Clinton First Post-Inauguration Video Statement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvdp9jiUA9I (Trigger warning: Hillary's voice and face)
"The Future is Female". Hillary smugly adopts the slogan smugly displayed during the feminist-led anti-Trump post-inauguration march, hereby admitting that, yes, the purpose of the Xth (current year's) Feminism "wave" is for women to grab power from men, and not, as they had always assured, to reach whatever "equality" they would apparently not currently have.
Nothing new for the red-pill-aware but akin to Sandberg's quote admitting Hypergamy is real and should be encouraged, I think this event can be considered a cultural waypoint: The concealed power move is concealed no more.
I am really curious to see how male feminists are now going to intellectually and morally justify the continuation of their adhesion to a movement that now openly seeks to establish dominance of a subgroup of humans over the subgroup they actually belong to.
Thanks Hillary, you've just sent millions of Men our way.
[deleted] 7y ago
Like Milo says, feminism is a world wide failure. Only a small fraction of women in the west identity as feminists. Inflammatory nonsense like this shit from Hillary just makes more people likely to call bullshit. She has shot the movement in the foot
grubek 7y ago
Feminism has always been a white rich girl movement http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/2017/02/01/the-death-of-the-women-couldnt-vote-manipulative-narrative-2/
bad_watcher 7y ago
Women say they are not feminists because they are aware of the negative connotations of the word.
The vast majority of women still support these movements, as evidenced by their continued silence on men's issues and rampant hypocrisy on practically every gender issue
spikeybumpy 7y ago
Many women consider feminist and ideas to be about 'equality' rather than feminist. Its just that these ideas have become mainstream.
[deleted] 7y ago
Saying they "aren't a feminist" is essentially them trying to stay within the pack. They know the label is toxic, and will deny the label even if they still truly believe in feminism, because they know calling themselves a feminist is a bad social move.
ECTD 7y ago
This is the minimax move is game theory. This is why you vet women though if plating/fucking.
[deleted] 7y ago
Thank you. You could ask women if they identify as a feminist and most will say no, but they want equal treatment. Moderatism is something that Reddit seems to be ignoring these days outside of the echo chamber walls we build in our subs. Most people aren't marching in the streets demanding free abortions.
TyrannyVengeance 7y ago
I would subject more men are actual feminists than women.
whataboutudummy 7y ago
You would *submit more men are actual feminists than women.
[deleted]
vwzwv 7y ago
It's the ultimate shit test.
[deleted] 7y ago
And it's (poor) sexual strategy
Toolman890 7y ago
Well she's right. Their plan is working and I can see it developing in real time. It only just kicked into another gear recently. The only good part about this is that their fullblown matriarchy will probably not last for very long before it collapses.
Luckyluke23 7y ago
i can't wait till 30 years from now when they do studies on how bad femminism was and how it fucked us all into oblivion.
[deleted]
CrazedHyperion 7y ago
Many women would totally dislike having another woman bossing them around.
Rollo-Tomassi 7y ago
It was never about 'equality'. It's always been about female supremacism.
They don't even try to hide it anymore. Reverse the genders in this video and any man uttering the words would be guilty of hate-speech.
Auvergnat 7y ago
The point of my post exactly. They've reached a waypoint where they have enough weight in the cultural discourse not to have to hide it anymore. The time when they would attempt shaming people for criticizing feminism because "feminism is about equality, aren't you for equality?" is no more. Now begins the time when your criticism of feminism will be answered by "yeah well get used to it, now it's our turn."
johnchapel 7y ago
What do you mean NOW openly?
They've been openly anti male for years.
It's just funny because no, the future is NOT female and never will be. The very idea of that is laughable.
[deleted] 7y ago
[--removed--]
Auvergnat 7y ago
When I talk about the purpose of feminism here, I mean the desired end-goal of a self-proclaimed feminist woman, NOT the desired end-goal of the men who originally backed up the movement as a means of society subversion.
