This article really took my cheese so let me get right to the quotes.
teen girls tell researchers they are twice as depressed, anxious and stressed out as boys. And though girls beat out boys in college and graduate school admissions, according to a University of California-Los Angeles study, female college freshmen have never been lonelier or less happy.
What! So girls are unhappy? Boys are killing themselves at a rate 4 - 6 times higher than girls but that doesn't matter! What matters is if girls are unhappy or "lonely."
In the so-called age of girl power, we have failed to cut loose our most regressive standards of female success -- like pleasing others and looking sexy -- and to replace them with something more progressive -- like valuing intelligence and hard work.
Oh No! Girls are pressured to be attractive and to do the unthinkable: Please others!!! That is obvious misogyny. Women should not have to please anybody. Men have to please women.
Can you hear me now?
social media -- where, according to Pew Research, girls tend to dominate, using visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat in far greater numbers than boys -- isn't helping the matter. The pressure to get at least one like per minute on Instagram and keep up scores of daily Snapchat "streaks" is unending.
Oh, yes! Boys blow out their brains and end up homeless and/or estranged from their children, die 8 years younger than women, are murdered at many times the rate, make up 90% of people in prison and are 1/3 LESS likely to go to college. They are falsely accused, hounded, ridiculed, screamed at, and defiled- and that is just the husbands.
But women are pressured to get "likes" on their social media. Are we seriously publishing FAKE NEWS stories like this?
a daily feed of friends and celebrities showing off tight abs and thin arms deepens girls' body shame
Can we hold women accountable for things they are able to control like loose abs and fat arms? No! We can only hold MEN accountable for things over which they have absolutely NO CONTROL like their height or dick size.
That seems fair.
Girls who spend the most time using technology, a 2017 study revealed, were most likely to say they were sad or depressed nearly every day. They were also more likely to want to change their appearance, not enjoy coming to school and not participate in sports and other activities.
Of course this is NOT due to anything the girls do. Why that I-Phone FORCED her to continue posting on Instagram and trolling for likes/validation/dopamine hits. It was the phone...and the phone was invented...by a MAN.
Therefore, it is men's fault.
reassure daughters that it's a toxic culture that is asking too much of girls. This can mitigate girls' feelings of isolation and self-blame.
Obviously society asks to much of girls!
Society FORCES them to wear makeup.
Society FORCES them to spend mindless hours staring at their phone trying to get another "like."
Society FORCES them to be nice and "please" others. Wait, are they serious?
Show me a single scrap of evidence that society forces or pressures girls to act pleasing and pleasant. I haven't seen it. Feminist society encourages girls to be arrogant, headstrong, unpleasant, obnoxious, self absorbed and even cruel.
Then when girls who are headstrong, arrogant, headstrong, unpleasant, obnoxious, self absorbed, and cruel, it turns out they report being more unhappy!
Do I think this is good?
LittleRedditAddict 8y ago
Trying to turn princesses into CEOs and lost boys into fags. Good job America.
F_Dingo 8y ago
FUCK ME that's some hardcore shit
In all seriousness, this article is a cruel joke. I want off of this ride.
[deleted] 8y ago
There actually is one impossible dilemma that young women do face but that has basically become unspeakable. They are told that it is ok, even admirable, to be a slut, despite the fact that most know on some level that this makes them less attractive for the long term relationship and commitment that they ultimately desire. If they don't put out we discard them and move on to the next skank that will. If they put out too much and word gets out, it damages their ability to have a LTR. Sucks for them, but oh well. You reap what you sow.
Fedor_Gavnyukov 8y ago
well no shit they're unhappy. with all the cucks and soyboys giving them undeserved attention on social media, their head grows bigger than a hot air balloon. and when reality hits when they're in the real world and the guys they want couldn't give two fucks about them because these broads are average at best, that balloon pops followed by a daily dose of anti depressant cocktail
[deleted] 8y ago
Women already have next to no pressure on them from society, at most they have parental pressure and even that's absent most of the time. Most parents still think some beta cuck provider will take of their daughter like the olden days.
But, men have to build a career and find a job to survive. We don't even have a chance to find the elusive beta provider, true female providers don't exist. If you're a stay at home dad, that's code for a sperm donor and a slave that can be pushed out of the family at any time.
AllahHatesFags 8y ago
Feminism is ultimately bad for women as well as men.
[deleted] 8y ago
Buttfuck 'em then go radio silent.
crespo_modesto 8y ago
I do wonder about the makeup, I see a girl with a good face, but it's caked with make up, why?
