It occurred to me recently that many guys may not know what their wives are telling the attorney in preparation for that looming divorce filing she didn't tell you she was already planning. So, let me give you some insight on what that conversation looks like behind the scenes.
All of these are approximations of actual quotes I've heard throughout my career. They usually start with an allegation that the other side is abusive, followed by my asking: "How is he abusive?"
The Typical Conversation
This is based off of an actual conversation I had with one client in particular, but is fairly common of most:
"Did he ever hit you?"
"No," she says.
"Okay, so how was he abusive then?"
"He's verbally abusive."
"How so?" I always ask.
"He swears at me."
"Out of the blue or during arguments?"
"During arguments."
"Did you swear back at him?"
"Yes, but nowhere near as bad as he did it to me. He gets REALLY angry during arguments. Did I mention he's emotionally abusive too?"
"How's he emotionally abusive?"
"Because he gets soooo mad at me for little things or when I didn't do anything wrong at all!"
"Does he think you did something wrong?"
"Well yeah, that's why he's mad. But I swear I didn't. I just didn't do it his way - and he wants to make me feel horrible for that. That's emotional abuse. I looked it up on the internet."
"I'm sorry to hear that. Have you ever gotten mad at him over something that he felt was unjustified?"
"Oh sure. He accuses me of nagging him all the time."
"And have you ever yelled or gotten angry in those situations?"
"Well, yeah - because he's so abusive that it makes me mad and I can't help but yell and get angry! But what do you think? Can we show the court how abusive this man is?"
Other Memorable Quotes
I have added the first sentence for context, but I assure you that ALL of these quotes have included an allegation of the exact type of abuse referenced at some point in the conversation/testimony, and the second sentence on is part of the explanation given. Some are my client, others are the opposing party during my examination.
-
"He's manipulative. He doesn't actually do anything that I could call abusive, but he does things to make me feel abused anyway. That's how he tries to get away with his abuse."
-
"He's manipulative." I ask, "How does he manipulate you?" She answers, "By asking me to do things, and then I feel like I have to do what he wants all the time." I ask, "Does he ever threaten you if you don't do it, either direct or implied?" "No, I just know that he'll be angry. He uses his anger to manipulate me into getting his way."
-
"He's manipulative. He uses the kids as pawns to get at me." I ask, "How so?" She answers, "When we're fighting, sometimes he takes the kids and leaves the house. He says he's 'giving me time to cool off.'" "What does he do with them?" "Usually they go to a park or out for ice cream or something fun, knowing that I'm at home in tears - and he doesn't care. Then he looks like the fun dad and I'm the crazy mom who they have to be saved from. And everyone thinks HE is the hero in the situation!"
-
"He's emotionally abusive. Every time we argue, he just sits there silently and doesn't talk or get mad or do anything. He knows it infuriates me, but he keeps doing it!"
-
"He's emotionally abusive. He loves to look at me with this smug grin on his face, even when I'm obviously mad at him." I ask, "You mean he does it when you're not mad too?" She answers, "Yeah, he's just smug all the time."
-
"He's emotionally abusive. He told me if I tried to leave him, he'd fight for custody of the kids."
-
"He's emotionally abusive. He told me that if I didn't handle this situation his way, he'd take the kids and live with his mom for a while." I asked, "Isn't that what you did when you filed for divorce two years ago before dismissing it?" She answers, "Yeah, but I'm the mother. That's different."
-
"He's sexually abusive. He thinks I should have sex with him whenever he feels like it, and he'll try to pressure me to say yes." I ask, "Do you say yes or do you stand your ground?" She answers, "I always say yes. It wouldn't be abuse if I felt like I was allowed to say no."
-
"He's sexually abusive. He made me give him blow jobs even though he knows I don't like it."
-
"He's sexually abusive. He looks at me all the time, even when I don't want him to. It creeps me out."
-
"He's sexually abusive. When we have sex, after he's finished he ends things and never tries to help me along, then makes me feel guilty for not finishing as fast as him. It makes me not want to have sex with him anymore." I ask, "So did you stop having sex with him or tell him you didn't want to?" She answered, "No. I just started finishing myself off afterward."
-
"He's sexually abusive. He raped me many times during our marriage, forcing me to do all kinds of outrageous things, like blow jobs, hand jobs, and other stuff." I find peers in her congregation to confront her about these accusations. She tells them, "Oh, I made all that up. My attorney said I had to say those things to win custody."
