I feel like this started to happen around 2010. And the amount of censorship that has been brought on anti-islamic viewpoints is staggering! (That anti islamization of the west FB page, and Milo's Twitter being taken down to name a few). Anyways I've heard a few theories of why this is. One was from TRP -- that The EU is trying to ghettoize europe so that the state could have more control due to the destabilization from massive immigration. And stefan molyneux's theory was very similar. Does anyone else have thoughts on the REAL reasons why its looked at as a cardinal sin to criticize islam or refugees?
Thanks
edit: i dont get how this got so many comments yet so many downvotes.
Allisclearnow 7y ago
Here there is a video you need to watch about "Who is behind of the Multiculturalism". Also do your own research for God sake. Look behind of every important person who pushes for "multiculturalism". I will help you. 90% of the time there are J...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_LjvSIBKVc
PlusGoody 7y ago
It's their same game plan as for blacks. They deny criminality, illegitimacy, welfare dependency or lower IQ can have ANYTHING to do with the condition of most blacks. Anything that appears to be the fault of backs is just racism. And it works. Tens of billions of dollars a year worth.
chazthundergut 7y ago
One could argue from a globalist elite perspective, but that doesn't capture the reasoning of the average "liberal" in America.
It really has to do with not wanting to demonize/ marginalize an entire group due to the actions of a few. Like how we don't think the actions of a few abusive men should impact the legal rights, parental priveleges, or social standing of all males, or how we don't want gun rights infringed upon due to the violence of a small number of crazies. Liberals tend to "look out" for the interests of minority groups, and in America Muslims are one such group.
Now, I'm not justifying it or saying that we shouldn't have an honest and open discussion about Islam and it's ideological conflicts with the West. But do not mistakenly assume that anything but a very tiny minority of liberals are actually holding pro-Islamic opinions in order to topple the West or promote the globalist agenda or destroy the fabric of America or anything like that.
[deleted]
animal_one 7y ago
Once you realize that the left's goals are actually to destroy White people, it starts to make a lot more sense. How can they claim to support two obviously opposing groups (gays and muslims)? They do so because they both help to destroy Whites.
[deleted]
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Arab-Muslim people are white. I think you mean "Westerners"
Camberlain 7y ago
Bingo.
The left will support whatever is most destructive to White western society. The reason people are confused when they see the left supporting opposing groups is because they assume they support those groups for their own sake and not simply because they both are a destructive force for White western society.
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Good. White people are athletically inferior to Africans and intellectually inferior to Asians anyway. It was just a matter of time before racial mixing saved Whites from their own genetic inferiority as superior quality men were imported to improve the genetic stock.
EDIT: Forgot the /s/
Camberlain 7y ago
Wow, you are some sort of genocidal super-racist.
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Where's the lie? Asians are smarter, Blacks are faster, and African-Americans are both (Black being an ethnic identity held by the decendents of slaves, African American being recent immigrants from Africa). Racially mixed people are found more attractive, which means the natural order of things is racial mixing.
Camberlain 7y ago
You really have a super-hatred for White people like me.
Why?
Literallyoprah 7y ago
I don't hate anyone, hate is for weak people. I just find them inferior, like dogs, except dogs have souls /s.
Honestly, I just like pushing white people's buttons because they get so butt-hurt so easily. I'm racially mixed, and I find conversations about white nationalism unproductive regarding TRP because it has nothing to do with male sexual strategy, especially in the context that it is typically discussed.
Camberlain 7y ago
So you're a mixed race supremacist?
I can understand why you feel that way, the only other option would be to recognize that you are in some way inferior to what you could have been.
Literallyoprah 7y ago
There is no such thing as racial supremacy because the fitness of genetics is relative to the environment.
Racism is a problem because it interferes with the natural order of genetic exchange, which limits genetic diversity and this human ability to adapt to changing environmental forces.
Racial mixing will ultimately be the savior of humanity. We will tear down the walls that have held back progress one beautiful, racially mixed baby at a time (because statistically, racially mixed individuals are perceived as more attractive that single-race individuals).
Camberlain 7y ago
There really is no such thing as a "natural order." I see a future where genetic engineering allows us to pick the types of children we want and I honestly don't think racially mixed children are going to be desired by many people.
Kind of like how purebread dogs and horses are the most desired.