Then I resume crying to myself.
tibikush2012 8y ago
attention whores are miserable and living a life of seeking validation? Who knew?!
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
It's not just attention whores. Women are reporting record levels of unhappiness. I think it is because women are nucking futs and need strong male (and regular injections of antidepressant semen) in order to be happy. Most Thots use condoms and don't get their hot beef injection and they certainly don't get masculine control and direction.
If you let children do whatever they want they are going to be miserable. Fact.
RPmatrix 8y ago
mate this world is nucking futs! I completely agree with your idea in the 'passive resistance' of MGTOW ... tbh I can't see any other way ...
The 'socially acceptable indoctrination' so many people live by these days leads to fucking crazy situations like this where there's so much crazy, confused thinking going on idk where to begin!
being 'normal' in a crazy world means being crazy ... think about it. How many people do things they disagree with just for the money? Far too many imo ...
His (Lovell's) 'career' is playing video games!
You can't make this shit up!
WTF!? I'm not sure I believe this . . . . you decide! But I believe he said this;
Wut!? are you fucking kidding me?
TheReformist94 8y ago
I don't see how they can be miserable when they all get hundreds of likes and any dick they want like ordering a pizza (but for free)
JJ3314 8y ago
I do wonder if these women aren’t experiencing the kind of counterfeit satisfaction, and corresponding letdown, that men who are addicted to porn might experience. On the one hand porn gives you virtual access to an infinite harem of women: even a real life player will not be able to physically sleep with a similar quantity as one can access via porn. On the other hand many men feel a kind of psychological let down from habitual use of porn. It may compare favorably to a shitty relationship with a woman, but there are satisfactions to be gained from a good relationship with a woman that porn cant provide (even if it provides more sexual variety).
Being an instragram/facebook thot garners you more attention and validation that you might get from a single man, but it’s no substitute for a stable relationship with a high value man, even if the latter is not always going to provide her with the degree and consistency of validation she seeks. An instagram thot can post pictures of herself in makeup and sexy outfits, and get a thousand thirsty men giving her a thumbs up, whenever she wants a fix. A real man will see her when she just rolls out of bed, wont put up with her annoying shit tests, and hopefully has a job and a life, so can’t focus all his attention on her whenever she wants.
ThrowFader 8y ago
except women get the validation, men don't.
Otherwise a good observation
420KUSHBUSH 8y ago
This just in: Scientists say 100% of people die. More on the breaking news at 6
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
jcad1947 8y ago
So true. Plus 18 year old girls (who are college bound) are told, "you are the future, do well and make the world better!!!" and that is the same thing that 18 year old boys used to be told. Can you imagine the pressure that puts onto young people ? It causes stress, loneliness, competition (which impacts girls worse than boys).
So these girls are unhappy and don't get LTRs from quality guys like they used to, because (guess what) the sex ratio for freshmen in college is 60-40 !! They are the new voices on campus and they have to influence what goes around them.
Red pill truth is take advantage of such unhappiness. It's possible for red pill guys to do well with the super competitive women; heck, red pill guys often withhold intimacy anyway.
[deleted] 8y ago
Key difference is that the female beauty standard requires some diet, and squats. The male beauty standard requires years of lifting and discipline and sometimes even steroids.
LeftHookTKD 8y ago
You don't even need a good diet. Just don't stuff your face like a land whale. It's not hard to be a healthy weight. Building muscle is what's hard and takes time. Women don't need to do that.
metallicdrama 8y ago
Wait. The girls are? Lol. According to the same TV teenage girls secretly run the world. Ten that shit off. Give zero fucks.
Reformed65 8y ago
More, and more and fucking more, it's gone to the point where they want MORE. You give them- and the SJWs- you give them a hand and they'll, not your arm, but HALF of your body.
This is why, I gulp when I hear about rights, they've ruined the definition. Every time I hear "we want more rights" "we want more insert shit" then I think "NO! That's not what you want, cause we'll give it you and then you'll WHINE MORE." First, trans say they want to be known by their pronouns, then they say they want their own bathroom, then they say they want the NHS, we the British taxypayers, to pay for their surgery!
And what's here? First, they wanted out of the kitchen, done, then they wanted to work, done, then equal wage, done (and it's fucking done it's in the law), then they wanted gender quotas, done and soon they'll want us eliminated, they'll do this because society views them as the weaker sex and thus gives the privilege yet they're leading a coup d'tat.
