Dear RPers,

In our last installment, we discussed the damage porn inflicts upon or subconscious in terms of sexual perception and the complacency it causes through its limitless availability and sexual fantasization for profit. We also discussed how for our generation most adolescent sexual upbringing is self-orchestrated to a media designed to and which thrives from continued use, and how many of the sexual expectations we’ve developed during our period of adolescence are founded upon unrealistic or uncommon real-world practices further hard-wired into our psyche by our continuous use of the media.

In short, if Disney causes of our ill-conceived notions on love, Pornhub causes of our ill-conceived notion on sex.

What we will be discussing today are ways in which abstinence from masturbation can be weaponized and used in your daily encounters with women, we’ll touch on how womens’ perceptions of men alter through abstinence from masturbation and how it affects the tell-tale “inaction rationalization i.e. male-hamstering”.

In Part 3, we’ll begin comparing active approach v. passive approach in terms of masturbation, we’ll touch on further monitoring and controlling your PAT and we’ll discuss in-depth a topic that is commonly discussed indirectly on TRP but has been rarely addressed forthright: radical polarization (as opposed to standard polarization).

ADDENDUM

Before I begin, please remember to approach what is being discussed as objectively as possible; the necessity of porn and constant masturbation have been hardwired to your psyche at adolescence, so some of the topics that will be discussed may seem difficult to swallow. Just as you’ve felt oppression when introduced to the truths behind love, women and the societal miscommunications on both, you’re first reaction may be to lash back out of frustration. This is a normal and understandable response. Porn and masturbation addiction are both dopamine-addictions, as are drugs, alcohol or nicotine. A depravation or endangement of any dopamine stimulants will elicit such a response. Remember, however, to regularly practice your restraints and mediations of masturbation even after reading this article; a one-time attempt at regulated abstinence doesn’t provide a cure-all for dopamine addiction, one AA meeting doesn’t a sober man make.

BRAZZERS, NOW AVAILABLE IN PINK!

Men need sex. Women need validation.

Men supplement their lack of sex with masturbation, which in turn is supplemented in unlimited quantities through porn. But how do women supplement their validation between male encounters?

Women haven’t made it out of our digital age without the digital age unscathed and without some form of socially-ambiguous digitally-based dopamine addiction; for women Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, PoF, Tinder, OKCupid, Fling, Tango, Tumblr, Vine, YouTube, Twitch, KiK, SeekingArrangement, etc. are all social playgrounds in which women have their need for validation satisfied through the limitless validation availability for women, a business-crafted fantasization and idealization of relationships, the desires of the men validating them and through their own fantasized version of their SMV (i.e. the belief that men in real life will pursue them to the degree online men will r that their real-life SMV matches their online SMV just as we discussed in “Local Sexy Single Women: Part 1 & 2”).

Sound familiar? It should.

Just as men become addicted to the instant and limitless need-fulfillment provided by porn, women are addicted to the instant and limitless need-fulfillment provided by social media. And just as it creates a complacency in men not to pursue real sex, women's addiction creates a complacency to not make themselves pursuit-worthy.

The difference between each genders’ addiction comes forward when each gender's false addiction-created vision of reality meets real-world applications. A complacent, lower-than-her- potential SMV woman can still get real-world validation from a higher SMV male due to the feminist social landscape and “macro-sociological beta mindset” created within.

In this landscape, even high-value men will validate low-value women because the intrinsic value of pussy is ungodly high (due to the two addictions we just discussed).We can consider the woman’s addiction healthy: she receives constant validation from every facet of her life; she can get validated from men in her social circles, supplement it with online validation through social media, there’s no negative societal stigma towards validation addiction among women and the fantasy created by social media addiction is rarely combated as men will alter themselves to match said fantasy, albeit with ulterior motive (in some cases, society supplicates this fantasy through media like movies, music and TV by describing it as normal or “expected”).

As a man we aren’t so lucky. We can consider a man’s addition unhealthy: he only receives constant sexual release from one facet of his life (his addiction), his intrinsic value towards pussy is raised (due to scarcity), the fantasy derived from his addiction is aggressively rejected by real-world experiences/societal norms and –although common practice among men- his addiction is negatively perceived by society (i.e. a girl can openly talk about how many friend requests she's received this week, but he can’t openly talk about how he spanked it five times to Back Door Sluts 9).