NeoreactionSafe 7y ago
Problem --> Reaction --> Solution
In America we have those who follow Baphomet (Blue Pill) who seek to dissolve humanity through equality and depolarization of sexual energy.
Islam is all about being the "perfect" warlord who seeks to conquer all opposition. Those who are defeated will "rest in peace" so Islam is known as a "religion of peace". Life is struggle, death is peace.
So the Dark Luciferian globalists are using two opposing memes (Baphomet and Islam) to create the "Problem".
The "Reaction" is of course shock after terror occurs.
The "Solution" is to attack anything sane and healthy.
So in the end the two memes weaken the third group... the people... who really just wanted to have their sovereignty and be left alone.
Obama is the embodiment of the Baphomet and is bisexual, but he is obedient to his globalist masters and does everything they want him to do.
The goal of all of this can be found at the Georgia Guidestones:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
[deleted]
NeoreactionSafe 7y ago
You completely missed my point.
Baphomet <--> Islam
It's the staged conflict of bizarre extremes and we are supposed to be too stupid (Blue Pill dumbed down) to see the magic trick going on.
Hillary is a lesbian... she fucks a Muslim woman:
Hillary's Body Woman Huma Abedin - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wpdJyirtlw
...she plans to keep the globalist magic show going.
Hillary Clinton body language around Huma - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60m9PhVPMYM
FunAndFreedom 7y ago
agent provocateurs aren't even subtle anymore
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
Jos_Metadi 7y ago
Welcome to the libertarian party! There is plenty of room here for people with different beliefs and lifestyles as long as they are willing to extend the same freedom to others.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
delta91 7y ago
I love how we're hoping to get just 10% of the vote. That's a success for us.
My cynicism aside, I've heard that amongst independents, more people will vote for Johnson over Clinton. And that if we do get more than 10% that's an eye opener, and gets the party on the map, and who knows? Maybe destabilize the two party system.
[deleted] 7y ago
The short answer is that followers of that particular ideology are at the very top of the Left's victim totem pole by a country mile.
RedditAdminsSuck_88 7y ago
Globalism and Greater Israel. It's two-fold.
It's all about rubbing diversity in the faces of western white males.
The biggest threat to globalism is nationalism.
The end game of the globalist is a single, dumbed down race, nationwide. This makes the global population easier to control from the top down via a new world order style one world government.
Then you have Greater Israel, which is Israel expanding its borders and taking over more land in the Middle East.
The globalists accomplish goal #1(single race) by flooding western white countries with 3rd world muslim refugees and open borders. Their aim is to take out the western white male, the #1 threat to globalism, as they are the demographic that leans most toward nationalism. They will take out this demographic by breeding them out. This is the #1 reason diversity is pushed.
However, Greater Israel is accomplished a 2nd way. This is accomplished by getting the western military power countries ANGRY at muslims. Flooding western white countries with muslims and them committing terrorist attacks will get them angry at muslims, which will cause the white males of these countries to be more and more willing to wipe out muslims in the Middle East. This will free up the land for Israel to expand and create Greater Israel.
Can you see it now?
They flood countries with muslim refugees and 3rd world unskilled types by opening the borders, and call you racist if you oppose it. To breed out the western white race and set the table for a new world order.
On the other hand, they want muslims to stir up trouble once inside the borders, so the western military powers go do Israel's dirty work for them in the Middle East and use military strength to defeat Israel's enemy in the region(the muslims). This way Israel can have their enemy destroyed so they can establish greater Israel without having to do the dirty work.
It's two-fold. Have your cake and eat it too. Muslims are just useful pawns the globalists are using to breed out whites, and then the muslims will be dealt with later.
samurai96 7y ago
How is the white man a threat to anyone? You guys have been defanged already. The reason they want refugees could be many reasons, but the only one you can be certain of is that the developed world is running out of labour. Without labour they can create no capital so they invite immigrants.
Have you ever sat and thought why like 80% of the guys coming in are economic migrants, not refugee families?
I think they're making a mistake because Muslims are a pretty big threat to globalism and the current financial system. If they wish to preserve they should fix their own culture to have more kids, not bring in a ticking time bomb.
Gumpool 7y ago
This guy right here
Bravo sir bravo!
