriage... these are the worst in a nest of vipers. First step to avoiding it is knowing it's there. And don't marry a woman who's not consciously submissive.

Lots of good stuff in here. Marriage is so outdated. The mere fact that you have to pay for a lawyer to break up your marriage shows it’s just a government money making sceme that uses religion to guilt you into it.

Hypergamy is only a problem if you’re not in the top 20% of men. We’re no longer apes living in the jungle where genetics are king. You can get to the top 20% if you work your ass off. You can either bitch and complain or get to work.

This is a great post and exposes a lot of truth, but I'm going to strongly disagree with the points about submissiveness and nurturing being socially enforced behaviours.

(1) Women's nurturing nature is the only reason why we have survived as a species - it's the defense mechanism that ensures that in the general case women will not throw their babies away, since babies heavily rely on their mothers in their early years. All the women who have thrown their babies away, failing to form an emotional bond, have rarely produced babies that survive into adulthood. We are all the genetic offspring of those who could bond with their children.

That said, it's not that in the past there was some sort of socially constructed rule for women to be nurturing, it is simply that there is currently a socially context that strongly overpowers the nurturing instinct by enabling and encouraging women to abandon their nature in favor of becoming obedient corporate drones. Where do you think the crazy cat lady stereotype comes from? The social structure tries to squash a woman's desire to raise children, and the suppressed instinct reemerges later in life as raising cats as a proxy for children. Women are literally torn between conforming to the social norm of the herd and following their motherly instinct. The social norm commonly wins, since on top of its compelling authority it also promises the emotionally appealing ideas of empowerment in the form of career, and unrestrained indulgence in the form of the CC and consumer culture.

(2) Women are naturally submissive. The catch is that they are only submissive when they feel safe. Society easily provides the conditions for physical security, as well as the opportunity for each woman to provide material security for herself in different ways.

The most important type of security gets left out, however. Psychological security is something that I don't think society will ever be able to adequately provide for women in a centralized way. It's one of the resources men hold a monopoly over. Women, no matter how successful, will always feel lonely, neurotic, purposeless, etc. etc. Those feeling never go away, but women chill down if they attach themselves to a man who they perceive is capable of withstanding those emotions. A woman is willing to submit to a man as long as he satisfies her needs for security and excitement. Women can be extremely docile when all their needs are satisfied properly.

If they have no psychological security, however, they become increasingly irritated, and this manifests in things like extremely outrageous demands and phenomena such as third wave feminism AKA "the biggest shit-test known to man". Women will always overstep their reasonable limits and bombard with shit tests when they feel insecurity - without psychological security, the anxiety only rises, and a woman would be insane to act submissively while feeling under threat.

Hypergamy is a fact, but its not right to dismiss some of the most crucial instincts women have that have historically enabled the survival of them and their children.

The nurturing instinct and submission are like crack cocaine to women, because it's biology's way of guiding them towards those behaviors. The women who found pleasure and enjoyment in submission and raising children were spared and protected in the old times - those who didn't very often were not.

Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.

Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

About your last paragraph, what suggestions would you make to stop playing by the rules?

As in, in straight sexual content it would be obvious. But if you broaden the concept, everyday your a cuck to the govenment who take the lions share of your payments to support the decline of civilization. Societal and law rules make it harder, or even dangerous, to pursue liberal sexual strategies if you are a man.

In such a context, what your take on what to do?

Lots of truth here. The only issue is that marriage was always flawed. People get bored of each other. After awhile in a marriage, women have their children and no longer worry about their biological clock, and men no longer have the hot young body next to them. The things that brought them together have run their course.

Marriage was never going to produce long term happiness. Other than being a good structure for raising kids, there’s no real long term benefit to it. Marriage laws just need to be updated.