In this game show contestants are asked a series of difficult questions while attached to a lie detector. The results are recorded, but not shown... then what occurs is they ask those same questions on television and if their answer matches the lie detector results they receive money. The more money, the harder the question (hopefully you guys get the jist).
In this particular episode, this woman exposes an incredible amount of RP truths from settling with her current husband, being unfaithful, being down to marry her old crush if provided the opportunity and the list goes on. The ending is the kicker and I hope you guys enjoy it:
[deleted] 10y ago
There's no way that wasn't staged. The last question being a big justice-y "false"? Them tracking down her ex? Come on. It's entertainment.
En_sigma 10y ago
The video's comments are hilarious. Retards.
As for the video - a woman that burns down everything for money (the whole while purporting that she is HAPPY to be getting all of this off of her chest) should tell you all not to get married.
I am married, mostly happily (cuz AWALT), and when my wife asked my son what field he was thinking about and to keep in mind that it would need to be something that would allow him to support a wife and family...I laughed and told him not to worry about that part, there are not any women worth marrying out there.
Bronze_Bound 10y ago
Nobody intelligent ever post comments on any YouTube video.
strivingforfreedom 10y ago
I disagree, I was watching a samurai documentary once and the top comment was a guy saying that the samurai were all black people.
[deleted] 10y ago
I thought about examples that would erase the anger from my head and one particular video came to mind which I cannot remember where it is from. It was a girl and guy drama type game or big brother type thing where in the end they had the final contestants do a little bit of prisoner's dilemma. They each decided to split the grand prize or take it all. If you both split you both get half. If you take and the other splits, taker gets all. If you both take you both get nothing.
The guy completely manipulated the woman into splitting and ended up taking all of it. He knew she would fall for it because he understood that he was a beta bitch on the show. Once it was revealed that she got nothing he went off on a rant on how much of a bitch she was. Please someone find the video; I'm sure it would be enjoyed here.
makethemsayayy 10y ago
lmfao, that's hilarious. find that shit
KidGrizz 10y ago
Welp...looks like I will never get married.
lelliot_rodger 10y ago
It took seeing this video to make you decide that?
[deleted]
brotherjustincrowe 10y ago
He already failed the shit test marrying her, comforting her while the credits rolled was just compounding his failure. She can't even look at him now. Well, I hope she at least takes care of those cats.
Disillusi0n 10y ago
I think I read an article once about he even stayed with her to try and work things out.
Total cuck.
makethemsayayy 10y ago
She's not even fucking hot like what the fuck this dude is as BP as it gets. If I ever get in a showdown with this pig, I'd have it gun and car in 5 minutes.
babydocnorman 10y ago
So wifey was a hair salon assistant. Explains a lot. Guaranteed crazy. Hubby should have watched this video before they got married: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwbKYcBdVyk
[deleted]
CallMeMurphy 10y ago
My friends wonder why I question women and their intentions so much and why I am always skeptical, this is exactly why. Next time one of my friends questions my RP-ness, this is what I'm going to show them.
Hokuto199x 10y ago
That last question though. Almost cried from the laughter.
TheOneWhoWokeUp 10y ago
That was the ultimate hamster.
edit: Hamster not hampster...
cruxae 10y ago
http://i.imgur.com/F7zhDHI.png
Hokuto199x 10y ago
It's what happens when the hamster goes nuclear.
mangofrugtjuice2 10y ago
These game shows are fake as fuck
magus678 10y ago
I haven't really thought about it before, but when they finally are able to lie detect with serious accuracy, everything is going to change.
Im sure there will be some slight taboo associated, but when you can do a quick 10 question run down with your SO about whatever, a lot of the structure of how things work is going to shift.
Nevermind the much more massive implications for the legal process. I'm putting this up there with male birth control in importance.
Like every problem ever, we won't solve things socially, we will solve them technologically.
beginner_ 10y ago
Imagine that. lie detector for the home. If she doesn't submit to a test, next her.
BluepillProfessor 10y ago
Feminism will not be able to survive if the lies are exposed- nor will most marriages.