Not trying to oppose the Frankfurt School argument here. Just that I found more interesting to discuss this event in the light of how feminism exists in the head of women (jealousy of men's power and attempt at taking it by covert means such as victim status signaling and manipulating men's natural tendency to white-knight), rather than how it existed in the heads of cold-war-era marxist men to subvert America or current capitalists to make more money out of the American people.
Troll_Name 7y ago
Taxes are just part of the destruction of family.
Destruction of family is a part of enslavement.
Family is about lifting people up, not by giving one equal share to millions of different people but by giving all of your strength to your own group. This is what the ultra-elites do for their own, but commoners are supposed to start from the very beginning with each passing generation.
This is how the top stays on top for anything longer than a handful of years.
[deleted] 7y ago
It was also about increasing competition in the labor force as a means for oligarchs and corporations to pay lower wages. Nobody talks about this in terms of lack of wage growth since the seventies, but it's blatantly apparent to me.
selfsufficientnigga 7y ago
Correct. Dismantling of the power of the people has been going for a long time, and feminism's destruction of the power of a family is equivalent to christianity's destruction of the power of a clan in the middle ages (which they achieved by banning marriage between cousins and forcing clans to water themselves down in that way).
Feminism is just a neochristianity in this regard. Just another shitty religion with the same old boring parts (guilt, original sin, false equality that only applies if you sing the party line, etc).
[deleted] 7y ago
You give the state too much credit. Its not some deep conspiracy. Its a by-product and a social backlash from living during the cold war.
peterson2004 7y ago
Wave 1 = Additional tax
Wave 2 = Destroy family unit
Wave 3 = Stupid Population, completely dependent on state
kagetsuki23 7y ago
wave 3 was to promote globalism and lead to borderless countries, and free market.
but even these feminist will be throw out once the era of automatons and other machines appear in the work industry.
TryDoingSomethingNew 7y ago
But you did forget this basic - and constantly proven true - tenent:
"The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality"
From that I can see all the other little things coming...basically lifting women above men at the expense of men.
lqtys 7y ago
That's the definition of bullying: a bully lifts his own status by bringing down others.
TryDoingSomethingNew 7y ago
A little bit different, considering it's an agenda that demonizes one gender but I do see parallels in both.
Platos_slow_brother 7y ago
Feminism dies the second all the lights go out, and don't come back on. It is an orchid that only exists in the hothouse of Western wealth, created by men.
scissor_me_timbers00 7y ago
So true. Only in our unprecedented free society of wealth could women behave this poorly and be tolerated. This hothouse is giving bloom to some very strange species of human behavior. Third wave feminism is definitely a strange and abnormal orchid.
Spartacus1486 7y ago
I've been ranting about this for years. Never have I managed to put it so eloquently. Well done sir.
Billee_Boyee 7y ago
This happened in microcosm here over the past couple of days. We had a rare snowstorm in Puget Sound and lost power. There are 3 men, 1 male teen, one 8 year old boy and 2 women living here. Everyone with a penis was out in the cold, shoveling snow, splitting wood, maintaining the generator, de-icing the walkways, getting the cars out etc.
The two women did not step out the door.
[deleted] 7y ago
Same. After a winter storm we tend to get trees down across the roads out here. I'm out in my truck with a chainsaw, and I meet other guys doing the same. Never seen a woman out there.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 7y ago
[--removed--]
turok281 7y ago
From an economic and financial standpoint, this is highly inaccurate. I do agree however that, not only feminism, but every popular movement is used for political purposes. No great mystery here. These movements are not necessarily created with a political agenda in mind, but they certainly hijacked and directed if they gain popularity. I would dare say the same thing about RP. The alt-right is pretty strong here.
throw17453 7y ago
Couldn't agree with you more. The idea that the creation of feminism was a concerted and controlled effort to destablize the family structure, and brainwash the minds of the youth - in order to establish a new world order does not hold up to scrutiny.
It has existed and grown for many more lifetimes than any one individual, and changed multiple times - so the argument that it could be purposefully steered by a group with a specific end goal is immediately less likely.