When scientist WHEN they build upon that surgery where females are able to get impregnated through their own cells, we'll be done for, we'll all talking of this collapse, when that point of the future marks, our legs will collapse no matter what every ounce of our muscles we use to stop it.
BurnoutRS 8y ago
A girl doesnt feel pressure from society to be sexy. She feels pressure from her own fucking brain. The same way guys feel pressure to be macho. Its a preservation mechanism.
You have this incredible ability to assess your standing in any given social hierarchy and then, wow, your body, mood, etc. will all change in response to where you find yourself sitting in said hierarchy. At the bottom? You feel like shit. Its your brain telling you "do something, theres a problem"
RP085 8y ago
The point of the article is to point out the loneliness and depression young girls feel because of society's idea of what they should be. As such, it's meant to make you reflect on whether or not we should adjust our approach to how we bring up our daughters, so we can spare them the suffering of growing up with all sorts of debilitating ideas. Its point is to create awareness that hopefully can transform into compassion for them.
Do you think a 15 year old girl feels depressed and lonely just to piss off men who don't feel like they're being heard and like their rights are given importance? C'mon. It's not about competing to see which gender has it worse.
What is the bluepill? Having all kinds of erroneous beliefs (whether you're male or female) about how us homo sapienses work, in the context of sexuality. This bluepill-ness is what makes everybody suffer; boys and girls.
Girls are taught about all this nonsensical "gurrl power" since they're young, and the thing is, women don't want to be these "kickass" people; they want to just be girls. Society makes them feel shame if they want to allow themselves to be girl-like. Delicate, soft, light, nurturing, etcetera. Does this ring a bell? Men don't feel good having their energy blocked by society when they want to do "man-things" and be man-like; it's no different with girls. That's why they're miserable.
If you are red-pilled you should know women are highly sensitive and their feelings are a huge part of their focus. Well, these sorts of things make women feel whithered, so it's no wonder. Why hate on them? Or on the people who want to shed light on it, for that matter?
ThrowFader 8y ago
If you are truly red pilled you will not hate women. You will understand that they are similar to children.
However, the grown men who perpetuate the incessant whining of women children deserve to be shat on.
And exposing BS is not equivalent to hating fyi
Kinbaku_enthusiast 8y ago
Oh I laughed.
Their goal is to leverage female unhappiness to get changes that lead to even more female unhappiness and you know it.
RP085 8y ago
Why did you laugh? That's what journalism is; shedding light on issues. Granted, CNN have lately demonstrated to be a pretty piss-poor outlet, but it's still journalism. They're doing a report on an issue. What's funny about that?
Can you specify what you mean by "getting changes that lead to more of their unhappiness", 'cause I'm worried I might be stupid if it's that obvious and I'm supposed to know it.
Kinbaku_enthusiast 8y ago
Journalism shedding light on issues? That's what it's supposed to be. That's not what it is.
Their job is to tell you what to think. That's not shedding light. That's smoke and mirrors. I think it was msnbc where they beautiful freudian slip, complaining about Trump saying: "He's telling people what to think! That's our job!"
If you think journalists are shedding light, then you know very little about the state of journalism. I'm not just talking about CNN. I'm talking about the whole rotten system. CNN, MSNBC, FOX, most of the tree is poisoned. Even Pulitzer, who they named the journalism prize after had a considerable muck-raking, story invention period for the $
That's not to say everything they say is false. It's smoke and mirrors. They'll deceive you with a truth. That's their goal that's implicit from their actions.
When's the last time you've heard any network correct or apologize for a prior error? Instead they'll silently delete it and never talk about it again. Or leave it up, if they think they can get away with it.
But if you want a simple example, tell me what CNN said about reading wikileaks. Did they tell people it was illegal? Is it illegal? Were they shedding light on this matter? Or were they leveraging their reach for political goals?
Changes like more single motherhood, longer education for women (leading to getting to the wall, chasing a job a woman doesn't want and diminishing her dating pool by both increasing her demands (someone more succesful than herself) and diminishing her SMV (waiting until older before serious dating).
I really liked parts of your post. You were apt in identifying that yes, these are real issues girls face and women are unhappier than ever. Yes they're taught about nonsensical girl power (and I'm sure CNN has done its share of that too). However women are also victims so it's balanced by reports of poor women and maybe we need some female quota's to make them happy again.
Of course quota's in reality lead to resentment, underqualified women in high positions and the resulting prejudice because did she get there because she is good or was it the quota?