Sam Kinosen explained it all to us.
JP_Whoregan 10y ago
It's almost impossible to "lie detect". "Lie Detectors" are not actually lie detectors, they are "nervousness detectors".
magus678 10y ago
I was referencing future devices rather than current ones.
zephyrprime 10y ago
Lie detectors are already pretty accurate. It's just that some people are able to game them by training beforehand. For an untrained person, they're pretty accurate.
Some years ago, they used an MRI to do lie detection. This was just an experiment and not a product. It would not surprise me at all if the military or CIA had already developed a field usable version of that.
JP_Whoregan 10y ago
Lie detectors aren't accurate at all. That's why, to this day, they are inadmissible in any court of law in the United States.
SuperMike83 10y ago
They don't actually work at all. What they are good for is tricking people. People believe they work and get scared. Anyone can beat a lie detector by remaining calm.
"A particular problem is that polygraph research has not separated placebo-like effects (the subject's belief in the efficacy of the procedure) from the actual relationship between deception and their physiological responses"
http://www.apa.org/research/action/polygraph.aspx
DrXaos 10y ago
Agreed. The polygraph is an entirely different procedure than the fMRI test.
That test was much more focused and more legitimate: could detect whether or not a person was particular familiar with a face presented visually. This recognition is an involuntary built-in specialized brain circuit and could be recognized with (statistical) accuracy despite efforts to deceive. fMRI could detect quick blood flow of spontaneous metabolism in that brain area.
DarkCircle 10y ago
You guys are missing the genius of that last question and the timing of it. This woman has some grade A hamster going on. The purpose of the hamster is to rationalize that the wrong they are doing is justified and at the very heart, to believe that they are a good person. That is the core of hamstring; feeling good about yourself or your actions when you KNOW should not.
She could not have possibly answered the question truthfully because she has been lying to herself about herself her whole life. Acknowledging who she is would just be too painful and whenever that twinge of pain attacks, she blames it on the closest person near by.
She was whipped up in to a frenzy over the money and even lied to everyone that "it is not about the money it is about getting it off her chest and feeling better". In reality she was happily fucking over her husband and family for the cash.
The one person she would not hurt is herself so she could not possibly be honest with herself and admit she is an awful person. I believe this is at the core of bad women. They want to believe that in spite of all of the people they hurt for no reason, they are somehow good people.
If the author/producer asked that question first, she could have lied but he/she got her in to an emotional state where all of the evidence was on the table looking directly at her. That lifetime of hamstring just kicked in and the words came out. She KNEW the answer, but that reflex kicked in.
Absolute genius.
Pointless_Endeavors 10y ago
The real rage inducing part was her sister hitting the buzzer and saying "No one want to hear that answer" when two seconds prior her husband very clearly says he wants to hear the answer.
imaRPman 10y ago
Sister already knew the answer.
boogalooshrimp1103 10y ago
I thought it was funny when the husband went to stop her and the dad held him back
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
FLFTW16 10y ago
On that golden ball gameshow, freeze frame at the 2:29 mark. After the dude "looks her in the eye" and promises to split, she closes her eyes to try to hide a microsmile. She knew he was going to give her everything.
TheSecretIsPills 10y ago
That video should be on the RP training manual lol!
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
Steve_Wiener 10y ago
An angry response from a woman to that video ( unless you accused her) is... telling. Hmmm.....
boney_hoo_hoo 10y ago
Had she confirmed AWALT, it would be similar to a machine becoming self aware.
dj10show 10y ago
She has a neural-net processor, a learning computer
cptspiffy 10y ago
Yes but they set it to READ ONLY mode in the factory.
Man-with-a-pitchfork 10y ago
Oh, come on, people.
Lie detectors are bullshit, game shows are bullshit, and a game show built around lie detectors is obviously complete crap.
I think the last question was funny enough, but let's not pretend that any of this really happened - it's all fake, scripted, paid for.
usul1628 10y ago
Totally cringe inducing. At least the guy knows now and not in 15 years when she can't keep up the facade and has kids as leverage. Even not knowing what she was going to say, I think all of us here could identity her for what she is in about 30 seconds. Fake hair, fake tan, airhead, already past the wall at 26 lookswise.