-
"He's financially abusive. He controls the check book and I have to ask for permission whenever I want to buy anything." I ask, "Has he ever said no to anything that you needed for daily living purposes?" She answered, "No."
-
"He's financially abusive" as above (a common one). I ask the same question. She answers, "No." I ask, "Has he ever said no to anything you wanted to buy at all?" She answers, "No. But he still has all the power over the finances and I have none."
-
"He's financially abusive. He keeps all the accounts in his name and refuses to let me know what's in the accounts." I ask, "Have you ever asked and he told you no?" She answers, "No. I don't feel like I'm allowed to ask. But he never gave me access."
-
"He's financially abusive. He buys whatever he wants, like eating out for lunch while he's at work pretty much every day. But when I want to buy something, he always says no." I say, "Give me examples of things he's said no to." She answers, "Usually new decorations for the house." I ask, "Is he buying decorations for his man cave or his office?" She answers, "No, he doesn't value decore, and because he controls all the money, it means I can never have what I want, while he still gets to have whatever he wants." I ask, "And what is it, exactly, that he wants?" She answers, "Usually he just spends money on food." [Note: the guy wasn't even obese.]
-
"He's financially abusive. He spends all our money, and then there's nothing left for basic needs. We're in so much debt." I ask, "What types of things does he buy?" She answers, "TVs, sound systems, video game systems, computer stuff." I ask, "Have you ever bought things like that for fun yourself?" She answers, "Yeah, he buys me a new smart phone every year. I also have a few ipads and a laptop. He likes to buy me jewelry too. He thinks I have to forgive him when he does that. But then when there's no money left for groceries, we end up having to put it on the credit card, and now I'm constantly in a panic over all the debt we've racked up. Can the courts make him stop? I can't handle the financial abuse."
-
"He's financially abusive. He knows I can't afford this divorce, yet he keeps doing everything possible to ring up my attorney fees and make this case cost a small fortune." I think to myself, "No, you calling me for 3 hour chats 2-3 times a week to talk about your insecurities and not letting me hang up the phone is what's costing you a small fortune. Learn to shut up and this whole thing would have been 80% cheaper."
-
"He's verbally abusive. He yells and screams and swears at me all the time." I ask, "Do you ever do it back?" She answers, "Yes."
-
"He's verbally abusive. He lies all the time." I ask, "Do you have any proof of any of the lies you just told me about?" She answers, "No, he's really good at hiding things. And a lot of the stuff he lies about are smaller things just to get under my skin, not big things that would be provable."
-
"He's verbally abusive. He calls me names and tries to make me feel bad about myself, telling me I'm worthless and that nobody could love me." I respond, "I'm really sorry to hear that. That sounds cruel. How did you handle it?" I thought she'd say she went to her room and cried. Her actual answer: "I know I shouldn't have done it, but I started breaking his things. I figured that if I wasn't worth anything, he couldn't have anything worth anything either. I get that I reacted poorly, but that doesn't change the fact that the way he talked to me was abuse, and I want the court to see that."
-
"He's physically abusive. Just look at these pictures!" She pulls them out, I say, "Oh, that red mark on your neck?" She says, "No, that was a bug bite. It's the spot on my arm, where he hit me." I ask, "Oh, the dot right there?" She says, "No, the other arm." She points to a slight discoloration that I'm pretty sure was really just a shadow. I say, "Oh, the picture must just be faded too much to notice. Can you get me one with better resolution so the judge can see what you're pointing out?" After she gets me the better resolution copy the next day, I still couldn't see it. She didn't have any other angles of the shot (presumably because she couldn't get the shading just right from any other angle).
-
"He's physically abusive. Look at the pictures of the bruises on my arm!" The pictures were entered as exhibits and showed very serious bruises. She added, "I took this video of him slamming a door on my arm repeatedly." It gets marked as an exhibit and played for the judge. The video shows the two arguing, then she drops her phone, so the video goes black, but audio can be heard of her screaming and a door slamming on her arm multiple times. Later at trial, I have my client on the stand presenting a video that he was taking simultaneously, showing her slamming the door on her own arm with an identical audio track.
-
"He stalks me. He walks his dog in front of my house all the time." I ask, "How far away does he live?" She answers, "4 houses down."