What’s worse, by supplementing his lack of sexual release through women by masturbating, the necessity that drives him to pursue real-world sex declines. It becomes a want and no longer a need.

The amount of rationalization supporting his inaction will also increase. Below are some examples of rationalizations (i.e. ”male-hamstering”) commonly displayed by a complacent male (think to yourself how many of the following you’ve told yourself at any given time):

• “She’s not THAT hot. I can find much hotter than her." (she’s actually hot)
• “She looks like a bitch. I don’t want to put up with her attitude.” (un-grounded remark)
• “That’s probably her boyfriend beside her. I don’t want to step on any toes.” (fear of confrontation)
• “She probably doesn’t like (insert character trait here) guys” (self-deprecation)
• “I’m probably not her type. She probably likes (insert subculture here) guys.” (meekness)
• “She’s out of my league. I’m not good enough for her yet.” (unnecessary bar-setting)
• “I’d go up to her, but I don’t want to come off as a creep.” (fear of polarization)
• “I have nothing to say to her. We’ll have nothing in common.” (lack of depth)
• “All girls who wear (insert brand here) are (insert stereotype here).” (generalization)
• “I’ll wait her to give me a sign. When she does (insert weirdly specific IOI here), I’ll go talk to her.” (impossible scenario creation)

You must convert your “want” for sexual release back into a "need".

Next we’ll discuss how complacency through masturbation is communicated to women and how the necessity of sexual release becomes a great weapon. Speaking of weapons…

A GUN AIN’T S___ WITHOUT BULLETS

Okay, so let’s say your strolling along on some bright and sunny Wednesday, and a robber jumps out from the shadows. You’ve never left home without your trusty pistol, but because you’ve never actually needed it until now, you don’t have bullets in it.

You know that it's empty, but the robber doesn't. You brandish your gun, holding it up to his stupid mug.

At first the robber’s impressed by your preparation for his assault and is fearful of your unwavering resolve. But then he starts to see through you. He notices your hands are shaking. He sees you’ve begun to sweat. He sees your finger’s not on the trigger. He can sense the fear in your eyes. He can sense your lack of conviction.

He calls your bluff, robs you blind, takes your wallet, runs off and spends your hard-earned dough on a bunch of stupid shit like shopping, make-up, pedicures and nail-polish. I think your getting my metaphor now (just to beat you over the head with it, it’s a metaphor on gaming women).

Brandishing a gun only gets you so far; if the robber is in-experienced (young/virgin) or scared-themselves (insecurity) or unarmed (unattractive) or weak (overweight) or psychotic (psychotic), just pointing your gun at them might work. But let’s face it, you want the type of gun that’ll intimidate (give tingles) to even the most opposing (sexy) of adversaries (hot-ass fine women).

Consider your “gun” as the metaphorical representation of your SMV (or a phallic metaphor if that's your thing). Now consider every day you abstain from masturbation as a bullet in your “gun”. The more “bullets” you load, the more powerful the "gun", the more intimidating you feel.

‘Feel’ is the keyword here.

Not every robber will see your brand of gun as imposing, but it's not the gun that counts. Your imposing demeanor should come more from you wielding the gun than the gun itself. The gun is just there to compliment that demeanor with hard evidence

Even if you're wielding some toy BB gun from Wal-Mart, if you hold that toy gun firmly and with confidence, your conviction and the mystery behind the gun’s true/unsaid nature will be enough to intimidate any robber (to beat you over the head again, it’s a frame metaphor).

Without bullets however, feigning is only a temporary solution. Fear always shines through when your gun is empty, and the smaller the gun the more fearful you’ll appear.

As impressive as your Desert Eagle or Beretta may appear, whether it's from an engraving, customization or even a gold-finish, it won't make a difference if the robbers aren’t afraid of you or if they question your resolve. More importantly, a robber’s not going to pull the trigger for you. The most you can ask for is that they make themselves an easy target.

As we discussed earlier, masturbating removes the need for sexual release. While in some cases that might be seen as a good thing, if one is actively pursuing women or would like to enhance the frequency or efficiency of a current sexual relationship, it can be a crippling vice.