When asked for evidence you will often get youtube videos with narrators "exposing" the agenda's of hidden elites - and pinning it together with historical references, which they then go on to embellish and explain in ways that match the point they are trying to establish - but do so as if their interpretation is merely a portrayal of the facts.
selfsufficientnigga 7y ago
Feminism has always been going for the disrupting of family order, from the very start. Of course, it's hard to discern whether it was the goal or just the method, but when they are so fused together, it doesn't really matter.
We are familiar with the current result of feminism's battle to poison the family structure and order, but it has been going for over a century by now - until 19th century, it was considered proper and in children's best interest that they stay with the father in case of divorce, until the feminists of the time started pushing the 'tender years' doctrine which brainwashed people into thinking it's essential that children stay with mothers at all costs. Of course, this was motivated by the monetary gains of having the children as economical hostages, but the results of the move are still with us over a hundred years later.
Your_Coke_Dealer 7y ago
I wouldn't say it was created for any nefarious purposes. It was created for a legitimate equalization of women to men, and when that was as achieved as it could possibly be, the movement ran out of steam. Subsequent "waves" were likely injections of money and political support into the effectively dead movement for political aims different from that of the original movements. This is, of course, a theory only
TheRiseAndFall 7y ago
Or, as often happens with people, they were able to get their way, saw that it was "easy" and wanted to see if they can get more. The problem is that society obliged them. We live in a very peaceful time of relative growth and prosperity. We can be lazy, sit back and relax, and power, water, food, and entertainment are still provided. So nobody pushes back with any real force and they keep grabbing for more.
The feminist movement is getting everything they ask for so they keep asking for more. The "this is payback for all that oppression" bullshit is hamstering their actions. None of those dumb cunts marching through the streets and screaming about oppression has had a hard day in their life.
Slut_Slayer9000 7y ago
And everything used for a "political purpose" is really for a financial purpose.
freesid 7y ago
I respectfully disagree. Power and Money are not the same. Politics is mostly about power.
Slut_Slayer9000 7y ago
Then you really haven't swallowed the pill. Power=Money and Money=Power. The people in politics got power because of money whether that be their own or the people funding them to protect or enhance their personal business interests. Once in power they can influence legislation to make more money.
vwzwv 7y ago
I like that Hillary is being so faggy about feminism. She's only driving home to America how shallow and domineering staunch feminists are. Honestly, if Trump was running against AnYoNe else I don't think he would have won. Hillary so obviously needed a chauvinistic cock shoved in her mouth Trump rose to the top and won.
jakeecio 7y ago
Male feminist will still support this movement. The simple reason being they are white knights.
Billee_Boyee 7y ago
"The future is female, but I am history."
Thanks for the trigger warning. I cannot stomach that beast.
badchad_isglad 7y ago
It's been entertaining seeing the results of failed progressive policies and agendas come to a climax. The decline has never felt so real and so good. Enjoy it boys, it'll only get more fun.
scissor_me_timbers00 7y ago
For real. We're entering the terminal phase now. Watching the constant bloom of cancerous social behavior is fascinating, tragic, amusing. American society is ripe to be savaged by hardship.
exit_sandman 7y ago
That's Hillary's problem (well, one of them). She was never able to resist casting her own personal ambitions as a general struggle of womenhood against the patriarchy (she only used different words); and her narrative of "underdogs unite and gang up on the straight white cismale!" horribly backfired by driving the vast majority of white men and the majority of white women (who, after all, are mostly married to white men) into Trump's camp. Serves that cunt right.
ArkAngelEV 7y ago
That might be a gross oversimplification, but my mom found it humourous that hillary's thirst for power knew no bounds. According to her, if it's a choice between a malevolent man and a power hungry women, moms would pick man 99/100
PaulAJK 7y ago
Absolutely. Also I can't help thinking that Bill failed too many shit tests, so she started to believe she was better than him, and that she deserved everything he had. Since then she's been entitled to the presidency. "That looser supplicating beta had it and I'm his superior, so it's mine by right".
exit_sandman 7y ago
Nah. It's probably more that she considers herself smarter than Bill (she possibly is) and because of this felt entitled to the presidency. I wouldn't be too surprised if she saw her fight against Trump as a proxy fight against her husband (and against all guys who were like both of them); and losing against him probably was like having her hubby's love life dragged out all over again.