-
"He stalks me. He constantly posts things on Facebook directed to me and he won't stop." I ask, "Have you ever told him to stop?" She answers, "No." I ask, "How difficult has it been managing your social media account with him doing this?" She answers, "Oh, he doesn't actually tag me in any of them. I only find out about it because my friends tell me about it."
- "He stalks me. He used to take videos of us having sex together." I asked, "When did you find out about this?" She answers, "I mean, I agreed to it at first, but I didn't know he was still doing it after the first few times. Plus, I didn't know he had videos of other women too - and he didn't delete them after he broke up with them! He probably still has my video too. Don't you think that's creepy like a stalker? He's out there watching videos of me naked after we're divorced. The court has to realize that's stalking, right?" I ask, "Do you have any evidence that he's actually watching those videos?" She answers, "No." I ask where she found the videos, she answers, "In a box in our shed." I ask, "Does he know you found the videos?" She answers, "No." I ask, "So, in all probability, he thinks they're still packed away in a box in the shed and hasn't actually seen them in years, right?" She answers, "Yeah, I guess that makes sense."
In all of these situations, the women genuinely believed they were the victims of abuse. I 100% believe that they were being sincere in their allegations, despite that in most situations they did not come anywhere close to the actual legal standard of abuse. To that end, I have only used examples from cases where the allegation of abuse didn't actually get substantiated in court (except a few of them, where the cases are still pending, but it's not been an issue yet). I'm not here to increase panic about the divorce-rape boogey-man.
BONUS 1. Gender Reversal: "She filed a CPO against me saying I'm abusive, but she's the abusive one!" I ask, "How so?" He answers, "For example, when we would have sex, she'd make me choke her. I was really uncomfortable with it, but she'd pressure me saying she couldn't orgasm unless I was choking her hard enough that she was actually having trouble breathing."
BONUS 2. Parental Alienation [an EXTREMELY common conversation]: "He/she is alienating my kids from me! He/she lies about me, blames me for everything in front of the kids, keeps telling the kids I cheated on him/her, tells the kids it's my fault we're getting divorced, etc. This HAS to stop. Don't the courts care about parental alienation? I read online that this is a big deal and that the Courts will put a stop to it." I ask, "How's your relationship with your children?" They answer, "Oh, they love and adore me. Our relationship is very strong." I ask, "How's the other party's relationship with the kids." They answer, "Not very good. The kids really struggle being over there because of how bad of a person he/she is." I ask, "Given what you just said, who do you think the court will believe is the actual alienated parent?" They answer, "But they're doing it to themselves! I'm the one being alienated by all the things they say about me." I answer, "Give me 3 examples of how your relationship with the children has been irreparably harmed by those things." They never get past the first.
BONUS 3. Danger to the Child: "He doesn't love our daughter. It's so obvious. He's using a size 3 nipple, which I know is the manufacturer recommended, but she had acid reflux 6 months ago, so she should only be using a size 1 nipple on her bottles to limit the flow. How does the court not see that he just doesn't care about his daughter at all?" [Yes, this one's more exaggerated because of the way I summarized the conversation, but every claim I referenced is true, nonetheless.]
Caveats
In maybe 2-3 of these cases there were more significant things that came up and these were secondary rationales. But in the majority, these were the primary reasons given.
I also have a number of cases where the abuse was very, very real. This isn't to say that abuse doesn't actually happen. Rather, it's to show that women have a grossly inaccurate concept of what actual abuse looks like.
NOT The Point
My point here is not to make you afraid that all women will cry abuse just because they can. It's also not to make you afraid of abuse charges that she will inevitably contemplate at some point throughout your marriage. I'm also not trying to make you extra cautious of doing anything that could possibly be interpreted as abuse in court.
The Point
My point ACTUALLY IS that if a woman isn't attracted to you or (even if she is) she's decided to leave, she's going to be prone to interpret any negativity in the relationship as a form of abuse no matter what you do. Sometime her feelings will be legitimate in light of the circumstances. Don't be that guy, unless it's self-defense. But none of the things I referenced above went anywhere in court, no matter how fervently she pushed the issue (some cases pending). So, my conclusion for you guys is to look at a list like this and think to yourself:
- There's no point worrying about whether or not she's going to cry "Abuse!" someday. Just assume she will.