This of course leads to those women feeling inadequate (because they are). There are few surer recipes to unhappiness then getting a job you're not fully capable of doing.
I picked quota's as just one example, but there's a myriad of blue pill examples you could pick from CNN reporting. Or journalism in general.
RP085 8y ago
Ok, I get what you mean now. You're basically pointing out that media outlets like CNN have an agenda when they make these kinds of reports, which is to allocate more power to women (taken away from men), via presenting narratives that make people form beliefs about women being victims and needing more (from men). So in essence what you're saying is: "They're not the humanitarian people you're giving them the credit of being; they're manipulators of people's thoughts".
I guess I can see that possibility. However, I don't think it's necessarily explicitly conscious at the level of the individual journalist; they're just a cog in a bigger machine that no one person controls or understands.
Maybe the reason I tend to focus more on the essence of reality than on what people are doing is because I'm not too bothered by the collective unconsciousness of the people propagating silly ideas in society, because I have the sense (the hope) that eventually, truth always emerges from the rubble and the chaos caused by the disorderly experimentation of low-quality consciousness. Truth is not fragile and it can withstand the blows of countless dumb trends and waves of thought. In the end, after enough iterations of ideologies have been attempted by culture, however many years it takes, people have to arrive at truth. Which is somewhat simple and elegant and needs not to leave anybody distraught.
And when that happens, it won't matter if a bunch of dense people propagated a bunch of b.s. over the years; what matters is that people learned to be better along the way.
I don't know what I'm ranting about anymore, I'm sleepy as shit. I'm just gonna click 'save'.
Kinbaku_enthusiast 8y ago
That's kinda what I'm saying, but it's not "for these kinda reports", it's the whole god damn tree. War reports. Election news. Celebrity stuff. And I don't know enough meteorology to say if the weather reporting is accurate so I'll give them a pass in that regard.
I hear your hope that truth will prevail. I don't share it. Most of the time it's possible to find truth or something close to it with sufficient time and effort.... However the person who found it then has the capability of broadcasting the findings. However that person also has the power to introduce distortions. And distorting other's worldview is incredibly powerful. I mean if you place any value in redpill, you know how powerful our paradigms for viewing the world are.
Redpill is a persuit of truth and success for male identity and sexual strategy. However, you know that it can't be offered and eaten straight up. It has to be eaten in pieces.
That's what journalists know and they must self-censor so the stupid uninformed people at home can follow what they are saying. This breeds contempt for the audience in journalists.
Also, when any journalist publishes truth contrary to goals of its subsidiary, they get canned and memoryholed, like david seaman who wrote for huffington post and published an article about hillary's health.
Finally who cares if specific journalists are aware of their role in the propaganda machine or not? It's not like the result is different. Though if you really knew some journalists well, you'd know it's par for the course.
menial_optimist 8y ago
Yeah what did they expect would happen when the culture steered women away from their nature? You see it the same with extreme effeminate (straight) BP men. Completely brainwashed against what their own male nature wants them to be. The result? Lonely, cucked, happy wife happy life, bad quality/duty sex, divorce rape, children who disrespect them as a father, children who don't really take their fathers authority seriously, lets the wife run the household etc etc etc.
cappadocianhawk 8y ago
Impossible expectations: A warm meal, a warm hole that's exclusive, a warm embrace after a long day of work.
[deleted] 8y ago
Women's lives are almost entirely based on cultivating and advertising their sexual value.
Women force themselves to do all these things that they denounce. It feeds on itself. They're in competition with other women. They're the driving force in the market.
Just today, I was walking into a store to make a delivery. I glanced back and see a HB6 walking fast behind me, about 12 feet away. I guessed that she was thinking I'd hold open the door.
I swing the door open and keep moving along. I'm a busy man.
"Thanks for holding the door open, you fucking asshole!" I heard behind me.
As she leaves, I hear her mutter under her breath, "you piece of shit."
I smiled to myself as I carried on with my task, thinking how I'm not paid to be a doorman.
Yeah, forced to be pleasant and pleasing by men. Haha.
[deleted]
jackandjill22 8y ago
Exactly. Girls do that all the time. They set expectations of men because they're so used to manipulating them to get what they want. & my BP friends don't understand this. They think "Why're you such a jerk to her man" bro, when has that bitch ever done anything for you; or me? WTF is wrong with you Snap out of it.