Fuck_shadow_bans 10y ago
Shit is hilarious. FALSE. Take that money away!
makethemsayayy 10y ago
what a dumb bitch, you did all that for nothing just cuz you couldn't admit you were a piece of shit, deep down.
VanityKing 10y ago
That last question thoe. Seriously, she's able to come clean about all the other things she did for money but the worthless whore can't admit what a stupid piece of shit she is. Absolutely disgusting excuse for a human being.
leftajar 10y ago
That's the part that stuck out most to me.
She threw a shitload of money away just because she had to hamster herself that she's a good person. The depth of her hubris is so great, as to deny her the entire point of revealing all that bullshit in the first place.
tedted8888 10y ago
Prefect example of how humans act first then justify later. I'm sure she genuinely feels she is a good wife lol.
-SoItGoes 10y ago
That was fucking hilarious...
fortifiedoranges 10y ago
That's because she believes that she did nothing wrong. I've found that most women have ridiculously low self-esteem.
Blaat1985 10y ago
People with low esteem tend to actually feel that they are to blame for everything that is wrong in their life and that thry are bad people. Think the right word in this case is narcisist.
surgeon_general 10y ago
The thing is that was a lie detector test. So she DID feel that she was a bad person. She was caught lying when she said she didn't think she was a bad person.
Meglomaniac 10y ago
I think this shows us that perhaps women instinctively know that they are bad people for doing things, but how they are perceived socially is more important.
I_like_big_titays 10y ago
I think the guy in charge of the yes or no buzzer realized that was his one moment in life to score one point for justice.
fortifiedoranges 10y ago
Lie detector tests aren't an indication that you're lying, it shows that you're panicked though. Her heart rate went up during the test because the hamster was spinning the wheel in overdrive.
VanityKing 10y ago
I think the main fact that society denies is that women are not logical creatures. I don't understand how she could come to the conclusion that she is a good person when she has cheated on her husband, would willingly leave her husband for her ex boyfriend, and has stolen money from her job among other things. Any rational huMAN being would know and admit that he is a piece of shit for doing all these things, yet this stupid fuck lied about it and lost everything. If the genders were reversed in this situation, society would harass the husband and most likely have him kicked off the police force and hated by his friends and family. Society makes me sick
asimplescribe 10y ago
That question is rigged. It's too vague and undefined. Damn near every person on the planet has done good and bad, and all it takes is for some doubt to surface in your mind and you fail the polygraph. Either way you answer that one you are screwed out of the money.
VanityKing 10y ago
I don't understand how anyone in the world can believe they are a good person after having stolen money, cheated on their husband multiple times, and even admitting in front of the world that she would immediately leave her husband for her ex if given the chance. This is some next level solipsism right there, and frankly I have never been more disgusted with the human species ( mostly female) until that video.
makethemsayayy 10y ago
I've stolen a number of times to get money for drugs. Do I think there's moral conflict on the situation? Sure, but I would go with: yes, in society's eyes I'm a bad person.
VanityKing 10y ago
The question was do YOU think you are a good person, and despite whatever rationale you may pretend justify your actions, you subconsciously understand what you're doing is wrong and would fail just as she did. I'm already fairly disgusted with this stupid slut in the first place, but I would lose what little faith I had left in women if the lie detector determined she actually believed she was a good person despite being such a worthless piece of shit.
makethemsayayy 10y ago
I kinda do think I'm a good person still. In the cost-benefit analysis I've given more to society than I've taken, but it's not hamstring it's logic. But yeah I guess it IS a good thing somewhere in her brain knows that she's a fuck up.
epUser 10y ago
AWALT but this one is a special cunt, not regular one.
[deleted]
Position5hero 10y ago
Wow this is really bad.
Even beyond what's obviously bad, the way she goes about it...
She was able to ADMIT SHE CHEATED ON HER HUSBAND- with a smile on her face.
She almost seemed proud of herself through most of it.