[deleted]
[deleted]
jimmyb207 7y ago
You're right. The MSM, TV and especially the "news", which is just fear porn and propaganda now, does demonize Muslims. 9/11 and all of the so called "terrorist" attacks are all part of an anti-Islamic narrative that has already been written from beginning to end. Make people hate Muslims so they will accept the never ending wars in the Middle East.
ISIS which is used to demonize Islam, is about as Islamic as Dick Cheney...they're actually mercenaries doing the dirty work for Israel and the US in the region that is to become Greater Israel.
Not only is there a Red Pill reality when it comes to women, but there is a Red Pill the size of a tennis ball when it comes to the true reality of what is actually going on in this world...I'm not talking about the MSM manufactured reality. Most Americans are not capable of believing truth. They have been brainwashed that truth is ‘conspiracy theory.’ A population this stupid has no future.
[deleted] 7y ago
Then why is it that the MSM narrative is so hesitant to bad mouth islam. Shaming people for badmouthing refugees and muslims seems like an unproductive way to get the national climate to want to bomb more middle eastern countries.
JizzBomb_ 7y ago
A. They do, you mean to tell me fox news or any conservative leaning website hasnt been against muslims and islam since 9/11 you deluded
B. "the good ones" will lie and report the offical government narrative (muslim terrorist did blah blah blah) and let you come to your own conclusions, while bringing on the most pathetic liberal youve ever seen to seal the deal.
C. With hollywood pumping out shows depicting arabs as either billionairs,bombers,or bellydancers along with zionist agents like bill maher, pam geller,sam harris, various others. Theres really no need for their good agents like wolf blitzer in trouble
However, they will try to blame islam when its convienent. Wanna invade a country that just stopped selling oil in dollars? SURE just find some useful arab idiots. Abassador just got killed by your "peaceful protestors" in that country you just "liberated"? Just blame that movie
RedditAdminsSuck_88 7y ago
Because muslims are pawns they are using. It's not about Islam, its about their skin color. The muslims will be dealt with once they have achieved their objective.
rpm612 7y ago
[deleted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.0341
OneRedYear 7y ago
Shhhh. Conspiracies don't have to actually make sense. Just let the feels of victimhood and paranoia wash over you.
[deleted]
FunAndFreedom 7y ago
http://i.imgur.com/79XLdzE.jpg
[deleted] 7y ago
To be fair though, the original post is just a rehash of "Mein Kampf". Funnily enough its almost 1:1 with what the jihadis claim with jews etc except they hate us westerners as well.
A much more balanced approach I feel is to see the disappearing working class and resulting drop off in voter base for left wingers as the real reason why they´d like to bring in all these scroungers. Muslim immigrants vote overwhelmingly left, they come from socialist dictatorships to countries like my native Sweden where a vote for the left is like a salary negotiation.
[deleted] 7y ago
Some real conspiracy theory stuff right here...intriguing nevertheless
Gumpool 7y ago
So tell us whats the real deal behind all of this then?
Or the daily show doesnt cover this topic so it would be hard for you to elaborate
[deleted] 7y ago
I stopped listening to Alex Jones and Glenn Beck a long time ago, so I'm a little rusty
Gumpool 7y ago
Glenn beck is a cuckservstive hack and alex jones is a cia shill
[deleted] 7y ago
"Conspiracy theory" is a fear word designed to delegitimatize non-mainstream ideas about the world. Remember when Mk Ultra was a conspiracy theory?
[deleted] 7y ago
A conspiracy theory is an explanatory or speculative hypothesis suggesting that two or more persons, or an organization, have conspired to cause or cover up, through secret planning and deliberate action, an event or situation typically regarded as illegal or harmful.
[deleted] 7y ago
Yeah I know what it means. But what about how people perceive someone who believes in them?
[deleted] 7y ago
I suppose that depends on whether their theory is backed up legitimate substantiated claims or its just a bunch of sensational claims
el_Technico 7y ago
How exactly is the western white male the biggest threat to globalism?
The western white male much like the far majority of other peoples in the West is too stupid to know what is best for him, and agrees with most of all the social engineering that is taking place in the West. If the government told him that getting a shot with hepatitis in it was good for him he would sign up for it.
Western white males make up a large portion if the majority of the armed forces (NATO and the US) being used to push the globalist agenda.
The greater Israel project is however a real thing and western governments are funding and supporting Daesh/ISIS to achieve it.