[deleted] 8y ago
She wasn't sucking my dick, so I owed her nothing.
[deleted] 8y ago
Haha even if she is sucking your dick you don't owe her much. A pre suckie shower is just a courtesy.
francisco_DANKonia 8y ago
I think it is less about the competition and more about the lack of manly men.
Competition always will be a thing just like male competition, but the resource they are after is dwindling and they are starving like North Korea for someone strong.
Biggie_Smores 8y ago
Alright so girls do hurry up to have the door held.
My favorites are the ones who make an extra effort to not touch the door, I'll close that shit rigthb on them lol
Self-honest 8y ago
I feel like letting the door hit a cute girl, then making fun of her for not paying attention is a solid opener.
Self-honest 8y ago
She wouldn't hurry up if she wasn't comfortable getting close to you and checking you out. You drop the door on her, show her you don't give a fuck, and then make fun of her and give her what she wants. Lol.
Self-honest 8y ago
Yep. I was on an elevator at work with 5 coworkers. Three of them were male friends and one was an unknown woman. We got off the elevator in the order we got on. One of my friends waited for the woman to get off first and she said, "at least there's one gentleman here." Please lady... you aren't sucking my dick, we work in the same building. I owe you nothing.
Casanova-Quinn 8y ago
Women expect chivalry when it's to their benefit.
ThrowFader 8y ago
tbh if you understand the childish frame of most women this kind of behavior will not bother or surprise you.
It is like gum on the street. It's nasty and annoying, but as long as you ignore it and avoid it, you should be fine.
Self-honest 8y ago
Agreed. I didn't even hear her. My homie that was such a gentleman brought it up later.
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
a generation of women who hit the wall hard boi
[deleted] 8y ago
The funniest part is that women are being valued for their intelligence and hard-work, and it turns out they're worse than useless
[deleted] 8y ago
The captain Save a Bro needs to stop.
When you improve yourself, you improve the world. Those that enter your world may be savable.
The mindset of Society wide change will drive you fucking nuts
[deleted]
ThrowFader 8y ago
The outrage is indicative of a lack of understanding of the mechanics that actually dictate human interaction. It spells beta, but isn't a death sentence. I'd argue that "Save a Bro" tendencies are good because they can be converted into passion. Passion to unearth the secrets of knowledge and power. As consequence, red pilling oneself.
I'd go further than suggesting improvement of oneself. Frustrate yourself with every thing unfair in the world, until you realize the rules you lived under don't exist.
Then you create your own rules. Frame.
The point is advocating "improvement" makes no practical sense to the recently enlightened because they do not have their "own world" yet. There are still shaking of the illusions of the Matrix.
It's like learning to code. When you first start, you can only say "Hello World" and shit. But once your inherent understanding of the code increase, you can create applications from scratch.
Life is code. Act accordingly.
francisco_DANKonia 8y ago
Yes! Haha, Captain Save-a-bro, perfect
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
They did it to me in Graduate School. As a lawyer I just cared about whether the check cleared but now it is like I can see our civilization from 60,000 feet through space and time. I can see what is happening. I see what they did to make it happen. I see what we can do to change it. I see what is going to happen if we don't.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
Taipanshimshon 8y ago
no
you did it to yourself.
The 60 k foot view only matters once you have so many checks clear you dont need them any more.
You still need yours to clear. So make sure your shit is on lock.
Power, Money, Respect.
I don't see women in that mix.
jackandjill22 8y ago
Oh, it's been on that trajectory. Probably too late now. You're late it's(society) a mess. Imagine the worst case scenario 3 years ago. We've surpassed it by leaps & bounds. Drop the idealism & prepare for the worst. Fortify yourself in preparing for the most dangerous outcomes & "play the odds". Focus on survival while the chips fall where they may.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
Check out Bluepillprofessors Manifesto which I posted a few weeks ago. My solution is to use the MGTOW strategy consciously and wilfully. Until we can get a better deal with women today we should walk away, spin plates, no LTR, no marriage, no commitment, go MGTOW. In the work world, ignore women, do not invite them to dinner, invoke the Pence rule and refuse to be alone with ANY woman.
Nothing changes no matter how many MILLIONS of men die. It is only when enough women are affected- even slightly- that change happens. That is why I post these stories and why they give me hope. The more women realize that riding the CC, and having total sexual and legal power in marriage is going to prevent them from finding a husband, the more people will come to our side. Even now the Overton Window is fully open and more and more women are saying: Where are all the good men! It will have a great cost and I believe many women are going to have to die alone, covered in feces and urine and half eaten by their cats but that eventually we will prevail.