Turkerthelurker 7y ago
"Whats going on is a battle between guys that like steak, beer, and full grown women vs. a bunch of pot-bellied pedophiles."
Paraphrasing Alex Jones on the Joe Rogan podcast.
Let's pretend he was being hyperbolic... but that really is what the election turned into. Straight men and women that support tradition vs limp-wristed men and women weirdos that have been conditioned to prioritize feelings over rational discourse.
PaulAJK 7y ago
Yeah, this too. I actually thought I'd added that in my brief post for some reason, I didn't proof read it...
CuntyMcFagnuts69er 7y ago
She's definitely more intelligent than Bill. But Bill is smooth, likable, and charismatic. She's a cave troll. And I voted for her. I'd rather a cave troll than a troglodyte.
perplexedm 7y ago
Want to see Hillary trying this meme multiple times and be proved wrong every time.
[deleted] 7y ago
Not sure why anyone gives a fuck what that old bat thinks. She'll be dead before Trump goes and I'm willing to bet the next left president will be a man again.
No one wants a bitch running the show. Not even most other bitches.
northern_yeti 7y ago
You are 100% correct. A female co-worker even said that Monday morning.
[deleted] 7y ago
No wonder she lost to a baboon. The Future is Robotic
Stythe 7y ago
Some things going to break at some point. I was reading a trash paper today and it was talking about women from the womens march wanting to strike. They were vague about the reasons of course, because there aren't any, but I think it was supposed to be about Trump again. They quote was that it was unclear whether women were just going to strike, or whether they were also not going to do dishes or take care of kids. All I could think about was "Well there goes any argument about equal pay right out the window."
Joking about the false lack of equal pay is one thing, but when it said doing dishes or taking care of kids, all I could wonder was what thay actual fuck? Seriously? Good God, it's nuts.
batfish55 7y ago
If they've bought into the whole "masculinity is toxic" thing, they'll probably embrace their new female overlords with open arms.
whatsthisgarg 7y ago
thanks for the trigger warning, I'm not going to watch that barf but what's this:
is this where she's saying
datefuck the bad boys and marry thegoodboring/stable boys? Doesn't sound like hypergamy to me, sounds like good old ordinary AF/BB where she doesn't have to put out any effort to hold on.Auvergnat 7y ago
Yes it is that quote, and yes it's more about admitting women's dual sexual strategy than admitting hypergamy defined either as "marrying up" or "a woman is attracted to the highest value man her own SMV can attract".
Yet Rollo decided to call it "open hypergamy" (see https://therationalmale.com/2014/06/18/controlling-interests/ & https://therationalmale.com/2014/08/07/open-hypergamy/). I don't like conflating different concepts either and would have rather kept AF;BB and Hypergamy as seperate ones, but unfortunately the Master did so I will follow.
whatsthisgarg 7y ago
You are a stickler for terminology, and I really appreciate that. If you want to rouse Rollo on this, perhaps he has something to say. I would guess it would be better than simply equivocating on how hypergamy is obtaining the best at the time and how that changes, but it might add up to just about that.
Back to Sandberg: the bile you should feel rise in your throat when she describes the absolute Beta (when you know TRP, because it's written in very PC language who could argue with that? equal partners? etc.) and then says NOTHING COULD BE SEXIER? AND LOLOLOLOL
that Sandberg article and Tracy Clark-Flory shit should perhaps be revisited: it is intense, and intensely powerful both for "empowering" women and also enlightening men
exit_sandman 7y ago
The fun part is also that it's borderline autistic of her to openly admit this and only betrays her total lack of empathy for men: because those "marriagable" men - the stable, reliable, respectful, boring, nerdy ones, the guys who would be willing to do everything for their women - are anything but elated at the idea of getting some bad boys' leftovers. At the askmen-sub, whenever her name (and her quote) comes up, the guys who are pretty pissed at the mere mentioning of it.
exit_sandman 7y ago
Well, hypergamy in a redpill context and AFBB go hand in hand - because here "hypergamy" usually means "doing everything she can think of do to get a guy better than the woman, and far more than she would for another guy (including NSA sex)", which is the AF part of the AFBB equation.