But the worst bit? She was able to admit she cheated with no shame- but she wasn't able to admit that she didn't think she was a good person.
She had no issues embarrassing her husband on national TV, really destroying him- but when it comes to saying something bad about herself? Hell NO.
Movonnow 10y ago
She believes it. She hasmtered it away. She cheated but it was not her fault, she took off her ring to appear celibate because she wanted to have fun.
If one were to understand one thing from this video it would be this capacity women have to cheat on you, steal money from her job, divorce rape you, cut your penis off....whatever and still believe 100% they are right to do it and that they are not a bad person at all.
Then, keep in mind the whole system backs up women whatever happens and this is how your wife will be able to ruin your life while sleeping well at night.
imaRPman 10y ago
"She almost seemed proud of herself through most of it."
Yes because all attention was on her and she felt "empowered" by the show.
Women often us the word empowered, I think this is a good example of how seductive power can be to a women. She was in such an empowered state she slut shamed herself on national TV.
Like you said..."with a smile on her face"
[deleted]
Polorutz 10y ago
Well, she doesn't know about the lie detector results so when she is asked the question she believes what she is saying even though unconciously she doesn't.
By her answer and lie detector not matching up she lost 200 grand so that's what's hurting her really.
sealteamaus 10y ago
i enjoyed sadistic pleasure watching the thing come clean
vengefully_yours 10y ago
That's called schadenfreude
vengefully_yours 10y ago
She's no different than most women.
thrice_as_nice 10y ago
Have to disagree, this woman is just a really crappy person, not all women are like that. Yeah, I know, RP says AWALT...maybe some of that's true, but the huge bias of this sub is that lots of people who are attracted to it are people who have been burned, or are young and have seen immature women, thus are much, much more likely to believe AWALT based on their experiences...most who have not been burned have no reason to come here.
Just a reminder to take these concepts as one part of a larger philosophy rather than an ultimate dogma - TRP has helped me a lot but it has a place. Carry on.
vengefully_yours 10y ago
The difference between her and most girls? This one was honest about it.
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
vengefully_yours 10y ago
She is exactly like the vast majority of women I have known. She is what is called typical, there is often some truth behind stereotypes.
SlappaDaBayssMon 10y ago
Agree, but I would expect these kind of sleezy romance game-shows to be just as disingenuous as your typical post-waller.
[deleted] 10y ago
Honestly for the husband its probably the best thing to possibly happen to him... he can save a few years of his life with that succubus. Article below on the follow up:
April 21, 2008 Vol. 69 No. 15 Moment of Truth Fallout: Why I Left My HusbandBy Liza Hamm, With Kathy Ehrich Dowd A Month After Saying She Was Unfaithful on the Lie-Detector Game Show, Controversial Contestant Lauren Cleri Reveals She and Her Husband Have Separated Five weeks ago, Lauren Cleri was ready to fight for her marriage to husband Frank—despite the bombshells about infidelity she'd just dropped on FOX's The Moment of Truth. "I don't believe in divorce," she told PEOPLE in March. But now? "Frank and I aren't living together," with no plans to reunite, she says. "I couldn't be happier."
Sure, she may have done some damage when she told 8.5 million viewers that she had cheated on Frank (later insisting it was just emotional infidelity) and that she should be wed to an ex-boyfriend instead. Cleri says the couple of two years already had problems—but airing them didn't help. Two weeks ago, Cleri, 26, moved back in with her parents in Pennsauken, N.J., while Frank, 25, a police officer, stayed in Piermont, N.Y. After the show, "we didn't talk that much," she says. "He kept changing his mind. [He'd say,] 'I want to work things out.... I don't want to.'" Finally, she realized "if I tried to work things out, I'd be going back to unhappiness."
Frank, meanwhile, "just wants to lie low," says his mom, Maggie, who adds, "he's not angry with Lauren. A part of him still loves her." She's forgiven Lauren, but not The Moment of Truth: "That show is out to ruin people's lives."
Her daughter-in-law disagrees. "At first, I regretted going on the show," Cleri says, "but now I'm thankful. It sped up the process of finding what Frank and I need."