[deleted] 8y ago
This will not work because it is a gigantic Nash Equilibrium. It might be in males' best interest in general to basically "go on strike" but it will always be in the interest on an individual male to "cross the picket line" and get what he wants from women, especially the beta males for whom supplicating is the only option. Your plan is ultimately completely unrealistic.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
There are always scabs and I agree it is a particularly big challenge. We don't need a full strike. We don't need to destroy all women. We just need to make SOME women uncomfortable SOME of the time for there to be social change.
[deleted] 8y ago
I don't think so, honestly. Hopefully I'm wrong.
FireDrillem 8y ago
Agreed! I recently had my way with a 1st rate, firebrand, HB7, feminazi, chica. Playing with fire, no doubt, but hey, I'm a veteran now. After a few weeks of buffing and waxing her ass like a champion, her fatherless daughter (single mothers alert!) got sassy, shitty and out of Iine with me. I calmy disengaged them both and revoked her penis privileges. I later told her it was too risky to date an extreme feminist with a father hating daughter. She's been posting FB non stop about how "stupid" the Pence rule is and how Men need to stop fearing false accusations. She can't understand why no one sticks around very long.
sadomasochrist 8y ago
You only have this mindset because you're adopting society's frame. Read my post in the RPEC sub. Your last piece of blue pill conditioning needs to go, playing by the rules.
zyqkvx 8y ago
Please don't use acronyms that don't show in Google. Red Pill EC? EC what?
sadomasochrist 8y ago
It was directed at him. It's the Endorsed Contributor subreddit.
JJ3314 8y ago
Fear of hitting the wall and being a spinster needs to hit at an earlier age to motivate a greater percentage of women to get their act together at a younger age. Not sure how that can happen, apart from men shunning marriage, but making a particular point to not marry a woman above 25, 27, etc. Even then society has a massive apparatus set up to protect the emotions and interests of women, and the behaviors of individual men have a negligible impact on the sexual market place. Broad scale trends have to occur—massive deaths amongst men (war) for instance, for women to feel the scarcity in their bones. MGTOW/withdrawal from marriage may play a comparable role if the phenomenon is widespread enough, but there will be a lot of anti-male rhetoric fomented in the media in the meantime, convincing women that MGTOW/TRP arose because all men are evil, as opposed to it being a response to the evils of a gynocentric society.
AllahHatesFags 8y ago
We really need to bring back shame in our society, especially for women. They need to know that this will be their fate if they don't stop Instagram whoring and riding the CC and marry a decent man while they are still young. We need stronger language against these cunts to really put the fear of dying alone into them; I'm going to start calling feminists catfood.
[deleted]
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
RandyBumgardner85 8y ago
This is nonsense. I'd rather jack off to porn than bang a realistic sex robot in the same way that I'd rather bang a conscious woman than an unconscious one.
There's more to sex than putting your dick in a warm wet hole. If you can't see this you're either a virgin or a psychopath.
ThrowFader 8y ago
virgin or a(n idiot)
There FTFY
[deleted]
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
THis is such baloney. Sex robots will never take over the desire for real pussy in any large scale way. This is more futurism delusion.
[deleted] 8y ago
I know, it is absurd. At best it will be like taking drugs. Fun for a while but completely self destructive and massive amounts of self loathing. Also AI is nowhere near as advanced as people believe it is, and possibly will never become so.
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
I can’t believe so many spergtards on here buy into this stuff and why I’m getting downvoted. Sex robots will be some fringe fetish that some guys will try once, and a few of them will repeatedly do. But the uncanny valley is much larger for a sexual behaving robot than for a merely talking face of a robot.
[deleted] 8y ago
Yea there seem a to be a few moronic positions held by lots of people on TRP. Fortunately the good beliefs outnumber the bad.
MickMensa 8y ago
I'm not sure why you're getting down-voted. People are 100% delusional if they believe we are close to this being a reality.
If sex robots are ever convincing enough to be indistinguishable from real women they will take the place of pornography, not the place of real women. ThePwnter might as well paint a face on his pillow and fuck that.
Charmingaxelotl 8y ago
I have no dog in this, but dude realistic sex robots are already here:
MickMensa 8y ago
Do you have a source to back this up?
Realistic does not just mean a robotic pussy that can get wet or a face that can make expressions. Realism would be a machine indistinguishable from a human woman in every sense.