From there, the guys who fare best are the ones who make her second-guess why she's divorcing him in the first place. And yes, that second-guessing is EXTREMELY common as well, despite how few women are willing to admit it. But they tell their attorney everything along those lines too. This is one of the reasons it's so vital to maintain a firm "stay plan is the go plan" mentality if your marriage is falling apart - not in the hope that you might win her back, but because the things that would give you that chance are the same things that are going to tweak whether she cries "Abuse!" or "Aw, I'm going to miss how bold of a person he was."

RP_4life 6y ago
I've had to stop reading all of your examples because it reminded me of someone I've dated shortly. Man, she was so gorgeous and I should have just ran away the moment she mentioned she was in an "abusive relationship".
I was too infatuated by her to see the red flag. Something I never thought would happen. And she went full on psycho after a few dates.
Always vet them. Vet them hard - drill them with questions about ANYTHING that remotely sounds like a red flag to you. I know, it might not be romantic to do so right on the start, but trust me - you will regret not doing so later on.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Red-Curious 6y ago
This is true in most states. My mom did that to my dad. There's also an attorney I know who charges $1,000 just for an initial consult because he's so unethical that everyone wants to rule him out for the opposition while not hiring him themselves either. As a result, he earns $250,000 a year on initial consults alone, 90% of these people never hiring him.
The strategy does backfire occasionally because if you get caught doing that the judges will consider it a sign of bad faith and dishonest tactics and will hold that against you when assessing your credibility as a witness later on.
SKRedPill 6y ago
Women have no frame, at best an emotional frame that changes with their feelings. They can be easily persuaded into believing they are a victim by arousing anger against their partners.
This is how women in marriages often got manipulated by their own friends and family as well.
[deleted] 6y ago
I'm 25 all I got to say is you guys can have it I got a life as an MD ahead of me. Fuck marriage, fuck women, fuck having kids and all that. I'd rather die alone and in comfortable solitude before I EVER gamble the shit you and other men go through. Before you assume I don't have any experience I have a history of success with women young. But I also learned young about them. All I got to say is more pussy for you guys to pursue and game. I like my hobbies and if a woman makes getting the ass easy with ZERO game or a little upfront money that's the only way I'm dealing with them. The love shit is none existant. Be safe brother.
red-sfpplus 6y ago
Yeah. And just assume you will have multiple courts cases, get judges recused, your kids taken away and $2.2K a month of YOUR fucking money taken away by a cunt who will lie and a faggot ass Judge who believes her.
(some cases pending)
Fuck marriage, fuck scumbag family attorneys and fuck the divorce process and economic system built around it.
BarracudaRP 6y ago
Fucking sucks, that's huge. Is that child support plus alimony? Or do you just make a shit ton more than she does?
red-sfpplus 6y ago
No Alimony in Texas. That is all Child Support.
And all the other child support I pay, like shoes and shit because NONE of that money goes to the kids.
Praexology 6y ago
You should definitely ask the judge to mandate a spending report from her. If you are having to put even more money towards your kids because she is wasting a part of it, you could very likely get the support lowered.
That way you could use the excess as discretionary spending your kids behalf instead of your exs negligent decision making.
(That said, I have no idea how the court works in Tx but, it might be worth a few hundred bucks.)
Tyred_Biggums 6y ago
2200 in CS + 2500 alimony. And this was considered “low”.
I should have moved to Texas.
umizumiz 6y ago
WHOA
MentORPHEUS 6y ago
Was dating a woman about 8 months. Pleasant times, every Sunday I'd make a big brunch and we'd eat together with her grown son. One morning she kept insisting something was true that obviously wasn't, so after several tries at explaining it I told her, "You know, if you try to look up gullible in the dictionary... it's not there!" After a perfect pause she says wide-eyed, "Really?" I started chuckling, her son started chuckling, then she got the joke and started chuckling; the subject was changed and the moment forgotten.
Many months later her junkie sister died, her shithead nephew moved in, and she stopped taking her prescription meds and started doing crystal meth with him. This quickly led to me dumping her, she came to my business off her nut and broke a bunch of expensive things and was carted off to jail and her car impounded. A few days later she tries to make up with me as if none of this happened and I told her not to even call cause of the domestic violence. She laugh-scoffed and said men can't be victims of domestic violence only women, and that in fact I was an abusive boyfriend the whole time we were dating.