JP_Whoregan 10y ago
Translated,
"That show is out to shame women for their Open Hypergamy.
See, the wife isn't ashamed that she fucked around on her husband. That part she's perfectly fine with. What she is ashamed of is the fact that it now has social consequences to her validation train, and people might actually judge her for her actions. As we all know, in a feminine primary society, we absolutely can't have any of that going on.
Glenbert 10y ago
I can relate. I don't believe in killing people. But I really, really like detonating IEDs in the middle of my street.
circlhat 10y ago
Thank you, I see this posted every 4 months and always wondered what happen.
01-559-2620 10y ago
A succubus would want to fuck him, this bitch pretended to be asleep and other shit...
[deleted] 10y ago
Hilarious, that she sees it has ruining anyone's life... it's her son. Her son. Yet she is still on Team Girl? It's her own flesh and blood who was betrayed, and seen as the lesser man by someone who should have been completely devoted to him. She should be praising that show. I mean, if they did not separate, how would she even be sure that any grandchildren were actually her blood? I cannot imagine how that would not matter.
culofiesta 10y ago
She's more concerned about her son's marriage than her son. Having a married son, a daughter in law, house in the suburbs, etc is keeping up appearances. She cares about her appearance more than anything, including her son.
zephyrprime 10y ago
She should be "Thank god that stupid show exposed the truth!"
soupermain 10y ago
The mom blamed the show for ruining people's lies lmfao
balalasaurus 10y ago
I wonder what she did about the 'hidden things her daughter knew about her husband'
[deleted]
I_Am_My_Own_God 10y ago
It just goes to show that women will always stick together. Even when it comes to their own sons.
GuruDev1000 10y ago
In all honesty, the woman reveals that there are secrets of her father that she has kept from the mother, which means she's sticking up for a man.
A_Medical_Physicist 10y ago
I honestly don't believe this is true, there are plenty of mothers out there that would put their sons above anyone in the world; frankly, the mother is obviously right in the sense that the producers probably aren't looking for:
"Did you ever do anything bad at all even once in your life?"
"No"
cptspiffy 10y ago
Agreed. My mother will gleefully take any opportunity to throw my wife under the bus. There is no honor among thieves.
aazav 10y ago
What? She didn't blame her own mouth? How surprising!
[deleted] 10y ago
The buxom blond wife of a city cop yesterday said she humiliated her husband in front of 8 million viewers of the reality show “Moment of Truth” – revealing she slept around and wanted to be wed to another guy – in a bid for fame and fortune.
But Lauren Cleri, 26, and her baby-faced hubby, rookie NYPD Officer Frank Cleri, 24, of Rockland County, said after appearing on the Fox show Monday night, they came away without any prize money, no immediate job offers for her – and a potentially irrevocably broken marriage.
“We’re kind of up in the air right now – I want to [get back together], but I don’t think he does,” Lauren said as she shared an umbrella with her husband outside their tiny apartment in Piermont. “It’s not very easy to overcome,” said Frank, a cop with the 48th Precinct in The Bronx. Frank Cleri said he had been aware of his wife’s cheating but not prepared for the emotional drain of their going public with it for the money.
Standing tensely next to his wife yet still wearing his wedding ring, he said, “Everything that was mentioned during this show, we had talked about before. We’ve had our issues. Unfortunately, now they’re not just our problems. Everyone knows about it.”
The pair catapulted into the national spotlight on the stomach-churning episode when Lauren revealed that she had cheated on her husband of two years and really wished she was married to an old boyfriend. The show has contestants take a lie-detector test off-stage beforehand. They are asked some of the same questions later posed to them in front of the audience.
On Monday’s show – taped two weeks ago – Lauren’s ex-boyfriend made a surprise appearance and asked: “Do you believe I am the man you should be married to?” As Frank Cleri grimaced on the sidelines, his wife said, “Well, wow, um. I’m going to be honest and say yes.” The lie-detector results said she was being truthful, and she was awarded $100,000. After admitting that she cheated on Frank, too, and netting another $100,000, she was asked if she thought she is a good person. She answered, “Yes,” but the lie-detector test said she was lying. She lost all of the money.