WeedDaddy 7y ago
If the mass media was promoting pro-Western narratives, the globalists could not operate in and undermine the West. But if men are kept suppressed by public shaming and making them unemployable, there is no man in the house to stop foreign interests meddling with their society.
RedditAdminsSuck_88 7y ago
Most likely to own guns.
Most likely to be nationalistic or conservative.
Less likely to submit to government authority.
Less likely to depend on government.
Less likely to accept forced diversity and open borders.
You are correct about ISIS. ISIS is a Mossad-CIA joint operation false flag, used to, you guessed it, justify never ending war in the Middle East(never ending until all of Israel's enemies are destroyed, anyway)
el_Technico 7y ago
My friend, unfortunately I have to say that of the five points you mentioned, four are BS and legitimately sound like some racist white hope propaganda. Perhaps your life experience is different, but in Canada and international I've been exposed to just about every race there is and most people are more or less similar. Most people are sheep, but somehow western populations are worse, and there is no great white hope.
The reason massive migration is taking place is because of the lack of resources in Africa and the middle east, and war is a big factor. The reason some nations are accepting them is again because of resources and the need for cheap labour and population replenishment due to the natives not having children. It's that simple.
White American males do have an affinity for guns. That's true.
Trucks_N_Chainsaws 7y ago
Is this what your Cuck Minister told you to think?
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.2799
el_Technico 7y ago
Right, because Indians and Chinese have super integration abilities that Arabs don't have.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.1034
el_Technico 7y ago
Most of the immigrants are going to Germany, and they don't care if you can speak English or not. Plenty of Arabs have university degrees.
Yeah, it sucks when foreigners come in and take minimum wage jobs. That doesn't stop western nations from importing them so that the elites can have a cheap labour force. In Canada we even have a special program for them called the foreign workers program. Philippinos and other peoples come in and make even less than minimum wage, but the government supports such programs at the detriment of their own people. US does the same with Mexicans.
makeshift98 7y ago
The bourgeois(white people) are a horrible group of people who have to atone for the terrible things that they've done to the proletariat(minorities). How else, other than subjugation and force, can one group of people be doing so much better than another? It is morally right for the workers to seize control of the means of production(public discourse and moral superiority), and the oppressors are by definition wrong and unable to criticize.
It's ok to criticize Christianity because white people, but not ok to do the same to Islam because brown people. ALL CULTURES ARE EQUAL AND ANY INEQUALITIES STEM FROM WESTERN OPPRESSION. Throw in cultural relativism and a dash of original sin and you have leftist rhetoric.
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Does anyone else remember when TRP used to be about male sexual strategy and not white-nationalism?
Da-Aaron 7y ago
One can only hope that this dies down after the election.
[deleted]
this_guy2001 7y ago
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Seriously, yeah, it's getting pretty lame.
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
The_Donald
Also, I've never felt more anti-Muslim sentiment in the press and MSM since the Bush years.
OP's projecting from an echo chamber.
[deleted] 7y ago
This thread is not intended to be about white nationalism. But I feel like a big chunk of this sub is about decoding MSM. So I feel like this question is relevant.
[deleted] 7y ago
It's an anti-Marxist stance more than anything. Think how easy it will be to usher in new laws when half the population dives head first into shackles and false promises from a Government that blatantly wishes to regulate every business transaction and is currently creating a spy network tracking every citizens move.
trp_dude 7y ago
Are you the guy who had that sign, "Keep your government hands off my medicare"? :)
[deleted] 7y ago
I was actually the guy next to her with the sign that said 'Obama's a Lion African'. You can't miss me, I had about 40 tea bags stapled to my colonial style hat with the declaration if independence stapled onto my shirt. The skin has since grown over them. ha! Someone said I was going to get an infection from that but I made sure the staples were sterile. Stupid doctors.
[deleted]
Gumpool 7y ago
To swallow the red pill is to destroy the matrix of society this is all connected. Sexual strategy is not what the red pill is only about that is mere a small part
[deleted]
[deleted] 7y ago
I think his point is that all of these things are somewhat inter-related, and that the redpill is the idea of shattering illusions about our present society. But even ignoring this, one could still argue that this is related to sexual strategy due to it: concerning feminists that generally support islam/shame people who don't support islam, the breeding out of white people from majority white countries (the US and European countries), and also the impact on the SMP (potentially more interracial relationships).