Of course I was taken aback by this ludicrous claim so I demanded she tell me when I was ever abusive to her. The ONE example she could come up with was, "Remember when you told me to look up gullible in the dictionary? THAT WAS ABUSE!" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
MentORPHEUS 6y ago
It was just long enough after finding TRP to cut ties quickly and without remorse when it went into the shitter, instead of trying to help/fix her. Even by my standards now several years on, she was actually a pretty good GF till the rapid unfolding at the end. For reference we were in our mid-late 40s with no pretenses of expecting or getting a virgin unicorn bride in the deal.
The sister never overcame their childhood issues and was a known dumpster fire her whole life. She lived in a different state and wasn't talked about much.
Unfugwitable 6y ago
Something something something... a female will always rewrite history once the relationship is over...
I’ve been accused of the emotional and financial abuse stuff myself and I’ve seen friends RECENTLY go through it and I can only stand back and watch AWALT play out in real time.
Focus on yourself, Kings.
Edit—
I forgot this was MRP.
Focus on yourself, Faggots.
Tyred_Biggums 6y ago
If anyone thinks their wife is incapable of this, think again. My STBX and I fought and argued for awhile (especially during Rambo) until I learned to STFU. It all came back and bit me in the ass when she took out a domestic violence restraining order.
So what did she claim as "abuse"?
This equated mental, emotional, and physical abuse apparently.
There's more along these lines but you get the gist. Court agreed, had to spend a lot of money to fight it despite having evidence of her abuses. Got evicted from my house, was effectively homeless for a week.
Anyhow - don't underestimate her feelz making everything super bad and spinning it. If she finds a sympathetic judge - you're fucked.
Lesson learned: get your ducks all in a row before dropping the divorce bomb - I didn't listen to the advice - 100% my fault, don't make the same mistake.
umizumiz 6y ago
My wife didn't want to divorce so bad she somehow found a way to have the whole fucking thing dismissed and made it to where I had to refuckingfile.
Lawyer told me she had a private phone call with the judge lmao all it took
Women get what they want at court. Protect yourself, boys.
Persaeus 6y ago
can you elaborate? do you mean be prepared to move out immediately or something else?
Tyred_Biggums 6y ago
Start documenting. I had documents, photos, texts, audio for three months. While I still took a consent decree which kept the protective order for a year - it was watered down to basically nothing. If I didn’t have this evidence that my lawyer showed hers, I’d be in a different situation.
Have a back up plan - ideally you’re going to stay in your house, but when the sheriff evicts you, don’t have much of a choice. I was NOT prepared for this and stayed with friends, family, and In hotels for 10 days until I got an apartment lined up.
In my state, she can go invent this shit and a judge can sign an ex parte temp order that’s good for 7 days. And there is zero you can do about it until the court date.
Find a good lawyer.
Persaeus 6y ago
solid advice. i'll be mostly gone for the preceding three months, and should be mostly gone for another 1-2 months after. youngest turns 18 in January so that's not really an issue. ideally i'd still be able to stay in my house occasionally until he goes off to college in August; but i got other local options too.
BostonBrakeJob 6y ago
I've been MIA for awhile. Are you gearing up to file?
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Never forget that if some thing is really important to you, have POSSESSION of it before you file. To this day, I have never received any of the photos I took of my kids growing up. Courts can order it, but doesn't mean it will ever happen. If it is important, have possession of it. Can't go get something when she has the habit of calling the police every time you get near your house.
I would have never believed that my kids photos would be held hostage (there were many other things). Expect crazy or you are not prepared.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
What if you decide you want to leave? You are closing a gate you do not own yet.
OK so what exactly do you win? Kids only get one mother, and you are going to try to be more important? This will backfire on you.
I see you post a lot, but you just don't seem to have any comprehension of the potential results of your actions. Either you are a very young spergy guy, or you are joking. One more thing, until you clean up your thinking, do not even consider an LTR. Good luck.
RStonePT 6y ago
/u/trudatness tried that, ask him how it went.
Persaeus 6y ago
thanks for the mindset adjustment
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Just one more thing...
I had a Patek and a gold nugget collection. All in a safe that I told her I would come back for the next day. She got the safe opened before I could get back. Forever denies that she did it. Never saw it coming. Unlike the photos, it was just stuff.
umizumiz 6y ago
I lost all pictures, including baby pictures of myself.
