Introduction

I recently stumbled upon a gem of a comment containing a view on female sexual success and male sexual success. Female sexual success was portrayed as a near-guarantee despite her effort, while male sexual success was portrayed as a return ON his effort. That assertion is because of the failures of men and women to understand the other, and our inevitable default to our self-understanding (solipsism).

Solipsism in Men and Women

The concept of female solipsism is used to explain many TRP concepts like hypergamy, women preferring strong men capable of leadership, and the inability of women to love a man the way he desires to be loved. This is supported by the idea that men and women seek different things in these areas.

For example, love for women is tied heavily (perhaps exclusively) to her hypergamy-focused dual-mating instincts. Love for men is tied heavily to his own polygamous-focused dual-mating instincts. Due to these differences, women love men the way the only way they instinctively understand- that is to say, fleetingly and in constant competition. Likewise, blue-pilled men love women the way they instinctively understand- through demonstration of loyalty, support, and effort.

This demonstrates not just female solipsism, but male solipsism as well. This is a key understanding, as male solipsism (the blue-pill) can unduly influence our own analysis of women, men, and both our attendant sexual strategies. This is despite the ability (or lack thereof) to break free from our individual, solipsistic (blue-pill) worldviews. More on this later.

Solipsism in Sexual Success

We (as men) frequently assume that the measurement of our sexual success (engaging in intercourse and successfully procreating) is the same measurement that applies to female sexual success. This is obviously incorrect, as the innumerable differences between men and women immediately preclude such a conclusion. The Sexual Marketplace alone stands starkly against such a notion. It stands to reason, then, that men and women also have different standards of sexual success.

Male success is measured by the ability of men to attract a mate and successfully procreate. Women desire strong, powerful men. It follows then, that the stronger and more powerful you are, the more women you can attract. Therefore, men need to put in significant effort in order to become strong, powerful, and more sexually successful. However, men also require access to healthy, youthful, women in order to increase the returns of sexual success. Other women will do, but if we can secure a younger, healthier woman (higher fertility), our efforts are more likely to be successfully rewarded (more healthy, strong babies). In order to do that, we need to be stronger than our peers. This forms the basis of male competition in the sexual marketplace.

Female success, conversely, is not measured by the quantity of their offspring, but by the quality of their offspring. Hypergamy drives women to obtain the highest quality genetic material they can get for their offspring. Women need resources for these quality offspring to survive, and in our current society, this gives rise to the Alpha/Beta dynamic. Hundreds of thousands of years ago, however, these seemingly disparate desires were one and the same. Powerful, strong men, without a doubt, were in command of resources that weaker men simply did not have. Therefore, the stronger and more powerful a man was, the greater the quality of offspring that could be produced with said man. However, these women must contend with said man's desire for women who have higher fertility. Therefore, women put in significant effort to appear more fertile than their peers. This forms the basis of female competition in the sexual marketplace.

The Solipsistic (Blue-Pill) Society

Solipsism is the blue-pill

Let that sink in for a minute.

Nearly everything about the red-pill fights against the solipsism of men in dealing with women. Blue-pilled men pedestalize women because that's what men want. We want women to make us the center of their world and, by extension, the sole purveyor of their fertile womb. Blue-pilled men are exceedingly loyal to women because that's what men want. We want women to be loyal to us so we can have unfettered access to their fertile womb. Blue-pilled men white-knight to support women because that's what men want. We want to be supported by others when we need it so we can stay strong (and retain access to that fertile female). Blue-pilled men treat women with the golden-rule, the (ahem) gold-standard of solipsistic thinking. Treat others as you would like to be treated.

Women, also, are blue-pilled like never before. Their solipsism translates directly into how they attract men and bear children. They find the masculine attractive, so they become more masculine in appearance. They dress like men, have short hair like men, behave like men, because that is what they find attractive in men. They try to obtain power and resources because they find these qualities attractive in men. That takes time, so they wait to have children, decreasing their fertility in the pointless endeavor of trying to attract men. Women use abortion and birth-control so they can have sex with any number of partners they desire, something that strong, powerful men do. Solipsism (the blue-pill), is a direct assault on female sexual success in nearly every aspect of their strategy.

The symptoms of our societies' ills- feminism, low birth rates, weak men, poor performance of men in education, the decline of marriage, all of it is traceable to the destruction of our mating strategies.

It is no surprise, then, that these societies inevitably falter and collapse. Weak blue-pill generations cannot compete with the strong generations created by the sexual strategies that evolved over millennia.