Lauren said she had been called by a casting agent months ago about appearing on the show and, “I didn’t think it was going to be this big a deal, because I thought so many people are doing it, we’re not going to stand out.” The pair said they had planned to share any money she won.
But the show’s executive producer, Howard Schultz, said Lauren Cleri told him later that “she doesn’t want a relationship [with her ex or her husband]. “She wanted out of her marriage, and she wanted to . . . tell the truth,” Schultz told The Post. “Perhaps some of it was then, ‘If I’m going to end my marriage, then if I can win a hundred thousand or two hundred thousand dollars. I can start a new life with some cash in my pocket.’ ”
Asked if she went on the show to get out of her marriage, Lauren yesterday said “definitely” not. Additional reporting by Kate Sheehy and Carolyn Salazar jeane.macintosh@nypost.com
balalasaurus 10y ago
And that gentlemen, is why you should never get married.
dj10show 10y ago
I still am flummoxed by the fact that infidelity does not void your right to half of his shit. Oh right, but then she could claim she did it because she was being emotionally or financially abused and then she'd be the victim.
Glenbert 10y ago
Don't be. Historically, sluts weren't able to provide for themselves post divorce. That put the onus on the government to take care of them. The government already had it's hands full providing for unmarried sluts.
Now that many sluts actually out earn their husbands you might see a change in things.
zephyrprime 10y ago
I really wish that marriage's were actual contracts with actual terms that were legally enforceable in them. Then when shit hits the fan, there would be an actual line that reads "In case of infidelity, cheater forfeits rights to communal property."
dj10show 10y ago
I was actually thinking about this yesterday. Would it be possible to have a clause like that inserted into a pre-nup? Although, I've heard some crazy stories about how stealthy women can be when they're cheating, so they may never get caught.
KyfhoMyoba 10y ago
That's what marriage USED to be. The marriage contract was standardized by Christianity, and usually enforced through the Church. The State took over and fucked it all to hell.
zephyrprime 10y ago
I don't know but I don't think it will matter anyway because prenups don't have a strong legal standing at all in court anyway. That's why the courts are always deciding awards beyond the limit of the prenuptial.
Glenbert 10y ago
I don't think so. "No Fault Divorce" really has little to do with any sort of ideology... even though it was packaged that way. It was created to free up the family courts in California (thanks Reagan).
I've got to imagine that trying someone for infidelity would be one of the most tedious and time-consuming processes a court could possibly entertain.
KyfhoMyoba 10y ago
That's one of the biggest reasons the courts wanted the legislatures to institute no-fault.
[deleted]
dj10show 10y ago
I was thinking it should free up family courts because you'd be less likely to cheat knowing you also wouldn't be able to go all Scrooge McDuck.
Glenbert 10y ago
All it does is change the order of operations. So instead of cheating, she goes Scrooge McDuck and then it's on to the carousel, guilt free!
dj10show 10y ago
How did I not figure that one out? Obvious outcome is obvious.
Hoodwink 10y ago
You think people (and most of all, women) are all too logical and altruistic.
Most people go with their feelings and jump at opportunities as the environment allows. There's very a low-bar set for people who are considered to have a 'high integrity' or someone who follows all laws and social expectations.
Have you had the opportunity to cheat with a really hot, sweet, feminine girl who threw herself at you when you had a girlfriend? Most men don't get the opportunity to trade-up by just accepting the offer.
dj10show 10y ago
Actually the most female attention I had was when I had a fiancee. The weird thing is that I didn't even realize they were hitting on me, but my other half would be telling me how they were checking me out or acting all girly. Some of them were ridiculously hot, but I value my word over most things.
Looking back on it, she asked what cheating meant to me. I said if you cheated on me, we'd be done. She said if I cheated on her, depending on the reason (not as some sort of revenge thing), she saw herself trying to work through it.
I was kind of RP to start off. But I thought as relationships progressed, the shit tests should stop, not realizing I needed to keep on top of my game. I went BP in an attempt to acquiescence.