You don't realize how much that shit means until you realize it is actually gone.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Yes, and as you get older (like me, older than dirt) it wears on me a bit more. I lost control over those pictures long ago, so now I take some quiet times, and I recreate the images in my mind. In some ways it's better as it forces more detail and context from the mental image. Even better, they can't be taken away again.
SteelSharpensSteel 6y ago
Damn, that’s cold.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
The hard part was, I was just so stupid, I never saw it coming.
Once you are leaving, you are the enemy. Anything said to the contrary is a lie.
umizumiz 6y ago
Yep.
STFU is sooooo important during and prior to divorce.
You are not lying in the slightest.
You will become the living embodiment of Satan to this woman.
It's also nigh impossible to fuck them peacefully during this time period as they will cling to that shit and think everything's cool, thereby making you a bigger piece of shit the next morning when you act like nothing important happened.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Nope, Satan became her bestie friend. I landed even farther below...
throwitdownman 6y ago
Holy shit. Your examples almost sound exactly like OP, however in your case it went the opposite result. That’s bullshit.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Red, you "heard" these things, I've lived through them more than once.
The most important thing is to not let them become any part of your reality or narrative.
In the final analysis, on ending a marriage, disengage.
red-sfpplus 6y ago
Yeah, that is why I love yo old man.
Keep fucking those dumb 20 year old sluts and keep giving us 40 year old men hope.
Red-Curious 6y ago
Admittedly, a couple of these things are from my own wife during our "dark years." Completely agreed on not letting them define you.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
...and that could be the world's shortest definition of Red Pill.
ciscokid12345 6y ago
Great post. So true. My STBXW says I was abusive for years... Complete horseshit.
She recorded me talking sternly to her last week "You can not continue drinking and driving with the kids! If I hear about this again, I will be contacting CPS."
Her attorney called mine later to say that they would be pursuing a restraining order for my verbal abuse and threats.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Either call CPS or don't. Do not threaten. All you did was solidify
her opinionthat you are weak, and, give her attorney some rope to hang you with. Edit: It's not her opinion you care about anymore.If it is a line in the sand, stop talking STFU, and start calling CPS. Otherwise just disengage and accept the things that you cannot control and get busy on the things that you can. Sound familiar?
Red-Curious 6y ago
Solid. More to /u/ciscokid12345 - I usually advise my clients to have zero contact with the other party at all unless they've specifically run it through me first. In about 20% of my cases I'm holding back my client from making progress. In 80% it saves their butts. I'll take the 20% hit to avoid losing 80% of the time. People aren't as smart and tactful as they think they are.
I do make exception for some of my extremely competent clients who I've already coached for some time.
ciscokid12345 6y ago
You are 100% right on all aspects...
After the incident, I came to terms with what you said by myself. I was in fact, wasting my time. Solidifying her weak opinion of me and giving her attorney ammo.
I filled a report with CPS 30 minutes later and filed an emergency request for order with the court the following day.
The court agreed to hear my case next Wednesday because of the serious nature of the allegations. We've been waiting on a court date since last August.
So win or lose at least I gave it my best and can sit with the judgement knowing I tried.
umizumiz 6y ago
Fuck yeah bro
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Good on you. Not what you decided to do, but that you DID decide your course of action and took it.
Like you said, win or lose, you're the ape throwing the stones, not just another money ducking them.
One last thing. As long as you engage with her, in her frame, you lose. By disengaging can you operate in your own frame.
TheBlockedUser 6y ago
Anything and everything to present themselves as victims and the man as the perpetrator.
Amber Heard's sisters...
SBIII 6y ago
Here's a list of scary sounding facts.
This list is not to make you scared but to make you aware.
Aware of something that sounds really scary but really isn't that dangerous at all.
So even though the scary list frightens you, there's no reason to panic.
Just wash your hands every ten minutes, stay at home and wear a face mask.
DaLaohu 6y ago
We'll know in two more weeks.
SBIII 6y ago
I once went on a hunting trip in Scotland. Every 5 minutes or so, our guide would fire off a shotgun into the air. After the third shot, I asked him why he was doing this.
"To scare off the tigers", he said.
"But there's no tigers around here", I replied.
"That's because the gunshots scare them off", was his reply.