Charmingaxelotl 8y ago
I don’t have a source with me but I know I’ve read articles about what they’re doing in Japan.
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
No shit. This is another red pill these fucking tards need to swallow. The “sci-fi” future that people fetishize is mostly fantasy. People like to imagine that we’re either headed to some novel-esque tech utopia or tech dystopia. It’s all a fetish. It’s makes them feel like their lives are interesting. So they exaggerate the significance of a few tech trends and predict some Bladerunner reality in 2040. It’s ridiculous. Sex robots will never replace real women except for a minority of weirdos. You can take that to the bank.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
MickMensa 8y ago
The future you describe will only ever be 'porn 2.0', not 'women 2.0'. No one has claimed that this technology is not being pursued - we are casting doubt on your claims that robots will be considered superior to women.
I'm more interested in hearing why you want this to be a reality. Your initial comment claimed that if everyone, male or female, were fucking robots instead of each other then this would result in the ultimate patriarchal society. I'm yet to see you back that up. Has the availability of internet porn resulted in a return to patriarchal society? Fuck no.
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
Eh I still don’t think it’ll be more than marginal.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
"This is the biggest damn fool thing we have ever done. The bomb will never go off and I speak as an expert on explosives."
Advisor to the President, 1945 a month before the Trinity test.
[deleted] 8y ago
Ok that was one guy. All the scientists knew it would work.
MickMensa 8y ago
With hindsight it is easy to look back and quote people's doubts about great achievements. That adds nothing to this specific argument and you could have posted this on any thread about technology.
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
This is a classic fallacy you’re using. There are examples in history like what you cited, but then people like yourself like to analogize them anytime another outlandish tech claim is shut down. The truth is that the large majority of futurist tech dreams/claims are actually bullshit. It’s the occasional one that becomes real. So im not buying that your example is analogous to this sex robot thing. The odds are strongly that it follows the pattern of false hope than of fulfilled tech prophecy. I’m not debating that sex robots will improve and will be a thing. The claim I find ridiculous is that they will replace women in any meaningful, society-altering way.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
LOl sex robots won’t be able to give birth you moron. Quit buying into this futurism delusion bullshit. Yes tech will improve. Yes AI will improve. But robots are not a life form. They’re an imitation of a life form. They won’t be sexually satisfying except to a minority of weirdos. They sure as hell won’t be able to give birth. Good fuck
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
God you’re an idiot. That’s just an improved incubator, we’ve had incubators for years. The idea that this is gonna replace real women is just spergtarded.
[deleted]
red-pill-man 8y ago
Who let all the blue pill feminists in here?
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
Are you referring to me or the other guy?
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
1z1z2x2x3c3c4v4v 8y ago
You forgot to add the new advances in VR Tech, that will allow you to super impose the Celebrity of your choice upon your view of the sex doll. Now, for a small licensing fee, you will be able to see and hear your Celebrity crush.
Eventually, the Celebrity will also have fleshy molds of her body that can be attached to the doll, for the ultimate, physical and mental experience.
For a monthly fee, you can get new Celebrity molds shipped securely to your home, and with your Broadband Internet, you can download the latest voice sounds, and body movements for your doll.
Yes... this will indeed corrupt the weak minded man, and allow him to do nothing but work, earn money, pay for sex doll subscription, and stay home everynight....
JJ3314 8y ago
I’m not convinced that these robots have to perfectly emulate a real life “10” to make a dent. They simply have to be attractive enough to effectively compete with most women who fall in the 4-6 range (especially beyond age 30) to have an impact. And even then, it’s not necessary for 100% of men to run out and purchase these things, and drop out of the sexual marketplace. If even 30-40% of men lose complete interest in pair bonding with women the effects will be felt throughout the sexual marketplace.
People talk about the benefits in terms of not having to put up with the personality problems of women, high risk of divorce and alimony. There are also benefits in avoiding STDs and “oops” pregnancies.
I’m married, happily so—I’m not advocating VR porn or sexbots because they are an ideal. But certain factors have to be in place to get married these days, that many men have limited access to. I sympathize with the urge to seek out these alternatives to women, if the women available to you are all terrible.
ThrowFader 8y ago
The nuance involved in human interaction is far too complicated to ever allow this to become a reality.
Unless the robot adopted human guises and assimilated into our culture a la Electric Sheep.
Ironically they'd functionally assume the purpose and character of women either way.