If the mods haven't removed it, then I assume it's fine.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
Gumpool 7y ago
Fuck the movie, Stay forever blue pill plus then
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Except white nationalism is fundamentally flawed, so it's not about the truth, it's about wrapping all your conspiracy theories in a bundle to make yourself feel arbitrarily special. The fact that most member of TRP are white men who are probably "Race realists" means that male sexual strategy gets wrapped up with all these crazy conspiracies.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
You're making this stuff up, and you are mischaracterizing WN.
'Conspiracy/ies' is a childish pejorative. Sorry that you don't like White people, but, we have rights just as much as BLM adherents.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
To be honest, I can see an actual tie in: it is one of the pillars of the battle against Cultural Marxism, which is the main power behind feminism.
WeedDaddy 7y ago
It's usually brown men who take exception to white nationalism.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
And, SJWs, hipsters, landwhales, feminists, etc...
Gumpool 7y ago
Im not talking about nationalism, but please tell me why nationalism is wrong? And why just "white" nationalism What OP is talking about is not nationalism its behind the matrix but this is why I feel that the red pill or this place is just blue pill plus and many of you in here have not swallowed the red pill for real, many here cherry pick their shit
juliusstreicher 7y ago
Uh...you're asking somebody with THAT username, just what is wrong with white anything???
trp_dude 7y ago
This is not nationalism. It is anti-Muslim rhetoric, which is un-American. Real Americans don't discriminate on basis of religion.
[deleted] 7y ago
It's criticizing the MSM's view of Islam. How is that anti Muslim rhetoric?
America was literally founded by criticizing the mainstream. And while I don't know about what is a "real" American, I can say a real Canadian should defend himself from the scourge of radical islam if we are to maintain our fucked multi cultural society.
WeedDaddy 7y ago
When freedom of religion was conceived, it was thought to apply just to different sects of Christianity. At that time no one seriously considered Islam.
In general, tolerant societies are bound to be the garbage bins of intolerant societies. It's foolish to make a virtue out of getting trampled over and suffering hostile populations.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
Actully, "REAL AMERICANS" can, if they so choose. Congress, not people, is prohibited from discriminating.
States, irrespective of the SCOTUS's bad decisions, are quite free (per the Constitution) to discriminate on a religious basis.
[deleted]
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Long story short, because TRP is based on objective observations of reality and how to deal with those consequences, not about one's personal feelings of Islam and speculation about the (ultimately inevitable) end to the white, western dominance of global human society.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
Islam and the "end to the white, western...society..." CAN be quantified objectively.
WeedDaddy 7y ago
There is no "global human society", that's a blue pill construct to exploit the sympathy of gullible people.
There are different human strains which are competing against each other. If nations like China or India get an upper hand in global matters, it won't be pretty for the rest.
Gumpool 7y ago
Oy vei mordecai oy vei So 50 people getting shot didnt happen?
If you are not ready to understand how the world and society drills it dildo all up in your culo I would suggest that you dont swallow this crap HOWEVER you never answered my questions but I will let that slide for now Clarabelle
juliusstreicher 7y ago
One piece of punctuation for this entire post. Hmmm...obviously it...well, actually, nothing in this post is obvious, not even...well, nothing.
Literallyoprah 7y ago
Shot by a closeted homosexual, non-practicing Muslim, natural-born American citizen who pledged allegiance to mutually exclusive Islamic groups who all hate each other.
[deleted]
Jos_Metadi 7y ago
Blue pill is based on a lot on fear. So those who operate under its auspices cower and grovel and hope that appeasement and submission will buy survival or even favor.
[deleted] 7y ago
yeah, there has been a lot of talk like that. I've heard ppl say "if trump gets elected I am afraid that the country will get bombed by ISIS because he's so openly against (radical) islam" I feel like appeasing these terrorists isn't the right answer and has proven not to work.
Jos_Metadi 7y ago
Buying off the barbarians didn't work for Rome in its latter days, didn't work for the Danish paying the danegeld against the Viking barbarians, didn't protect the Angkor Wat against the Ayutthaya, didn't protect Europe against the Nazis in WWII, etc. It doesn't even work against school bullies, much less committed fanatics.
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
[deleted] 7y ago
This is because the Left processes them through their bigoted Western worldview. They are incapable of truly understanding the content of the Quran and how Muslims actually follow Islamic doctrine in their lives.