RStonePT 6y ago
We know now, we just have to pay attention and look at the numbers
red-sfpplus 6y ago
We know that mass crowds prevent the spread of stupidity.
InChargeMan 6y ago
What's the fun in that?
RStonePT 6y ago
Maybe I've been here too long, but this sounds like levity to me.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
We've both been here too long.
Yep, reading and laughing my ass off most of time! Keyboards be damned, full speed ahead to fuck me Fridays.
red-sfpplus 6y ago
You pissed all over this thread.
I love it. I can tell when a post hits close to home.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
...and you also. We both jump on stuff that we know well. So how's your divorce going?
red-sfpplus 6y ago
The divorce is final.
She is taking me back on an enforcement, claiming I did not give her some property at the end. Including the actual vehicle she is driving daily, a fridge, and a few other nick nacks.
Its just madness.
Had a few large issues with fitchick over the quarantine, related to her semi-adult kids.
I essentially told her that once her last one graduates high school next year I am moving to downtown Dallas. So at that point her 18 and 20 year olds need to be in an apartment, even if she is paying for it.
I am not raising her kids, nor are they going on my payroll. That is her and her ex's issue.
I am moving on with my life.
As expected, she is totally on board. I do not think it is unreasonable either.
My own children do not live with my full time.
Let alone someone elses.
Red-Curious 6y ago
I'll never understand guys who don't get this.
red-sfpplus 6y ago
Admittedly, it took me a minute to get to this point.
Now, I have been accused of changing the rules of the relationship.
Yeah, so what?
I define the relationship - not you.
Red-Curious 6y ago
WISNIFG Bill of Assertive Rights #4 - "You have the right to change your mind."
Society thinks that once you make a statement, you're locked into that statement for the rest of your life. Changing your mind isn't an option. Do you know how many political leaders could have gotten out of a jam if they'd simply said, "Yeah, I did say that back then. I changed my mind because I'm smarter now." Done.
My wife used to pull this crap on me. "But you said ... !" "So? I changed my mind." Done. No need to try to rationalize a reconciliation between your past statements/conduct with your current decisions.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Yup. It's not the stuff.(she wants)
Good you're moving on.
[deleted] 6y ago
I don't understand these two, maybe provide a bit more context of those specific cases?
"He's sexually abusive. He thinks I should have sex with him whenever he feels like it, and he'll try to pressure me to say yes." I ask, "Do you say yes or do you stand your ground?" She answers, "I always say yes. It wouldn't be abuse if I felt like I was allowed to say no."
"He's sexually abusive. He made me give him blow jobs even though he knows I don't like it."
From outside they seem to have a point.
edit: typo
Red-Curious 6y ago
The first is absurd because "yes" means "yes" under any system. The only time there's an actual dispute is on whether or not "no" means "no" or "no" means "I'm playing hard to get, but I really want you to show your dominance by trying harder."
The second is absurd because because it's obvious he didn't actually "make" her give blow jobs. She didn't feel like it, but decided to do it anyway because it was the path of least resistance for her over saying no. If he actually did "make" her, she would have been talking about how he forced her mouth open or tied her down or how he threatened her so heavily that she didn't feel comfortable biting his dick off while she was down there. There are so many ways to get out of a blow job if you didn't want to, and if he did anything that would actually prevent her from taking those alternative paths, she would have brought them up as even more severe forms of abuse that simply didn't occur.
tradingthings 6y ago
Sexual coercion is a real thing. Imagine being scared to say no bc you know the repercussions of saying "no" include, anger, hostility, name calling, threats of divorce, and rehashing every argument you've ever had for the next 3-5 hours and possibly all night bc they won't let you sleep. It's easier and quicker to say yes so that you can get some sleep, bc you're the one that also had to wake up with with the kids in the morning and the one who tends to them at night when they wake.
Red-Curious 6y ago
You're missing the point. What you're describing may be a form of coercion, but it isn't abuse and there's nothing unlawful about certain types of coercion, such as what you're describing. At the end of the day, if she didn't like it, she could leave and the laws will help her do it. "He gets angry and makes me lose sleep every now and then" v. "I'm being sexually abused/maritally raped" aren't even close to the same spectrum.