In addition, the only situations where masturbation can be viewed as non-destructive is when it is both regulated and porn-free (I can’t stress that enough).

Next, we’ll discuss both the Predator and Observer approaches to masturbation and masturbation abstinence.

“HUNGRY V. STARVING”

In the comment section of the previous "Power of Horny" article, some people compared the “thirst” caused by masturbation abstinence to a thirst for water.

I vehemently disagree with this notion; if one's dying of thirst, they’ll drink from whichever body of liquid presents itself first, be it a fountain of pure filtered spring water or a murky puddle at a gas station.

I believe this “thirst” is more like a “desire”, like a desire for entertainment.

Let’s say you’ve been working constantly over the past few weeks and you haven’t had the chance to just relax and watch Netflix. When you finally get an opportunity to kick back for the day, you’ll want to make sure the show or movie you decided watch will be worth your time. You may watch a trailer or you may have heard some comedy movie is good or maybe you’ve waited to watch something for a while. You may even watch something you’ve seen before because you enjoyed it.

What you're less likely to do is plop down and throw on the first show that pops on screen. You wouldn’t enjoy sitting through reruns of Iron Chef when you hate cooking shows just because you haven’t watched Netflix in a while. Finding the right show may prove to be time-consuming, but you know it’ll be worth it in the end.

This is the mindset abstinence will put you in. Hungry, but not desperate. And in order to find an happy medium between desperation and complacency, we’ll will brake our theory into two approaches: Predator and Observer and define PAT within said context.

The Predator approach is to be used by those who are actively pursuing multiple sexual relationships or aiming for more frequent or efficient satisfaction from a sexual partner. I believe most men will fall into this category.

The approach is simple to begin, difficult to master: masturbate as rarely as possible. Remember the gun metaphor? The more bullets you’ve loaded, the more intimidating the gun.

In the presence of attractive women, you'll want to appear both confident and sexually-hungry (which is different from sexually-starved, which we’ll discuss in a minute). Women want to feel desired. They want you to throw them around the room and plow them like a caveman. They want you to spontaneously walk up to them at a bar, woo them over with sexually-charged conversation and bang them in the back of a burgundy ’03 Mazda Speed-6.

But women can read through bullshit like the newspaper. Just like the robber and the gun, it all works better when it’s genuine.

It’s one thing to take a girl home and fuck her all "rough-like" because you read once on TRP how AWALT and like rough sex. Sure she’ll like that at first, but because you’re heart won’t been truly into it, she’ll pick up on your lack of conviction eventually. Now if you’re throwing her around like tissue paper because you haven’t had sexual release in over a week well, that’s something else entirely.

When you eat, you eat. But when you eat out of hunger, you eat with conviction.

Aside from all this, I've suggested masturbation as rarely as possible over complete abstention for a reason.

Unlike a real gun, your gun can be overloaded. This "overloaded state" is what we'll refer to as Potential Abstinence Threshold (PAT) or the point at which your sexual desire reverts back to it’s instinctual state, causing you to seek any form of sexual release with little to no discrimination or prerequisite.

Know yourself, know your body. My PAT is roughly 2 weeks. Any longer than that and I begin to make reckless decisions about the women I chose to accompany (see “The Man-Eater”). Know and learn your PAT and be honest with yourself. No really, be honest. Some people can last a month without release, some a week. You MUST find your own.

Here’s a quick way to test your PAT: As you abstain, monitor your attraction levels to the women around you. Your pivotal point will be where the attractive women seem to jump out at you, the inaction rationalizations' influences are minimal and the unattractive women become quasi-invisible. You’ll know you’re past your PAT if MOST women become attractive to you and you've become you’re TOO forward or aggressive with your approach.

If you monitor your PAT correctly, at the peak of your resolve, cold approaching will become second nature.

Your body naturally feels a need for sexual release, so when you cut its stimulation through masturbation, it will inhibit any factors that might impede it from gaining sexual release elsewhere. Your brain will turn rationalizations like “She probably only likes biker guys” into “She may hang around those guys, but that’s only because she hasn’t met me yet”.

(Part 2 was going to be longer but it seems I’ve hit the text limit. This means there may or may not be a Part 4 after Part 3. Either way, until next time RPers.)