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
Assumes Daesh and AQ were waiting to be invited before attacking.
They have a declared, written ideological bend they planned on implementing since the 1970's.
mugatucrazypills 7y ago
This behavior by the left has been explained to exhaustion in "The Rage and the Pride" and "The Force of Reason." From the period after 9-11. Although as she describes, the political origins of the phenomenon date back to the early 70s.
Fear is a component in the leading of the general population by the nose.... But so is the violent "triumphalism" of Islamics.
mugatucrazypills 7y ago
Recommend also "The closed circle - an interpretation of the Arabs" , tl;dr : there is absolutely no reward for moderation, decent behavior tolerances or pluralism in the leadership of these societies. Kindness is weakness which is exploited by the next aspirant to power.
Sound familiar?
[deleted] 7y ago
OP, everyone here is wrong.
To answer your question I will refer you to this man:
tl:dr
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
Resident Muslim guy here,
I do NOT feel any lovey dovey MSM coverage at all.
Especially with the 2016 Election and the happenings of this past week. I haven't felt like I'm walking on eggshells like this since the several years after 9/11.
Especially not since 2011. That's around when Syria started collapsing and the whole Isis shit started developing. Only things I saw in the press starting 2014 was orange jumpsuits.
You mentioned some FB/Milo censorships but these are literally this week and Milo got reinstated (remember he cut his teeth on men's rights; wasnt really Islam until recent).
I'm assuming you've been spending too much time on subs like The_Donald and now anything that's not calling for interment of Muslims into concentration camps looks like "positive media coverage".
I know, I've been there a lot and there a couple of days back there where it really looked like there could be a lynch mob if this was IRL. Which is scary because; while I'd like a strong leader like Trump if even for 1 term; I sometimes wonder if that allows that one nut job to think they can do vigilante justice for who knows what.
[deleted] 7y ago
I am sure because you are muslim you have been getting a lot of flack and things aren't fun for you right now. But I am still going to have to disagree with you about media not being too soft on Islam. I mean for christ sakes Obama wouldn't even say the words radical islam in his speech on the shooting!
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
Maybe the negative stands out to me a lot more than the positive.
I usually see it as constant deluge of negative press and the positives are only snowballs here and there out of pity. So I don't rely on those.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
I'll bet 10 trillion dollars that no Westerner has said shit to him, or given him fuck all in the way of 'flack'. My money says that he feels uncomfortable, but, not because of any substantial reason. Most people, who are 'minorities' have listened to the Leftist shit about "white Bubbas" terrorizing Muslims, beating up blacks, etc... and actually believe it, and feel paranoid.
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
No you dumbass. I meant the_donald sometimes turns into an echo chamber of confirmation bias. That's a lot more than uncomfortable.
He said media; not real life. I don't listen to leftists; I'm on the redpill for a reason. Maybe the negative rhetoric stands out to me and I avoid anything nice because I'm cynical. Then again I live in a deep blue state and work for corporate America so it's not surprising there was ZERO talk at the office about Orlando.
juliusstreicher 7y ago
I don't give a shit what you meant. I was addressing the post of the person whom I sub-posted on, not yours, fuckhead.
TheRedThrowAwayPill 7y ago
Listen you cancelled abortion, you're replying to same thing I was so deal with it.
WeedDaddy 7y ago
Islam is the elephant in the room which the obedient people are not allowed to acknowledge, a test of faith in the politically correct society. It's a way to separate submissive followers from those who think independently, because opposing it is rational self-interested thinking.
-LiterallyHitler 7y ago
Sometimes i'm afraid we'll all be rounded up and gassed and the normies will be told "it's ok, they were evil white racists"
MajorStyles 7y ago
The Western media is obsessed with white men, because that's the man of choice for most of these women - their 10%, tier-one Alpha: think Tom Brady, Matthew Mconoghey, etc.
They are literally incapable of envisioning a world outside of these men. This is similar to the way that the 90% of men with low SMV do not exist. Muslim males, being in that 90%, do not exist for these women either.
Therefore, every conversation has to get routed back to what women are obsessed over - the top 10%. This also explains their obsession with the Brock Turner story, as opposed to their indifference at the Orlando shooter.
[deleted]
[deleted] 7y ago
[deleted]
[deleted]