You ask any woman: Would you rather be sexually abused and raped by your husband, or have him get angry and call you names? The answer is a no brainer and the fact that they make the opposite choice in practice makes it clear that at least in the moment it doesn't feel like sexual abuse or marital rape - they only want to recharacterize it that way after the fact when it suits their purposes.
tradingthings 6y ago
You've clearly never been in this situation before. Nothing is black and white or as simple as just leave. And exactly: abusive behavior is on a spectrum. But it's still abuse.
Under a government website on domestic abuse: Types: 1) controlling or coercive behavior: ... "Coercive behaviour is: an act or a pattern of acts of assaults, threats, humiliation and intimidation or other abuse that is used to harm, punish, or frighten their victim."
Red-Curious 6y ago
In most cases I've referenced, there's no evidence the person felt coerced at the time. It was regret after the fact, once divorce proceedings started, that caused them to recharacterize everything. Stop trying to white knight by pretending these cases are more credible than they are. I'm not taking these from some random third party. These are from my own cases that have mostly been tested in court.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Red-Curious 6y ago
Oooh, so you're a woman. I thought this sub was male only and was handling the conversation as such (u/bluepillprofessor - is that not the case?).
Either way, what I'm hearing you say, then, is: "I don't like having sex with my husband, but he gets mad if I don't, and it's not worth it to fight him on it, so I agree. See? My abuse is real." You're literally affirming the exact point of my post.
I also come from a place of believing: "Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control" (1 Cor. 7:5). Notice that it requires mutual consent within marriage to DENY sex, not to have it.
So, I'm not really inclined to have much sympathy for your position. You don't like having sex with him anymore? File for divorce and you won't have to. By staying married, you're communicating to the world, "What he does to me isn't so bad. Even though I don't like it, I still prefer to be married to him," which is your implicit stamp of approval that you're okay with it. If it's not significant enough of an issue to make you divorce him, why do you think anyone else should take it as significant when you, who are actually experiencing it, don't?
tradingthings 6y ago
So first off, I'm not religious, so quoting the Bible to me would be irrelevant.
Secondly, when did I state I don't like having sex with him? Quite the contrary. The issue is he wants sex several times a day. If we have sex in the morning, he wants it again before the day is over. Me saying no leads to an argument or shitty attitude from him. He likes to say I "never want to have sex", so I finally got an app to track our frequently and initiation rate. We are currently averaging 7.6 times a week, with me initiating 60% of the time. It's not always this frequent, but we have always been easily 3x a week on our worst weeks. Since reporting the app stats to him, he says it's inaccurate bc it doesn't account for his initiations that I turn down, which is true. But he doesn't seem to understand that him asking me so often means I will eventually turn him down, and he takes rejection so personally and lashes out in ways that damage our relationship.
It's not necessarily a reason to divorce, not when we have kids and other aspects are great. Plus, as you've pointed out here, who's going to take me seriously when I don't have any hard evidence, and I'm really only complaining bc my husband wants to fuck me all of the time? I think that some of his reactions in the last were complete overreactions and yes, abusive, manipulative and coercive to get what he wants bc he knows I know what the consequences of saying no will be.
[deleted] 6y ago
[deleted]
Red-Curious 6y ago
It's funny how riled up you get over a disagreement with a rando on the internet. You don't have to read any of this if it upsets you that much.
shyrix 6y ago
Thank you for this!
InChargeMan 6y ago
Ok, so is this post mental masturbation? It's best to spend our energy on things we can change.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
So you don't think we can talk her into not acting crazy?
So it's abandon all hope, them bitches are crazy? OK I'm in.
InChargeMan 6y ago
The best thing we can do is lead by example and stay out of her frame. Knowing what could be in the future is helpful, but unless you can prevent this in a meaningful way while living your life the way you want it, it is not actionable so it isn't worth our energy. Fearing something gives it power over you.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
Well said, in response to my hyperbole.
OK, I'm still in.
so_woke_da_wookie 6y ago
Talking is nearly always not the answer.
Over60_FireTempered3 6y ago
...and yet we dumb ass men are all over the internet complaining about the women. Go figure.
so_woke_da_wookie 6y ago
We’re the real trannies. Once we were shamcocks.
InChargeMan 6y ago
I don't complain about women. They are a fun challenge, and they make life better. You don't hear guys complaining about how hard climbing Mount Everest is. I want to enjoy the challenge, enjoy the climb...then cum.
so_woke_da_wookie 6y ago
It’s as if by magic, when a man stops bitching about women, they become fun again... notwithstanding the lag.