Women have their greatest appeal as their desirability. Robots arguably will never be more desirable than humans in any of our lifetimes.
You know how you feel after you fuck an ugg (fatties butter face etc)?
That's the same feeling people will get from fucking robots.
"Your so gay man you can even get real pussy LOL!"
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
They’ll never be able to cross the uncanny valley to the point where a robot feels sexually realistic. Quit buying into this nonsense.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
zyqkvx 8y ago
Just had a gross thought. Maybe they will start growing pussy-like 'things' like they do in-vitro meat.
ThrowFader 8y ago
until you actually have any insight into how ANY monumental new discovery works dont make BS comments like this.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
scissor_me_timbers00 8y ago
Nah, sorry. They’re not crossing the uncanny valley for sexual behavior for a robot. It’s already notoriously difficult to cross it for just a robot face talking. Now imagine all the movements and noises and emotions during sex, not to mention the overall feel. That’s a much much larger uncanny valley. It’s not happening my dude.
[deleted] 8y ago
[deleted]
JcHgvr 8y ago
And these are the realistic expectation young / teenage boys are facing
https://s10.postimg.org/jez7gjjw9/l_1674259c4b81c07capno.jpg
[deleted]
[deleted]
JJ3314 8y ago
Yeah makeup is an ancient convention, so while it’s not going away could you imagine if no women wore it? Google pornstars without makeup, and you’ll see that most of these women fall in the 5-7 range (facewise), with the rare 8. The popular ones have normal BMIs, so good on them, but even then many of them are artificially enhanced. It occurred to me, after looking at these pictures, that my wife is actually better looking than the majority of them.
I think approach anxiety would go down noticeably if the makeup and fashion industry were not in existence. You would probably see a certain percentage of men who are currently considered betas starting to act more alpha since they would have a different perspective on the relative SMV of a given woman. I think most guys can’t tell when a woman is wearing minimal amounts of makeup to make their skin seem smoother, lips fuller, or whatever, but it results in men falsely elevating a woman's SMP value with respect to them in their minds, which is a shame. Much of TRP I think is coming to the realisation that so many women are phonies when you look at them truthfully. It’s comical that so many tests of fitness are applied to men to see if they are the real deal by a gender that by nature and nurture traffics in multiple layers of falsehood. That’s probably much of what’s behind the matrix analogy.
spencerc25 8y ago
I think the power of makeup really shows in environments with bad/low lighting, which coincides with the time they happen to wear the most make up - nightclubs/bars. Meeting girls at night can be really tricky and this video exemplifies why the way she looks when you meet her may be a terrible representation of how she actually looks.
TheDevilsAdvokaat 8y ago
In other words, how girls "feel" is more important than the actuality of what is happening to boys.
When the female gender's feelings are more important than the male gender's reality it shows you we are living in a culture biased towards the female.
jackandjill22 8y ago
Don't worry when some other teenager schools up some public place because of an emasculinzed culture it'll sink into their collective psyche alittle more. Might take some time. But eventually someone will get fed up.
BluepillProfessor 8y ago
This is why I posted the article. Stuff like this enrages me.
Girls have it tough because they are pressured to get "likes" and this is somehow a crisis while men lose their lives, families, and their honor and nobody gives a flying fuck.
Then when you point it out, the Hard Core Terps say "accept women for what they are" and everybody else shames saying you must be gay or hate women.
I accept women for what they are but I don't have to like it and I really don't like the way our society- even the 'strong' men of Red Pill- literally step over the crushed bodies of men and boys in their rush to protect the ladies from the slightest inconvenience.
TheDevilsAdvokaat 8y ago
I agree. There was a bit of an uproar one time when a newspaper published an article about teen suicides with a picture of a sad looking girl and people pointed out the article's own figures showed teen boys were suiciding at three times the rate of girls - but of course females evoke more sympathy so they chose a girl's pic.
JJ3314 8y ago
I’ve wondered for a while now if movies/media that depict a father sacrificing himself to save and protect his vulnerable family doesn’t tend to show more daughters than sons. It seems to me that that’s the case, but not sure if anyone else has noticed this.
TheDevilsAdvokaat 8y ago
I don't know...but i have a feeling you might be right.
Just finished watching "The foreigner" last week too... (that's not a non-sequitur; if you've seen it you'll know what I mean....and yes I found it worth watching.)
anon2777 8y ago
i don’t particularly think this is a gendered issue. both men and women in the west face impossible expectations and both are more depressed as a result.
[deleted]