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
Hypergamy is the cause.
AFBB is the expression of hypergamy
mattstanton 7y ago
What's AF/BB? Also I saw a graph in school of women's desired testosterone level in a male partner over the course of a month. It was low... until she got her period. Then it spiked the fuck up. Then back down again. I think this is why the first born son thing was so hyped up: the first born son was the son of the alpha male and he got (all? most?) of the inheritance. The beta males were always around because of the children after the firstborn. That's what I think, anyway. Otherwise I don't know where beta males came from. Evolution red pill: humans are pieces of shit.
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
> What is AFBB?
Wow. Just wow trp. Have we sunk this low?
READ THE FUCKING SIDEBAR, ALREADY!
Listen, I know it's after New Years and there are a lot of NYE resolutioners here, but come onnnnn...
mattstanton 7y ago
Sorry I never read side bars. I read the glossary now though
northern_yeti 7y ago
Are you sure you can read? Because READ THE SIDEBAR is literally posted everywhere.
Auvergnat 7y ago
Alpha Fucks; Beta Bucks. https://therationalmale.com/2011/08/23/schedules-of-mating/
and yeah about testosterone peaking at ovulation: https://therationalmale.com/2012/09/25/your-friend-menstruation/
And in a general manner: buy the two rational male books (or read 3 first years of best off material). Will open your eyes
mattstanton 7y ago
I already added them to my cart before reading your last sentence lol
Hillarysdilddo_2016 7y ago
Yes. To be liberal is to be a self-loathing, death-cult, cuckold.
It truly is amazing that anyone short of total retards would join that party.
Because of that and because of the power of statistics I'm really beginning to believe that the entire base of support is fabricated.
Just like they said Hillary had a 92% chance to win. Total fabrication. Just like they said 1:5 women were raped in college. Total fabrication. Just like they said women earn $0.7:$1. Total fabrication. Just like they say everyone is feminist. But only 33% of women identify as feminist. That means only 0.33 x 0.5 of the USA population.
When we think about it in this way I start to think probably the number of votes that cunt got were a fabrication as well.
But maybe that is just wishful thinking that people wouldn't be so stupid in this country to vote for such a patently corrupt, deceiving cunt.
goldaxis 7y ago
Remember the time Jill Stein wanted to recount all the votes in states Trump won until they got to Detroit and discovered that 37% of the city's precincts tabulated more ballots than the number of actual voters counted in the poll books? Oops...nevermind!
Hillarysdilddo_2016 7y ago
Exactly. Made me think that the Green Party is just a subsidiary of the DNC. Paid and funded by them to leech votes away from Republicans.
If it were not she would've recounted states with a closer margin.
Think about the objective as well. Shit-stain Stein took money. Blatently told people she was going to pocket it. And then worked to get chief crook Hillary the election.
These bitches and both parties are so patently corrupt it is unbelievable. They don't even try to hide it.
To say people vote for that is either a) a lie (rigged voting) or b) people themselves are immoral and unethical. I believe it is both.
Edit: just to be clear republicans are total shit too, but I've never seen more corruption than in the DNC.
goldaxis 7y ago
The main difference between Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton is that Jill actually got arrested during her campaign for the presidency, LOL!
spikeybumpy 7y ago
She really does seem like an alien in human skin.
cliffhung 7y ago
IMO This should be on the newly created redpillright sub.
[deleted]
disgruntledearthling 7y ago
Comments are disabled for that video
cashmoney_x 7y ago
She looks like Jigsaw from the Saw movies.
[deleted]