Guess what happened? She dumped me, I lost my preselection, and nosedive.
makethemsayayy 10y ago
Subconsciously, your demeanor and attitude changes when you have a girlfriend. You give off more of an air of satisfaction and it makes people want to be around you.
aazav 10y ago
Wow. I used to live in Piermont. It's actually a nice place. It is interesting to place a connection to that type of event and a place I used to live.
Seems sad that something like that would happen in a place where you once lived and liked.
But to be stoic, it demands that one look at it in a manner of "wherever there are women, one can expect this type of thing to happen. He's free of that poison and better prepared to face the realities of life."
Stoic wins when dealing with matters like this.
culofiesta 10y ago
The most boring places have the craziest stories behind closed doors.
[deleted]
RPthrowaway123 10y ago
I remember watching this. They both knew their marriage was fucked up, they just decided to go on a gameshow and get some money out of it.
life036 10y ago
WTF, was that her husband consoling her in the last few frames of the video?
makethemsayayy 10y ago
"who wants to fuck my wife! I'll pay for everything! you can have half my savings, and I'll give her money for your dates! Can I please watch though? I won't interrupt I just want to see!"
DRMMR76 10y ago
You should be aware that "lie detectors" have been found to be correct...about 51% of the time. They're virtually as accurate as a coin flip.
Strongbhoy 10y ago
The "Bullshit" episode on it shows how unreliable they can be and how they can be beaten.
However, none of this would surprise me in the least.
[deleted]
meet_me_at_high_noon 10y ago
Anyone else notice how the girl's dad was holding his son-in-law's hand? The dad totally gets it.
enteralterego 10y ago
I thought these things were scripted and staged?
jolly--roger 10y ago
I don't know how or why would they stage this thing aired in February 2008 so that the husband would file for divorce in May..
//edit: months
PencilNeckBrah 10y ago
Why would anyone agree to go on this show if they weren't planning on telling the truth? Why is the husband comforting her after?
The producers must have known that the boyfriend was of some significance if they actually had him show up, so obviously this entire thing is scripted and she told them everything in advance.
Masonjarteadrinker2 10y ago
LOL damn I remember seeing this live.
[deleted] 10y ago
[deleted]
makethemsayayy 10y ago
no there's just an entire gameshow based around it and the husband who JUST FUCKING SAID he wanted to hear it. Get the fuck out of here you stupid bitch.
Meglomaniac 10y ago
Ahaha the best was the girl saving the woman by hitting the buzzer to save her.
She knew what the answer was.
The BEST part was when the girl failed when she had to think outside the box and see if she was a bad person for HER choices. Solipsism at its finest. Even for 100 grand or w/e the prize was, still cant think outside what she wants.
[deleted] 10y ago
Lol was that her husband comforting her in the end?
laxing22 10y ago
here is a better link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=salFV5YKb0w
(full def and length)
Recovery2015 10y ago
Good entertainment, but that show is staged.
Doesn't mean women don't cheat though
TheRealMouseRat 10y ago
Husband gets the best deal ever. Free money and gets out of a shitty marriage. Jackpot!
[deleted]
boogalooshrimp1103 10y ago
they lost the money when she lied about being a good person
[deleted]
5850s 10y ago
HAHAHAHA ending was the best, wow. Yeah I think I am a good person. After all that she just said. Because in her mind, she honestly is.
Also very fitting that the lie detector test said she was lying on the last question. Her BODY gave it away even while her brain rationalized.
ShitLordXurious 10y ago
That last question - oh shit!
If she gets a question wrong like that, does she lose all the money she had built up (as in "who wants to be a millionaire")? In which case, did she do all that for nothing? Haha!
[deleted]
thenarrrowpath 10y ago
The sad part is...none of this surprised me.
[deleted]
RP_Since_Birth 10y ago
This is typical female behavior. AWALT stands true yet again.
fsoric 10y ago
Pozdrav Perica, nisam znao da ima i nas crvenih ovdje... zao mi muza, al kraj videa je dobar